Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[BlancoMailo]

I'm fucking. Wow. I'd love to see the look on the judges face when he reads this part.

View attachment 1779004

I don't recall Null ever mentioning being "held up at knifepoint"

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I don't recall Null ever mentioning being "held up at knifepoint"

IIRC someone showed up to his house with a knife once

 

[White Baby]

IIRC someone showed up to his house with a knife once

It was one of the former Trans Lifeline founders, who may I also add scammed his own organization out of close to 300k before it was forcibly taken away from him.

 

[LoverofPi]

Motion to strike. It's long and consists of her whining about Moon's lawyer, braging about her "increadible" lawsuit history, whining about Patriarchy, and making incoherant and stupid arguments.

Btw, Mel, Park Corp does not apply. Moon did give a valid explanation as to why he did not receive his mail, that being increadibly poor service.

It also doesn't apply, because in that case mail was received, was admited to being received, and only after that lost. It's different for Null

I would have expected even basic reading of the caselaw cited

I would like to thank Mel for providing us with readily accessed evidence of her obsession with status and success written by her own hand.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

The court granted me leave. Look back in the documents. It was in an Order. End of October-ish.




Since his jurisdiction defense is in his Motion to Dismiss, I will answer that second


Minimizing

Gaslighting.

 

[BlancoMailo]

IIRC someone showed up to his house with a knife once

It was one of the former Trans Lifeline founders, who may I also add scammed his own organization out of close to 300k before it was forcibly taken away from him.

Ah, didn't remember that they brought a knife, though I remember him saying he didn't answer the door, so not exactly 'held at knifepoint''.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I would like to thank Mel for providing us with readily accessed evidence of her obsession with status and success written by her own hand.

Filing a lawsuit is not "obsession". That's called asserting your rights to self respect.

You're so unbelievably manipulative. But then again, you're an atheist, so I don't expect anything else from you. That's why I never married an atheist.

1. How is that relevant?
2. "May be alleged" not "must be"

Okay, so you dodged one of my questions, and partially answered another.

You said that I didn't read the case law I cited. That was a vague statement. I clearly addressed Payne in my Motion to Strike. So why should I answer a question that is visibly in my Motion?

Guess we won't be starving after all. What a surprise. No one could have predicted this. Wow.

I'm discussing the lawsuit. Eat bones you evil bitch

 

[AnOminous]

Filing a lawsuit is not "obsession". That's called asserting your rights to self respect.

Filing a half-dozen losing lawsuits after being told you're crazy and you're wrong is called being an utter nutjob.

Aren't you being evicted? Shouldn't you be taking care of your tard babies instead of pursuing incredibly dumb lolsuits? Your kids will be in foster care with a nut like you taking "care" of them.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Filing a half-dozen losing lawsuits after being told you're crazy and you're wrong is called being an utter nutjob.

The lawyer already corrected you on this issue. At least he had enough brains to figure out that there have only been 2 lawsuits.

Aren't you being evicted? Shouldn't you be taking care of your tard babies instead of pursuing incredibly dumb lolsuits? Your kids will be in foster care with a nut like you taking "care" of them.

This is a series of incoherent random thoughts squished together side by side. Do you have schizophrenia?

Want to try that one again? Your third sentence doesn't make any sense.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Filing a lawsuit is not "obsession". That's called asserting your rights to self respect.

Filling a motion of which about 2/3 is whining about Patriarchy, Null's Male priviledge, how the whole world is against you, etc, is an obsession.

You said that I didn't read the case law I cited.

And you didn't. You provided Park Corp v Lexington as basis as to why Null's complaint about invalid service is invalid. However, with some reading of said caselaw, your argument falls apart as I have noted here.
I have even provided citacion from your own citacion that shows just how badly you misrepresented the allegeded similarities between the mail incidents.

I'm discussing the lawsuit. Eat bones you evil bitch

Mel: 4 times in 30 mins "I AM LEAVING."

Mel now: "Well, I need to discuss the lawsuit, so I must be here"

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Filling a motion of which about 2/3 is whining about Patriarchy, Null's Male priviledge, how the whole world is against you, etc, is an obsession.

I never said that the whole world is against me, I described social injustices and oppression. That's called social justice on paper, not "obsession" and "whining".

Too big a thought for ya, eh?

Mel: 4 times in 30 mins "I AM LEAVING."

Mel now: "Well, I need to discuss the lawsuit, so I must be here"

Read it again, it clearly says "I came to discuss the lawsuit"

And you didn't. You provided Park Corp v Lexington as basis as to why Null's complaint about invalid service is invalid. However, with some reading of said caselaw, your argument falls apart as I have noted here.
I have even provided citacion from your own citacion that shows just how badly you misrepresented the allegeded similarities between the mail incidents.

Go back and read the Motion to Strike. You missed the other case law. You are too eager to respond without first having read.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I'm discussing the lawsuit. Eat bones you evil bitch

You must leave a lot of meat on your bones then. I'd expect as much from the carcass of a fat hog.

 

[Spergichu]

If you're only here to discuss your lolsuit, why are you posting in this thread and not the one dedicated to your latest suit pinned at the top of the page?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I never said that the whole world is against me, I described social injustices and oppression. That's called social justice on paper, not "obsession" and "whining".

Too big a thought for ya, eh?

That's called whining on a motion. I think everyone here would agree with me on that

Read it again, it clearly says "I came to discuss the lawsuit"

You clearly missed the point. I was mocking the fact that you can't stay away.

Go back and read the Motion to Strike. You missed the other case law. You are too eager to respond without first having read.

You don't seem to be able to refute the fact that you misrepresented (horribly) to the court the situation in Park Corps v Lexington though. That doesn't look good, Mel.

The follow up paragraph does not apply for the same reasons Park Corps doesn't. Null did provide a valid explanation. (Well, I suppose it does apply in the sense that it says valid reasoning is needed, which Null has given)

 

[AnOminous]

Want to try that one again? Your third sentence doesn't make any sense.

None of your pregnancies made any sense. Instead of choosing actual fathers you just got jizzed up by whatever inbred retard was available, like a bitch in heat. You are a sad excuse for a human.

 

[LoverofPi]

Minimizing

That's not what minimizing is, Mel. But by all means, continue to misuse terminology you do not understand.

Filing a lawsuit is not "obsession". That's called asserting your rights to self respect.

I never said filing a lawsuit was an obsession. I SAID you had provided us an example, made by your own hand, that handily demonstrates your obsession with status. Which you did. As Useful Mistake noted, your motion was fixated on your status, the assumed status of Null and council, your previous legal failings, why those "don't count" and listing off what you consider to be your legal successes, which are entirely irrelevant to the matter at hand.

You're so unbelievably manipulative. But then again, you're an atheist, so I don't expect anything else from you. That's why I never married an atheist.

On behalf of all Atheists and in my capacity as a pope, we don't want you, Mel.
Not that what I said was manipulative. I was genuinely thanking you for providing us evidence of your bevy of NPD traits. But then again I shouldn't expect you to understand that, what with your poor reading comprehenion. Sorry, I know you have problems with big words I meant "with your no read the good."

You said that I didn't read the case law I cited. That was a vague statement. I clearly addressed Payne in my Motion to Strike. So why should I answer a question that is visibly in my Motion?

Because you didn't understand the caselaw you cited. Obviously.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

None of your pregnancies made any sense. Instead of choosing actual fathers you just got jizzed up by whatever inbred retard was available, like a bitch in heat. You are a sad excuse for a human.

You don't know what men I turned down and what men I accepted over the years. I turned down plenty of men who told me that a man is "head of the house", that's for sure.

My pregnancies don't make sense to your brain because you are a patriarchal sexist. I bet you wouldn't be saying the same thing about Jacob who had 13 children from 4 different women? Oh, so Jacob is a "hero" but myself Tamar is a "slut" and "whore" for acting the same way? So why is OK for men to behave that way, but not women?

OOOH, that's because Patriarchy is male narcissism full of male entitlements, now isn't it.

You can take your Patriarchy and shove it up your ass. Because it won't be long before righteous women finish throwing off male oppression all around the world. Your Patriarchal World Order is dying. You're suffering a narcissistic injury by observing a woman like me who has matriarchal elements in her family. You men here are showing narcissistic rage because women like me threaten your Patriarchal World Order. You're bed fellows with the devil. Keep raging at me, I'm not blind to what is going on here.

I don't care if you like the way my children came into the world or not, my children -- all 6 of them -- are BLESSINGS

You don't seem to be able to refute the fact that you misrepresented (horribly) to the court the situation in Park Corps v Lexington though. That doesn't look good, Mel.

The follow up paragraph does not apply for the same reasons Park Corps doesn't. Null did provide a valid explanation. (Well, I suppose it does apply in the sense that it says valid reasoning is needed, which Null has given)

I didn't misrepresent anything. Case law was cited with relevant quotes. It's really simple. Moon had no explanation for how he lost his mail.

If you're only here to discuss your lolsuit, why are you posting in this thread and not the one dedicated to your latest suit pinned at the top of the page?

Because they are speaking about me in third person there. Not to me directly. I'd rather keep it tidy and just respond here.

demonstrates your obsession with status.

That's not what "obsession with status" is. "Obsession with status" is people who are pre-occupied with being famous and looking big and important.

That's not what minimizing is, Mel. But by all means, continue to misuse terminology you do not understand.

That is exactly what minimizing is. "People you calling you out" is an attempt to re-frame what is happening here to look like something smaller and different than what it actually is: ABUSE

 

[White Baby]

Oh, so Jacob is a "hero" but myself Tamar is a "slut" and "whore" for acting the same way? So why is OK for men to behave that way, but not women?

Jacob took care of his wives and treated them as such according to the rules of his religion, which was drastically different than the corruption you follow. You have moved from man to man, discarding each like an empty pringles can when they displease you. It would be equally as despicable if you were a man going from woman to woman.

 

[SargonF00t]

You don't know what men I turned down and what men I accepted over the years. I turned down plenty of men who told me that a man is "head of the house", that's for sure.

My pregnancies don't make sense to your brain because you are a patriarchal sexist. I bet you wouldn't be saying the same thing about Jacob who had 13 children from 4 different women? Oh, so Jacob is a "hero" but myself Tamar is a "slut" and "whore" for acting the same way? So why is OK for men to behave that way, but not women?

OOOH, that's because Patriarchy is male narcissism full of male entitlements, now isn't it.

You can take your Patriarchy and shove it up your ass. Because it won't be long before righteous women finish throwing off male oppression all around the world. Your Patriarchal World Order is dying. You're suffering a narcissistic injury by observing a woman like me who has matriarchal elements in her family. You men here are showing narcissistic rage because women like me threaten your Patriarchal World Order. You're bed fellows with the devil. Keep raging at me, I'm not blind to what is going on here.

Have you heard of Islam?

There is a much greater likelihood of it taking over the world, than women "throwing off male oppression".

 

[Toasty]

I don't care if you like the way my children came into the world or not, my children -- all 6 of them -- are PAYCHECKS $$