Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Marshmallow can't get any other women, that he continues to stick with you proves this. You're the bottom of the barrel. No sensible man would ever want to be stuck with you. You're a miserable harpy, you're trashy af, you need to be minded like a small child. You're easy too, you even give it away to relatives. Didn't you say that he just hangs up on you? Pretty much means he's sick of your shit, I doubt any of us would hang up on a partner that was relaying their concerns. Unless we didn't care if we made things worse. Just shows that he doesn't care about your relationship. He doesn't care, you know he doesn't care, you're only with each other because neither one of you can do any better. Some people actually have self-esteem, the thing about you and Marshmallow is that neither one of you has any spine so you'll be stuck together forever, hating each other. You're the only warm hole that will accept his pathetic beaner penor, you're stretched out and nasty.

Imagine pushing 40 and posting your cheap and trashy fetish gear publicly. It's like the mind of a 10 year old was put into a middle aged woman's body.

That's just your opinion. I don't agree with any of it.

Imagine being so miserable about yourself that you have to sign up to a website to try to verbally abuse a stranger to feel better about yourself. Look at you, you're pathetic.

A healthy, well adjusted person doesn't talk the same way you do. You're insane.

 

[Toasty]

Imagine being so miserable about yourself that you have to sign up to a website to try to verbally abuse a stranger to feel better about yourself. Look at you, you're pathetic.

A healthy, well adjusted person doesn't talk the same way you do. You're insane.

No u

 

[Kosher Salt]

Imagine being so miserable about yourself that you have to sign up to a website to try to verbally abuse a stranger to feel better about yourself. Look at you, you're pathetic.

Pot, meet kettle.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Pot, meet kettle.

I haven't verbally abused anyone. EYE for EYE is not abuse.

 

[Kosher Salt]

I haven't verbally abused anyone. EYE for EYE is not abuse.

Tom-A-to, to-MA-to.

 

[super thug]

You're just mad because you know everything I said is true. You've even admitted it, you said he was a narc, that you deserved better. You both wind up back together because you can't do any better. He's a complete failure of a man, you're a complete failure of a human being. But keep piling on that delusion cope of yours, it's the only cope you have because your reality is just that nightmarish.

 

[redcent]

I haven't verbally abused anyone. EYE for EYE is not abuse.

Verbal abuse? More like verbal sparring, which you agree to by coming here yet you suck at it. It isn't said to make you feel small or to terrorize you, but said in consideration that you're a grown adult who can handle a few mean words. Clearly you're not.

If eye for eye negates responsibility, then consider all these mean words as revenge for you sending threats and lawsuits to null, which grown sensible adults don't do. You still can't find point A. You think people start threads here for no reason? No, it's because your lawsuits and threats make you a loon.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I haven't verbally abused anyone. EYE for EYE is not abuse.

If you're really this stupid you should do society a favour and just disappear.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You're just mad because you know everything I said is true. You've even admitted it, you said he was a narc, that you deserved better. You both wind up back together because you can't do any better. He's a complete failure of a man, you're a complete failure of a human being. But keep piling on that delusion cope of yours, it's the only cope you have because your reality is just that nightmarish.

Never said I was mad and I clearly said the opposite: I don't agree with any of it. It's not factually accurate on so many levels.

Marshall can get another girl. He's physically attractive and has a steady job. In fact, he should go get a new wife. One that believes in all that submission doctrine. They would get along really good. Marshall and I don't get along because he wants to control me and we don't agree on what an "Ezer" is. I won't be controlled by any man. He should have known not to marry me.

I don't believe in submission to men so really the solution is that I need to ask better questions not to be deceived by someone who says they believe in gender equality.

I don't worry about meeting someone new. It will happen in time. My mom was overweight and a divorced single mom and she was never without a steady man.

eye for eye negates responsibility, then consider all these mean words as revenge for you sending threats and lawsuits to null, which grown sensible adults don't do. You still can't find point A. You think people start threads here for no reason? No, it's because your lawsuits and threats make you a loon

Appropriation is a cause of action, you're an idiot. Go look it up dumbass

Point A was using my name here without my consent, beginning March 13, 2017.

You don't want to be accountable for your actions. That's all there is to it.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Appropriation is a cause of action, you're an idiot. Go look it up dumbass

Point A was using my name here without my consent, beginning March 13, 2017.

You don't want to be accountable for your actions. That's all there is to it.

We have the right to talk about you, with or without your consent. You're trying to get the courts to violate our First Amendment rights. Fuck off and die, bitch.

 

[Toasty]

I haven't verbally abused anyone. EYE for EYE is not abuse.

Because in Melinda's world, 2 wrongs DO make a right.
No wonder cps is so concerned about her kids.

 

[talk talk talk]

What kind of Chinese food do Mountain Jews get for Christmas?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

We have the right to talk about you, with or without your consent. You're trying to get the courts to violate our First Amendment rights. Fuck off and die, bitch.

Actually, no you don't

§ 8.01-40. Unauthorized use of name or picture of any person; punitive damages; statute of limitations.​

A. Any person whose name, portrait, or picture is used without having first obtained the written consent of such person, or if dead, of the surviving consort and if none, of the next of kin, or if a minor, the written consent of his or her parent or guardian, for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade, such persons may maintain a suit in equity against the person, firm, or corporation so using such person's name, portrait, or picture to prevent and restrain the use thereof; and may also sue and recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use. And if the defendant shall have knowingly used such person's name, portrait or picture in such manner as is forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this chapter, the jury, in its discretion, may award punitive damages.

B. No action shall be commenced under this section more than 20 years after the death of such person.

What kind of Chinese food do Mountain Jews get for Christmas?

Mmm Chinese food

Because in Melinda's world, 2 wrongs DO make a right.
No wonder cps is so concerned about her kids.

Nobody said anything about 2 sins making a right

The injury moron, not the sin. Take your pagan speak and shove it up your ass, it's my First Amendment right to believe my religious beliefs

 

[Kosher Salt]

Actually, no you don't

§ 8.01-40. Unauthorized use of name or picture of any person; punitive damages; statute of limitations.​

A. Any person whose name, portrait, or picture is used without having first obtained the written consent of such person, or if dead, of the surviving consort and if none, of the next of kin, or if a minor, the written consent of his or her parent or guardian, for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade, such persons may maintain a suit in equity against the person, firm, or corporation so using such person's name, portrait, or picture to prevent and restrain the use thereof; and may also sue and recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use. And if the defendant shall have knowingly used such person's name, portrait or picture in such manner as is forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this chapter, the jury, in its discretion, may award punitive damages.

B. No action shall be commenced under this section more than 20 years after the death of such person.

Federal law cannot infringe Constitutional rights, retard, and we're not using your name or picture

for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade

We're just talking about you, and you can't stop us. Gargle bleach.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

We have the right to talk about you, with or without your consent. You're trying to get the courts to violate our First Amendment rights. Fuck off and die, bitch.

Appropriation is a Federal Tort too.

for advertising purposes or trade

Exactly, for a business. Kiwi Farms is Lolcow, LLC. A business.

we're not using your name or picture

You're using both without my permission.

 

[Toasty]

for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade

Too bad these conditions don't apply, or your appropriation suit wouldn't have been dismissed. Get over it.
You can't just run around sueing anyone who says your name any where ever. Well, maybe YOU can, but you'll meet with the same success that you already have.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Actually, no you don't

§ 8.01-40. Unauthorized use of name or picture of any person; punitive damages; statute of limitations.​

A. Any person whose name, portrait, or picture is used without having first obtained the written consent of such person, or if dead, of the surviving consort and if none, of the next of kin, or if a minor, the written consent of his or her parent or guardian, for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade, such persons may maintain a suit in equity against the person, firm, or corporation so using such person's name, portrait, or picture to prevent and restrain the use thereof; and may also sue and recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use. And if the defendant shall have knowingly used such person's name, portrait or picture in such manner as is forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this chapter, the jury, in its discretion, may award punitive damages.

B. No action shall be commenced under this section more than 20 years after the death of such person.

If that actually mattered news papers in your State wouldn't be able to use photos of anyone or use their names. There's an exception to every rule.
Edit:

https://www.rightofpublicityroadmap.com/law/virginia

Learn the law Melinda before you site shit you don't know.

Nobody said anything about 2 sins making a right

The injury moron, not the sin. Take your pagan speak and shove it up your ass, it's my First Amendment right to believe my religious beliefs

Only if it's a religion recognized by your country. Your bastardize version of Jewish beliefs is not recognized.

 

[redcent]

Never said I was mad and I clearly said the opposite: I don't agree with any of it. It's not factually accurate on so many levels.

Marshall can get another girl. He's physically attractive and has a steady job. In fact, he should go get a new wife. One that believes in all that submission doctrine. They would get along really good. Marshall and I don't get along because he wants to control me and we don't agree on what an "Ezer" is. I won't be controlled by any man. He should have known not to marry me.

I don't believe in submission to men so really the solution is that I need to ask better questions not to be deceived by someone who says they believe in gender equality.

I don't worry about meeting someone new. It will happen in time. My mom was overweight and a divorced single mom and she was never without a steady man.

Times change. The men of this time are different from the men of your mother's time. Keep that in mind

Appropriation is a cause of action, you're an idiot. Go look it up dumbass

Point A was using my name here without my consent, beginning March 13, 2017.

And how is that abuse? If you were salty about that why not just ask the mods here to kindly take it off? That's what a sane adult would do.

Mentioning someone isn't abuse. How the hell are people supposed to communicate if you can't even mention someone? Are you really that weak, that fragile, that you expect the whole world to walk over eggshells without you even telling them how much of a weak willed faberge egg you are? How is that fair?

Like fuck, you mention plenty of people you know irl in this thread, your sister, marshals ex, and so on... should they sue you? Should they send you death threats? No, stop thinking this is all to terrorize you. Look at your argument and see how you fail

You don't want to be accountable for your actions. That's all there is to it.

Pot meet kettle. Get some self awareness, seriously

 

[Toasty]

You're using both without my permission.

You are using your own name and picture to participate and contribute to discussion and private communication on this website. Your lawsuit for appropriation was dismissed. Get the fuck over it already.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

We're just talking about you, and you can't stop us. Gargle bleach.

I sure can stop you. I can re-open my Appropriation case in Wise County Circuit Court. They still have jurisdiction over it. Statute of limitations has not expired.

Too bad these conditions don't apply, or your appropriation suit wouldn't have been dismissed. Get over it.
You can't just run around sueing anyone who says your name any where ever. Well, maybe YOU can, but you'll meet with the same success that you already have.

It does apply moron. KiwiFarms is a business. Go read the case law idiot

The suit wasn't dismissed because Kiwi Farms isn't a business. It was dismissed because I ommitted a few details in my writing that I brought up in the hearing.

But I know you're too dumb to figure out something called distinguishing factors

Only if it's a religion recognized by your country. Your bastardize version of Jewish beliefs is not recognized.

Not according to SCOTUS who has rules several times that individual beliefs independent of sects are valid

And how is that abuse? If you were salty about that why not just ask the mods here to kindly take it off? That's what a sane adult would do.

Mentioning someone isn't abuse. How the hell are people supposed to communicate if you can't even mention someone? Are you really that weak, that fragile, that you expect the whole world to walk over eggshells without you even telling them how much of a weak willed faberge egg you are? How is that fair?

Like fuck, you mention plenty of people you know irl in this thread, your sister, marshals ex, and so on... should they sue you? Should they send you death threats? No, stop thinking this is all to terrorize you. Look at your argument and see how you fail

I haven't mentioned anyone by full name and haven't used anyone's picture

Quit trying to project your evil onto me

Pot meet kettle. Get some self awareness, seriously

There's nothing for me to be held accountable for. Quit trying to project your actions onto me

You are using your own name and picture to participate and contribute to discussion and private communication on this website. Your lawsuit for appropriation was dismissed. Get the fuck over it already.

Pictures that I chose to put idiot.

I didn't put my full legal name up here at all. You all did that to my profile you lying bitch