Probably the fact that you were wrong every step of the way.
If I was Null's lawyer, that's one of the points I would make. Her motion to strike has been proven (by her) to have been filled frivolously. The only times you do that is when you want to waste everyone's time and money, and stall the suit.
Mel, I personally debunked every single one of your lawsuits points after I came here, citing law and caselaw, that you still haven't refuted to this day. I have destroyed any and every argument you argued with me over law.
That being said, have you had a chance to finally look at Russo v White? Or Snyder v Phelps? Both destroy your case, although, I'd say Russo v White does a better job.
I believe she said it was because society hated women, and because she was poor and pro-se(which is funny because pro-se get special priviledges)
Are you gonna go over your entire law history on a court document
again?
He pretty much is, given that you can never point out even prima facie proof that he is guilty of anything.
Looks like the users on here know it better than you.
Okay, tbf, I am waitting for her next filling. It's always fun to laugh at.
At yet you keep whinning in your suits how being a women puts you at a disadvantage.