WWE Champions General - Despite his claims, DSP is still spending thousands of dollars on the WWE Champions mobile game

[Colloid]

Also his fiancé has no idea how much he wasted, and is wasting on this game.

It cracks me up how you’re inadvertently becoming a gambling intervention service with some of these family man whales. I imagine that all of those wives are secretly thankful that deranged Nigel put a spotlight on their husband’s spending habits.

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Just want to put this out there in case the engaged WWE Champions guy is reading...

You can save a ton of money if you don't invite anyone and have a justice of the peace marry you in your mom's cat piss scented living room. Wear your suit from confirmation when you were 16. Saves so much money.

 

[TheGoutburglar]

It cracks me up how you’re inadvertently becoming a gambling intervention service with some of these family man whales. I imagine that all of those wives are secretly thankful that deranged Nigel put a spotlight on their husband’s spending habits.

I wonder if, when they get busted, their husband's go on a butt-hurt tirade about sick fucks on the internet ruining their lives?

I'm guessing probably not, because it takes a special kind of upbringing to create a piece of shit like Phil.

 

[Kosher Dill]

It cracks me up how you’re inadvertently becoming a gambling intervention service with some of these family man whales. I imagine that all of those wives are secretly thankful that deranged Nigel put a spotlight on their husband’s spending habits.

To be fair, these low-tier guilds are certainly spending much less than Half-A-Mil Phil. He has like 100 more top-tier husbandos than the average member of his latest guild.

 

[TheGoutburglar]

To be fair, these low-tier guilds are certainly spending much less than Half-A-Mil Phil. He has like 100 more top-tier husbandos than the average member of his latest guild.

Phil has no idea how lucky he is to have found a woman like Khet, whose likelihood of murdering him upon discovery of his money-wasting hobby is (probably) as close to 0% as can be. Same cannot be said for the spouses of the other degenerates, who are being saved from that by the comparatively miniscule amounts they've wasted.

NOTE: I do not lament that Phil is unlikely to get killed over this. Some kind of consequence would be nice, but not THAT.

 

[Autism Spectroscopy]

It cracks me up how you’re inadvertently becoming a gambling intervention service with some of these family man whales. I imagine that all of those wives are secretly thankful that deranged Nigel put a spotlight on their husband’s spending habits.

Something tells me Intervention with Kiwis isn't the first confrontation you'd like to see yourself in lol

 

[Surly Muppet]

The Farms was never wrong about a major theory regarding Phil like this. We're only 'off'.

We were right about the escort saga: Phil was flying a woman around the country/continent and throwing money at her. It was just a demonic Michigan horse instead of a criminal Dutch whore. We were right about the scam - which Phil glosses over because it's the part that actually matters. We just had our adjectives wrong.

In fact, in my eyes, Kat was actually worse because not only was it the same scam, but it required Phil to make the absolute sociopathic move of openly mewling about being lonely and single on Thanksgiving, when he was dating the woman he was going to move in all of 3 months later. At least if it was the Dutch escort, that part would have been less fucked up.

We're not wrong here, either. The reason this works is because all evidence we can find points to this as filling in all the necessary blanks of his inflated business expenses, missing money, and bizarre behavior. If, in 4 months, we find out that Phil passed off a crippling cocaine addiction as 'microtransactions', and that he can't even play a mobile game because he spends all of his time coked out and running around the house like Jasper... then we're still not wrong. We just had the wrong addiction, but the rest was pretty much as we deduced. And no matter how it gets painted, Phil is still a scamming, defrauding piece of shit.

But it is definitely Champions.

 

[grump]

I'm surprised how many of these guys have gfs. They're not exactly Victoria Secret caliber but still. Its strange when so many other guys seem to have trouble in this area.

 

[Big Brown Schlub]

I'm surprised how many of these guys have gfs. They're not exactly Victoria Secret caliber but still. Its strange when so many other guys seem to have trouble in this area.

Even a little social skill and confidence can go a long way. I mean just look at some of the lolcows on this site. Ethan "The Gunt Caesar" Ralph is a fat ugly disgusting white trash drunkard manlet and yet he SOMEHOW has a new woman lined up to fuck before the last one is even completely done leaving him or has even given birth to his child yet.

 

[TheGoutburglar]

The Farms was never wrong about a major theory regarding Phil like this. We're only 'off'.

We were right about the escort saga: Phil was flying a woman around the country/continent and throwing money at her. It was just a demonic Michigan horse instead of a criminal Dutch whore. We were right about the scam - which Phil glosses over because it's the part that actually matters. We just had our adjectives wrong.

In fact, in my eyes, Kat was actually worse because not only was it the same scam, but it required Phil to make the absolute sociopathic move of openly mewling about being lonely and single on Thanksgiving, when he was dating the woman he was going to move in all of 3 months later. At least if it was the Dutch escort, that part would have been less fucked up.

We're not wrong here, either. The reason this works is because all evidence we can find points to this as filling in all the necessary blanks of his inflated business expenses, missing money, and bizarre behavior. If, in 4 months, we find out that Phil passed off a crippling cocaine addiction as 'microtransactions', and that he can't even play a mobile game because he spends all of his time coked out and running around the house like Jasper... then we're still not wrong. We just had the wrong addiction, but the rest was pretty much as we deduced. And no matter how it gets painted, Phil is still a scamming, defrauding piece of shit.

But it is definitely Champions.

And even if we got the wrong addiction, is Phil really about to admit where his money has really been going all this time, regardless of where it is? No. It doesn't even have to be something embarrassing, it just has to be somewhere other than what he claims/implies. So no matter what here, he can't gloat about us getting it wrong unless he really isn't wasting his money on ANYTHING, which is just physically impossible. Even before getting his debt wiped out, he wasn't paying his bills else he wouldn't have accumulated any debt to begin with. Anyone noticing a black hole was on the right track long before his Champions account was found, and as soon as it was, all anyone really needed to do was observe how upset he gets about the meme sticking around for awhile. Boom, done deal, there's your black hole. Phil's a child, he's incapable of doing anything other than making it quite obvious when you've stumbled onto exactly what he has been trying to hide.

As for Khet being worse, yes, I agree on that one for the same reason as you, it made Phil a piece of shit instead of just a guy who paid for sex/brief companionship, and can be laughed at for it because he's Phil.

 

[grump]

The Farms was never wrong about a major theory regarding Phil like this. We're only 'off'.

We were right about the escort saga: Phil was flying a woman around the country/continent and throwing money at her. It was just a demonic Michigan horse instead of a criminal Dutch whore. We were right about the scam - which Phil glosses over because it's the part that actually matters. We just had our adjectives wrong.

In fact, in my eyes, Kat was actually worse because not only was it the same scam, but it required Phil to make the absolute sociopathic move of openly mewling about being lonely and single on Thanksgiving, when he was dating the woman he was going to move in all of 3 months later. At least if it was the Dutch escort, that part would have been less fucked up.

We're not wrong here, either. The reason this works is because all evidence we can find points to this as filling in all the necessary blanks of his inflated business expenses, missing money, and bizarre behavior. If, in 4 months, we find out that Phil passed off a crippling cocaine addiction as 'microtransactions', and that he can't even play a mobile game because he spends all of his time coked out and running around the house like Jasper... then we're still not wrong. We just had the wrong addiction, but the rest was pretty much as we deduced. And no matter how it gets painted, Phil is still a scamming, defrauding piece of shit.

But it is definitely Champions.

Whenever I have the tiniest doubt it always comes back to this. The money goes somewhere...

 

[Quantum Diabetes]

If by some cosmic miracle this isn't Phillypoop, I want to know who's dropped this ungodly amount of dough on this shitty game. The combined total of all games I currently own is about $17,000 and that's since 2011. And I've won contests and gotten a lot through raffles, contests and being a beta tester.

 

[LyteSydeByll]

I'm surprised how many of these guys have gfs. They're not exactly Victoria Secret caliber but still. Its strange when so many other guys seem to have trouble in this area.

They have money to blow on a wrestling gacha game, of course they can blow some cash to keep a gf tangentially interested in them.

 

[Seven Devil Wolf]

The Farms was never wrong about a major theory regarding Phil like this. We're only 'off'.

We were right about the escort saga: Phil was flying a woman around the country/continent and throwing money at her. It was just a demonic Michigan horse instead of a criminal Dutch whore. We were right about the scam - which Phil glosses over because it's the part that actually matters. We just had our adjectives wrong.

In fact, in my eyes, Kat was actually worse because not only was it the same scam, but it required Phil to make the absolute sociopathic move of openly mewling about being lonely and single on Thanksgiving, when he was dating the woman he was going to move in all of 3 months later. At least if it was the Dutch escort, that part would have been less fucked up.

We're not wrong here, either. The reason this works is because all evidence we can find points to this as filling in all the necessary blanks of his inflated business expenses, missing money, and bizarre behavior. If, in 4 months, we find out that Phil passed off a crippling cocaine addiction as 'microtransactions', and that he can't even play a mobile game because he spends all of his time coked out and running around the house like Jasper... then we're still not wrong. We just had the wrong addiction, but the rest was pretty much as we deduced. And no matter how it gets painted, Phil is still a scamming, defrauding piece of shit.

But it is definitely Champions.

Phil is a prime example of the rationalisation hamster. It's more of a red pill term, generally aimed towards women, but being as effeminate as he is, it's not surprising Phil does it.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rationalization%20hamster

This is why it's so 'hard' to pin Phil down on something, despite how much evidence the Farms have on him. The more evidence you provide, the better, because what Phil will do is rationalise, pick out the weakest link in the accusation/claim, and lazily debunk that. He doesn't need to address the whole, just the part he can easily prove is wrong.

"You went to the cafe to meet with Mark, because you're cheating on him with me."
"No, you're wrong. You can do a polygraph, and I'd pass." (On it's face, this is true - she's not arguing she didn't cheat, just that you're wrong, therefore, invalidating your claims. Sure, she is fucking Mark, but she didn't go to the cafe to -meet- him. She met her friend Jane, before going to Mark's to get her back blown out. DEBUNKED!)

"You spent 40k on WWE Champions using your credit cards."
"Hahahaha, what a dumb nudnik. I didn't pay for WWE Champions on my credit card, how stupid are you?" (Also true - he did pay 40k on WWE Champions, but he actually used Paypal with his bank account, then paid off his balance using his credit card. DEBUNKED!)

 

[hundredthousand]

It makes me laugh every time how many of them look like slightly different versions of Phil.

The faction leader even has his own Autism Crown

It's a guild requirement.

You must be middle aged, overweight, ghostly pale or with bad skin and horrible facial hair (goatee preferred) with a gremlin of a wife / gf, and have a shit job.

Bonus points if you have a young child and keep this hobby / addiction a secret from your spouse while dumping your savings for little Timmy's college fund into gacha pulls.

 

[TheGoutburglar]

We'll never get the answer to this question, but I would love to know if Phil actually accepts that the amount he has wasted on gacha is gargantuan. It's hard to even speculate on, because Phil is the kind of stupid asshole you can picture being in denial of it despite the evidence ("There's no way it's that much!"), just as easily as you can picture him figuring it out and trudging forward without any regrets. It's not like he regrets lying to his paypigs in order to get the funding for his not-so-secret hobby, after all.

 

[Seven Devil Wolf]

We'll never get the answer to this question, but I would love to know if Phil actually accepts that the amount he has wasted on gacha is gargantuan. It's hard to even speculate on, because Phil is the kind of stupid asshole you can picture being in denial of it despite the evidence ("There's no way it's that much!"), just as easily as you can picture him figuring it out and trudging forward without any regrets. It's not like he regrets lying to his paypigs in order to get the funding for his not-so-secret hobby, after all.

It baffles me. I understand it's easy to get carried away, not notice those 'small purchases' build up (I'm the same with Amazon and takeout, ngl), but when you put it side by side... here in Vanityland (powerlevel successfully contained!), that's about the amount for the down payment on a mortgage. It's similar to what I paid for my current place. The amount Phil has spent on sweaty men could have paid off a chunk of his current home, or if he really insisted, a sizeable down payment on a buy-to-rent property to generate passive income. The amount you can do with $40k in terms of investments is staggering. The guy could easily be on his way to retirement by 50 with the right investments on property, but no, gotta live in that moment, eh Philburt?

 

[WolverineGuy22]

Has anybody with the ability checked if DSP has given this new faction the approval to kick him out yet? So happy the pig hunt is back on, thank you @Nigel of Ukip for your service.

 

[TheGoutburglar]

It baffles me. I understand it's easy to get carried away, not notice those 'small purchases' build up (I'm the same with Amazon and takeout, ngl), but when you put it side by side... here in Vanityland (powerlevel successfully contained!), that's about the amount for the down payment on a mortgage. It's similar to what I paid for my current place. The amount Phil has spent on sweaty men could have paid off a chunk of his current home, or if he really insisted, a sizeable down payment on a buy-to-rent property to generate passive income. The amount you can do with $40k in terms of investments is staggering. The guy could easily be on his way to retirement by 50 with the right investments on property, but no, gotta live in that moment, eh Philburt?

On one hand, we know that Phil legit doesn't have certain aspirations, like owning an actual house, or doing real traveling, or having an actual family. Kind of hard to have any motivation when what you want to spend your time doing involves nothing but wrestling, gacha, and gin. Forever.

On the other hand, we also know that regardless of what Phil wants out of life, he sucks with money too much to ever be living a legit sweet life. It isn't just with mobile games, it's in every facet of his life. He just constantly wastes money and, by all appearances, genuinely has no idea how much more of it he could have if he stopped listening to his broken brain and listened to everyone else.

This is why it's hard to say if he knows or cares what the figure really is. One possibility is just as likely as the other.

 

[Big Brown Schlub]

Phil is a prime example of the rationalisation hamster. It's more of a red pill term, generally aimed towards women, but being as effeminate as he is, it's not surprising Phil does it.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rationalization%20hamster

This is why it's so 'hard' to pin Phil down on something, despite how much evidence the Farms have on him. The more evidence you provide, the better, because what Phil will do is rationalise, pick out the weakest link in the accusation/claim, and lazily debunk that. He doesn't need to address the whole, just the part he can easily prove is wrong.

"You went to the cafe to meet with Mark, because you're cheating on him with me."
"No, you're wrong. You can do a polygraph, and I'd pass." (On it's face, this is true - she's not arguing she didn't cheat, just that you're wrong, therefore, invalidating your claims. Sure, she is fucking Mark, but she didn't go to the cafe to -meet- him. She met her friend Jane, before going to Mark's to get her back blown out. DEBUNKED!)

"You spent 40k on WWE Champions using your credit cards."
"Hahahaha, what a dumb nudnik. I didn't pay for WWE Champions on my credit card, how stupid are you?" (Also true - he did pay 40k on WWE Champions, but he actually used Paypal with his bank account, then paid off his balance using his credit card. DEBUNKED!)

Can't believe red pillers just re-discovered the motte-and-bailey fallacy. A type of medieval castle was one which was divided into the motte, or the easily defensible part of the castle and the bailey, the castle town which would even be abandoned in a bad siege until it would be eventually taken back from the motte if the siege fails. As such, the motte-and-bailey fallacy has a more controversial claim be the bailey, while a less controversial one is the motte. The "attacker" has to disprove both the bailey as well as the motte and if he doesn't, the "defender" then claims that even the bailey is still seen as correct despite being easily dismantled in an argument, just because you couldn't dismantle the motte.