This made me think about how Burning Man started out with a whole thing about "radical self reliance", where you had to bring all your own stuff and rough it in the desert with everyone else for like two weeks, and now you've got billionaires just kinda landing their jets there and joining in and there's no real protest against it.
I guarantee you that most of the people who made Burning Man what it was have long since shrugged at what it was become, left, and started a new Burning Man type festival that nobody has heard of yet, but might in five or ten years.
Burning Man was always about doing your own thing, the people who start a movement about roughing it in the desert for two weeks while doing whatever artistic shit in the nude just because you can, are hardly the kind of people to complain as they stick around to helplessly watch it burn.
They just leave and start again.
Movements that prize the DIY, ground-up, individualist, roughing-it style of life and art can never be really killed because its not about branding. Whatever it's called doesn't matter. Because it's about individualism functioning with and alongside a collective, the movement itself doesn't matter as much as the individuals in it, and the individuals will always find a new way to keep living the way they want. It's kind of beautiful. Something something Jeff Goldblum, life finds a way.
And that's kind of where it stayed. It's a way to rebel against your parents when you're a teenager in the 80s, going against your parents idea of ideal life coming from Leave it to Beaver. The problem is, we're a solid 40 years out from the 80s, and the things Jim considers rebellious is the same kind of shit billion & trillion dollar corporations agree with. Everything went full circle, and now conservatives embracing the nuclear family and calling out Black Lives Matter and Antifa for what they are is the modern form of rebellion.
Every few generations will find a way to rebel somehow, because nothing is perfect. The nuclear family is a great ideal that many people and situations can't live up to (and many who can but just refuse to because they're Rebellious(TM)). There are women who get knocked up for welfare and cut their baby daddies out of their lives--that's fucked up and on them. But how do you aspire to the perfect nuclear family if its the reverse situation, where your boyfriend gets you pregnant and doesn't want anything to do with you or the kid?
The US Leave it to Beaver lifestyle was a reaction to the extravagance of the 20s and the hardship of the 30s, and influenced by the growing wealth of the 40s due to profiting off the war machine. But it refused to answer the question of where all those pesky blacks fit in into society if we were going to be civilised and not own other human beings anymore, even though white people were the ones who brought them into the mix in the first place (yes the Africans were sold by their own people but Europeans didn't have to buy them and transport them)... it didn't answer what all the Asian immigrants and the people who originally lived there were supposed to do. It was an incomplete model and it got too full of itself and imploded.
We see the same thing happening now: the leftist model is incomplete because it is too focused on remaining progressive. They only have a journey in mind, no destination. That is an incomplete model and it is leaking members like a sieve as more and more individuals find a place they would like to end their journey at, and eventually it will implode on itself too. We're seeing the early stages of it now.
The next thing we replace it with will hopefully be better than what we currently have AND what we used to have, and then maybe society can relax a bit. I think everybody's getting tired of all this constant change.