- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
Yes, but Saint was claiming something else.
Data: Information; especially in a scientific or computational context.
You refuse all science that came about after 1960, thus you refuse all new data. Additionally, we can argue science is the root of all information, especially on the subjects you broach, thus making all information an offshoot of science. Furthermore, if we really want to dive down the rabbit hole, then these two topics are a spectacular collection of evidence that you dismiss any information that contradicts your dogma, most of which comes after 1960.
Also, I did later clarify that this obviously wouldn't apply to books on things that would have no political bearing, like electronics.
So you moved the goal posts.
So name a single example.
Of all the people you could ask this of, you chose 4Macie? Really?
You make wild claims like these all the time, and all you're doing is looking like a nut you are.
Irony.