The argument that he hasn't disproved is not convincing to me. It's like me saying "DZoomer, prove to me you don't spend thousands of dollars on WWE Champions". You couldn't particular disprove it because if in reality you never played it, there's nothing to show on your phone. Then I can say "show me your credit card statements", and even if you showed me that (which you shouldn't have to), then I can just claim you're hiding a credit card from me. Same with phil, he can't really disprove it because there's nothing really to show. The absence of proof doesn't mean guilt.
This is a fair point. The issue is, that isn't Phil's situation. Phil himself has said he played the game in the past. He's also complained about how predatory these types of games are, and cited that as a supposed reason why he stopped. He's also well familiar with the terms and everything. Now, let's be incredibly generous and, as you mentioned in an older post, assumed Phil was being hyperbolic and only played a few times. And hey, I'll even add, Phil being hyperbolic isn't out of character.
But your reasoning is where it falls apart. Phil could pretty easily disprove it by logging into his old account. He couldn't just create a new one because it'd be pretty easy to tell if someone had whatever the generic new player set of characters are. And unless I'm mistaken, there's also some way to search a username to look up their history, so a simple search would tell if Phil made the account the night before just to disprove it. Realistically, if we're giving him the biggest benefit of the doubt, he could redownload the app, login to his old account, and use that as proof that he did indeed play the game under a different user name, and there would be enough information on the profile to show it wasn't just a freshly created account.
Phil has tried to use the excuse that we'd somehow dox him or harm his family or whatever, so he can't show his phone. But he's since shown his phone for other reasons, I believe during one of his "I just got banned" streams. His dox has also been public information for years, and I can't really figure out a scenario where we hurt his family by knowing the name of a defunct mobile gaming account. Now, this wouldn't necessarily be 100% proof, and I'm sure people would insist that Phil could simply have made a new account at some point, but I think it'd be a pretty big win for Phil, who has certainly shown 0 restraint in previously dunking on people whenever he got the chance. He loves to bring up whenever we get stuff wrong, escort saga being a prime example. Hell, yesterday he tried to dunk on us by saying we greatly exaggerated the price of his coffee maker. Phil is not a reserved person, if he had something to easily rub in our faces, he'd do so.
To try and preemptively counter some arguments, we know Phil uses the same email for everything, and he's demonstrated in the past he also uses the same password for everything. Even if his autologin information isn't saved on his phone, he can request the login info get sent to his account, and can't try to claim he used a throwaway email he doesn't remember. A quick google search shows multiple posts with people asking how to get an account back, with other users answering you just have to contact Scopley's customer support and they'll ask for your original username and get you set up. Seems fairly reasonable to me, I imagine they'd want to make the process as easy as possible for returning customers. Again, it might seem like too much effort for anyone else, and while Phil is certainly lazy, he typically musters up his energy when it comes to being spiteful. Just look at how much energy he's spent the last few days to try and dunk on TLOU2.
As for the other argument, that TheyCallMeDSP could just be someone else with those initials. I mean, you're not wrong, that is technically possible. But I feel like a quick google search pretty clearly shows that, it is not actually a common name. There's quite a few TheyCallMe variants if you just google that, but all the DSP ones seem to belong to Phil. And as mentioned before, Phil isn't really known for changing things up. He uses the same name over and over, so it seems very out there that someone else would use that username, on a game that Phil himself has admitted to playing, for one of the few hobbies that Phil has. Unless I'm mistaken, Phil also used/didn't ever attempt to deny/even confirmed at one point, that he played the previous WWE iteration under the same name, and spent at least a few hundred bucks on it, so again, it isn't coming out of nowhere to assume this username was linked to him.
Now, in comparison, using DZoomer as an example, a quick google search for that username turned up a bunch of different things that, as far as I can tell, all belong to different people.
Then there's also the other smaller arguments of why Phil banned people who brought it up, why he banned people who mentioned the down from the rafters username, since there's no way he'd know that the "real" DSP changed his name to that, especially since changing usernames isn't even a normal option. Actually, adding onto that, why would the troll even try and do the name change? They had to go out of their way to contact customer support, and since it isn't an option normally offered, they had no way of knowing we'd still be able to track the name. If they wanted to try and hide because that's what the real DSP would do and they want to mimic him, there are plenty of other attempts they could have made to keep the act up without resorting to such a wild card that might have actually worked if Scopley had a better system, which again, there's no way to know they didn't because this isn't a service they normally offer.
There are a lot of other little things like this, on top of some of the bigger ones mentioned in this/other people's posts. Having doubt about something is fine and healthy. A lot of us initially had doubts when the idea was first proposed, with many citing the escort saga. That's why so many people are vehemently refuting you, because there's been enough deep digging to build what I consider a fairly strong case that this is Phil's account. If you still have doubts, eh, more power to you I guess. I'm sure you're not the only one. I mean, if nothing else DSP's fans seem to doubt it. But if you want to keep coming in here to insist you don't believe, you're going to have to bring something a little stronger to the table.