Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Why didn't you revert to form and call him a filthy goy like you do everyone else? Is it because you actually believe his show could be entered into evidence, yet somehow this entire thread will not be? LOLOLOLOL. You never fail to excell the accepted depths of stupidity. Why aren't you answering about the pic I sent? It's your biggest lead yet as to our identities? Why no comment?

His nose looks Jewish. But also, I don't call someone a Goy until they show behavior demonstrating that. He may be a Ger[גָּר], not a Goy. The difference is when Rekeita talks - at least this time - he expresses his opinion, he doesn't make up stories to defame me. Sometimes I do think he is trying to cast me in a false light or negative light, but for the most part he tries to focus on facts.

 

[Mushroom Tip]

His nose looks Jewish. But also, I don't call someone a Goy until they show behavior demonstrating that. He may be a Ger[גָּר], not a Goy. The difference is when Rekeita talks - at least this time - he expresses his opinion, he doesn't make up stories to defame me. Sometimes I do think he is trying to cast me in a false light or negative light, but for the most part he tries to focus on facts.

Still no comment on the massive lead I gave you?

 

[Swiss46]

His nose looks Jewish. But also, I don't call someone a Goy until they show behavior demonstrating that. He may be a Ger[גָּר], not a Goy. The difference is when Rekeita talks - at least this time - he expresses his opinion, he doesn't make up stories to defame me. Sometimes I do think he is trying to cast me in a false light or negative light, but for the most part he tries to focus on facts.

Lol you really are horny for him.

 

[TheShedCollector]

Oh my god I've just heard this stupid cunt on Rekieta. Ha ha ha she sounds like she's about to burst into tears at any moment. Quite possibly the dumbest person who has ever existed in the history of the human race.

@TamarYaelBatYah you are a complete failure of a human being. Everything you have ever done has turned to shit. You have no accomplishments. You live in a shithole of a house. Your entire life is pathetic. You are the dumbest person I have ever encountered. Nothing you have ever done, or ever will do will come to anything. Go ahead and put your children up for adoption and then do a summersault off the top of a tall building.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

His nose looks Jewish. But also, I don't call someone a Goy until they show behavior demonstrating that. He may be a Ger[גָּר], not a Goy. The difference is when Rekeita talks - at least this time - he expresses his opinion, he doesn't make up stories to defame me. Sometimes I do think he is trying to cast me in a false light or negative light, but for the most part he tries to focus on facts.

Lmao. You have explicitly said that stating your opinion is still defamatory. You said this to me specifically.

Edit: here



He 100% insinuated you were abusing the legal system and abusing Josh.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

FFS, it's "filing" also "whining"
"Filling" is what Mel is looking for next time she goes to get her favourite pan from Mushy.
"WInning" is a word that no place in any sentence referring to Melinda's lolsuits. Or Melinda in any sense.

Yes, yes, me spell bad, what else is new? If it will make you feel any better, I could try spell checking my posts

It should probably make it to the courthouse today

This did not answer any of my questions. But let me repeat the most important one. Have you, or have you not, looked at Russo v White? Or Snyder v Phelps? If so, how are you prepared to counter them?

 

[Baby Yoda]

Hi Melinda.

 

[CyrusKissFanClub]

The Talmud has no weight in teaching. It's a garbage book that means nothing to me, and nothing to The Messiah. The Messiah said not to eat the leaven (sin) of the Pharisees, who were the same ones that invented the doctrines that later were penned in The Talmud.

The reading of Lev. 19:15 is for ALL Israelites, not confined to judges. It doesn't say anywhere in Lev. 19 that the verse is "just for judges". You've added those words to the text and they are not there. The Torah says you shall not add to it.

You are incorrect. Abraham ibn Ezra, an independent interpreter of Torah, who was not a Pharisee nor a Talmudic scholar, considered a giant in the field of Torah exegesis , understood Leviticus 19:15 to be concerned with judges in courts.



Source: https://www.sefaria.org/Ibn_Ezra_on_Leviticus.19.15.1?lang=bi&with=About&lang2=en
(Click to enlarge.)

Although the Karaite Jews don't consider the Talmud to be authoritative they have their own Torah commentaries. One of the most important of these is Keter Torah ("Crown of Torah") authored by Karaite Sage Aaron ben Elijah. This raises the obvious question of why they need any sort of commentary at all. But we'll leave that alone at this time.​

The Karaite Press (https://the-karaite-press.myshopify.com/pages/open-karaite-initiative) are reconstructing and translating Karaite texts, including Keter Torah. Keter Torah is incomplete but they have released a draft version of parashat shoftim (48th weekly Torah portion covering Deuteronomy 16:18–21:9) here. Leviticus 19:15 is in parshat kedoshim but they've either not completed even a draft version or decided not to make it available.​

But anyway, parashat shoftim, specifically Deuteronomy 16:18-20 uses much of the same language as Leviticus 19:15 and Aaron ben Elijah -- a Karaite sage -- understands it to be referring to judges and courts.​

​

​

​

Hateful behavior toward Goyim and Idolators is all over The Torah and The Hebrew Bible.

Not if you exclude their behaviour towards their enemies such as the Amalekites. The double-standards for Jews/goyim in the Talmud can be regarded discriminatory. Tanya is Jewish exceptionalism or perhaps even Jewish supremacy. But the hate towards goyim you keep mentioning isn't in the Torah.

Starts with Exodus 32 and Deut 27. You don't know what you're talking about, read before you speak.

Exodus 32 is about the Israelites making and worshipping the golden calf.

Deuteronomy 27 is also about the Israelites making idols and breaking commandments.

No mention of goyim in either of those chapters. You should take your own advice.

You have a lot of learning to do,

You should only post something like that when you are sure that what you have posted isn't 100% correct. Otherwise you make yourself look like a fool. But you have been doing that for almost 800 pages so proceed as you please.

What you posted on ger is also incorrect.

Source: http://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6585-gentile
(Click to enlarge.)

you don't know who Elohim is.

Well apparently no one does except you. You are the sole practitioner of your incoherent syncretic religion. You are more exclusive than the Westboro Baptist Church. You have no feedback from anyone. Your children aren't going to question your logical inconsistencies and factual errors. You are in a tiny little insular bubble inventing all sorts of nonsense and producing the most outlandish interpretations of scripture purely so that you can justify the shit things you've done in the past, justify the shit things you are doing in the present and justify the shit things you plan to do in the future.

 

[Spergichu]

Wait, Melinda was using a four year old YouTube account to sperg in Nick's chat and then decided to JOIN his livestream being hosted on YouTube? Melinda must really want to be evil or impure to use YouTube that much.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Exodus 32 is about the Israelites making and worshipping the golden calf.

Yes, and what did they do to the Idolators?

Deuteronomy 27 is also about the Israelites making idols and breaking commandments.

Who are the curses listed for there?

Well apparently no one does except you

I never stated that.

Even if it were true, why would that bother you?

You have no feedback from anyone

Not factually accurate

purely so that you can justify the shit things you've done in the past,

You're putting the cart before the horse there.

Try entertaining the thought that I learned The Torah before I made choices

justify the shit things you are doing in the present and justify the shit things you plan to do in the future.

And yet after almost 800 pages not a single one of you can prove I have committed any sin

You should only post something like that when you are sure that what you have posted isn't 100% correct. Otherwise you make yourself look like a fool. But you have been doing that for almost 800 pages so proceed as you please.

What you posted on ger is also incorrect.

Um actually, that only reinforces what I posted: that Goy and Ger are not the same; and that Ger represents the word "stranger" or "sorjourner"

You are incorrect. Abraham ibn Ezra, an independent interpreter of Torah, who was not a Pharisee nor a Talmudic scholar, considered a giant in the field Torah exegesis , understood Leviticus 19:15 to be concerned with judges in courts.

Abraham ibn Ezra was mentored by a philosopher named Sa‘adiah, who taught him Halakha. So it is wrong to say he was not a Talmudic scholar.


source: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-ezra/

But anyway, parashat shoftim, specifically Deuteronomy 16:18-20 uses much of the same language as Leviticus 19:15 and Aaron ben Elijah -- a Karaite sage -- understands it to be referring to judges and courts.

Those Karaite commentaries don't have Lev. 19:15 mentioned

Wait, Melinda was using a four year old YouTube account to sperg in Nick's chat and then decided to JOIN his livestream being hosted on YouTube? Melinda must really want to be evil or impure to use YouTube that much.

I formerly used YouTube in the past for a platform for my small business until I developed a religious conviction that YouTube is a BaMaH [בָּמָה] around 2018.

Have you, or have you not, looked at Russo v White? Or Snyder v Phelps? If so, how are you prepared to counter them?

I can look into them after I edit my draft of my reply to the Motion to Dismiss

He 100% insinuated you were abusing the legal system

And that could be counted as the Tort of False Light or Defamation, yes. But most of what he said was opinion. (Not planning on suing him though, that's not a legal threat)

He can say I am abusing it, but when the court continues to allow me to file because the court understands what I am writing, then the situation is rectified.

 

[White Baby]

And yet after almost 800 pages not a single one of you can prove I have committed any sin

Because any time someone attempts to show you that you have, you literally twist Torah and the gospels to squirm out of it.

Um actually, that only reinforces what I posted: that Goy and Ger are not the same; and that Ger represents the word "stranger" or "sorjourner"

Obviously Goy and GeR are not the same word. But GeR still doesn't fit into the meaning you're attempting to force it into.

He can say I am abusing it, but when the court continues to allow me to file because the court understands what I am writing, then the situation is rectified.

The court could not have you declared a vexatious litigant until this case is completed.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I can look into them after I edit my draft of my reply to the Motion to Dismiss

I genuinely think you should take a look at these as I recommended a month ago. You should know the defenses the 'enemy' is likely to use, and the weaknesses in your suit. Ignoring the service/jurisdiction errors, these caselaw will address the inherent flaws that exist in any IIED lawsuit. You can use those caselaw to learn how to counter those problems, or just become familiar with the weaknesses that are likely to be exploited by the defendant.

When you do take a look, let me know, okay? I am interested in what your opinion is in regards to possible counter for difficulties these caselaw raise to you.

 

[LoverofPi]

Yes, and what did they do to the Idolators?

The levites slaughtered their fello countrymen.

Who are the curses listed for there?

Israelites.

I never stated that.

Even if it were true, why would that bother you?

It doesn't bother us, we state it as explanation that you worship a god of your own making.

Not factually accurate

Okay, who gives you feedback and course correct, then?

You're putting the cart before the horse there.

Try entertaining the thought that I learned The Torah before I made choices

If that's the case, then your terrible reading comprehension strikes yet again.

And yet after almost 800 pages not a single one of you can prove I have committed any sin

Well, most of us aren't attempting to convince you because we know you'll just apply your own bizarro standards to yourself and come up with an excuse.

Um actually, that only reinforces what I posted: that Goy and Ger are not the same; and that Ger represents the word "stranger" or "sorjourner"

Goy also means stranger, so what's your point here?

Abraham ibn Ezra was mentored by a philosopher named Sa‘adiah, who taught him Halakha. So it is wrong to say he was not a Talmudic scholar.


source: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-ezra/

And yet you have no argument against his words. You can only attack him via his character and even then by association.

I can look into them after I edit my draft of my reply to the Motion to Dismiss

"I'll look into stuff relevant to the case after doing work on the case"

And that could be counted as the Tort of False Light or Defamation, yes. But most of what he said was opinion. (Not planning on suing him though, that's not a legal threat)

He can say I am abusing it, but when the court continues to allow me to file because the court understands what I am writing, then the situation is rectified.

The court allows you such leeway because you're pro-se, not because your case is meritorious.

 

[Spergichu]

I formerly used YouTube in the past for a platform for my small business until I developed a religious conviction that YouTube is a BaMaH [בָּמָה] around 2018.

Good for you, but you literally JOINED A LIVESTREAM ON YOUTUBE AFTER YOU USED AN ACCOUNT TO SPERG IN THE LIVE CHAT LAST NIGHT. If you came to this conclusion two years ago, then why did you join Nick's stream last night?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Israelites.

And also a curse upon the Goyim:

"A curse on anyone who does not confirm the words of this Torah by putting them into practice.’ All the people are to say, ‘Amen!’" (Deut. 27:26)

The court allows you such leeway because you're pro-se, not because your case is meritorious.

I am held to the same case law and Rules as lawyers. I only get leeway in formatting

Because any time someone attempts to show you that you have, you literally twist Torah and the gospels to squirm out of it.

That's your hypothesis

You are incorrect. Abraham ibn Ezra, an independent interpreter of Torah, who was not a Pharisee nor a Talmudic scholar, considered a giant in the field Torah exegesis , understood Leviticus 19:15 to be concerned with judges in courts.

View attachment 1792160
View attachment 1792161
Source: https://www.sefaria.org/Ibn_Ezra_on_Leviticus.19.15.1?lang=bi&with=About&lang2=en
(Click to enlarge.)

Although the Karaite Jews don't consider the Talmud to be authoritative they have their own Torah commentaries. One of the most important of these is Keter Torah ("Crown of Torah") authored by Karaite Sage Aaron ben Elijah. This raises the obvious question of why they need any sort of commentary at all. But we'll leave that alone at this time.​

The Karaite Press (https://the-karaite-press.myshopify.com/pages/open-karaite-initiative) are reconstructing and translating Karaite texts, including Keter Torah. Keter Torah is incomplete but they have released a draft version of parashat shoftim (48th weekly Torah portion covering Deuteronomy 16:18–21:9) here. Leviticus 19:15 is in parshat kedoshim but they've either not completed even a draft version or decided not to make it available.​

But anyway, parashat shoftim, specifically Deuteronomy 16:18-20 uses much of the same language as Leviticus 19:15 and Aaron ben Elijah -- a Karaite sage -- understands it to be referring to judges and courts.​

View attachment 1792244​

View attachment 1792245​

​

Not if you exclude their behaviour towards their enemies such as the Amalekites. The double-standards for Jews/goyim in the Talmud can be regarded discriminatory. Lessons in Tanya is Jewish exceptionalism or perhaps even Jewish supremacy. But the hate towards goyim you keep mentioning isn't in the Torah.



Exodus 32 is about the Israelites making and worshipping the golden calf.

Deuteronomy 27 is also about the Israelites making idols and breaking commandments.

No mention of goyim in either of those chapters. You should take your own advice.



You should only post something like that when you are sure that what you have posted isn't 100% correct. Otherwise you make yourself look like a fool. But you have been doing that for almost 800 pages so proceed as you please.

What you posted on ger is also incorrect.
View attachment 1792411
Source: http://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6585-gentile
(Click to enlarge.)


Well apparently no one does except you. You are the sole practitioner of your incoherent syncretic religion. You are more exclusive than the Westboro Baptist Church. You have no feedback from anyone. Your children aren't going to question your logical inconsistencies and factual errors. You are in a tiny little insular bubble inventing all sorts of nonsense and producing the most outlandish interpretations of scripture purely so that you can justify the shit things you've done in the past, justify the shit things you are doing in the present and justify the shit things you plan to do in the future.

Also, I can bring to the table the fact that Lev. 19:15 uses the singular imperative form of "to judge" [שָׁפַט]. It is speaking to individuals, not plural (community) when it says "in righteousness thou shalt judge thy neighbor"

Conjugation tables: https://www.pealim.com/dict/2282-lishpot/

Good for you, but you literally JOINED A LIVESTREAM ON YOUTUBE AFTER YOU USED AN ACCOUNT TO SPERG IN THE LIVE CHAT LAST NIGHT. If you came to this conclusion two years ago, then why did you join Nick's stream last night?

I can VISIT a BaMaH[בָּמָה] temporarily for self defense. Visiting is not making it a way of life. Like Elijah who temporarily visited the altars of sinners to engage them in a duel between their fake elohims (1 Kings 1

It's only a sin to make a בָּמָה a way of life that you look to for your focus and meditation

 

[White Baby]

That's your hypothesis

It's reality, you just don't want to or cannot accept it because your entire identity is based on your own corruption of Torah.

 

[Beavis]

Melinda will you keep suing Josh after your latest lawsuit is dismissed?

 

[ScrappyLobsterchu]

I know I'm late, but thank you for having a talk with Rackets. I haven't literally paused a Youtube video out of second hand embarrassment for a good while. Holy shit. Not only are we kiwis eating corn this holiday season we are also eating תפוחי אדמה.

 

[LoverofPi]

And also a curse upon the Goyim:

"A curse on anyone who does not confirm the words of this Torah by putting them into practice.’ All the people are to say, ‘Amen!’" (Deut. 27:26)

If you want to see it as also applying to Goy, sure, but that's not who the primary recipients of the commands or the curses are.
You're kind of obsessed with imposing rules and judgements on Goyim rather than those making sure your own faith actually abides by the same.

I am held to the same case law and Rules as lawyers. I only get leeway in formatting

No, Pro-Se litigants are also given considerable leeway in their attempts to file and construct arguments, with judges able to grant many exceptions for pro-se litigants and instructed to give them every reasonable opportunity.
Incidentally, a lot of lawyers file entirely meritless cases that make it

That's your hypothesis

And that's your canned response any time someone's got you dead to rights.

Also, I can bring to the table the fact that Lev. 19:15 uses the singular imperative form of "to judge" [שָׁפַט]. It is speaking to individuals, not plural (community) when it says "in righteousness thou shalt judge thy neighbor"

Judge them fairly. You keep omitting the context to try and materially chance the meaning of the text. It's very obvious and convinces no one.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I am held to the same case law and Rules as lawyers. I only get leeway in formatting

Not exactly. Court's must try to understand your arguments in your favour, unless they are that horrid.

A document filed pro se is to be liberally [interpreted], but the court is not required to recognize obscure or extravagant claims defying the most concerted efforts to unravel them.

-Scott v. Carlson (2018 )

The handwritten pro se document is be liberally [interpreted]. [A] pro se complaint, "however inartfully pleaded," must be held to "less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers" and can only be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it appears "beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'"

-Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976) US Supreme Court

Melinda will you keep suing Josh after your latest lawsuit is dismissed?

Of course, she will