2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Arabs (and Persians, Kurds, Yazidi, Turks, and every other ethnic group) can manufacture arms well enough to make an occupation difficult, especially if they have international backing (which the Indians did not have).
they mostly build old german gun in license. the newer weapons of them are shit.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Honest Coyote
The audacity of these faggots, after undermining the public trust with blatant fraud, to argue that they couldn't be held accountable because it might harm the public trust. To the contrary, the only hope of restoring any trust is for the fraud to be exposed and the people behind it punished. Cheaters can not be allowed to prosper, after all.

Increasingly we are beginning to hear louder calls for punishment for the cheaters from the public. Subpoenas, firings, jail time, etc. Some form of accountability is long overdue, and if none of that happens, the justice system along with the Constitution will lose all meaning. Once trust in the system is broken, it'll never be seen as having ANY legitimacy over the governing of people ever again.
 
y'all got until midnight, so tick-tock
Not true actually. In Bush v. Gore the SCOTUS only weighed in because the safe harbor deadline had passed.

Even after December 14th when the electoral college has voted Congress could still trigger a contingent election.

The only constitutionally hard-coded deadline is January 20th when the next president is inaugurated and that is in the 20th Amendment.

BRB I'm off to bet $1 at astronomically high odds that the next POTUS will be neither Trump nor Biden.
 
Last edited:
We’ve gone from:
-There’s no evidence of fraud
-There’s inadequate amounts of evidence
-There’s evidence but we’ll ruin your life if you bring it up
-You brought up the evidence but we don’t like it
-There’s video but we totally debunked it
-There’s indisputable evidence of fraud, but you have to let us get away with it in order to protect “democracy”

72D5A050-BDBD-403D-A934-3049FCA085A9.jpeg
 
Because /pol/ these days is about as pozzed as a San Francisco twink after a weekend of bath-houses and meth.
There‘s an old saying about 4chan that goes as follows: “4chan is the only place on the web where someone will call you a faggot and then proceed to share tranny porn a few seconds later.”
 
We’ve gone from:
-There’s no evidence of fraud
-There’s inadequate amounts of evidence
-There’s evidence but we’ll ruin your life if you bring it up
-You brought up the evidence but we don’t like it
-There’s video but we totally debunked it
-There’s indisputable evidence of fraud, but you have to let us get away with it in order to protect “democracy”

View attachment 1774769
It's cute how you guys think that screenshots from Parler and Twitter count as evidence.
 
Not true actually. In Bush v. Gore the SCOTUS only weighed in because the safe harbor deadline had passed.

Even after December 14th when the electoral college has voted Congress could still trigger a contingent election.

The only constitutionally hard-coded deadline is January 20th when the next president is inaugurated and that is in the 20th Amendment.
Tonight is safe harbor.
3 U.S. Code § 5. Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors said:
If any State shall have provided, by laws enacted prior to the day fixed for the appointment of the electors, for its final determination of any controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, by judicial or other methods or procedures, and such determination shall have been made at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination made pursuant to such law so existing on said day, and made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution, and as hereinafter regulated, so far as the ascertainment of the electors appointed by such State is concerned.
You need something conclusive by tonight - not a lingering court case, not a promise to file more cases, not a youtube video, a conclusive "yes, this happened and invalidates so-and-so votes."

Now, it is true that if the states, for some reason, actually found a problem, you could trigger this one :
3 U.S. Code § 2. Failure to make choice on prescribed day said:
Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.
Say, for re-doing their election. So long as it doesn't violate that first one -- so, what, election before midnight? Find the flaw before midnight and host a new election before the 14th?

But it is particular about the electoral procedure:
3 U.S. Code § 7. Meeting and vote of electors said:
The electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.
Hence safe harbor being from midnight to the 14th.

Your suggestion is that Congress will somehow overturn the electoral votes and trigger an election re-do? That's the hope and the gambit?

Alright, so, for anyone wedded to reality, you've got until midnight tonight to get enough legislatures to declare that there's a problem which prevents them from choosing electors OR enough suits which affirm that there is a problem. So chop-chop, better hurry.
 
This really isn't a smoking gun on voter fraud issues in this year's election, but god damn. So Patrick Gaspard, President of the Open Society Foundations (AKA: George Soros' most well known cultural poisoning vehicle), is stepping down amid speculation that he'll be tapped as Secretary of Labor in Biden's cabinet. Taking his place is Mark Malloch-Brown, who among other things is the President of SGO Corporation, which is a holding company that owns Smartmatic. Yes, the voting software company that has been the subject of a bunch of controversy. Smartmatic wants the world to know that it is totally on the up and up, and would never do anything to undermine any election where its software is used. In fact it's so honest, it has a couple different pages of angry "ACKSHULLY" on its official website.

Yes, I know Smartmatic supposedly wasn't used in any of the contested states and blah blah blah, but Jesus Christ this just seems fishy. The Open Society Foundations is obviously well known for being extremely active in politics and pushing the most toxic of progressive trash ideology all over the world. Now the guy in charge of a very prolific voting software platform is going to be in charge of that wretched organization? Just how in the fuck does this NOT look ridiculously corrupt to any reasonable person?
 
Last edited:
So the endless wars are going be for for Iranian oil reserves?

They risked civil war by rigging a POTUS election with a zombie so they can go after oil?

If true then that means what reserves america has access to is very low or running out. Why else pull a move so desperate?

Like I said for the doomers. Chill the fuck out. Time Isnt on woke capitals side.

Evo and others scream at me for my post industrial views (they call it doomerism) but realize these are not my ideas.

I got them from people much smarter then me. Im not the most articulate, or best at backing up with what I say about the coming collapse of technology. The people who convinced me of my current ideas are just as smart as evo.

Relax. Things will get better. Just not better in the way you want them to. Thats just how it goes.
To be fair I wouldn't even call it Doomers, I'd call it being realistic. It's just reality and the acknowledgement in whichever way it goes is extremely harsh. A lot of us expected it to never get this far and it's like a kick in the teeth, despite the ability for many of us to adapt to a plethora of situations it doesn't make it any less a kick in the teeth to many who are realizing what's fully going on (for those who didn't realize it years ago)

Even then I don't think anyone wants to lose their current way of life which will inevitably happen with the current trajectory regardless of solution. It's less that I can't see the positives, but more weighing the negatives it's hard on the human psyche even for the mentally strongest of people. Even if "Woke capitalist" didn't exist, the current outcomes or path to the future is still going to be a set back if not partial nightmare for many of us.

It's not even that I didn't expect to have setbacks in life or the future, it's more not to this level or this potential an upheaval. I understand that's how it goes but it doesn't make it any less jarring, if I wasn't already a realist already I'm sure like certain other posters I'd become extremely jaded watching this shit show on full parade myself.
 
Tonight is safe harbor.

You need something conclusive by tonight - not a lingering court case, not a promise to file more cases, not a youtube video, a conclusive "yes, this happened and invalidates so-and-so votes."

Now, it is true that if the states, for some reason, actually found a problem, you could trigger this one :

Say, for re-doing their election. So long as it doesn't violate that first one -- so, what, election before midnight? Find the flaw before midnight and host a new election before the 14th?

But it is particular about the electoral procedure:

Hence safe harbor being from midnight to the 14th.

Your suggestion is that Congress will somehow overturn the electoral votes and trigger an election re-do? That's the hope and the gambit?

Alright, so, for anyone wedded to reality, you've got until midnight tonight to get enough legislatures to declare that there's a problem which prevents them from choosing electors OR enough suits which affirm that there is a problem. So chop-chop, better hurry.

The Thomas More Society filed a brief claiming that the only constitutional hard-coded date is the 20th of January. It's true that federal law sets other deadlines

But, that's a well-cited post.

It's not clear which way the SCOTUS will rule on this stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back