2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Meh. Q-tards is always gonna spin any good news as "ITS ALWAYS BEEN DA PLAN! 69D CHESS!".
"Haha, don't worry guys, by letting President Harris execute him, Trump has just tricked the uniparty into activating his 237 Dimensional Backgammon-Poker-Risk-Meepocalypse trap! Haha, trust the plan guys!"
 
Is it really luck that the biggest idiots in the country committed the fraud? Who forgets to shut off the fucking security cameras before pulling out hidden ballots(GA)? Willfully posted the election results on their own website showing that 1.1 million more mail-in ballots were received than requested(PA). The news showing footage of a police truck carrying 100k+ ballots at 4 AM as if they took Trump's late night speech as their cue to deliver the fraudulent ballots(WI). Then you have Michigan posting their election results where they have 157k absentee ballots with no registered voters. Trump's fighting against rocks with teeth and the only thing saving them is big tech covering for their stupidity.
People who don't know how to rig an election properly. Plus they trusted low IQ subhumans to actually do the rigging. And they have little to no experience rigging. Plus the people in charge of the Democrats are smug assholes.

I guess since the previous GOP nominess for a while were shitty candidates and Democrat turnout was high, they saw no need to rig until 2016 happens and 2020 gave them the perfect storm to use mail in ballots.
 
People who don't know how to rig an election properly. Plus they trusted low IQ subhumans to actually do the rigging. And they have little to no experience rigging. Plus the people in charge of the Democrats are smug assholes.

I guess since the previous GOP nominess for a while were shitty candidates and Democrat turnout was high, they saw no need to rig until 2016 happens and 2020 gave them the perfect storm to use mail in ballots.
I just think they flipped out once they saw Trumps voter base doubled and the most liberal cities went into overdrive with fraud, not caring about if people would realize how dumb it looked. Which is how you get Biden somehow being the most popular presidential elect in history.
 
I just think they flipped out once they saw Trumps voter base doubled and the most liberal cities went into overdrive with fraud, not caring about if people would realize how dumb it looked. Which is how you get Biden somehow being the most popular presidential elect in history.
If this election happened in any other country, it would have been called rigged. The fallout would have been so bad that Uncle Sam would force a new election to be done, like they did in Haiti.

From the voters that I know of his, pretty much apathetic and don't have a bright outlook on the country. They all went back to sleep for most of them.
 
"Haha, don't worry guys, by letting President Harris execute him, Trump has just tricked the uniparty into activating his 237 Dimensional Backgammon-Poker-Risk-Meepocalypse trap! Haha, trust the plan guys!"
"Don't worry, he'll run third party during his life sentence in prison. He'll be just like Eugene Debs, and he'll win a historic landslide. It's all coming together, just trust in the plan, friends."
 
Thank you for your service, obviously there is a great danger that in the future Kamala Harris's Stasi agents will hide this truly magnificent lawsuit that totally could have let Donald Trump win.
 
Which is why they're hoping righties get offed by Coronachan. When they try to be condescending, they're actually hiding their fear.
View attachment 1777970

HR Managers and College Professors Are Paying "Antifa" To Attack Trump Supporters This Saturday​

PayPal, Venmo and CashApp are allowing anarchists to raise money for transportation and riot equipment to attack the Million MAGA March in Washington DC this Saturday, National Justice can report.

Kai Breaux, a gender studies professor at Stony Brook University, collects the money on behalf of the Riot Safety Fund. According to their website, the organization specializes in transporting left-wing paramilitary groups to and from events, while also providing them with bail, food and "safety gear."
Jon Voight is right about leftists. This is about as clean cut good vs. evil as you can get.


This is why we declared independence from you Britbongs over 200 years ago....
EoxGoQGXIAQqDwm.jpg

Screenshot_20201209-201248(1).png

Is t-this fortychess? That seems extradimensional.

"We will save democracy, by destroying it!"

They like calling everybody else Nazis, but boy are they just a set of bitchin' uniforms and a few armbands short of a Nuremberg Rally.
A lot of these people are literally, truly actually literally, who the Nazis were fighting against. They're not fascists, they're not Nazis, call them what they are: communists, Bolsheviks, etc.
 
Thank you for your service, obviously there is a great danger that in the future Kamala Harris's Stasi agents will hide this truly magnificent lawsuit that totally could have let Donald Trump win.
Imagine being salty that someone on Kiwifarms had the audacity to archive something
 
Thank you for your service, obviously there is a great danger that in the future Kamala Harris's Stasi agents will hide this truly magnificent lawsuit that totally could have let Donald Trump win.
I didn't even read your bullshit and your kind will always be the bottom barrel of this world for a long time and will deserve it for backstabbing the ottoman empire. At least the other trolls have something to be proud of, but you, you are worth less than a rigger in Philly. You have no influence of any kind and while you cry about the shithole of Palestine, nobody cares and is willing to take a bullet to die for it. Nobody cares about all those shitholes in the middle east and most of the sane people themselves would rather live in Antarctica than the living hell those places have become.
 
Did we ever get a straight answer on whether, in the event of a state not sending electors at all, the winning candidate still needs 270 electors or just a majority of the actually-sent electors?
Because if MI, WI, GA, and PA are all thrown out and can't send any electors at all. Biden will still lead Trump 244 to 232 (if nothing else changes).
 
One of his sisters was actually given a lobotomy and has been memory holed.
This amuses me since my hard blue mother never forgot and would bring it up every time lobotomies were mentioned. The mental health community (sans "reee muh mental hulth" online activits) probably won't ever forget either.

Edit for spelling & to ask @3119967d0c an honest question: what would you do if pig flew and Trump wins this election?
 
Did we ever get a straight answer on whether, in the event of a state not sending electors at all, the winning candidate still needs 270 electors or just a majority of the actually-sent electors?
Because if MI, WI, GA, and PA are all thrown out and can't send any electors at all. Biden will still lead Trump 244 to 232 (if nothing else changes).
270 period, or contingent election. Jackson had the majority in 1824, and we all know the end to that story.
 
An open letter to the Federal Law Enforcement Officer(s) that monitor this thread

Dear Federal Agent,

With the recent confirmation that you are, indeed, keeping an eye on this thread, I thought that I may as well take a moment to speak to you. I do not mean this as an indictment or accusation against your person, but I would beseech you to hear me out.

To start, I'm curious what you were told when you were assigned to watch over us. Did they tell you we were a haven for Right-Wing extremists? That one mass shooter already came from here, so be on the lookout for another? Did they call us a hive of Neo-Nazis? Or did you simply receive your orders to monitor this thread with no further explanation? Hell, could you even be my or someone else's personal tard wrangler, and you simply stumbled upon SIGSEGV's post by happenstance?

I don't presume that I'm going to get an answer, but that highlights my real concern: I don't know what you and your agency are up to, and that scares me. I distrust authority, for I know that people do the wrong thing all the time, be it out of malice, self-interest, or simple negligence. Instead, all I have to go on is the actions of your agency and the actions of the Federal Government, and must draw my own conclusions from there, and what I see is, in a word: Evil. I see a government that continually attempts to limit our access to firearms, tacking more exceptions onto a right deemed paramount, citing safety and a desire to save lives, heedless of the fact that government have, do, and will continue to kill more than crime will ever accomplish. I see a government that gives itself the power to invade our privacy, monitor our communications, and track our locations, once again, for our own safety. I see a government that tells us to stay at home for two weeks, so that emergency facilities can be set up and the millions of people that are going to die from the second coming of the Spanish Flu can die in proper hospital facilities, and the next thing we know, nine months have gone by and we are being told that we can't have our families over for Thanksgiving or Christmas, lest the millions of deaths finally arrive. I see a government that threatens to not restore my civil rights and liberties unless I submit to mandatory body modification. I see a government that props up monopolies in the universities, media and technology industries, and in return these sectors do the things that the government cannot, controlling the spread of information and ideas into something that supports the government. I see a government that will blatantly violate the Will of the People to ensure that the first man in a century to present a real threat to it is removed.

Perhaps these things came of a deliberate plan, or perhaps they were the end result of tens of thousands of people making millions of decisions, collating into a discernible pattern. I wish to assume the latter, but as the years have gone on, the line between malice and negligence has become increasingly blurry, and decreasingly relevant. I don't say this as an indictment of America, if there is one constant to humanity, it is that given enough time, all forms of governance will trend towards tyrrany. I do say this as an indictment of the Federal and State governments, who continue seeking to oppress us, ostensibly for our own good, to preserve our lives at the expense of all that makes life worth living.

Maybe you've already moved on, content that I'm just another far-right anarchist nutjob. If not, then I sincerely thank you. Like you, I once took an oath of alliegence unto the Constitution, to defend it against enemies both foreign and domestic. Perhaps that was a red flag for you, perhaps I am one of those oathkeeper psychos. But I ask you in return, do you believe that the general path of our government is one that treats the Constitution as a guide to be followed, or as an obstacle to be overcome? When a judge makes an interpretation of the Second Amendment so far removed from both its text and intent that is may as well be a rewrite, is that following the Constitution, or replacing it? When a law enforcement officer enforces that ruling, is that following the Constitution, or ignoring it? Here is my stance: if a civil conflict should erupt between the Federal Government and a faction that seeks to restore the sovereignty of the Constitution without the layers upon layers of judicial activism, bureaucratic bullshit and flagrantly unconstitutional laws, I intend to throw in my lot with the latter. Have I just gone too far? Is Null going to wake up to another phone call about one of his members acting up? Or does that not need to be done because your agency already knows who I am? I have been very lax in my cybersecurity over the years, it would not be hard to figure out who I am. Hell, for all I know, there is already a bug on my computer, reporting this as I type it. What is to stop the FBI, CIA, NSA or DHS from creating a spyware program and ensuring that the antivirus programs make an exception for it? Do you have the faith in your peers and superiors to have the moral grounding to say "no, this is too far, security is not worth this"? Am I already on a threat list somewhere? Will I get a knock on the door the day shit kicks off, or will I be shot in my bed like Duncan Lemp, a tragic victim of a negligent discharge? I don't know, and that scares me. Let me put it this way: you don't get the option to assume that somebody is joking, if SIGSEGV had truly been serious about what he said, and you neglected to report it on the grounds that it was clearly a joke, what would have happened would have been, at least in part, your fault. Similarly, it would be negligent for me to assume that power is not being used; if your agency can do a thing, then why would it not? You may say "because it's wrong", but I would counter that you, as a law enforcement officer, should know better than most that relying on people to act in a just manner is a fool's errand.

I suppose that I will close with this: where is the point where you will draw the line? What will it take to make you say "no, this is too far, security is not worth this"?

I don't know, and that scares me.

Sincerely,

A Patriot

Great post, but I'd imagine the feds they have monitoring the Kiwi Farms of all places are the speds of the Feds.

Imagine getting your shiny Fed job you've always dreamed of, your buddy is doing cool covert shit against China or something and then they hand you your assignment; monitoring a hive of shitposters on a forum created to laugh at retards on the internet.

If Mr. Fed went to Thanksgiving this year, you can bet he answered any questions about his job with a half hearted 'If I told you I'd have to kill you.' getting a dry laugh from the folks as he died just a little more inside.
 
Did we ever get a straight answer on whether, in the event of a state not sending electors at all, the winning candidate still needs 270 electors or just a majority of the actually-sent electors?
Because if MI, WI, GA, and PA are all thrown out and can't send any electors at all. Biden will still lead Trump 244 to 232 (if nothing else changes).
As written in the twelfth amendment, it must be an absolute majority of the electoral college, not a simple majority, otherwise it goes to a contingent election. There is historical precedence for this in 1824, where 131 electoral votes were needed to win, yet a contingent election was required because while Andrew Jackson had the most electoral votes out of the candidates, he only had 99.

The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back