- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
Anyone who gets a hardon for open carry is a retard.
Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.
- Thread starter Mr Zero
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
$50 says this tard is a regular on A&H. In fact, I bet he was in those PM leaks
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
These are the same people who complain about slippery slopes when it comes to the government taking away rights.
Taco
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
No they will correctly identify them as domestic terrorists.
Let's just make Trump dictator until he can drain the swamp. Since he couldn't make any perceivable progress on this in four years I expect this will be a lifetime appointment but I'm also okay with that.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
This guy would have been a Tory and a Confederate were he in Washington and Lincoln's times.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2019
Garbage.Theory
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2020
I
I’d like to think I’d have been an abolitionist in 1850, but honestly, I’m 100% a monarchist in 1774.
Ive pointed this out to conservitive s several times. Lincoln was considered a mad liberal. The Founding Fathers? CRAZY LIBERALS. All these people they pretend to admire were considered liberal in their day.
I’d like to think I’d have been an abolitionist in 1850, but honestly, I’m 100% a monarchist in 1774.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
"Help me donate money to a millionaire."
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
A bunch of rednecks with their consumer-grade AR-15's are totally going to be able to take on the US military.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2015
Yeah, neocons would’ve hated the founding fathers. Lawyers, publishers, writers, economists, a literal mad inventor, old money rich kids that got handed military commissions.. a bunch of nerds really.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
Just think of that radical Tom Paine, after all. After he helped start one revolution, he got involved in another.
But they idolize the Founding Fathers as they see them. Their Jefferson was a Bible-believing Christian and not a deist who produced a Bible that took out everything he didn't like.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Dollars to doughnuts a manlet.
Not to mention funded by a literal Jew. REEEEE Soros of the American Revolution!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
You know, it was a popular conspiracy theory among the conservatives of the day that the American and French revolutions had been started by "bankers."
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
People may like it or not but it is virtually impossible to carry off a war without bankers being involved somehow. The side with better ones often has an insuperable advantage.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
You know why I put that in quotes, right?
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2018
If your beliefs are weird now, they’d be weird then.
A fair number of the abolitionists were pretty off, one of the earliest was a crippled dwarf named Benjamin Lay who would kidnap peoples children and then tell them that was what it was like for Africans. He also once dressed as a soldier in a quacker church meeting and proceeded to stab a Bible with a a sword, and he put like an organ, liver, or blood sack to make it look like it was bleeding. He’d probably have a thread today lol.
Yeah, they were the “elites” of their day. I mostly agree with you regarding neocons, populist conservatives, and especially evangelicals. However, I’d disagree regarding wealthier republicans, often labeled as Rinos, who are more likely to oppose trump and would vote for a Biden but not for a Sanders, consider themselves pro business (free trade/libertarian adjacent), likely have a degree (most likely in business, accounting, marketing, economics, etc), and aren’t fond of spending money on immigration control. Just as the Democrats aren’t one whole party with a single viewpoint, neither are the Republicans.
Recently the Republicans have taken a turn to appeasing poorer whites and in the not so distant past, they were actually better educated on average than democrats. Anyways, the wealthier and more educated Republicans have a better understanding of who the founding fathers were, what they stood for, and identified with them - ya know being irreligious, educated, rich, or at least above average white guys that were politically active, and were closeted sex fiends. In contrast, evangelicals see the founding fathers in a religious sense so they conveniently ignore their sex parties and their stances on God; Trump Republicans don’t know what their stances were; while neocons have like no respect for the constitution or for revolutionaries now or even when they were Democrats way back when.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2018
What edition of the Bible is this?
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
I wonder what sort of drugs these lunatic religious types are taking to think Trump is a holy being protected by God, if God wanted to have control over how a country works then why isn't God helping stop China or hell letting Jesus come back.
I am not trying to sound like an atheist but I hate these nutty Christian types since they treat God as their problem solver when God is not there to solve your problems, otherwise it would take away individualism and everything that makes one a human if a higher power can solve anything.
Sorry for going on a religious tirade but these sorts of people who want to put politics in the vein of a holy context do not understand anything about spiritualism or anything about religion.
Taco
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
Ben Garrison comics and homoerotic subtext. Name a more iconic duo.
