SCOTUSblog glowing with lolcow effervescence.
macris.substack.com
[...] rest of article at link
I was going to call her a lying piece of shit but then I realised she's probably telling the truth. 'As secure as it's ever been' is an interesting choice of words
Tell them to keep up with the plot. SCOTUS ain't crowing a kang. The argument being presented is that "the election's obviously screwy. So SCOTUS, make these cucking GOP legislatures grow a pair and make the decision themselves, as the Constitution says they're able to as the last bastion."
Yup. Really implies that not once and not ever in the long amd tumultuous US history, has there ever been somethimg screwy with the election system.
California can't have clean anything. Eliminate their voting records.
the rioters weren't normal people lmao, they were the same leftist goons and astroturfers that did the rioting in Chile back in August of last year.
Leftists will blame any problems on the GOP before the guy in office. Or they'll find a way. Look at what happened with Obama.
And who are stealing the election now
This Claim has been disputed
Literally on the day of the SCOTUS hearing? God is writing one hell of a final season.
Sorry to double post, but I read the article, and it's apparently a satire site. So this didn't happen.
Things won't go that far before people have nothing left to lose, most people were struggling back when the economy was actually running, now you have millions of people on unemployment and unemployment is running out of money. Lots of people will have nothing left to lose before it gets to 1984 levels of despair.
www.breitbart.com
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states."
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court before midnight on Monday challenging election results in four other states.
"The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.
Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states."
Hail Mary play, but at least Texas will not go gentle into that good night.
www.breitbart.com
The problem is that let's say the SC says okay. PA, MI, GA, and WI legislatures have to select electors. I'll proverbially bet that enough RINOs in those states will vote the electors be given to Biden because "muh will of the people".
Won't be a bad bet.
