Dr J
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2020
We know what they meant. It was a Freudian slipI think they mean there were multiple recounts of the votes. But yeah, this is poorly worded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We know what they meant. It was a Freudian slipI think they mean there were multiple recounts of the votes. But yeah, this is poorly worded.
Yeah, I am sure that they'd fuck that up in a press release. Come on now...We know what they meant. It was a Freudian slip
you wanna know the really freaky thing? nu-biden looks closer to the rothschilds than he does to old biden in terms of appearance.I don't want to derail the thread, so forgive me following schizoposting, but something is really bothering me.
So I saw on /pol/ yesterday this outlandish idea, that Joe Biden 2020 is not the same person as the previous Joe Biden.
It sounded incredibly stupid to me, but then I started researching the pictures. They don't look the same indeed, and I don't think it can be explained by rapid aging, facelift or whatever.
What do you think about it? The older Biden looked meaner and more intelligent at the same time. The new one has a totally different vibe. They look similar, and frankly I wouldn't be surprised that they could get away with it, because nobody ever paid attention to Biden before elections circus, who is going to look at some old Boomer face, and now he also wears mask, so it's harder to tell.
Here are the comparison pictures:
>gu-guys wait I'm still important please listen to me we just needed more time to prepare the Kraken!Speaking of which.
View attachment 1778715
Rudy apparently has more video evidence of shennigans in Georgia.
Also fucking round of appaluse for Rudy shrugging off COVID and getting right back on the saddle.
Trump lost. Less people voted for him than voted for Biden in enough states that Biden will win a majority of the Electoral College. If there was fraud then someone would have been able to provide evidence sufficient to convince any court. Even the Texas case doesn't allege any specific fraud, just the statement that mail-in ballots are more prone to fraud.If they were counting the votes, that would be one thing. They're not. They're counting the votes and the fake votes for Biden. They literally stopped the count and then tossed in enough votes until Biden won in 4 different swing states. They literally have them on film doing this. And rather than object to this, multiple GOPe senators are demanding we lose with grace and dignity and pray the DNC doesn't cheat so obviously next time.
My favorite is when people who use "breeder" as an insult also use the term "incel".
What people forget about the original Civil War was that much of the Confederate officer and NCO ranks were US Army, a good number of them veterans of the Mexican-American War.go to any gun range, it's doubtful that any of them can run much.
of course, those gun guys have the advantage of knowing the land, can blend in with the local populace who won't be friendly to outside military intrusion and are cable of enough to sabotage things (and if they don't they can just "hold my beer" things). if a civil war breaks out it will be 30% bosina-serbia, chechnya-russia, 70% iraq, afghanistan. i have no idea what minorities are going to do, i don't think they'll join the us army because fuck amerikkka and i doubt they'll fight against the us military because reperations.
They didn't though. That's the whole point. The mail-in process was subject to a lot less scrutiny than the in-person votes which is why the in-person votes are the only ones that can be considered to be genuinesignature matches happened at the beginning.
Because either decision is chaos.So I do have to ask one thing: If everyone agrees, on both sides, that the supreme court giving anything to Texas here is going to lead to unprecedented chaos, then why would they do that? Why wouldn't they just tell people to fix their shit for 2024 and then for everyone to lol calm down?
Because it's going to lead to unprecedented chaos no matter what they do.So I do have to ask one thing: If everyone agrees, on both sides, that the supreme court giving anything to Texas here is going to lead to unprecedented chaos, then why would they do that? Why wouldn't they just tell people to fix their shit for 2024 and then for everyone to lol calm down?
lol no, Conservatives will just seethe then cope that, "at least the Supreme Court fixed our election for 2024, here's how Trump can win that year guys!"Because either decision is chaos.
Simple, SCOTUS doesn't really have that as an option. They can't say "fix the process" without admitting that the process was fucked, meaning they'd have to give something to Texas. Its a Catch-22.So I do have to ask one thing: If everyone agrees, on both sides, that the supreme court giving anything to Texas here is going to lead to unprecedented chaos, then why would they do that? Why wouldn't they just tell people to fix their shit for 2024 and then for everyone to lol calm down?
While I have no problem gambling (I do sports betting myself), trusting an offshore site with that kind of dough is pretty ballsy. Even more established companies like Bodog pull shit to avoid cashing out, so be really careful with that stuff.Around $90k including some truly degenerate lotto tickets, ie Trump winning genuine blue states, the popular vote, landslide electoral votes etc
Currently about $75k still at play
Also around $10k on a Republican Senate majority
Given the horrifying levels of third world fuckery though I would gladly forfeit all of it if it meant BTFO'ing this fraud and the aparatus behind it.
even going by retard atheist logic this is stupid.Trump lost. Less people voted for him than voted for Biden in enough states that Biden will win a majority of the Electoral College. If there was fraud then someone would have been able to provide evidence sufficient to convince any court. Even the Texas case doesn't allege any specific fraud, just the statement that mail-in ballots are more prone to fraud.
You don't understand that by 'fixing' it they're tacitly admitting that it's brokenlol no, Conservatives will just seethe then cope that, "at least the Supreme Court fixed our election for 2024, here's how Trump can win that year guys!"
Even when talking shit they rely on somebody else to make good on their threats.
So I do have to ask one thing: If everyone agrees, on both sides, that the supreme court giving anything to Texas here is going to lead to unprecedented chaos, then why would they do that? Why wouldn't they just tell people to fix their shit for 2024 and then for everyone to lol calm down?