- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
View attachment 1781709
Yep it's there. Are they trying to get rid of Joe early or do they feel the ship is sinking?
Tucker says it's because they preparing the ground for Biden to resign so Kamala takes over.
The other possibility is they are playing the optics game and pretending to be un-biased hoping that it will get people to trust them again, and if they succeed people are dumb enough that it might just work. Something something attention span of gold fish these days.
Why not all three?
If Trump gets to win via SCOTUS, they've got the cover story for the MSM to throw Biden under the bus and absolve Kamala and the DNC of any wrongdoing.
If Biden's still in even after SCOTUS, they've got the cover needed to get Kamala in ASAP
In the meantime, it can be a convenient cover for the MSM to downplay the severity of the SCOTUS case and provide a scandal distraction that isn't just more fatigue-inducing Covid coverage (especially since the new vaccine has taken the wind out of that one)
I've always wondered about the idea that it would somehow be more advantageous to the Democrats to have Kamala Harris sitting in the big chair rather than Joe Biden. Joe has been a company man for decades and has never exhibited a personality that indicates he would ever balk at or go against what the party leadership wants him to do. Of course, Harris is the same way, so really they seem interchangeable to me: quintessential team player insiders. Is it just that Harris is a strongbrave brown woman, and somehow that means that her executive decisions would be worth more than identical ones made by Biden? Surely that isn't the consideration. (It is, isn't it?)
I'd say it has more to do with Biden being senile, elderly, and in very poor health while Kamala is textbook DNC establishment and highly mercenary so she can pander to the Progressives to get what the Dems want and then purge them via gerrymandering, primarying, or some other type of de facto disenfranchisement when they're no longer useful.