Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

[deductionotaku]

Yes. The context is laughing at otaku's lunacy.

Context? My lunacy? You're the one who trimmed the definition to only one word after dismissing Saint's context.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

Holden, my friend, I just wanted to get some information so we could write you a story. I just wanted to get along, and then you went and called me as dumb as a rocks. I mean I guess it was at least multiple rocks, as opposed to one, but still. That was mean. Hell, @Nara wrote you a story in which you had a threesome and you were still upset! I will still hold out the offer. We could write you in as the king, lording over the mongrel world. Presumably doing all the meth, women, and posts on the Farms that you'd want. What do you say?

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Anyway, not for noting, Otaku, but since I feel like it my point had been (obviously to anybody not as insane as you) that I don't trust scientific books that might have political bearing written after 1960 because they tend to have a PC bias and thus present false information, manipulate it or simply ignore correct information. Not that I "don't believe" correct information after 1960 jesus.

Though I knew that would be too complex for somebody as insane as you are.

Really.... you want ME to give you an example of a story you took complete and utter liberties with....

I meant one of stories about my life. So drop that rape thing of yours. I am lying about all of my stories, so what am I lying about when it comes to my life, please?

 

[sugoi-chan]

Anyway, not for noting, Otaku, but since I feel like it my point had been (obviously to anybody not as insane as you) that I don't trust scientific books that might have political bearing written after 1960 because they tend to have a PC bias and thus present false information, manipulate it or simply ignore correct information. Not that I "don't believe" correct information after 1960 jesus.

[Citation Needed]

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Except you.

I can fuck them much better than insane manginas here who think accepting a phone offer made by a woman is a rape. How far are they from understanding what current modern Western women want !

 

[sugoi-chan]

I can fuck them much better than insane manginas here who think accepting a phone offer made by a woman is a rape. How far are they from understanding what current modern Western women want !

I am left wondering what qualifies you, a Croatian male from the armpit of Europe, to speak as an expert on what modern Western women want?

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

I can fuck them much better than

And already, you're lying.

 

[deductionotaku]

No quote and no tag. I've frightened him again.

Anyway, not for noting, Otaku, but since I feel like it my point had been (obviously to anybody not as insane as you) that I don't trust scientific books that might have political bearing written after 1960 because they tend to have a PC bias and thus present false information, manipulate it or simply ignore correct information. Not that I "don't believe" correct information after 1960 jesus.

Though I knew that would be too complex for somebody as insane as you are.

So you're allowed to speak in generalizations and hyperbole without explicitly stating as much while the rest of us have to express our ideas with 100% literal meanings. I'd be surprised, but that's your standard means of moving the goalposts after you go and shove your foot in your mouth.

On top of that, your idea of "correct information" - as demonstrated by these two topics - is exclusively information that you were told backs your beliefs; we know you don't actually read any of this since your understanding of the texts is comparable to TJ Church's understanding of clarity. And the lone bit of logic you provide for this preference is how your approved evidence substantiated your prior evidence, usually creating a circle in the process while being completely oblivious to how this logic works for us as well. That's a larger bias than anything the bought scientists of today could ever generate, even citing their multiple cases of burying financially harmful studies on pharmaceuticals. Hell, that's a larger bias than a corporate executive being the judge in his own embezzling trial.

 

[Positron]

I explained my situation very well.

Modern Western women are whorish monsters anybody can fuck.

Gaining money is a waste of time in this society unless you're extremely wealthy because governments ensure that seducer men who have enough time to chase women are most successful from a current evolutionary standpoint.


Gradual feralization of society leads to rape being completely normalized, despite hilarious attempts from lunatics to act as if everything is as it was during a society they hate and wanted to destroy, which they now did.

Any ideas of monogamous relationships are a waste of time then. A lie sold to naive young boys.

No one wants to read your pony fanfic.

 

[BroAlpha]

@Holden, you're been shitposting all night and never answered anything I asked. Please tell me about your brother. I ask because many iconoclasts and radical leaders through history had the support and respect of their siblings, at least. Would you say he supports you? Would you say he respects you?

 

[4Macie]

I meant one of stories about my life. So drop that rape thing of yours. I am lying about all of my stories, so what am I lying about when it comes to my life, please?

That you wouldn't have sex with your mother had she said yes.
You might not fuck her NOW; but you definitely would have fucked her then.

My mother, the murderous whore, is refusing to have sex with me when that could alleviate my sexual frustration.

You wouldn't call her a murderous whore for refusing to have sex with you if you weren't going to fuck her.
You wouldn't have asked THREE TIMES had you not wanted to do it.

You also claimed "incel" was a term discussed and studied in science journals, yet couldn't produce anything more than a poll study. That's not a scientific study of any kind. That was them interviewing people from a love-shy forum and then talking about the results and how internet sites help people like them.

You said YOU SAW a woman get raped and then KNEW that she dated said rapist, but you couldn't provide a single piece of proof. If there was a rape on a beach, you bet your nasty ass there'd be a news story about it.

You said "Nonsense. There were other girls from other schools and neighborhoods who weren't utter scum. I could have gotten them if I wasn't love-shy at the time."
BUT, you aren't loveshy now and you don't have a girlfriend OR wife. So obviously the bit about you not getting them because of love-shyness is a lie.

Said you knew a woman was pregnant with your child 16 days after you had sex with her. That's not possible. It's a lie.

You said that "Incel" is being without sex OR relationship for 6 months; but then when I called you out on it, you said you've ALWAYS said AND....and then directed me to a link YOU created... which said OR. You lie about your own definition of Incel.

You said "My friend fschmidt has this to say: ..." but fschmidt has said he barely knows who you are, that he wouldn't let his daughter OR his son (future kids) near you at all. Said he talked to you a handful of times... if at all (he couldn't even recall who you were really...) . We had to describe you to him AND provide him some pictures ... it wasn't until then did he say "oh yeah, that guy....no we aren't friends." You aren't friends.


You posted my life event on your blog, completely mangled and warped. That's your life. You posted it on your blog, incorrectly. And instead of admitting you were wrong, you left it up there and said "well obviously it didn't happen to you...but it happened to SOMEONE out there...so I'm going to leave it up there". You're lying to anyone who might stumble upon your blog. You state "I recently read a woman bragging on a forum about her imprisoning a man who didn't rape her for supporting his family and kids that weren't his...". You didn't read that on a blog at all. You're a lying mclie face.



Must I go on??? Really?? Ok then.


At one point in the first thread (within the first couple hundred pages), you DENIED beating up your parents. It took someone posting the article online about you before you came clean.

You said you had a dog. Said you would post said dog's picture. You lied. The picture you provided was not of you but taken from someone's facebook profile.

You said what the people do here on the Kiwi would be illegal in your country; none of it is. We've checked your laws and everything. Nothing here is illegal by even your country's standards.

Ooh, found this tidbit. Not only did you say there were SCIENTIFIC STUDIES on incel, in depth... you've ALSO said this

Look, there are barely any papers on incel and I have yet to see any that really talks about consequences of incel like suicide, murder suicide, lack of motivation etc. It's all tiny bits and pieces.

So, don't ask me for any citations because it would be extremely dishonest. This is a subject that hasn't been properly researched yet.

If there were scientific studies, as you suggested, you wouldn't have needed to say this as well. What a liar you are.

I never slut shame. Nor should anybody. Especially anybody in my situation.

You slut shame at LEAST once every two pages.

I could literally keep going, but I doubt you'll even read any of this because you'll say something like:
When you start your first sentence with a lie, I stop reading. Or something like that.... fucking turtlesloth running your brain.

 

[CatFace]

You should know then @Holden that in history the consequences for a woman leaving a relationship was death, and women still ran.

You haven't been on the internet very long if you think a woman having sex with dogs or horses on tape is a 'consequence'. I'd imagine you get paid extra for that sort of shit.

So, consequences might dissuade someone from leaving, but they stop nothing.

Are you sure you don't want to give being a decent person a go? Like for just a month? If anything it'll be interesting to see a new posting style.

 

[supdup]

Yes, but Saint was claiming something else. Also, I did later clarify that this obviously wouldn't apply to books on things that would have no political bearing, like electronics.

That's awfully convenient. It's almost like Fuckbot makes stuff up to fit his conclusions.

Yes. The context is laughing at otaku's lunacy.

That's not a context, that's an action. All this time Fuckbot whines about us not understand the context, yet he fails to even understand what a context is.

I explained my situation very well.

Modern Western women are whorish monsters anybody can fuck.

Gaining money is a waste of time in this society unless you're extremely wealthy because governments ensure that seducer men who have enough time to chase women are most successful from a current evolutionary standpoint.


Gradual feralization of society leads to rape being completely normalized, despite hilarious attempts from lunatics to act as if everything is as it was during a society they hate and wanted to destroy, which they now did.

Any ideas of monogamous relationships are a waste of time then. A lie sold to naive young boys.

Here he presents a mega non-sequitur, but then earlier whined about someone else's non-sequitur which wasn't one.

 

[Positron]

You can't decide whether a subject has political bearing or not before hand. If some government think carbon nanotubes is to be encouraged as a research subject over silicon, hundreds of papers on electronics suddenly become political relevant.

 

[supdup]

saint - no, i haven't blocked you. i think you are more intelligent than supdup. you at least didn't say i chose to have a phobia or chose to believe that not killing a classmate at the age of 13 wasn't a good idea.

Funny thing. I never said any of that. Can someone ask him to show where I said those things? The second part has me stumped, not sure what he's referring to at all.

In Western Europe, yes*. But even these women might leave once they get a visa.

* which doesn't mean that the countries I am from and live in aren't the cultural West, these are completely different things)

Drealm once talked about ways to try and avoid this

Consequences are the only way to ensure good behavior in women. Women need consequences for divorce in order to remain married. My assumption here is all women by default have no morals. A woman will choose to remain married on the basis of relative consequences. Below is my list of strategic consequences I see enabling marriage, in no particular order.

1. Date or "marry" an illegal alien. She'll have no legal recourse and will be afraid to approach the law. The consequence of her leaving you will be she'll have to expose herself more to chances of being deported.

2. Date or "marry" a woman who doesn't speak English. Similiar to above, she'll have no way to understand the legal system. She'll need translation. The biggest consequence here is she'll have to learn English.

3. Date or "marry" a devout religious woman, who's denomination includes some aspect of going to hell for committing divorce or infidelity. The consequence here: burning in hell.

4. Date or "marry" a woman and create a closed loop social network for her. Indian culture is good at this. In Indian culture divorce rarely happens because the women know they'll be shunned by their entire social network. So the consequence here are losing all her friends.

5. Date or "marry" a woman and live in their foreign country. By living abroad you're not giving them the standard of living in your own country. Doing so allows you to hold up citizenship as in incentive for remaining with you. The consequence here is withdrawing chances of citizenship.

Hence the consequences part in my idea about women fucking dogs or horses on tape. Women are dealt with my consequences.

Basically, the only way for you or someone like you to get and keep a women is to put them in a situation where they can't or will have a difficult time leaving. Sounds like something a decent person would do.

 

[4Macie]

The new person being 'feature' is the new perfect mate for Holden...
Holden has never made me want to vomit.... this... person has done that in less than 5 pages.

BUT, this person claims to like bloodplay, rapeplay, and kiddie porn. All the things Holden clearly wants in a woman. Think we should hook them up guys.
(I'm also not sure...but maybe they have a dick? I haven't figured that one out yet)

 

[HickoryDickory]

You said "My friend fschmidt has this to say: ..." but fschmidt has said he barely knows who you are, that he wouldn't let his daughter OR his son (future kids) near you at all. Said he talked to you a handful of times... if at all (he couldn't even recall who you were really...) . We had to describe you to him AND provide him some pictures ... it wasn't until then did he say "oh yeah, that guy....no we aren't friends." You aren't friends.

Welp, that explains why he wouldn't even go on holiday to visit Frank. (It must've been the first thread? I read the short Frank thread and he kind of ignored some questions, so I guess it was answered there?)

Marijan must at least try to live in his own version of CWCville, but knows that if he tries it irl he'd get smacked down... Otherwise he wouldn't have wised up and realized that he has to quit doing certain things or risk going back to jail. He's just like an anti-social purse puppy that barks and when you go near it it hides under the furniture.

-- Edit --

In regards to his parents, he said that they never even tried introducing him to their friends daughters. I really can't blame them for not wanting to ruin friendships over their creeper of a son...

 

[4Macie]

Welp, that explains why he wouldn't even go on holiday to visit Frank. (It must've been the first thread? I read the short Frank thread and he kind of ignored some questions, so I guess it was answered there?)

Marijan must at least try to live in his own version of CWCville, but knows that if he tries it irl he'd get smacked down... Otherwise he wouldn't have wised up and realized that he has to quit doing certain things or risk going back to jail. He's just like an anti-social purse puppy that barks and when you go near it it hides under the furniture.

-- Edit --

In regards to his parents, he said that they never even tried introducing him to their friends daughters. I really can't blame them for not wanting to ruin friendships over their creeper of a son...

Right?!?! If I had a kid, and my friend tried to bring Holden around to try and set them up, they'd be instantly disowned. I would never talk to them again.

 

[Marjan Šiklić]

Macie - some fact checking. Fschmidt merely said (to an extremely rude, sick question on whether he'd give me his daughter, asked because you're idiots) that he wouldn't because he doesn't know me well enough.

Completely reasonable answer, though more reasonable act would be to tell you you're insane.

You have no idea about our views and think we want women to be given like a sack of potatoes.

At the same moment, you would be absolutely ok with your son being jailed for inflicting pain to women by not raping them, simply because you admit you cannot get over the 1955 norms you helped to destroy. You want men jailed for not killing women.

You want men to actually hurt women by not raping them and killing them, simply because you're stuck in some aspects of the world that existed 100 years ago. A world you hated and helped destroy.

Just face some fucking facts - WOMEN WITHOUT PATRIARCHY LOVE RAPE. AND TO THOSE THAT DON'T THERE IS NO PROTECTION FROM RAPE WITHOUT PATRIARCHY.

 

[Frank Rizzo]

You have no idea about our views and think we want women to be given like a sack potatoes.

See kids, it's a-ok for a guy to rape a woman in Holden's mind.

But to be given a woman like a sack of potatoes? THAT'S DRAWING THE DAMN LINE!