Conrad Aaron Collins / Diginée / Digibro / Digibrony / Otaku Gonzo Journalism & the Pro Crastinators Podcast - Pedophile, Two-Faced Weeaboo Ponyfag Youtube Analyst Who Wants to be a Loli + Drama, Friends & Enemies

[Keeper of Locks & Keys]

This guy's girl voice sounds like fuckin ben shapiro lmao.

Thank god he never endures for longer than 10 seconds to 5 minutes max.

 

[Terrorist]

Digi and May represent the 2 most common archetypes of pedophiles:

1. Digi: The manchild. Emotionally stunted, socially awkward, nerdy or childish interests, may see himself as a child on some level, has mental illnesses (if not a below average IQ) that keep him from living a normal functional adult life. These types are obviously “off”, tend to over share, and don’t get social cues, so they’re the ones who get caught the most.
2. May: The groomer (most powerful pedos’ and female pedos’ MO). Social manipulator who acts bubbly and youthful to gain access to kids. If they have sex appeal, use it to manipulate adults in proximity to kids. Not caught as much because they can gain enough trust to form a circle of defenders from allegations, and blend into different social circles easily.

 

[Cheetahman]

It was a shit test that Digi spectacularly failed.

Digi isn't the first autist to have been tricked into the tranny treadmill, and he's not going to be the last.
Pretending May was doing it ironically/was testing him is an insane cope to relieve a manipulative crazy woman of her accountability, considering she was almost certainly also responsible for the trooning out of Ash Vampire, as well as this new Faith grooming arc.

 

[Keeper of Locks & Keys]

To be fair, I'm really interested (for some bizarre reason) on how their relationship progressed. It seemed like a very normal male-female relationship when it started out (you can watch his music videos for his horrible music and see how happy he seemed to be early on).

Digi isn't the first autist to have been tricked into the tranny treadmill, and he's not going to be the last.
Pretending May was doing it ironically/was testing him is an insane cope to relieve a manipulative crazy woman of her accountability, considering she was almost certainly also responsible for the trooning out of Ash Vampire, as well as this new Faith grooming arc.

I can confirm the trooning of Ash as I was talking to him shortly before his troon saga. I kind of respected his view on anime before he declared "the anime community to be one of the most toxic communities ever" and switched to the LGBTQ and furry community. He made an excellent video on Darling in the Franxx which got taken down on YT but is still up on lbry.io. After he went down the glory hole of the internet I never talked to him anymore; I'm not one to question his life decisions.

 

[tantric_depressive]

Digi isn't the first autist to have been tricked into the tranny treadmill, and he's not going to be the last.
Pretending May was doing it ironically/was testing him is an insane cope to relieve a manipulative crazy woman of her accountability, considering she was almost certainly also responsible for the trooning out of Ash Vampire, as well as this new Faith grooming arc.

The two things don't have to be mutually exclusive of one another

 

[Omnium Ultimatus]

Digi and May represent the 2 most common archetypes of pedophiles:

1. Digi: The manchild. Emotionally stunted, socially awkward, nerdy or childish interests, may see himself as a child on some level, has mental illnesses (if not a below average IQ) that keep him from living a normal functional adult life. These types are obviously “off”, tend to over share, and don’t get social cues, so they’re the ones who get caught the most.
2. May: The groomer (most powerful pedos’ and female pedos’ MO). Social manipulator who acts bubbly and youthful to gain access to kids. If they have sex appeal, use it to manipulate adults in proximity to kids. Not caught as much because they can gain enough trust to form a circle of defenders from allegations, and blend into different social circles easily.

Here we go again. Neither of them are pedophiles. Digi has never expressed any interest in fucking real kids, or even liking being around them. If a pedophile who had as much fame and clout as him wanted to touch kids they'd make themselves look presentable, keep all their skeletons in the closet, and do things to boost their image while giving them easy access to children. That's what Jimmy Savile, and a lot of YouTubers did, and the latter send sexual DMs to underage viewers. A pedo isn't going to tell you upfront that he likes fucking kids. And May, as much of a walking sack of shit she is, isn't a pedo either, let alone some upstart Ghislaine Maxwell wannabe. She's a flipflopping hypocritical snake who went from stating she was trans to being some America First Trumptard when she became Ralph's cum dump. She'll pretend to be compatible with you just so she can steal your money. And while I've read about the shady shit she's involved with regarding Faith, there's no evidence she's interested in fucking her baby. If not the baby, then I have no earthly idea what other kids you could be referring to. The only things that're constant with her is being superficial and a gold digger. There's plenty of actual documented acts to despise Digi and May for, hate them for those instead of taking shit out of context.

Digibro's forever lost my respect for all the horrible shit he's done. But, if anyone wants to tell me that he's a pedo or a potential child molester, whether they be retarded newfag users who just read the thread title or the outdated OP, or philistines who don't bother to understand the Japanese subculture of lolicon, I will defend Digibro to the death from that baseless accusation, not because I still respect him, but because we should judge the guilty on the crimes they actually commit and not baseless misconstrued bullshit. Being guilty of one crime doesn't make you guilty of others. But it seems like people think the alleged crime is all that matters.

Quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of seeing this bullshit being thrown around and equated with Digibro's failings and actual despicable acts, or even seen as more heinous than them. After all, when Null recently came on the Dick Show, he just spergged about how Digi and May were somehow potential child rapists because they were lolicons, while ignoring the actual scummy practices they were engaging in. He is right that Ralph associating with May will blow up in his face though, just not for the right reasons, but I digress.

There are numerous things to hate him for, all of which I and others have written on extensively in this thread. But, I cannot and will not hold him being a lolicon or his defense of it against him, nor will I equate lolicon to pedophilia. One's fetishes mean less to me than their actions. Believe me, if there was just one instance in Conrad Aaron Collins' roughly two-decade internet history where he showed any sexual interest in children I would've brought it up, or someone else would have. But there is none.

To this day, no one has brought up a single shred of evidence that he's a pedophile, and when they do they either bring up his vocal defense of lolicon or that out of context clip from Insufferable Social Media Argument The Podcast which was obviously a fucking bit, and if you understood the difference between a loli and an actual child you'd know that the dream scenario he's describing is just like how otaku say their dream life is to be with their waifus. I should know, because I've actually been in that culture for ten years, and they do it all the time. My avatar is a fucking ten-year old image of Kaguya Houraisan from Touhou (a loli treasure trove) and my custom title is a reference to a Touhou fan song from 2006 that's originally based on a 2ch meme. And whether they're from the East or West, otaku generally don't care about relationships with real girls, let alone with actual prepubescent children. They prefer the illustrations for the aesthetic qualities unique to them. I know it's difficult for Westerners to understand, where their entertainment has been consolidated, cartelized, and politicized by marxists, but if you understand Japanese culture it makes sense why these tendencies exist in otaku.

 

[Polinky]

Might have said it before but am retarded and don't remember shit - May becoming a lolcow in her own right (and a personal lolcow I've enjoyed keeping tabs on since May/June) and proving herself to be scummier than I ever thought has been too good. Agree that Digi is starting to become less of a cow between the two, but that May doesn't deserve the satisfaction of having her own thread here. Time to update that art she loved so much I guess!

I wish the Ralph thread wasn't moving so fucking fast, and could actually find where the leaks of her trying to manipulate Faith are. Does anyone know what page it all started?

I also agree that I think May and Digi are degenerates and the way they proudly boast their degeneracy is a huge red flag but I think it's a stretch to assume they wanna fuck real kids.

 

[Turbulence]

Find a highlight and click forwards or backwards till you find the highlight that has the leaks.

 

[the_watcher]

As far as I know this hasn't been posted here yet, so for completion's sake: May's threesome coercion texts to faith (Gunt's ex GF/preggo teen), if anyone may still have doubts about her character. She is also not denying any assault occuring.

 

[Keeper of Locks & Keys]

As far as I know this hasn't been posted here yet, so for completion's sake: May's threesome coercion texts to faith (Gunt's ex GF/preggo teen), if anyone may still have doubts about her character. She is also not denying any assault occuring.
View attachment 1774272View attachment 1774273View attachment 1774274View attachment 1774275

Very interesting. How did this get leaked?

 

[the_watcher]

Very interesting. How did this get leaked?

From what I recall, Faith released these herself, but I'm not super deep into Gunt lore. I just grabbed these off of May's Twitter replies.

 

[Terrorist]

Here we go again. Neither of them are pedophiles. Digi has never expressed any interest in fucking real kids, or even liking being around them. If a pedophile who had as much fame and clout as him wanted to touch kids they'd make themselves look presentable, keep all their skeletons in the closet, and do things to boost their image while giving them easy access to children. That's what Jimmy Savile, and a lot of YouTubers did, and the latter send sexual DMs to underage viewers. A pedo isn't going to tell you upfront that he likes fucking kids. And May, as much of a walking sack of shit she is, isn't a pedo either, let alone some upstart Ghislaine Maxwell wannabe. She's a flipflopping hypocritical snake who went from stating she was trans to being some America First Trumptard when she became Ralph's cum dump. She'll pretend to be compatible with you just so she can steal your money. And while I've read about the shady shit she's involved with regarding Faith, there's no evidence she's interested in fucking her baby. If not the baby, then I have no earthly idea what other kids you could be referring to. The only things that're constant with her is being superficial and a gold digger. There's plenty of actual documented acts to despise Digi and May for, hate them for those instead of taking shit out of context.

Digibro's forever lost my respect for all the horrible shit he's done. But, if anyone wants to tell me that he's a pedo or a potential child molester, whether they be retarded newfag users who just read the thread title or the outdated OP, or philistines who don't bother to understand the Japanese subculture of lolicon, I will defend Digibro to the death from that baseless accusation, not because I still respect him, but because we should judge the guilty on the crimes they actually commit and not baseless misconstrued bullshit. Being guilty of one crime doesn't make you guilty of others. But it seems like people think the alleged crime is all that matters.

Quite frankly, I'm sick and tired of seeing this bullshit being thrown around and equated with Digibro's failings and actual despicable acts, or even seen as more heinous than them. After all, when Null recently came on the Dick Show, he just spergged about how Digi and May were somehow potential child rapists because they were lolicons, while ignoring the actual scummy practices they were engaging in. He is right that Ralph associating with May will blow up in his face though, just not for the right reasons, but I digress.

There are numerous things to hate him for, all of which I and others have written on extensively in this thread. But, I cannot and will not hold him being a lolicon or his defense of it against him, nor will I equate lolicon to pedophilia. One's fetishes mean less to me than their actions. Believe me, if there was just one instance in Conrad Aaron Collins' roughly two-decade internet history where he showed any sexual interest in children I would've brought it up, or someone else would have. But there is none.

To this day, no one has brought up a single shred of evidence that he's a pedophile, and when they do they either bring up his vocal defense of lolicon or that out of context clip from Insufferable Social Media Argument The Podcast which was obviously a fucking bit, and if you understood the difference between a loli and an actual child you'd know that the dream scenario he's describing is just like how otaku say their dream life is to be with their waifus. I should know, because I've actually been in that culture for ten years, and they do it all the time. My avatar is a fucking ten-year old image of Kaguya Houraisan from Touhou (a loli treasure trove) and my custom title is a reference to a Touhou fan song from 2006 that's originally based on a 2ch meme. And whether they're from the East or West, otaku generally don't care about relationships with real girls, let alone with actual prepubescent children. They prefer the illustrations for the aesthetic qualities unique to them. I know it's difficult for Westerners to understand, where their entertainment has been consolidated, cartelized, and politicized by marxists, but if you understand Japanese culture it makes sense why these tendencies exist in otaku.

Have May or Digi harmed any actual children or consumed real CP? Probably not. But an attraction to drawn children doesn’t become non-pedophiliac because they’re not real.

“Aesthetic qualities” lol OK dude, what next, Digi reads hentai for the articles? It’s porn, sold alongside the real thing in Akihabara and elsewhere until recently IIRC. I may be a filthy American pig-dog who doesn’t understand superior Nihonjin ways, but even I can tell there’s something impure about “lolicon”.

 

[Sped Xing]

Forgive if I'm late on this, but in the newest episode of The Creepoff, starting at about 44:18, Karl tells Vinny about his friend Digi Knee buying old crocs, and Vinny is unimpressed.

 

[the_watcher]

Have May or Digi harmed any actual children or consumed real CP? Probably not. But an attraction to drawn children doesn’t become non-pedophiliac because they’re not real.

“Aesthetic qualities” lol OK dude, what next, Digi reads hentai for the articles? It’s porn, sold alongside the real thing in Akihabara and elsewhere until recently IIRC. I may be a filthy American pig-dog who doesn’t understand superior Nihonjin ways, but even I can tell there’s something impure about “lolicon”.

I'm quite the last person that would defend a pedo, but digi at least multiple times stated, that when he consumed lolicon, he always viewed the porn from the little girl's perspective, being helpless, getting fucked etc. (which would also explain his taste for dick, getting pegged by may). Projecting himself as the abused instead of the abuser.

Does that make him less harmless? Hard for me to judge. He doesn't strike me as a full blown pedophile yet but who knows what the indochina hormones do to him. Maybe he is already chemically castrating himself/killing his libido etc. .

 

[Omnium Ultimatus]

Have May or Digi harmed any actual children or consumed real CP? Probably not. But an attraction to drawn children doesn’t become non-pedophiliac because they’re not real.

What's the line between fiction and reality? Does liking violent video games make you a maniac sociopathic? Does liking games where you kill women make you a sadistic abusive misogynist, as Anita Sarkeesian falsely concluded? And before you claim that's a false equivalence, violence has been just as integral as sex has since the beginning of animal life on this planet. If one didn't know how to be violent, whether that meant defending yourself and your tribe, raiding the other tribe, or fending off rivals from stealing your mate or food, one would've fucking perished without passing on their genes.

The aggressive ones were also the most likely to have mates, since they could protect their mates, and we are descendants of them. It's also why a lot of women are sexually attracted to "bad boys". While this capacity for aggression still exists within every individual so as to ensure one's survival, there are easier better ways to survive, so being violent is seldom useful or necessary. That's not to say that a lot of people can naturally kill without batting an eyelash. Combat is a skill that one needs to train for mentally and physically, but we do find many outlets to satiate this urge without harming others, and ergo inviting harm onto ourselves, but in our case we'll focus on violent fictional media.

“Aesthetic qualities” lol OK dude, what next, Digi reads hentai for the articles? It’s porn, sold alongside the real thing in Akihabara and elsewhere until recently IIRC. I may be a filthy American pig-dog who doesn’t understand superior Nihonjin ways, but even I can tell there’s something impure about “lolicon”.

There is massive difference between a game like God of War and a Bestgore.com snuff film. One is fantastical and designed for player satisfaction, the other is cruel horrifying reality. You inhabit the same universe as the snuff film victim, and you know very well that the same fate could befall you. It's why most people who enjoy violent games can't find enjoyment in watching actual snuff - there is no metaphysical separation between the viewer and the subject.

The same principle applies to child pornography and hentai. A loli is not a real person. It is a fantastical entity with a fantastical body designed with a specific aesthetic purpose in mind. It's for the same reason that some westerners think anime characters look white, because the physical traits of most anime characters are stylized with a particular aesthetic, and aren't like those of actual Japanese people. A reader of hentai isn't going to feel disturbed or horrified over a loli getting penetrated. The material is played for effect so as to not invoke abhorrence towards it. Readers know it's not real on an intellectual level, they're just their to see girls of that aesthetic doing erotic things.

CP, just like snuff films, lacks the psychological separation between the viewer and the subject. One knows that a small prepubescent body isn't strong enough to withstand penetration, and the thought that the child was likely coerced and kidnapped is all the more terrifying. The reason actual pedophiles like CP is because of the qualities of real children. They don't want to jack off to unrealistic anime characters. They want to see real kids, just like the ones they see on their way to school, having sex with men. To say there's no difference is like saying someone who likes playing Doom also likes seeing people brutally dying in real life.

And regarding Japan, I don't think that country is a perfect magical paradise. I've known about it's major problems for years, and even it's own citizens are willing to acknowledge them. And yes, sex trafficking is among those issues. But to claim that lolicon is somehow linked or associated with criminal activity is not ignorant, it also shows that you have bought into the same bullshit that Jack Thompson and Anita Sarkeesian used to go after video games, disregarding the psychological difference between fiction and reality. It's fine if you dislike lolicon. Everyone has their own kinks. But at the end of the day, it's just another harmless fetish.

I'm quite the last person that would defend a pedo, but digi at least multiple times stated, that when he consumed lolicon, he always viewed the porn from the little girl's perspective, being helpless, getting fucked etc. (which would also explain his taste for dick, getting pegged by may). Projecting himself as the abused instead of the abuser.

Digi's relationship with lolicon is like a guy who likes straight shota hentai. They're usually not there just to see a shota getting fucked, rather, they adore the caring nurturing, almost motherly, sexual relationship between the shota and the older girl. It's this romantic idea that a girl would care about you so much that they're willing to give you their body to satisfy your needs. If Digi sees himself as the loli getting fucked so much, that makes him even less likely to be a pedo. Why would he have any desire to be on the unrelatable other end if he's not comfortable with it?

Does that make him less harmless? Hard for me to judge. He doesn't strike me as a full blown pedophile yet but who knows what the indochina hormones do to him. Maybe he is already chemically castrating himself/killing his libido etc. .

Deep down, Digi has always been an emotionally-vulnerable submissive. He isn't by any means violent, unlike, say, Endless Jess, who's known in the PCP fanbase for having quite the temper. I know he would never be comfortable with fucking actual children, and with all these hormones he wants to take to make him more of a women, he probably won't have enough testosterone left to even think about that. Suicide on the other hand - now that I can see happening.

 

[Terrorist]

What's the line between fiction and reality? Does liking violent video games make you a maniac sociopathic? Does liking games where you kill women make you a sadistic abusive misogynist, as Anita Sarkeesian falsely concluded? And before you claim that's a false equivalence, violence has been just as integral as sex has since the beginning of animal life on this planet. If one didn't know how to be violent, whether that meant defending yourself and your tribe, raiding the other tribe, or fending off rivals from stealing your mate or food, one would've fucking perished without passing on their genes.

The aggressive ones were also the most likely to have mates, since they could protect their mates, and we are descendants of them. It's also why a lot of women are sexually attracted to "bad boys". While this capacity for aggression still exists within every individual so as to ensure one's survival, there are easier better ways to survive, so being violent is seldom useful or necessary. That's not to say that a lot of people can naturally kill without batting an eyelash. Combat is a skill that one needs to train for mentally and physically, but we do find many outlets to satiate this urge without harming others, and ergo inviting harm onto ourselves, but in our case we'll focus on violent fictional media.

There is massive difference between a game like God of War and a Bestgore.com snuff film. One is fantastical and designed for player satisfaction, the other is cruel horrifying reality. You inhabit the same universe as the snuff film victim, and you know very well that the same fate could befall you. It's why most people who enjoy violent games can't find enjoyment in watching actual snuff - there is no metaphysical separation between the viewer and the subject.

The same principle applies to child pornography and hentai. A loli is not a real person. It is a fantastical entity with a fantastical body designed with a specific aesthetic purpose in mind. It's for the same reason that some westerners think anime characters look white, because the physical traits of most anime characters are stylized with a particular aesthetic, and aren't like those of actual Japanese people. A reader of hentai isn't going to feel disturbed or horrified over a loli getting penetrated. The material is played for effect so as to not invoke abhorrence towards it. Readers know it's not real on an intellectual level, they're just their to see girls of that aesthetic doing erotic things.

CP, just like snuff films, lacks the psychological separation between the viewer and the subject. One knows that a small prepubescent body isn't strong enough to withstand penetration, and the thought that the child was likely coerced and kidnapped is all the more terrifying. The reason actual pedophiles like CP is because of the qualities of real children. They don't want to jack off to unrealistic anime characters. They want to see real kids, just like the ones they see on their way to school, having sex with men. To say there's no difference is like saying someone who likes playing Doom also likes seeing people brutally dying in real life.

And regarding Japan, I don't think that country is a perfect magical paradise. I've known about it's major problems for years, and even it's own citizens are willing to acknowledge them. And yes, sex trafficking is among those issues. But to claim that lolicon is somehow linked or associated with criminal activity is not ignorant, it also shows that you have bought into the same bullshit that Jack Thompson and Anita Sarkeesian used to go after video games, disregarding the psychological difference between fiction and reality. It's fine if you dislike lolicon. Everyone has their own kinks. But at the end of the day, it's just another harmless fetish.

Sex and violence are very different impulses. The metaphysical separation between stimuli provided by video game violence (clicking buttons for achievements and dopamine - the appeal of a violent game is largely the same as a nonviolent one) and real violence (going on a murder spree) is indeed massive. But the stimuli provided by drawn porn and real porn are the same (cooming to 2D vs 3D depictions of the same thing), and the stimulus of a real sex act is very similar. This is why violent videogames/movies shouldn’t be banned, but child abuse sites should be.

What are loli characters a stylized depiction of, and what is their aesthetic based on? Seems to me to be little girls. The appeal is that they have the features of real children. It’s not like a “loli” is some unrelated fantasy creature.

And yes, softcore “Junior Idol” DVDs depicting real children were sold alongside lolicon material in Akihabara, and that’s just what was in the open. They know their market.

 

[Pipi420]

Digi and May represent the 2 most common archetypes of pedophiles:

1. Digi: The manchild. Emotionally stunted, socially awkward, nerdy or childish interests, may see himself as a child on some level, has mental illnesses (if not a below average IQ) that keep him from living a normal functional adult life. These types are obviously “off”, tend to over share, and don’t get social cues, so they’re the ones who get caught the most.
2. May: The groomer (most powerful pedos’ and female pedos’ MO). Social manipulator who acts bubbly and youthful to gain access to kids. If they have sex appeal, use it to manipulate adults in proximity to kids. Not caught as much because they can gain enough trust to form a circle of defenders from allegations, and blend into different social circles easily.

Is this the new narrative? May is using her "looks" to fuck kids?

edit: fuck my bad didnt realize we entered the loli vs kidfucking debate timeloop again

 

[RhoasJonas]

Another day, another argument over the minutia of who is or isn't a pedo, the definitions of it and where the lines are. Digi is questionable precisely because he isn't some average joe blow cranking it out to a loli doujin every now and then or just liking art on a twitter feed, he actively obsesses over it to a major degree and has an audience of variable age ranges that also houses headcases that would do anything for him.

 

[Dogfacefuke]

As far as I know this hasn't been posted here yet, so for completion's sake: May's threesome coercion texts to faith (Gunt's ex GF/preggo teen), if anyone may still have doubts about her character. She is also not denying any assault occuring.
View attachment 1774272View attachment 1774273View attachment 1774274View attachment 1774275

This is just absolute madness.

I've seen the Mexican cartel cut a man's face off, or slice a man's belly open like a flap and expose his organs, but I can at least understand that they do that to strike fear into those who would dare stand against them.

Why would you fight so adamantly for this?

Why would this be something you push so so hard for?

A pregnant meth head simpleton and a disgusting cretin gunt?

I can't believe May is this insane and pathetic. I'm actually a little shocked.

 

[Pipi420]

This is just absolute madness.

I've seen the Mexican cartel cut a man's face off, or slice a man's belly open like a flap and expose his organs, but I can at least understand that they do that to strike fear into those who would dare stand against them.

Why would you fight so adamantly for this?

Why would this be something you push so so hard for?

A pregnant meth head simpleton and a disgusting cretin gunt?

I can't believe May is this insane and pathetic. I'm actually a little shocked.

Its really creepy and manipulative. It reads like someone trying to get others into their cult. "We'll make something beautiful, it will improve your relationship, just try it"