Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Toasty said:
You know, there's stereotypical shroom music like led zeppelin, or pink floyd, or even modern trance, and then there's whatever that was.
Click to expand...
How about some Mishroomhead?
(I listen to everything but country. Though I do listen to hickhop.)
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Gidget
A Cardboard Box said:
Continuing to post here significantly diminishes your standing for IIED. How can you be a victim of IIED when you can just choose to not interact here? Remember, the court isn't punitive, the court makes right. A potential remedy for being made fun of online is to just not go to the places making fun of you. The judge isn't going to issue a court order restricting our 1A rights to call you a dumb fucking cunt.

Saying "I believe you are a narcissist and here's why" isn't defamatory. We've been over this. Also in order for HIPAA to apply, we would have to be in lawful possession of your medical records, i.e your insurance company, the state, or your medical provider, and they have to release them without a waiver. Someone guessing or hearing that you have BPD or NPD, and then going "I heard/believe that Mel has NPD/BPD" can, in no way, be a HIPAA violation.

Also, it's fucking HIPAA, not HIPPA. Read the fucking law you are invoking. Lmao.
Click to expand...

🖕🖕🖕 Gaslighting

Your website isn't important enough to spell check for

And I'll save my response to the legal part for a pleading before the court
Useful_Mistake said:
Judge ordered you to respond. You did. He might feel like that's good enough and do a rulling. At the very least, he will make a judgment on your motion to strike before the 31st.

Speaking of IIED, have you finally looked over the caselaw I showed that kills your case (Russo v. White, 241 va. 23 (1991) )? You might actually learn what counts as a victim of IIED if you read it (spoiler, you don't).

The fact that you disagree with what a fact is, bears no meaning on the fact that we can, and have, looked over the requirements, and found that you fit. Good Faith belief is a defence in regards to defamation (Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727 (1968 ). ). And, in any case, you likely count as at least limited purpose public figure, so, really we can say whatever we want. Few reasons as to why you might be a publuc figure can be found here
Edit: 4th circuit rulling also gives the opinion that a person like you would be limited-purpose public figure (Carr v. Forbes, Inc.)

It only applies to health companies, not private citizens. We can leak all the info we want. This all doesn't matter, because we haven't shared your medical files regardless.

Nope, he was completely correct.

While you can email it to the judge, yes, normally things like that are not accepted(there is nothing stopping judge from reading said email and questioning you over its validity). Regardless, Null's lawyer can, and has, include/d them in his motions.

Literally nothing in here (at least since I joined this thread) can be used as an exhibit for anything else than to show how mentally deranged you are. You think this is defamatory? Sue me.

I sincerly doubt it. You have mentioned that all of us are trolls you don't believe in. It would then be logical to assume that if we are liars/trolls here, were are in the emails as well.

And, that, could be used as an exhibit. This is basically an admission of more comming frivalous lawsuits.

No, but in law, they could be used as a sign of harassment, had she not replied and continued to make conversation.

In her defence, her IIED claims are not against the forum, but against Moon, and three(?) other forum users. Then again, she is interacting with all of them including her supposed abusers, so....yeah, you got a point.


Honestly, the only thing you need to read is Russo v White, to find out why IIED almost never works. Like the Supreme Court of Virginia said, the court is "not favoured in law".
Russo v White shows just how extreme the damages must be to prove IIED. I briefly talked about it here for anyone intrested.
Click to expand...
🖕🖕🖕
A bunch of babbling that is easily defeated with case law in a pleading before the court

PASS


Anonymus Fluhre said:
I understand that you probably suffer from some form of reading disability, but this is a good read as to why your IIED claims wont work

And of course for any lawsuit

Click to expand...

You clearly didn't read your own source

The rest of your legal argument will be addressed in my upcoming pleadings


Kosher Salt said:
And like Null's lawyer pointed out, her motion to strike contained her arguments for her response. The judge might decide that the matter has been fully briefed. You don't necessarily get the right to file a second response, repeating all your BS arguments and throwing a few extra noodles at the wall just in case, just because you fucked up and filed something that you incorrectly called "motion to strike" instead of calling it a response.
Click to expand...

That's not even accurate at all. A Motion to Strike comes before an Answer. It's predicated on the idea that there is another document to follow. Especially when the Motion to Strike says "another document is to follow".

The Federal Rules also allow 21 days for each litigant to respond. That's why Moon's attorney filed a "Combined Memorandum". There isn't one set of rules for attorneys and another for pro-se litigants. The rules have to be enforced or Attorneys and Judges can be reported to the appropriate agencies.


LoverofPi said:
No, but a judge can be made aware of external information and can take that into account even if it is not formally in evidence
Click to expand...

Inaccurate. There's a whole rule book defining what can be said in a pleading and when.



Ask Jeeves said:
@TamarYaelBatYah You are fat and I would not have sex with you.
Click to expand...

Thank you. Relieved to know the Kiwi Farms cult is not a sex trafficking ring.



Deadpool said:
You're not a victim of IIED though. You're a stupid bitch whose ass hurt about mean words on a website no one is forcing you to read, or interact with.



We're allowed to discuss our theory's and point out the veracity when compared to your behavior. It's not our fault every single symptom lines up with behavior you've demonstrated here.

Isn't it also hypocritical that you're complaining about people accusing you of having a mental illness, when you do the same to me with your retarded repetitive reply of "take your meds"? The only difference is I'm accept I'm mentally ill and that there's nothing wrong with that. You get defensive and squeal about it like the brood sow you are.


My posting in this thread is also EYE FOR AN EYE. You and You're abusive rapist manlet husband showed up and started shitting up a website I frequent, while also insulting users I'm friendly with. I reacted by by insulting you in return. The literal definition of EYE FOR AN EYE. However as a narcissistic cultist you can't accept the same standards you hold others too.



Lie all you want, but we all know your lolsuit was a shitty intimidation tactic. You thought that we'd be so scared of our usernames being sued that we'd stop shit talking. This is evidenced by how ass hurt you got when we all mocked it and continued mocking you. There was much giant font posting and a rage quit.



Oh the irony of a cult member accusing others of being cultist. I do have to give you a small amount of credit. At least the cult you're in is one you created, however you lose that credit because the only other members are your retarded niglets.


You emailing people and them using the email you used against you isn't stalking, especially when in the next sentence you make is:


You realize how weird and warped this is right? You talk about other people being like serial killers (like your children in the future) but keeping a list of every slight against you is definitely warped and serial killerish. Most people don't do that weird shit.



It's not stubbornness it's being too stupid to know when to quit.



Nah I'm saved by the grace of Jesus Christ, but I'll laugh as you burn begging for your pagan god elhomo to save you, you goy whore.
Click to expand...

🖕🖕🖕 Gaslighting x1000

Eclair's Shota Paradise said:
You're only a 'victim' because you continue to kick the hornet's nest. You can't do that, then cry foul when you get stung. Or, I mean, you could, since that's what you're doing, but it's doing nothing to help your case.
Click to expand...
🖕🖕🖕 Gaslighting
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: secret watcher, nekotlc, Viridian and 7 others
Given the amount of time this cum dumpster spends larping here as a lawyer, Jew, author, victim, et al, I’m assuming she either has six tits or totally neglects her six blessings/monthly welfare $$$.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake and Mushroom Tip
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Viridian, Botchy Galoop, Mushroom Tip and 2 others
TamarYaelBatYah said:
🖕🖕🖕 Gaslighting x1000
Click to expand...

TamarYaelBatYah said:
🖕🖕🖕 Gaslighting
Click to expand...
🖕 🖕🖕 Misusing a term you clearly don't understand the meaning of x1,000,000.

It's kinda funny that you're both too stupid to realize what a word means, while also being too stupid to come up with valid arguments so you keep misusing the term.

Nigger you're dumb.

Actually I fucking challenge you to not only telling us what gaslighting actually means without using Google and how any of our posts is actually doing it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Useful_Mistake, Spergichu and 2 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: super thug, Botchy Galoop, Useful_Mistake and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back