Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I honestly don't get the whole non-binary thing. It's like they keep changing the rules depending on the person.
When you think about it non-binary has replaced the queer label. I remember when queer was the label anyone gay or transgender wanted to present themselves as special, more unique than just liking the same sex or cross dressing.
 
Screen-Shot-2020-04-08-at-1.05.24-PM-775x578.png
The optimal level of crime in cities is not zero.

If you don't have drunk people doing stupid things or the occasional drug dealer slinging contraband, you probably live somewhere very boring. If you don't have teenagers breaking stuff and tagging walls, you probably priced out all the families.

If you don't have ethnic mafias harassing each other, your city probably doesn't attract a healthy diversity of immigrants. If you don't have ethnic mafias at all, you've probably atomized everybody in dangerous ways.

Most importantly, if you have no visible crime whatsoever, you probably live in an authoritarian police state with very little cultural dynamism and a criminal class directly integrated with the security services.

You cannot restrict human behavior to inflexible social norms all the time, and trying to do so is exactly the kind of high-modernist imposition that did enormous damage to so many people who lived through the 20th century. Life is messy, cities should be messy too.
 
View attachment 1780638
On the good side, the odds of this passing in Texas at any fucking point in history are less than zero. Bitch just painted a target on her back to accomplish nothing.
 
View attachment 1780638
The article reads like something from the Onion before the Onion turned to shit. She should have gotten into talking about home invasions involving rape for maximum points.

"Look, ladies, they just want to coom. It's your responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. You should try to flee, but if that doesn't work, it's not fair to the man to die. He probably needs that orgasm more than you do."
 
Imagine having such imbecilic arguments, and on top of that, such bizarre speech codes, that after delivering a completely idiotic argument and being told "lol no," your only retort is to call someone a "wilting head of lettuce." In what world is that a cutting insult?

Hers was probably the only threat they could print, since it lacked the rape-you-to-death-with-my-feminine-penis content found in the rest.
 
Last edited:
In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state’s “castle doctrine.” This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say…

“I’m not saying that stealing is okay,” Meza explained. “All I’m saying is that it doesn’t warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed.” Meza was quick to reassure that her bill “would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves.

Under the new law the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner.”

“In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does,” Meza reasoned. “The homeowner’s insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better.”
Those quotes in the article are fake. Aparently they come from a satire post by some guy named John Semmens.

You have to look up the source when the info is that juicy.
 
In the same way, i've seen lately that sometimes female samurai are brought up every now and then to say that japan is based and that weebs are just deluded.
They were very few female samurai and they only became soldiers because, usually, their husband died and they had to take up the responsabilities of their husband as a leader of their clan until they got married again.

I get they want some kickass female warriors, but if they want some that are historically accurate, just look at the amazons. But i guess they are too white for their taste.
Amazons are mythical. They were mentioned by Greek historians but historians back then tended to blend history, myth and religion together and it's often hard to untangle them.

Edit: the japanese women going to war is undoubtedly bullshit too. Samurai primarily fought with bow and arrow on horseback. You have to train most of your life to be good at something like that.
 
Last edited:
Amazons are mythical. They were mentioned by Greek historians but historians back then tended to blend history, myth and religion together and it's often hard to untangle them.
You got a point. I understand women want to feel empowered that women throughout history have contributed just as much as men done during times at war. And to be blunt they're right at times. However, it has more to do with women who were usually guerrillas rather than soldiers; enlisted women were rare, and even today is faced with controversy, even in developed countries.
 
I found this online and felt it was too good not to share here.

TL/DR; Asian SJW bitch gets butthurt when she goes to her son's kindergarten parent-teacher conference and the white teacher doesn't ask questions about the child's home life, thus depriving SJW mom of sperging about how she doesn't teach her son about respecting others' personal space because muh culture and shit.

 
You got a point. I understand women want to feel empowered that women throughout history have contributed just as much as men done during times at war. And to be blunt they're right at times. However, it has more to do with women who were usually guerrillas rather than soldiers; enlisted women were rare, and even today is faced with controversy, even in developed countries.

If you're talking about contributing to war by actually killing people you're right (I've heard a bit about female guerillas in Central and South America and read some books about women working with the Viet Cong, quite a few Soviet women took up guns as well). What people don't talk about as much is that women were typically providers of medical care for the war injured, a lot of nurses had ranks and served under fire. Might not exactly fit the "warrior woman" aesthetic but it was honorable and necessary work.

If a feminist SJW is being a sperg just say women should have to sign up for the draft, that never fails to be hilarious.
 
If you're talking about contributing to war by actually killing people you're right (I've heard a bit about female guerillas in Central and South America and read some books about women working with the Viet Cong, quite a few Soviet women took up guns as well). What people don't talk about as much is that women were typically providers of medical care for the war injured, a lot of nurses had ranks and served under fire. Might not exactly fit the "warrior woman" aesthetic but it was honorable and necessary work.

If a feminist SJW is being a sperg just say women should have to sign up for the draft, that never fails to be hilarious.
ask them about the stats the at my gathered or why they don't volentier more for service.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™
Back