2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well there was obviously a few isolated cases of voting fraud. What people mean when they say no evidence of voting fraud is no evidence of wide-spread voting fraud. There's 360 million people in the US, there's always going to be a few bad actors.
That have been proven, that doesn't mean other cases don't exist, and even if they didn't, I think our pollsters need to tighten up their protocol and take necessary steps to make sure as claimed that this is the "most secure voting in the US history" or whatever BS they've concocted and tried to tell everyone. I'm not saying you can have a perfect voting system without some fraud, but I think a lot of people are seeing major flaws and protocols not being followed in ways years prior they were without getting into major anomalies that are being noticed by many in the population. Republican or Democrat or Independent. It stinks to high heaven.

Four years ago, my ID was checked and I even had to give a bit of my personal information when I went to vote in my district, this year it was almost as if people didn't care as long as I gave my name and I matched some lists they were holding. That to me is a red flag on its own and I'm not even in a major metropolitan (or heavily populated) area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
I brought up the Russian Collusion because it argued similar things, such as the election being tampered with. It was a comparison.

Also, I could say the same about you in refusing to change your mind. Users on here have shown videos, court documents, and statistical analysis to show how faulty this election process was. Finally, you understand that being told you’re like Chris Chan on the Farms is a tad redundant? Everyone here is pretty autistic for even having a Farms account, so in a way, we’re all like Chris Chan.
All of those claims were thoroughly debunked and just bad statistics by people who don't know how elections work. But seriously, trying to convince you is completely a waste of my time since you're legitimately autistic and would refuse to believe any evidence unless Trump himself said so.

There's being Chris-Chan level autistic and bullheadedness, like you are being, and then being autistic enough to be on Kiwi Farms, which we are all guilty of

Four years ago, my ID was checked and I even had to give a bit of my personal information when I went to vote in my district, this year it was almost as if people didn't care as long as I gave my name and I matched some lists they were holding. That to me is a red flag on its own and I'm not even in a major metropolitan (or heavily populated) area.
How so? The amount of effort that committing fraud that way would be not worth the effort. You'd be able to do it once, maybe twice, in each district before they knew it was you again. And that's even assuming you could find the info of people who hadn't voted yet.
 
I wouldn't trust either the government nor private companies to run a linked voting machine system. Even if you print out the record, the printed out result is still going to be reliant on the code being legitimate.
You don't think a paper printed human-readable record of the choices a voter selected is a check on this hypothesized magical machine manipulation? Hmm
Four years ago, my ID was checked and I even had to give a bit of my personal information when I went to vote in my district, this year it was almost as if people didn't care as long as I gave my name and I matched some lists they were holding. That to me is a red flag on its own and I'm not even in a major metropolitan (or heavily populated) area.
Yes, many US jurisdictions have different rules the first time you vote in an election after registering.
 
I never mentioned you neg-rating me. You sure seem mad, little guy. Is everything okay?
Here is a long term solution to save this thread since @It's HK-47 is at his breaking point and either will mass ban or just let this thread become shittier.

Everyone place him on ignore or ignore all his posts.

And let only @secret watcher deal with him, his new arch nemesis.

I am really unironically saying this. This is not some joke by me. Let @secret watcher deal with him and we enjoy the popcorn.

Same with the other well known shit birds. We know who you are.

I will no longer neg rate HHH and leave it to my based hero. But it's hard just not to neg him.

Edit: I will not neg rate in this thread but other threads are all open for grabs.
 
Last edited:
Arizona case confirmed there was 9% of mail in ballots that were inconclusive when doing a signature check...thus meaning they should be thrown out and would in any other country. This would likely be enough to flip the state. Not throwing those out eould make the win fraudulent.
If the same holds true in the other states and it clearly does otherwise be allowing checks that would be widespread fraud by any reasonable view.

That’s why this needs time to be investigated. To make sure that widespread fraud did not happen.

And yet YouTube says we can’t suggest it had an effect on the election when it easily could have?

Thank you @Null for everything you do
 
Last edited:
Here is a long term solution to save this thread since @It's HK-47 is at his breaking point and either will mass ban or just let this thread become shittier.
If you think I'm anywhere close to reaching my "breaking point" over this thread, you haven't been watching me herd autistic cats for very long.
 
Here is a long term solution to save this thread since @It's HK-47 is at his breaking point and either will mass ban or just let this thread become shittier.

Everyone place him on ignore or ignore all his posts.

And let only @secret watcher deal with him, his new arch nemesis.

I am really unironically saying this. This is not some joke by me. Let @secret watcher deal with him and we enjoy the popcorn.

Same with the other well known shit birds. We know who you are.

I will no longer neg rate HHH and leave it to my based hero. But it's hard just not to neg him.
It's funny how you even started a PM thread to whine about me to the other right-wingers because you are sad that this isn't a hugbox and then you freaked out when someone added me. But you're totally not mad :story:
 
Four years ago, my ID was checked and I even had to give a bit of my personal information when I went to vote in my district, this year it was almost as if people didn't care as long as I gave my name and I matched some lists they were holding. That to me is a red flag on its own and I'm not even in a major metropolitan (or heavily populated) area.

Honestly, you probably got a poll worker that cared more about it. Electoral law is really futzy about the ID thing - I believe that they can ask for it, but if you don't provide it, they can't necessarily reject you on that ground. Every single election I've voted in was just the latter case - I gave my name, I was in the right district, I spelled my last name.

You might have trouble finding them all too easily, but you can contact local officials for a copy of your county and state's voting rules and regulations to see what is strictly required and what isn't.

If you think I'm anywhere close to reaching my "breaking point" over this thread, you haven't been watching me herd autistic cats for very long.

But what other possible explanation could there be as to why you're not threadbanning everyone that isn't giving their energy to the texas lawsuit spirit bomb?
There's only so many times that the proud saviors of america take someone ignoring their internet stickers.
It isn't that this election hinges on the texas lawsuit unveiling some line of argument we haven't seen before and really digging in to caselaw and precedent to support it - this election hinges on people on kiwifarms not having to read opinions that don't mirror their own.
 
How often do you vote? I've literally never once been asked to present my id, and the furthest 'proof' I ever had to give was spelling my last name afaik. This has been the case for a long, long fucking time and it's completely the poll workers' prerogative to ascertain you are who you say you are, within legal bounds. Now mind, I'm in favor of requiring ID to vote, but this isn't something new or unique.

Small-scale fraud occurs every single election at every single level - arguably even more consequential for local elections, given how much more important individual votes are. But if you can find a few hundred or even a few thousand votes that are verifiably fraudulent, you still lack the case to throw out -literally several million-. Or, to the tune this lawsuit has to achieve (if, indeed, its recommended redress even can be ordered during safe harbor), tens of millions of votes.

"Couldn't there maybe potentially have been a lot of fraud, if you think about it?" isn't going to run the gamut.
Four years ago I voted for the presidential election. I was asked for my Id and had to give some tidbits of information before being able to vote. Every year (during certain months) I have to vote, for all kinds of random nonsense in my area. About 6 months prior to my most recent vote I was voting for some tax related nonsense and had to prove I was who I said I was and keep in mind this district has less than 600 people and they stepped up verification even in my area.

Then this presidential election came and all of a sudden the protocols for voting in my area became "laxed" to say the least.

I'm not arguing that there won't be voter fraud, there always will be ways around it, but I think if people are going to claim it's the most secure voting event ever, they should at least be following protocol more tightly than when I voted for a tax from the library six months ago. It just doesn't make sense at all to me.
 
It's not a matter of not being interested. They're being threatened. If Trump is crowned by the SC, then it's on the heads of those individual justices. They "betrayed" the Republic, they're now "responsible" for what comes next.
Member when a Chief Justice made the Civil War inevitable with the Dred Scott decision and lived to a ripe age of 87 near the end of that war? Then again, maybe the Republicans were a bunch of accelerationists who secretly loved that decision for the outrage it caused, Lincoln did attend his funeral after all.

Or do you think that because there was no CIA back then that America was the model Republic that the founders envisioned, and they single-handedly turned the country from that into a de-facto Mafia state by killing Boomer Jesus JFK?
 
Last edited:
Well, you should inform Trump's lawyers then since you're obviously a master of the law and can prove that the democrats cheated. Just accept it and I will stop laughing at your cope.
If you turn off your projector for a minute you'd have noticed over a month ago that this election did not meet any international standards for transparency and fairness. It's not my fault that I'm not as emotionally invested in this whole thing as you and can use my eyes to read.

Lol you're the one going through my post history and neg-rating me, so I was curious who you were. Or are you just another Corbin alt?
Nobody has to go through your post history to give you stickers on a dozen posts in a single go retard. You're just a third of every page in this thread's posts because of your autistic dedication to flaunting your cluelessness.
 
It's funny how you even started a PM thread to whine about me to the other right-wingers because you are sad that this isn't a hugbox and then you freaked out when someone added me. But you're totally not mad :story:
He made it because he thought the Farms were going to get shut down by Null and invited everyone he liked to talk with him on it. One guy invited you for shits and giggles because you were brought up sometimes. You get mocked openly here enough, we don't need to do it secretly.
 
He made it because he thought the Farms were going to get shut down by Null and invited everyone he liked to talk with him on it. One guy invited you for shits and giggles. You get mocked openly here enough.
As soon as I got invited he locked the thread and started another one. As soon as I left, I hear he unlocked it
 
Then this presidential election came and all of a sudden the protocols for voting in my area became "laxed" to say the least.
So... ID verification that is not actually required is enforced more stringently on local elections with low turnout and less busy pollworkers than major elections? That's not exactly surprising.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back