Super Hans
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2020
The ass is fake, but the picture itself isn't. Mia got ass implants a while ago.
Porn and Porncows
- Thread starter *Asterisk*
- Start date
The ass is fake, but the picture itself isn't. Mia got ass implants a while ago.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
Not sure how you noticed that detail, but all I can say is that the picture itself looks like Photoshop and shitty lighting.
Fatafata v2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
INNOVATIVE ARTISTS LTD - Filing history (free information from Companies House)
INNOVATIVE ARTISTS LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual return, officers, charges, business activityfind-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
View attachment 1793046
She is worth around £250,000
That's just the equity in one company, with a balance date nearly two years ago. Quick look at companies office shows she has three other coys that haven't filed a balance sheet yet.
Although logically she would have other entities setup in more favorable countries, with lessor details of ownership available (e.g. hidden behind layers of lawyers that hide who is the ubo).
Jimjamflimflam
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2020
It's peak soy consumerism. A fusion of porn and pop culture coooomsuming.
Genderbender cosplay gives these fanboys a chance to finally jerk off to Batman and joker without it being gay.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Well, thanks to the magic of a subreddit dedicated to backyard brawls, I found this onlyfans account.
>Shovel girl
Hmm...now where have I heard that name before. Oh yeah.
This was back in 2014, in 6-7 years she's gone from trailer trash getting into backyard brawls and getting whacked by a shovel to posting onlyfans. The internet really does allow the sour cream to rise to the top.
>Shovel girl
Hmm...now where have I heard that name before. Oh yeah.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2020
Backyard brawls? Wtf?
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
That "WHANG" sounds makes me laugh every time. 
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
It's called r/fightporn, mostly consists of backyard brawls or worldstar bottom feeders getting into scraps. That video popped up and someone in the comments linked her Twitter... Which linked to the Onlyfans.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
There's Barbara Gordon. And Catwoman. And...Harley Quinn,
Gloomy guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2020
When I read "backyard brawls" I thought that was going to be something like She Fights. Anyone recall that? The guys behind it got arrested because they were legit beating up mentally disabled dudes and hobos. Here's an article about it since it's fitting for this thread: https://archive.md/56hFC
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2017
OTTAWA COUNTY, MI – A Grand Haven couple will have to pay for disposing of their son’s pornography collection.
The only question is how much.
David Werking, 42, sued his parents, Beth and Paul Werking, after they tossed out what a judge called “a trove of pornography and an array of sex toys.”
U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney in Kalamazoo granted the son’s request for summary judgment in his favor.
The parties have until mid-February to file written submissions on damages.
The parents’ attorney, Anne Marie VanderBroek, said she is working to establish the value of the items that were disposed of but declined to comment about the case.
David Werking contends damages are around $25,000.
His attorney, Miles Greengard, contends that his client should receive treble damages, which is allowed under his claim of conversion of property.
“We have asked the Court for treble damages, which we believe are warranted given the wanton destruction of the property,” he said.
He was pleased with the judge’s ruling. The case wasn’t just about a guy and his dirty magazines.
“This was a collection of often irreplaceable items and property,” Greengard said.
His client had moved into his parents’ home in late 2016 after a divorce. After he left for Muncie, Indiana, he expected them to deliver his belongings. He later realized that a dozen boxes of pornographic films and magazines were missing.
His father said in an email: “Frankly, David, I did you a big favor getting rid of all this stuff.”
The judge earlier rejected the parents’ request to dismiss the case.
“Getting to the heart of the coconut now, the legal issue before the court is whether Paul and Beth converted David’s pornography ‘to their own use,’” Maloney wrote earlier.
He found that they did.
In his latest ruling, he said: “As early as 1874, Michigan courts have recognized that conversion to one’s ‘own use’ was broad and could include destruction due to the converter’s ‘belief in [the destroyed item’s] deleterious effects.’”
The Michigan Supreme Court confirmed that conclusion in 2015, Maloney wrote.
“In this case, there is no question that the destroyed property was David’s property. Defendants repeatedly admitted that they destroyed the property, and they do not dispute that they destroyed the property. Therefore, the Court finds that there is no genuine dispute of material fact on David’s statutory conversion claim.”
The parents had called police on Aug. 23, 2017, over an “incident” and asked that their son leave for at least three days. The son repeatedly contacted his parents and tried to retrieve his property from their home, the judge said.
The parents said they had told their son when he moved in that he could not bring pornography into their home or it would be destroyed. They also contended he had abandoned the property and said he could have mitigated his losses by removing it himself.
The judge said the parents would not allow him back and that they said they would ship his property to him.
The parents had kept some materials, described as the “worst of the worst,” in a safety-deposit box, concerned it could be illegal.
Ottawa County Sheriff’s Department reviewed the materials and found no evidence of child pornography. No charges resulted.
The most important part is exactly what was in the safety deposit box
The only question is how much.
David Werking, 42, sued his parents, Beth and Paul Werking, after they tossed out what a judge called “a trove of pornography and an array of sex toys.”
U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney in Kalamazoo granted the son’s request for summary judgment in his favor.
The parties have until mid-February to file written submissions on damages.
The parents’ attorney, Anne Marie VanderBroek, said she is working to establish the value of the items that were disposed of but declined to comment about the case.
David Werking contends damages are around $25,000.
His attorney, Miles Greengard, contends that his client should receive treble damages, which is allowed under his claim of conversion of property.
“We have asked the Court for treble damages, which we believe are warranted given the wanton destruction of the property,” he said.
He was pleased with the judge’s ruling. The case wasn’t just about a guy and his dirty magazines.
“This was a collection of often irreplaceable items and property,” Greengard said.
His client had moved into his parents’ home in late 2016 after a divorce. After he left for Muncie, Indiana, he expected them to deliver his belongings. He later realized that a dozen boxes of pornographic films and magazines were missing.
His father said in an email: “Frankly, David, I did you a big favor getting rid of all this stuff.”
The judge earlier rejected the parents’ request to dismiss the case.
“Getting to the heart of the coconut now, the legal issue before the court is whether Paul and Beth converted David’s pornography ‘to their own use,’” Maloney wrote earlier.
He found that they did.
In his latest ruling, he said: “As early as 1874, Michigan courts have recognized that conversion to one’s ‘own use’ was broad and could include destruction due to the converter’s ‘belief in [the destroyed item’s] deleterious effects.’”
The Michigan Supreme Court confirmed that conclusion in 2015, Maloney wrote.
“In this case, there is no question that the destroyed property was David’s property. Defendants repeatedly admitted that they destroyed the property, and they do not dispute that they destroyed the property. Therefore, the Court finds that there is no genuine dispute of material fact on David’s statutory conversion claim.”
The parents had called police on Aug. 23, 2017, over an “incident” and asked that their son leave for at least three days. The son repeatedly contacted his parents and tried to retrieve his property from their home, the judge said.
The parents said they had told their son when he moved in that he could not bring pornography into their home or it would be destroyed. They also contended he had abandoned the property and said he could have mitigated his losses by removing it himself.
The judge said the parents would not allow him back and that they said they would ship his property to him.
The parents had kept some materials, described as the “worst of the worst,” in a safety-deposit box, concerned it could be illegal.
Ottawa County Sheriff’s Department reviewed the materials and found no evidence of child pornography. No charges resulted.
The most important part is exactly what was in the safety deposit box
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They're lucky there wasn't actually any child pornography in there, because if there had been, they would have been in possession of it and would be facing charges themselves.
The Real SVP
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
But who needs softcore, when you can have hardcore... in VR?
https://vrcosplayx.com/cosplaypornvideo/suicide_squad_harley_quinn_xxx_parody-323642/ https://vrcosplayx.com/cosplaypornvideo/harley_quinn_a_xxx_parody-325112/
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Someone with PACER needs to look up this lawsuit and pull the documents. According to another article, he meticulously listed out over 1600 porn titles in his complaint
Case info here:
Werking v. Werking et al
Personal Property: Other case filed on April 10, 2019 in the Michigan Western District Court
dockets.justia.com
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
Oh yeah, and then you get people talking about how we're so damn hard on teenagers being horny and stupid.
We also have...Daria:
Daria A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
The Legend of Korra. With Asami!
The Legend of Korrasami XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Borderlands:
Borderlands: Mad Moxxi A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Misty:
Pokeballz - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Lollipop Chainsaw:
Lollipop Chainsaw A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
League of Legends:
Luxana Crownguard A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Bioshock:
Bioshock XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Wonder Woman:
Wonder Woman A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Lola Bunny:
Lola Bunny A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Frozen:
Frozen A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
The Legend of Zelda:
The Legend Of Zelda - A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Scarlet Witch:
Avengers: Scarlet Witch A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
The Pink Ranger:
Power Rangers A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Officer Jenny:
Pokemon: Officer Jenny A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Mulan:
Mulan A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Mirror's Edge:
Mirror's Edge A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Horizon Zero Dawn:
Horizon Zero Dawn A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Mera from Aquaman:
Aquaman: Mera A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Jessie from Toy Story:
Toy Story A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Buffy The Vampire Slayer:
Buffy The Vampire Slayer A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Jubilee from X-Men:
X-Men: Jubilee A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Kill Bill:
Fuck Bill - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Doki Doki Literature Club:
Doki Doki A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
The Witcher:
The Witcher: Yen & Triss A XXX Parody (Lesbian) - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
Velma and Daphne from Scooby-Doo:
Scooby Doo A XXX Parody - VR Cosplay Porn Video | VRCosplayX
It's like going to a convention without having to drop hundreds of dollars.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Mia Khalifa just got caught engaging in some true "poo in the loo"ery. This disgusting skank took her dog out for a walk, it took a shit, she forgot her bags, so she uses her corona mask to pick it up, then inverts it and wears it again. When ourguy Manuel Ferrara said she was disgusting to fuck, he really meant it.
archive.is
Love the response as well. "I would rather be shamed for this than be anti mask".
Mia Khalifa 'Caught' Picking Up Poo With Mask Before Putting It Back …
archived 18 Dec 2020 18:47:13 UTC
Love the response as well. "I would rather be shamed for this than be anti mask".
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
I have no words. Shit's just nasty.
Product Placement
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
All for mask wearing but that place isn't busy if anyone is near more than easy to keep your distance well over the 2 meters you should while wearing a mask. I mean only need masks in none open places and busy places.
Gross fuck, just no, also who has just one disposable mask with them, I normally have 3 or 4, in case one breaks or something, not like they take any room up.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
There is no reason to wear a mask outside if no one is around. Also no reason to if there is but they are far away from you.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I'm pretty sure exposing yourself to animal feces on the ground is more dangerous than whatever could possibly happen from not wearing a mask outside.