Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I already know what it is. You're the one who should review


View attachment 1775060

So you know what it is, but you're still going for it anyway? Despite the fact that your motion likely will not pass?
No wonder you couldn't pass the bar exam for the shittiest law school in the US.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

So you know what it is, but you're still going for it anyway? Despite the fact that your motion likely will not pass?
No wonder you couldn't pass the bar exam for the shittiest law school in the US.

Moon's attorney graduated from Appalachian School of Law. And yet you're mocking the school. Ooookay.

What makes you so sure it won't pass?

Maybe you need to be investigated for fraud and bribery

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What makes you so sure it will be a denial?

Maybe you need to be put under investigation for fraud and bribery

You okay, Mel? You don't sound okay.

I already know what it is. You're the one who should review


View attachment 1775060

Key points being "insufficient defence"(which it is not, since it is well argued and cited), and "redundant", whIch it is not. Please, this is embarrassing.

What makes you so sure it won't pass?

The fact that you are not fighting a wall this time, but an actual lawyer

Moon's attorney graduated from Appalachian School of Law. And yet you're mocking the school. Ooookay.

Moon's attorney has actual experience. For one, he served as chief prosecutor for 2 years

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Maybe you need to be investigated for fraud and bribery

What does me saying it's not gonna pass have to do with fraud or bribery lmao, nobody here is out to get you, we're here to see you fail due to your own incompetence. Quite literally the only reason you're even at this point is because Null wasn't able to respond, you haven't even won yet, let alone shown legal competence.

Moon's attorney graduated from Appalachian School of Law. And yet you're mocking the school. Ooookay.

Yes, the school is still shit. I'm not gonna lie about that. But someone who got in is still better than someone who was too dumb not to.

 

[ConSluttant]

Yes, anyone who stands up to you morally degenerate, unethical bullies is doing what a winner does: stand up to wrong doing.

Your other haters agree with me. We talk about you all in email threads. They are rooting for me





More like preparing my Motion to Strike, which is being filed.

Fuck you too



@Null -- your lawyer also called you Mr Scott on another page



Well, Joshua Moon, I didn't expect you to propose to me like this so soon after a break up with Marshall. But no, I will not marry you. You don't look like you know how to use a whip. You look too soft in the sack

And I think I saw you on "Don'tDateHimGirls.com"



You aren't a victim

Eye for eye you stupid bitch

RESET THE CLOCK!

I love this. Now it gets good. Motion to strike? Bwahahaha! She's flailing ladies and gents. Getcher popcorn.

 

[PomegranateKing]

Uh oh, melinda is investigating for fraud and bribery. Watch out, boys, she expects one of us to crack and give her the secret plans!

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You okay, Mel? You don't sound okay.

Key points being "insufficient defence"(which it is not, since it is well argued and cited), and "redundant", whIch it is not. Please, this is embarrassing.

The fact that you are not fighting a wall this time, but an actual lawyer

Moon's attorney has actual experience. For one, he served as chief prosecutor for 2 years

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230. And we can all see what Trump said about that

Moon's attorney has actual experience

Yes? So do I. 7 years of it. I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for it

Quite literally the only reason you're even at this point is because Null wasn't able to respond, you haven't even won yet, let alone shown legal competence.

Section 230 is the only reason Moon didn't get fried. And as soon as Trump fixes that, Null is toast.

RESET THE CLOCK!

I love this. Now it gets good. Motion to strike? Bwahahaha! She's flailing ladies and gents. Getcher popcorn.

Key points being "insufficient defence"(which it is not, since it is well argued and cited), and "redundant", whIch it is not. Please, this is embarrassing.

Try again.

"Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) provides that, on its own or upon a litigant’s motion before responding to a pleading, “[t]he court may strike from a pleading . . . any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” This rule has not been amended since 1946."

That includes FALSE statements.
Immoral ones too

His Motion/pleading can be gutted

Pro-se litigants cannot upload to Pacer. Look for it. It's on its way

 

[Dynamite Ninja]

Hey @TamarYaelBatYah, you said you “released” us and told us goodbye, implying that you intended on leaving this site forever. Now you’re going back on that? Your word is as good as dirt. I guarantee that your pathetic lawsuit is going to fail. You may have finally filed it, but just like your word, it’s as good as dirt. Keep on being very impotent you crazy bitch.

 

[B’Elanna]

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230. And we can all see what Trump said about that

Now you and Orange Julius Caesar will have something in common, losing.

 

[PomegranateKing]

Hey @TamarYaelBatYah, you said you “released” us and told us goodbye, implying that you intended on leaving this site forever. Now you’re going back on that? Your word is as good as dirt. I guarantee that your pathetic lawsuit is going to fail. You may have finally filed it, but just like your word, it’s as good as dirt. Keep on being very impotent you crazy bitch.

She's done that more times than you can imagine...

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Yes? So do I. 7 years of it. I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for it

1. You are not an attorney.
2. You didn't give us a list.
3. The suits that we dug up were all small claims.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230.

Section 230 is the only reason Moon didn't get fried.

You're talking as if he's already won. Why is that?

 

[obliviousbeard]

Hi Melinda, nice to see you back here! I hope you've been well.

Your other haters agree with me. We talk about you all in email threads. They are rooting for me

Most people who hate KF are usually either speds who got banned for well, being too spergy even for us, or people whose internet presence was documented (and ridiculed) here. So you're in contact with those people? Wouldn't honestly be surprised if some people would've formed a League to Remove Null Physically from the Internet.

But no, I will not marry you.

But would you marry someone who knows their way around with a whip tho? HMU

Maybe you need to be put under investigation for fraud and bribery

Pray tell, I've been out of the loop for a while; who bribed who and which fraud are you talking about?

His Motion/pleading can be gutted

So I'll take this that you're going to contest his motion to retain the default judgement?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

So I'll take this that you're going to contest his motion to retain the default judgement?

Yes, the Motion to Strike is only part 1. Part 2 will be my Answer/Response to their Motions

You're talking as if he's already won. Why is that?

I'm not. Those were the Appropriation and Defamation cases. Not this one.

In this case....well, wait for the Motion to Strike, I said it there

1. You are not an attorney.
2. You didn't give us a list.
3. The suits that we dug up were all small claims.

Wait for the Motion to Strike, it's all there

Hey @TamarYaelBatYah, you said you “released” us and told us goodbye, implying that you intended on leaving this site forever. Now you’re going back on that? Your word is as good as dirt. I guarantee that your pathetic lawsuit is going to fail. You may have finally filed it, but just like your word, it’s as good as dirt. Keep on being very impotent you crazy bitch.

Isn't "impotent" a word to describe defective penises? I've never heard that used in context of a person

Yes I released you. But then I saw you guys discussing the lawsuit

 

[Pizdec]

Yes? So do I. 7 years of it. I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for

You have a %0 success rate. I would not hire you for sex let alone as my attorney.

 

[Kosher Salt]

I'm not.

So you weren't talking about the current case when you said he got off the hook by Section 230? I guess you'll end up seeing that this one is no different, then.

 

[LoverofPi]

Yes, anyone who stands up to you morally degenerate, unethical bullies is doing what a winner does: stand up to wrong doing.

Your other haters agree with me. We talk about you all in email threads. They are rooting for me

Hey, you lasted a little more than a week! If you had that kind of self control earlier this year this thread wouldn't be here.

More like preparing my Motion to Strike, which is being filed.

Fuck you too

You really have no grounds with which to strike Null's motions.

@Null -- your lawyer also called you Mr Scott on another page

Well, Joshua Moon, I didn't expect you to propose to me like this so soon after a break up with Marshall. But no, I will not marry you. You don't look like you know how to use a whip. You look too soft in the sack

And I think I saw you on "Don'tDateHimGirls.com"

Awww, she is in love with Null!

You aren't a victim

Eye for eye you stupid bitch

And you're not a victim either. You sued the site before getting a thread, You've shown a disproportionate response to everything here at the Farms.

What makes you so sure it will be a denial?

Maybe you need to be put under investigation for fraud and bribery

Your pleadings are entirely without merit, and you only get by because judges are extra careful to give pro se litigants loads of extra leeway.

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230. And we can all see what Trump said about that

""Whhaaaaa, the mean people are making fun of me on the internet!" I believe.

Yes? So do I. 7 years of it. I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for it

Thank you for providing a list of your vexatious claims for the court.

Section 230 is the only reason Moon didn't get fried. And as soon as Trump fixes that, Null is toast.

He's trying to get rid of it because he's throwing a baby tantrum since people made fun of him. You have that in common.

Try again.

"Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) provides that, on its own or upon a litigant’s motion before responding to a pleading, “[t]he court may strike from a pleading . . . any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” This rule has not been amended since 1946."

That includes FALSE statements.
Immoral ones too

His Motion/pleading can be gutted

He hasn't made any false or immoral statements in his filing?

Pro-se litigants cannot upload to Pacer. Look for it. It's on its way

Why not post a copy here, Mel?

Yes, the Motion to Strike is only part 1. Part 2 will be my Answer/Response to their Motions

I'm not. Those were the Appropriation and Defamation cases. Not this one.

In this case....well, wait for the Motion to Strike, I said it there

Wait for the Motion to Strike, it's all there

I'm sure it will be hilarious. Post a copy here.

Isn't "impotent" a word to describe defective penises? I've never heard that used in context of a person

Of course your mind goes immediately to penises, Pam. But no, it means powerless. Odd that such a self proclaimed scholar would not know that.

Yes I released you. But then I saw you guys discussing the lawsuit

And you couldn't stay away, we know.

 

[Dynamite Ninja]

Yes I released you. But then I saw you guys discussing the lawsuit

That doesn’t matter at all. When you basically say that you’re never coming back, you’re supposed to leave and never return. However, you have said this many times, and every single time, you fucking came back. Like I said before, your word is as good as dirt.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

by Section 230. And we can all see what Trump said about that

I like Trump, I really do, but almost everything he says about Section 230 is retarded.

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230.

This implies you accept his victory. Also, no, he "got off the hook" for many other reasons, including piss poor service.

Yes? So do I. 7 years of it.

I really doubt it. You'd be at least compatent if you had that much experience.

I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for it

Motion to Strike is not for bragging, Mel. Also, mind uploading it here? I don't see it filled anywhere yet.

Section 230 is the only reason Moon didn't get fried. And as soon as Trump fixes that, Null is toast

No
Trump literally does not have the power to undo/change Section 230.

That includes FALSE statements.
Immoral ones too

This is stupid for many reasons including the fact that your citation doesn't cite it.
What statements were immoral?

His Motion/pleading can be gutted

Disagree.

Pro-se litigants cannot upload to Pacer. Look for it. It's on its way

Upload it here.

I'm not. Those were the Appropriation and Defamation cases. Not this one.

Then make it clear when typing.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You really have no grounds with which to strike Null's motions.

Except that I do and that's why it's been filed

Hey, you lasted a little more than a week! If you had that kind of self control earlier this year this thread wouldn't be here.

That's what you call cave man analysis

And you're not a victim either. You sued the site before getting a thread,

Factually inaccurate.

That doesn’t matter at all. When you basically say that you’re never coming back, you’re supposed to leave and never return. However, you have said this many times, and every single time, you fucking came back. Like I said before, your word is as good as dirt.

I don't need a Troll lecture on ethics. It's entirely hypocritical.

I reserve the right to change my mind based on circumstances and others' actions

See how that works?

So you weren't talking about the current case when you said he got off the hook by Section 230? I guess you'll end up seeing that this one is no different, then.

Obviously you didn't read paragraph 76

You have a %0 success rate. I would not hire you for sex let alone as my attorney.

I have a 75% success rate in state court

Upload it here.

I'd rather keep you in suspense