Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Highlighted that for you.

This just in: Fuckbot doesn't believe an orgasm to be a biological/physical process of the body.
He should really watch that women's orgasm how-to on RedTube. (Just the first guy 'cuz he's gots the book learnin')
 
I wonder what someone with persistent genital arousal disorder would think of @Holden's idea that being physically stimulated means you must enjoy whatever is causing it. I'm not a guy, and I know that guys get erections even when they don't want them, so why does he think things are different for women?

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent_genital_arousal_disorder
 
I wonder what someone with persistent genital arousal disorder would think of @Holden's idea that being physically stimulated means you must enjoy whatever is causing it.
Horrible comparison. These people don't enjoy it simply cause it's all they fuckin experience. They did enjoy it for the first few weeks/months.
 
Horrible comparison. These people don't enjoy it simply cause it's all they fuckin experience. They did enjoy it for the first few weeks/months.
Do you have any proof for this? And I notice you didn't mention guys getting erections when they don't want them.
 
So you do read my posts! :heart-full:


Ever notice how he stops responding to people who shut down his immediate argument, and then he'll change the subject?

Good times.


Yeah, notice that long response I gave him on all his bullshit that he never answered when I called for actual proof and to stop trying to deflect and just giving his opinion? Never answered. Like several others I did that I had to point out to him a second time to make him answer. He can't stand when someone shuts him down completely. He then turns into a three year old and just resorts to insults.


He doesn't want to talk with me, and I don't have a cold anymore or anything. (:_(


I don't think he likes talking to me anymore either. I feel your pain.


So what does employment even have to do with your seducer theory crap? You make such a big deal about employment hampering a man's chance at success. And yet, you confirmed @Saint as a seducer, despite the fact he works at the same time as having success in his relationships. And yet you, without this so called seducer trait, do not work, and still don't have the same success. Really it seems that your 'theory' should drop any aspect of employment mattering since your words seem to imply it's only this magical seducer gene that matters.



It's a lot easier to win at arguments if you pretend the people beating you in them don't exist.


You my friend, are a good man and you are cutting him to pieces. Are you a truck driver by chance?

Please keep up the good work. @supdup might start a betting pool about you next my friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
Do you have any proof for this?

Umm, sorry. This time I ran into a retard and made myself into a retard as well. First of all, you're confusing arousal and simulation. My claims were about the latter.

I do believe orgasm to be that. You don't believe orgasm is experienced mentally, dumbonista.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tfw you're considered a "veteran" at trolling and arguing with Fuckbot, so now you're looking on with pride at the next generation
I do believe orgasm to be that. You don't believe orgasm is experienced mentally, dumbonista.
And more black-and-white thinking! Also, "dumbonista" isn't a creative insult.
 
I do believe orgasm to be that. You don't believe orgasm is experienced mentally, dumbonista.

It's a physio-neurological reaction actually. Not that you'd have looked it up or learn something out of us correcting you Mr. I Crave Attention or Imma Kill Mahself.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit
Umm, sorry. This time I ran into a exceptional individual and made myself into a exceptional individual as well. First of all, you're confusing arousal and simulation. My claims were about the latter.

To bring this up again, does an unwanted erection become wanted if it leads to ejaculation?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cromit
Moccasin, here's what my point was.

That researcher says women enjoy rape because of, mostly genital simulation (in fact they enjoy it for many more reasons, like the fact that we are mammals most of whose reproduction resembles rape, plus women want to be dominated and don't want pussified manginas).

But that can't be compared to genital arousal that comes out of nothing. Jesus, you're not male, right? Having an erection isn't even that pleasant. So how does that compare?

Rape often brings not just arousal but orgasm. So what does ReGS do? It provides constant orgasms, which is not the same thing (in that case my original reply being correct) or just arousal without orgasm, which is annoying.
 
I meant on voice chat, but he's even too paranoid to do something as simple as that. It's not like I'm uber-spy or anything. :\

Lol sorry I thought you were talking about his habit of ignoring people he can't win an argument against on here.
 
To bring this up again, does an unwanted erection become wanted if it leads to ejaculation?
No, but it doesn't mean it won't be considered as something pleasant later.

ignoring people he can't win an argument against on here
You're ignored exactly because you can say something this breathtakingly stupid. Anybody who knows which posters made best arguments can see they're not ignored. You? You're just boring.

you are cutting him to pieces
This is why you're seen as insane idiot. He got a devastating reply and to you his nonsense (which he wouldn't even say if he read 10 of my posts) is cutting me. C'mon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back