Despite the fact that I know you are being sarcastic, you actually said something in line with The Torah for once.
The hilarious thing here is that you actually believe it, and the reason you believe it is your rather unhinged fear of being a victim, a fear that I'm sure many people have taken advantage of over the years.
The Motion to Dismiss included a request to Vacate any previous Order (because attorneys have the advantage of speed via filing to Pacer, I do not as a pro-se litigant). So I knew by the time my Motion to Dismiss arrived by snail mail, they may ruled on it and issued an Order. I think the Motion to Dimiss arrived and that is what prompted the judge to dismiss my Motion to Compel.
Well, I just need to file a more detailed Motion to Compel.
Ain't gonna work. Just going to waste the court's time.
Here's some plain text for ya, MORON
"If someone injures his neighbor, what he did is to be done to him — break for break, eye for eye, tooth for tooth — whatever injury he has caused the other person is to be rendered to him in return." (Lev. 24:19-20)
That's actually the foundation of American Tort law. Made possible by all the good ol' Jews in America.
If you're giving credit to ancient peoples for modern tort law, you may as well go back to where the jews got their inspiration, the Code of Hammurabi.
Anyways,
Yeshy says instead of Eye for an Eye, do not resist, and to live your enemies and pray for those that persecute you.
Have it in your OJB too. It really doesn't help your case at all.
And Moron, is that the best you can do? Weak burn, Mel. If you're going to try and insult me, actually try your best. I mean, I don't expect much but your best has to be better than that.
At least I hope it is.
"Eye for eye" is on the *injury*, not the method of inflicting the injury (sin)
If person A does action B, resulting in injury C to person D, then person D retains the moral right to do C. But no "B". So if Jane kicks John in the shin and causes pain in his leg, then John can cause Jane physical pain of the same degree in some way.
A lot of people miss that. That's the *injury* that you are allowed to inflict back, not the sin.
If we're insisting that leviticus is mandating this, there is nothing to suggest it is not mandating a mirrored punishment for all crimes against other humans.
You will see in my responses that it goes way deeper than some basic insults
I don't think we will, really. I think we'll see you claim such, but then show us some basic insults/
I actually never held anything against my sister that she did in childhood because I knew she grew up in hard circumstances. It's a myth that I held the lake incident over her head, I really never did.
I don't have emotional baggage from being hurt by anyone. I just don't believe in "peace, love and harmony" bullshit that Ghandi promoted.
What about love and forgiveness that Yeshy the Meshy promoted?
"Discretion" doesn't mean "I can decide the merits if I like you are not". "Discretion" means, they have to look at everything very carefully.
That is not what discretion means. In fact, discretion in this context is literally having the right to make choices. Discretion never means careful observation.
Show me one place in The Torah that says humans can forgive another human's sin.
(HINT: Don't hold your breath, you won't find it)
To add to the pile, Luke 6:37.
Not supported by the facts
Melinda is technically right. The record shows she clearly holds herself in contempt as well.
KF is not "everyone" and the fact that you view the world like that shows just how messed up your head is
Pot, Kettle, Black.
People in other cultures don't display the level of narcissistic scapegoating that most of you English speaking people aim for. Anglos, so typical.
Mel, you are every inch an Anglo.
