then tried to get me to state that I didn't think you were serious. I said that the only way I would believe you weren't serious about inflicting bodily injury upon me is by you offering information that demonstrated that you were not a hostile person toward me. People do that in the legal world all the time: exchange of information for demonstrating your actual malice, or lack thereof.
Toasty offered to give me the information on your behalf. Another lie she told me, as she lied to say you were her boyfriend. "Split Apart" she called it. I can subpoena the entire conversation, as you have a legal duty not to delete any evidence at this point.
So after she lied and said you were her boyfriend ("Split Apart"), she gave me a fake tattoo picture of Rafal and a woodsy area where he potentially lived. It was all a lie. Therefore, I can see that, in addition to the manipulation and lying, you are indeed a hostile party in this situation.
The legal principle is called "coercion". You tried to coerce a statement out of me with deceit. Makes it nul and void.