right, i haven't seen the whole thing because the state hasnt shown the whole thing. which means you dont have anything to prove me wrong either.
the video the state alleges is evidence that clears them of wrong doing doesnt clear them. you couldn't take those state farm clips out and arrange them in such a way to fashion a narrative that vindicates the state. thats conjecture.
all you have left is the statements made by the official which are anecdotal. since that doesnt prove anything you're now hiding behind "the state has the whole thing but you have to petition them for it".
in otherwords, you dont have the evidence to prove "this election was secure and legit" to be true
You could have FOIA'd the whole footage - you've failed the Don.
See, my argument? I'm not making it as matter of fact. I'm looking at the footage, and I'm saying, "What is this?" The GA officials provided an explanation. You have yet to offer a rebuttal to their explanation. Not just you, but the legal people, who would already have had access to the entire footage, have not offered a rebuttal.
You are literally asking me to prove a negative. You assert that the evidence was fraudulent. Officials testify and recount that it was not, and you provide this video evidence - which they provide explanation for. Got it? At this stage, here's what you have to do, because the
burden of proof has been shifted back to you. This is an important concept.
You have to show evidence that the election officials are lying or misrepresenting the facts in their case. You have yet to demonstrate that the statement "the election was secure and legit" is false, because you've buckled and crumbled under every request to prove it.
Literally the most you have is "but isn't it POSSIBLE that it was fraudulent? Couldn't it be TRUE that lots of votes were fraudulent? On the basis of this POSSIBILITY, discount 80 million votes."
Video evidence? Why would people be mic'd up. I don't know what world you live in but in mine CCTV doesn't record sound. All we see is people leaving together as a group and that group being identified as observers where less than a few minutes later ballots are being pulled from under a table in nonstandard packaging and are being processed. The news reported the observers as being instructed to leave and the observers themselves support that assertion. It is clear that counting was still continuing as this county would go onto report a massive drop massively favouring biden and closing near 200k in his favour.
Now you election officials claiming differently, but these are some of the same election officials who either the news negligently misreported or are lying to protect electoral impropriety.
Here's a question for you Jack, if the observers left by their own accord by a mistaken belief, that counting had stopped once the envelope openers had left, did the election officials not interrupt this process by informing the observers what was going on?
...uh. Where did I say it was surveillance? It was a stream set up by the election committee. I believe it's been called that in all instances.
Nigger do you have all of the footage? All of the testimony is this: the counters are told to leave, and the observers leave with them. Some news outlets report that the observers were also told to leave early-on, and the observers themselves state that -- yet there is no cell phone footage or indeed even this footage demonstrating that the
observers were told to leave. Meaning that they assumed they were told to leave. The officials all claim that they did not tell the observers to leave, and the observers just left with the other group because
they saw people leaving. Again, this ones' really easy to disprove - cell phone footage. Stream footage. Why didn't the legal team do this
The assertion that there was a massive jump makes complete fucking sense - the ballots that were going into the bins weren't being scanned into the count. Once they were scanned into the count, the number inflated. IE throughout the ENTIRE DAY that those ballots were being opened from envelopes, they were not being added to the Biden count. When they were scanned after the people opening the ballots left, the number went up.
The election officials are under no legal obligation to inform the poll workers that they could stand and watch some people scan in the ballots. I welcome you to find the legislation that suggests that the election officials will get in trouble for not informing a bunch of people leaving that they aren't required to leave. About all the more that they had to not do was
tell the observers to leave. And there's no evidence beyond a few testimonies that haven't been presented in an actual court of law that such a thing was ordered of them -- and hell, might even be some evidence that it -was- just the ballot openers told to leave that has been presented which is similarly not available to the public outside of making some FOIA requests.
"prove the election wasn't fraudulent" is not how this works. That's like proving a negative. The -implicit assumption- in all legal contexts is that it isn't fraudulent, and the burden of proof falls onto you to prove it is fraudulent. If your arguments fart out the instant that someone makes a rebuttal, you've got fuckall.
