Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[A Weddell Seal]

Yeah, the guy is unhinged.

Do you like weddell seals?

 

[LoverofPi]

I leave and you guys are going nuts!

So much for your theory that me not posting silences the thread. Uh-huh.

You're still filing like crazy. There's oodles to discuss.

well, as much as you're an idiot, at least you finally can accurately describe what I believe. Amazing.

Oh, I see I have touched quite a nerve indeed. Your beliefs, absurd as they are, are quite simple to understand and describe, Mel.

The Messiah came for the people of Elohim, which is not everyone.

Your words show you are a Pauline Christian. Contrary to what you believe, Elohim does not love everyone and could care less about saving the Goyim from the eternal fires of damnation

And this is going back to what I was saying about her essentially being a specific breed of judgemental christian with a jewish paint coat. Her description of her version of god is exactly the same as the people that make and read rapture novels.

 

[talk talk talk]

 

[Toasty]

Kiwi Farms isn't a court of law. There is no moral law saying I have to tell the truth to a bunch of stalkers

I guess you think that blatantly lying to a court of law is permissable, as your filings have quite a few of them.

 

[lolwatagain]

lol this is why we all say she's the dumbest person alive. Also a dirty cousin fucking skank.

Actually, I have to correct myself. It doesn't have to be authenticated at all, because it isn't hearsay, it's her words, so it's admissible as an hearsay objection. The fact that she didn't deny it and essentially admitted that it's accurate killed any chance of her arguing that it's inaccurate, so

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

For 4 and 1/2 years? That's not even logical. Marshall could get other women. He wouldn't be knocking on my door if it was just about sex.

This statement just proves how blind you are if it means getting that cavernous maw you call a vagina filled with something. Marshall is an abusive fat manlet with a criminal history. He has no redeeming qualities hence why he was stuck with you.

 

[Deadpool]

Actually, I have to correct myself. It doesn't have to be authenticated at all, because it isn't hearsay, it's her words, so it's admissible as an hearsay objection. The fact that she didn't deny it and essentially admitted that it's accurate killed any chance of her arguing that it's inaccurate, so

I know. She likes to tell "gotcha" at shit posts that done pertain to the case at all, but hands me a gotcha on a silver platter. I'd thank the stupid whore I'd I didn't hate her fucking guts.

 

[Spectre_06]

Posting my tits would actually increase male narcissism and patriarchy.

Actually this would increase suicide in men, which is already substantially higher than women.

 

[CansOfCant]

Oh ffs she's back
I preferred it in here when she'd fucked off. There was a lot more sense and not as much scrolling through half a yard of bullshit.

Honestly? I've read through this entire thread over the past six months or so but unlike any other cow, I cannot read her posts in their entirety. She hits this perfect sweet spot of stupid-smug that nauseates me and I have to take it in smaller doses through everyone else's responses. The lolsuits are hilarious, the idiotic quadruple posting to *correct the dumbest typos crack me up, and I can smell the spoiled milk wafting up off of that phrenologist's wet-dream peeking up in the avatar pic, but trying to read 10kbs worth of toddler-esque NUH-UHS in each of her posts is prohibitively, physically painful for me.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I guess you think that blatantly lying to a court of law is permissable, as your filings have quite a few of them.

I have never lied in any of my filings.

I didn't give YOU (you being Melinda Scott) any false information? I told you I don't know shit about any other users you dumb cunt. Besides it doesn't matter, YOU, MELINDA SCOTT acknowledged in that screenshot I never sent a death threat you moronic skank.

Incorrect. Burnt Toast over there LIED to me and said things about Karl and Rafal that were LIES to mislead me. THAT SHOWS MALICE and equated to a retraction. LEARN TO READ

Sure

@Baby Yoda What do you think?

 

[talk talk talk]

Actually, I have to correct myself. It doesn't have to be authenticated at all, because it isn't hearsay, it's her words, so it's admissible as an hearsay objection. The fact that she didn't deny it and essentially admitted that it's accurate killed any chance of her arguing that it's inaccurate, so

Just imagine Smelly vs. the Rules of Evidence.

 

[Deadpool]

Incorrect. Burnt Toast over there LIED to me and said things about Karl and Rafal that were LIES to mislead me. THAT SHOWS MALICE and equated to a retraction. LEARN TO READ

Toasty did those things, not me. Besides retracted or not you admitted I never threatened you. You can't just change your mind about that you stupid bitch. Either you thought I threatened you (which you know and admitted that I didn't) or you don't. It's not an opinion you can change. Learn to not be a massive retarded whore.

have never lied in any of my filings.

You lied about me threatening you, despite me having evidence that you don't believe I actually threatened you. So yeah you have clown car cunt.

It was nice of you to admit you (Melinda Scott) sent that message though.

 

[Baby Yoda]

View attachment 1807464

You would look gorgeous in them

 

[Kosher Salt]

I have never lied in any of my filings.

Incorrect. Burnt Toast over there LIED to me and said things about Karl and Rafal that were LIES to mislead me. THAT SHOWS MALICE and equated to a retraction. LEARN TO READ

Nice to see that you've given up your charade of not being Melinda Scott.

 

[Narr Then]

Honestly? I've read through this entire thread over the past six months or so but unlike any other cow, I cannot read her posts in their entirety. She hits this perfect sweet spot of stupid-smug that nauseates me and I have to take it in smaller doses through everyone else's responses. The lolsuits are hilarious, the idiotic quadruple posting to *correct the dumbest typos crack me up, and I can smell the spoiled milk wafting up off of that phrenologist's wet-dream peeking up in the avatar pic, but trying to read 10kbs worth of toddler-esque NUH-UHS in each of her posts is prohibitively, physically painful for me.

Aye, I'm the same about preferring to read other people's responses rather than her actual posts, and I do enjoy those tbf. And the lolsuits are just I've got to admit, I've learnt a lot about the American legal system from everyone dissecting them, so there's that.
She should just be limited to one post a day imo. They're long enough and so full of shit to keep everyone going for a full 24hrs until the next one, and it would save wear and tear on my poor thumb having to scroll through the fuckers.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Just imagine Smelly vs. the Rules of Evidence.

You think you know what you are talking about but don't. I can see all the holes in every post you make. You're the same idiotic profile that couldn't even accurately state the exceptions to CDA Section 230 immunity.

Toasty did those things, not me. Besides retracted or not you admitted I never threatened you. You can't just change your mind about that you stupid bitch. Either you thought I threatened you (which you know and admitted that I didn't) or you don't. It's not an opinion you can change. Learn to not be a massive retarded whore.

You threatened me and then tried to get me to state that I didn't think you were serious. I said that the only way I would believe you weren't serious about inflicting bodily injury upon me is by you offering information that demonstrated that you were not a hostile person toward me. People do that in the legal world all the time: exchange of information for demonstrating your actual malice, or lack thereof.

Toasty offered to give me the information on your behalf. Another lie she told me, as she lied to say you were her boyfriend. "Split Apart" she called it. I can subpoena the entire conversation, as you have a legal duty not to delete any evidence at this point.

So after she lied and said you were her boyfriend ("Split Apart"), she gave me a fake tattoo picture of Rafal and a woodsy area where he potentially lived. It was all a lie. Therefore, I can see that, in addition to the manipulation and lying, you are indeed a hostile party in this situation.

The legal principle is called "coercion". You tried to coerce a statement out of me with deceit. Makes it nul and void. That's why the last statement says "Any attempt to give misleading or deceitful....retracts this statement"

You would look gorgeous in them

Thank you. They feel good on my feet.

 

[White Baby]

ou threatened me and then tried to get me to state that I didn't think you were serious. I said that the only way I would believe you weren't serious about inflicting bodily injury upon me is by you offering information that demonstrated that you were not a hostile person toward me. People do that in the legal world all the time: exchange of information for demonstrating your actual malice, or lack thereof.

Toasty offered to give me the information on your behalf. Another lie she told me, as she lied to say you were her boyfriend. "Split Apart" she called it. I can subpoena the entire conversation, as you have a legal duty not to delete any evidence at this point.

So after she lied and said you were her boyfriend ("Split Apart"), she gave me a fake tattoo picture of Rafal and a woodsy area where he potentially lived. It was all a lie. Therefore, I can see that, in addition to the manipulation and lying, you are indeed a hostile party in this situation.

The legal principle is called "coercion". You tried to coerce a statement out of me with deceit. Makes it nul and void. That's why the last statement says "Any attempt to give misleading or deceitful....retracts this statement"

Tl;dr (pig squealing noises)

 

[Toasty]

I have never lied in any of my filings.

You seem to forget that we can read all of your filings.

Incorrect. Burnt Toast over there LIED to me and said things about Karl and Rafal that were LIES to mislead me. THAT SHOWS MALICE and equated to a retraction. LEARN TO READ

Kiwi farms isn't a court of law. There is no moral law that says I have to tell the truth to deranged serial litigants.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Kiwi farms isn't a court of law. There is no moral law that says I have to tell the truth to deranged serial litigants.

Well, there you have it. Admission of supplying me false information about Rafal and Karl. That shows your malice. Enough said.

 

[White Baby]

Well, there you have it. Admission of supplying me false information about Rafal and Karl. That shows your malice. Enough said.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YWdD206eSv0