2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if this is how the four shit states will submit their briefs since they don't have a defense beyond laches.

"Tom, I'm standing outside the Supreme Court as we wait for word from the defendants and, what's this, four little girls of mixed race are walking up the steps with papers in hand. They must be presenting the briefs for the courageous states of GA, PA, WI & MI! Why, their lesbian parents are also with them! Stunning and brave, Tom, whoever would try and take away the results of this election deserve to be sent to Guantanamo Bay."

Wouldn't put it past clown world. The dems know they own a plantation, and the stupid fucks keep falling on hand and knee to serve them.
 
Rudy apparently has more video evidence of shennigans in Georgia.

Also fucking round of appaluse for Rudy shrugging off COVID and getting right back on the saddle.
Oh, more nothing-burgers, huh? You better hope the videos are in 4k or I'm gonna be dispooting them ;)
If the videos show no inter-dimensional fraud, will you bend over backwards and say I (an awesome person) was right and that *you* (a pathetic person) were wrong?
 
I don't want to derail the thread, so forgive me following schizoposting, but something is really bothering me.
So I saw on /pol/ yesterday this outlandish idea, that Joe Biden 2020 is not the same person as the previous Joe Biden.

It sounded incredibly stupid to me, but then I started researching the pictures. They don't look the same indeed, and I don't think it can be explained by rapid aging, facelift or whatever.

What do you think about it? The older Biden looked meaner and more intelligent at the same time. The new one has a totally different vibe. They look similar, and frankly I wouldn't be surprised that they could get away with it, because nobody ever paid attention to Biden before elections circus, who is going to look at some old Boomer face, and now he also wears mask, so it's harder to tell.

Here are the comparison pictures:
 

Attachments

  • 1607583564470.png
    1607583564470.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 81
  • 1607570935008.jpg
    1607570935008.jpg
    111.5 KB · Views: 80
Oh, more nothing-burgers, huh? You better hope the videos are in 4k or I'm gonna be dispooting them ;)
If the videos show no inter-dimensional fraud, will you bend over backwards and say I (an awesome person) was right and that *you* (a pathetic person) were wrong?

*Sweats nervously knowing Rudy recorded the video on his nephew's PS Vita*
 
I don't want to derail the thread, so forgive me following schizoposting, but something is really bothering me.
So I saw on /pol/ yesterday this outlandish idea, that Joe Biden 2020 is not the same person as the previous Joe Biden.

It sounded incredibly stupid to me, but then I started researching the pictures. They don't look the same indeed, and I don't think it can be explained by rapid aging, facelift or whatever.

What do you think about it? The older Biden looked meaner and more intelligent at the same time. The new one has a totally different vibe. They look similar, and frankly I wouldn't be surprised that they could get away with it, because nobody ever paid attention to Biden before elections circus, who is going to look at some old Boomer face, and now he also wears mask, so it's harder to tell.

Here are the comparison pictures:
Why would the democrats replace a competent deep state Biden with the drooling old man we see now? Plastic surgery can explain this away.
 
I don't want to derail the thread, so forgive me following schizoposting, but something is really bothering me.
So I saw on /pol/ yesterday this outlandish idea, that Joe Biden 2020 is not the same person as the previous Joe Biden.

It sounded incredibly stupid to me, but then I started researching the pictures. They don't look the same indeed, and I don't think it can be explained by rapid aging, facelift or whatever.

What do you think about it? The older Biden looked meaner and more intelligent at the same time. The new one has a totally different vibe. They look similar, and frankly I wouldn't be surprised that they could get away with it, because nobody ever paid attention to Biden before elections circus, who is going to look at some old Boomer face, and now he also wears mask, so it's harder to tell.

Here are the comparison pictures:
It's the same person but he was definitely meaner and more intelligent back when Clarence Thomas was confirmed or when he passed his 1994 crime bill. Hasn't he had brain surgery though? Also, he's had a lot of plastic surgery. So it's no wonder he looks and acts very different. He's a human Ship of Theseus.
 
I don't want to derail the thread, so forgive me following schizoposting, but something is really bothering me.
So I saw on /pol/ yesterday this outlandish idea, that Joe Biden 2020 is not the same person as the previous Joe Biden.

It sounded incredibly stupid to me, but then I started researching the pictures. They don't look the same indeed, and I don't think it can be explained by rapid aging, facelift or whatever.

What do you think about it? The older Biden looked meaner and more intelligent at the same time. The new one has a totally different vibe. They look similar, and frankly I wouldn't be surprised that they could get away with it, because nobody ever paid attention to Biden before elections circus, who is going to look at some old Boomer face, and now he also wears mask, so it's harder to tell.

Here are the comparison pictures:
Funny thing is that as you get older, your ears and nose can continue to develop. Ronald Reagan's ears (and nose) changed in a similar way:
1607611576426.png
 

Attachments

  • 1607611534706.png
    1607611534706.png
    186.5 KB · Views: 72
My favorite are these two replies.

View attachment 1778738

The projection is a goldmine
go to any gun range, it's doubtful that any of them can run much.

of course, those gun guys have the advantage of knowing the land, can blend in with the local populace who won't be friendly to outside military intrusion and are cable of enough to sabotage things (and if they don't they can just "hold my beer" things). if a civil war breaks out it will be 30% bosina-serbia, chechnya-russia, 70% iraq, afghanistan. i have no idea what minorities are going to do, i don't think they'll join the us army because fuck amerikkka and i doubt they'll fight against the us military because reperations.
 
Has this been posted yet?
https://twitter.com/MIAttyGen/status/1336412439986966535/photo/1
Capture.PNG

EovjgyzXMAYc7cw.jpg

>their votes were counted - in some cases multiple times
How do you fuck up this bad? Don't they get that's the exactly the problem?

I don't want to derail the thread, so forgive me following schizoposting, but something is really bothering me.
So I saw on /pol/ yesterday this outlandish idea, that Joe Biden 2020 is not the same person as the previous Joe Biden.

It sounded incredibly stupid to me, but then I started researching the pictures. They don't look the same indeed, and I don't think it can be explained by rapid aging, facelift or whatever.

What do you think about it? The older Biden looked meaner and more intelligent at the same time. The new one has a totally different vibe. They look similar, and frankly I wouldn't be surprised that they could get away with it, because nobody ever paid attention to Biden before elections circus, who is going to look at some old Boomer face, and now he also wears mask, so it's harder to tell.

Here are the comparison pictures:
Good question. According to /pol/ the original died, and they didn't have another swamp creature handy to replace him, so instead they got the body double.
You sir have given me a good laugh
It's the same person but he was definitely meaner and more intelligent back when Clarence Thomas was confirmed or when he passed his 1994 crime bill. Hasn't he had brain surgery though? Also, he's had a lot of plastic surgery. So it's no wonder he looks and acts very different. He's a human Ship of Theseus.
He had two brain aneurysms in 1988. This fact doesn't get mentioned a lot for obvious reasons
To be fair to Joe, I think he meant it as a term of praise or affection, like "you magnificent bastards".

Don't take people out of context. We're not journoswine.
He called them 'dumb bastards'. The quote was most certainly not out of context.
 
Has this been posted yet?
https://twitter.com/MIAttyGen/status/1336412439986966535/photo/1
View attachment 1778768
View attachment 1778767
>their votes were counted - in some cases multiple times
How do you fuck up this bad? Don't they get that's the exactly the problem?
They aren’t even hiding it at this point. Holy fuck, could this be used against them in SCOTUS?
I think they mean there were multiple recounts of the votes. But yeah, this is poorly worded.
 
>their votes were counted - in some cases multiple times
How do you fuck up this bad? Don't they get that's the exactly the problem?
They are referencing recounts. The wording, admittedly, seems tailor-crafted to antagonize people who insist that votes have been re-used (despite said recounts).
They aren’t even hiding it at this point. Holy fuck, could this be used against them in SCOTUS?
hahahahaha jfc come on people if you're not actually desperate don't say dumb shit like this
 
The idea that Trump's lawsuits were irrelevant, and Texas's lawsuit was independent are absurd. Even absent of the cringe meme of 4D chess, I don't think you have one with out the other.

The Republicans initially were ready to sit back and take the L like good little cucks. Something changed in the second week after the election. Trump's biggest success probably was creating the political consequence of letting him lose with out a fight.

The next step was to try and convince the State Legislatures to do something with the evidence. Lawsuits are typically slow, and the deadlines of the election require expedient results. If it were one State needed to effect the result we probably would of seen a Trump lawsuit be more prominent. Much easier would be for a State of the same political party to say "hey, something about this is fucked, we won't be able to sort it out in time, so we're just not going to send our electors". I personally thought this was the most likely positive outcome and was personally black pilled and took a break from posting after all the State Legislatures made it clear they were going to do everything in their power to not make a decision on this.

Texas's lawsuit is cleaner as it's a stronger party in contesting an election than an individual. Original Jurisdiction is a lot easier path, it doesn't require traveling through the state or circuit courts, and it allows new evidence to be submitted. However, I think it unlikely to exist with out Trump fighting tooth and nail the last month.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back