Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[ConSluttant]

You think you know what you are talking about but don't. I can see all the holes in every post you make. You're the same idiotic profile that couldn't even accurately state the exceptions to CDA Section 230 immunity.





You threatened me and then tried to get me to state that I didn't think you were serious. I said that the only way I would believe you weren't serious about inflicting bodily injury upon me is by you offering information that demonstrated that you were not a hostile person toward me. People do that in the legal world all the time: exchange of information for demonstrating your actual malice, or lack thereof.

Toasty offered to give me the information on your behalf. Another lie she told me, as she lied to say you were her boyfriend. "Split Apart" she called it. I can subpoena the entire conversation, as you have a legal duty not to delete any evidence at this point.

So after she lied and said you were her boyfriend ("Split Apart"), she gave me a fake tattoo picture of Rafal and a woodsy area where he potentially lived. It was all a lie. Therefore, I can see that, in addition to the manipulation and lying, you are indeed a hostile party in this situation.

The legal principle is called "coercion". You tried to coerce a statement out of me with deceit. Makes it nul and void. That's why the last statement says "Any attempt to give misleading or deceitful....retracts this statement"





Thank you. They feel good on my feet.

So lemme get this straight. Melinda is allowed to lie. But if others lie to her that's wrong and proof of malice? Am I getting this right?

Damn. She dumb AF.

And what is this I see? Someone who thinks she still has APPROPRIATION torts available to her to wield as a weapon? Bwahahaha! I've been sued for that. In Virginia, Illinois and South Carolina. Guess what Melinda? They all FAILED! BECAUSE IT'S NOT A CRIME TO TALK ABOUT YOU ONLINE! Yes even on a website. Heck, even if I owned the website IT'S NOT ILLEGAL.

You don't know the application of law. You have such little actual knowledge about anything. You see something that makes your pussy wet and you go for it - never understanding what it's actually about but just buldozing your way though because of course you are right because you know EVERYTHING.

You are a pathetic imbecile and I apologize to actual diagnosed imbeciles because I may have insulted them by lumping you with them. They at least can learn. You cannot.

Actually, no you don't

§ 8.01-40. Unauthorized use of name or picture of any person; punitive damages; statute of limitations.​

A. Any person whose name, portrait, or picture is used without having first obtained the written consent of such person, or if dead, of the surviving consort and if none, of the next of kin, or if a minor, the written consent of his or her parent or guardian, for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade, such persons may maintain a suit in equity against the person, firm, or corporation so using such person's name, portrait, or picture to prevent and restrain the use thereof; and may also sue and recover damages for any injuries sustained by reason of such use. And if the defendant shall have knowingly used such person's name, portrait or picture in such manner as is forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this chapter, the jury, in its discretion, may award punitive damages.

B. No action shall be commenced under this section more than 20 years after the death of such person.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

You're suffering a narcissistic injury to your patriarchal world order so you are raging at a woman expressing her sexuality and independence in a way that threatens your patriarchy male narcsissism

"People fear what they don't know"

If someone talking about their religious beliefs frightens you, it's because you are brainwashed and don't respect people's rights to their religious beliefs. THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOT CHINA. Go read the First Amendment.

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO HOLD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

You live in the dark ages. You are a cave man, as are all of you KF TROLLS

You literally referred to yourself as property. Your children deserve better than a woman that screams feminist rights and then willingly calls herself a slave. You contradict yourself in the same breath.

Speaking as a professional in the field, you misinterpretation of ancient texts and modern laws is no basis on how to govern one's self. You do yourself a disservice, you do your children a disservice by teaching them that this is acceptable behavior (until they get older and start associating with others), parents that do this to their children lose their children, either through government action or through their own actions that cause their children to leave, you do your community disservice: you rely on subsidization because you are virtually unemployable in any position, your neighbors pay your bills for you, and you still think you're some proud and successful woman with high standards.

You are living proof that God is either dead, never existed, or stopped caring. He would have smote you ages ago, according to your own warped versions of scripture. By the very fact that you live the way you live, you prove the God you reach for is not there.

 

[Toasty]

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO HOLD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

People can hold all the beliefs they want, it's the practices that get people in legal trouble. For example, person A may believe that gay people should be put to death, they are all clear. But if they go around saying that they are going to do that, or actually do it, it's no longer an issue of religious freedom.
Likewise person B may believe that it is reasonable for parents to abandon or withold love from their children if said children choose a different religion. The belief is protected, the behavior is not.
I can't believe that a college graduate needs this explained, but this is Melinda, who thinks that Josh can violate her constitutional rights.

You live in the dark ages. You are a cave man, as are all of you KF TROLLS

Irony meter shattered. Bitch says this after typing a whole post on how bronze age slavery practices are relevant in her life today and how wonderful that is.

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

Sigsegv isn't a john doe. The John Does are me @Karl der Grosse and @Rafal Gan Ganowicz, and Jane Doe is @The Jumping Dwarf.

Can't believe Linda still thinks Marshall's ex-wife is a fat, ugly, hairy man like myself. Then again, that's probably what Marshall secretly desires deep down.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Can't believe Linda still thinks Marshall's ex-wife is a fat, ugly, hairy man like myself. Then again, that's probably what Marshall secretly desires deep down.

Only if they're blank.

 

[Toasty]

Can't believe Linda still thinks Marshall's ex-wife is a fat, ugly, hairy man like myself. Then again, that's probably what Marshall secretly desires deep down.

Wow, it's the birth giver! It's almost like a drop in from Santa!

Edit because idiot Mel may try to extrapolate my "birth giver" comment to be implying that this user is female. I am doing nothing of the sort. I'm implying that they began the initial thread, Mel's precious "Point A" where someone else was the subject.

 

[Vince McMahon]

I've seen people questioning all sorts of things that Melinda does but why does she have such an inconsistent and weird formatting? It reminds me of me when I was 12 and pretended that I'm this super intellectual guy and therefore I need to converse at length something that can be compressed in a few sentences. I've also seen this in other...particular people. Why do they do it? Why can't they be consistent in presenting their train of thot?

I don't expect this question to be answered but if someone thinks they can - go right ahead.

 

[White Baby]

I've seen people questioning all sorts of things that Melinda does but why does she have such an inconsistent and weird formatting? It reminds me of me when I was 12 and pretended that I'm this super intellectual guy and therefore I need to converse at length something that can be compressed in a few sentences. I've also seen this in other...particular people. Why do they do it? Why can't they be consistent in presenting their train of thot?

I don't expect this question to be answered but if someone thinks they can - go right ahead.

Because she's a boomer in heart if not physically.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Likewise person B may believe that it is reasonable for parents to abandon or withold love from their children if said children choose a different religion. The belief is protected, the behavior is not.
I can't believe that a college graduate needs this explained, but this is Melinda, who thinks that Josh can violate her constitutional rights.

Both your stupidity and your arrogance are your folly. THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION is protected too, you're an idiot.

You know nothing about the concept of a State Actor and you clearly don't understand the First Amendment. You're a bunch of international stalkers trying to attack the American Constitution

The First Amendment reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Irony meter shattered. Bitch says this after typing a whole post on how bronze age slavery practices are relevant in her life today and how wonderful that is.

You're an idiot twice over. The Torah isn't CAVE MAN beliefs.

You literally referred to yourself as property

A servant is not property, and I never said that. I actually said the opposite. Learn to read

Your children deserve better than a woman that screams feminist rights and then willingly calls herself a slave. You contradict yourself in the same breath.

I never called myself a slave moron, learn to read.

Feminist rights are all over the passage I quoted. The Torah doesn't sex traffic women like you Goyim. Women of all stations have rights, including servants.

Is English even your first language?

Speaking as a professional in the field, you misinterpretation of ancient texts

Come at me, fool. You think you know so much about The Torah but you can't even move beyond a theory and hypothesis here.

Where are your FACTS?

You do yourself a disservice, you do your children a disservice by teaching them that this is acceptable behavior (until they get older and start associating with others),

This is called tacky, unsolicited advice. I don't care about your opinion about how I should raise my children.

Get your own children and quit trying to think you have a right to raise mine, because you don't.

...., either through government action or through their own actions that cause their children to leave, you do your community disservice: you rely on subsidization because you are virtually unemployable in any position, your neighbors pay your bills for you, and you still think you're some proud and successful woman with high standards.

These same tired arguments have already been thrown around on this thread. Your arguments are lame and limp like an old man's penis. Quit trying to waste everyone's time and learn to use the search feature and read a thread properly before you post

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO EXPRESS THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND FREELY EXERCISE THEM AS WELL WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

You're a bunch of foreigners trying to attack the US Constitution.

You are living proof that God is either dead, never existed, or stopped caring. He would have smote you ages ago, according to your own warped versions of scripture. By the very fact that you live the way you live, you prove the God you reach for is not there.

Facts to support your theory?

You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?

 

[White Baby]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Except when you violate already established laws in the free practice of your religion, like abandoning your teenage children on the side of the road with the stray dogs when they rebel against you.

This is called tacky, unsolicited advice. I don't care about your opinion about how I should raise my children.

If you don't want to read unsolicited advice, you can always leave and never come back, like you've said you're going to do four dozen times.

You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?

G-d, or Elohim, or Emmanuel, or Jesus, or Y-shua, or YHWH, or Adonai has many names. Your inability to recognize this is why every theologian you've ever encountered has secretly recalled your inane ramblings while laughing their asses off, amongst many other reasons. "Elohim" literally means "god(s)".

Edit: I some words

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?

Yes. So you can just fuck right off, moron.

 

[Deadpool]

Since I've (a) secured other housing and (b) am not with Marshall and (c) have other Israelites helping me (c) I am eligible for redemption by another Israelite male, I think your story is way off. I have secured alternate housing and I have other Israelites - multiple - helping me. "Seek ye first the Kingdom of Heaven and all these things shall be added to you"

No you don't, and even if you did as soon as they're around you for more than ten minutes they'll realize what a toxic, piece of shit, whore you are and kick you to the curb. Where you belong.

You're suffering a narcissistic injury to your patriarchal world order so you are raging at a woman expressing her sexuality and independence in a way that threatens your patriarchy male narcsissism

"People fear what they don't know"

If someone talking about their religious beliefs frightens you, it's because you are brainwashed and don't respect people's rights to their religious beliefs. THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOT CHINA. Go read the First Amendment.

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO HOLD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

You live in the dark ages. You are a cave man, as are all of you KF TROLLS

No you're just a terrible person, who shouldn't be allowed around children lest they grow up to act like you. Having one person as shitty as you is bad enough. Honestly you should kill yourself.

You're an idiot twice over. The Torah isn't CAVE MAN beliefs.

Your right, It's bronze age goat herder beliefs. Most children (not your niglets because they are retarded and have a retarded teacher/mother) have a better understanding of the world than the people who recorded the Old Testament. That's why it's rife with scientific and historic inaccuracies.

You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?

The creator is not your pagan go elhomo.

Kill yourself whore.

 

[Mr. Faget]

I've seen people questioning all sorts of things that Melinda does but why does she have such an inconsistent and weird formatting? It reminds me of me when I was 12 and pretended that I'm this super intellectual guy and therefore I need to converse at length something that can be compressed in a few sentences. I've also seen this in other...particular people. Why do they do it? Why can't they be consistent in presenting their train of thot?

I don't expect this question to be answered but if someone thinks they can - go right ahead.

Easily explained:

"I'm SUPER-IMPORTANT, and it's paramount that OTHER PEOPLE also think I'm SUPER-IMPORTANT. So I'm gonna sperg up as many words as I can to sound SUPER-IMPORTANT and then they'll all see!"

You might also recognize this as the thinking habits of a 4-year-old.

 

[Vince McMahon]

Easily explained:

"I'm SUPER-IMPORTANT, and it's paramount that OTHER PEOPLE also think I'm SUPER-IMPORTANT. So I'm gonna sperg up as many words as I can to sound SUPER-IMPORTANT and then they'll all see!"

You might also recognize this as the thinking habits of a 4-year-old.

Okay, what's with her just going along with @Baby Yoda's sex talk and going along seriously too, as if this is not a "den of broods and vipers" but a sex parlour for her to find a dick to ride on? Is she actually mentally capable? Is she actually medically autistic? Does she have any intellectual/nervous system impediments?

Dementia patients may experience wild swings in libido, is Melinda dying?

G-d, or Elohim, or Emmanuel, or Jesus, or Y-shua, or YHWH has many names. Your inability to recognize this is why every theologian you've ever encountered has secretly recalled your inane ramblings while laughing their asses off, amongst many others. "Elohim" literally means "god(s)".

I mean, isn't the Lord basically calls Himself "I Am" to distinguish himself from the artificial gods humans belive in?

 

[Shaka Brah]

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOT CHINA. Go read the First Amendment.

She says, as she contrives to limit the First Amendment rights of people who are making fun of her.

 

[Toasty]

Both your stupidity and your arrogance are your folly. THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION is protected too, you're an idiot.

Wrong. Try telling that to all those snake handlers arrested, charged and convicted everywhere it's practiced except west virginia, which has no law against it. If the practice of your religion violates the law, you get arrested. Your local fundamentalist baptist preacher can't have a giant Koran bonfire right nextdoor to his strip mall church without the proper fire permits. Practice is absolutely restricted. Certain religious believers think that a woman like you should be stoned to death, in accordance with their religious beliefs. Is their practice protected by law?
There's definitely an idiot here.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Both your stupidity and your arrogance are your folly. THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION is protected too, you're an idiot.

You know nothing about the concept of a State Actor and you clearly don't understand the First Amendment. You're a bunch of international stalkers trying to attack the American Constitution

The First Amendment reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"




You're an idiot twice over. The Torah isn't CAVE MAN beliefs.



A servant is not property, and I never said that. I actually said the opposite. Learn to read




I never called myself a slave moron, learn to read.

Feminist rights are all over the passage I quoted. The Torah doesn't sex traffic women like you Goyim. Women of all stations have rights, including servants.

Is English even your first language?




Come at me, fool. You think you know so much about The Torah but you can't even move beyond a theory and hypothesis here.

Where are your FACTS?




This is called tacky, unsolicited advice. I don't care about your opinion about how I should raise my children.

Get your own children and quit trying to think you have a right to raise mine, because you don't.




These same tired arguments have already been thrown around on this thread. Your arguments are lame and limp like an old man's penis. Quit trying to waste everyone's time and learn to use the search feature and read a thread properly before you post

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO EXPRESS THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND FREELY EXERCISE THEM AS WELL WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

You're a bunch of foreigners trying to attack the US Constitution.



Facts to support your theory?

You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?

You know, if I presented any of this to a psychologist or therapist, they would very likely show immediate cause for alarm. Go to a real therapist and see what they think of this, and not one of your "friends" (even though I've seen emails that heavily imply you have no friends) who think the same or similar to you. Present yourself to a therapist who has absolutely no clue who you are upon meeting and see if they don't try getting you on meds

 

[Mr. Faget]

Okay, what's with her just going along with @Baby Yoda's sex talk and going along seriously too, as if this is not a "den of broods and vipers" but a sex parlour for her to find a dick to ride on? Is she actually mentally capable? Is she actually medically autistic? Does she have any intellectual/nervous system impediments?

Not a doc of any sort myself, but other Kiwis with actual experience there have speculated she has BPD or clinical narcissism. I've known a few of those types over the years, she certainly seems to fit that bill.

 

[Scrofula]

Both your stupidity and your arrogance are your folly. THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION is protected too, you're an idiot.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO EXPRESS THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND FREELY EXERCISE THEM AS WELL WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

Wrong again. It does not prohibit holding people to account for breaking laws. This is why Warren Jeffs can't have a harem of 8 year olds as wives, why the Church of the Creator cannot have a nigger-roasting ceremony, and why I, a practicing Satanist, cannot come to Shanty Holler and murder you as a blood sacrifice to Him.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You know, if I presented any of this to a psychologist or therapist, they would very likely show immediate cause for alarm. Go to a real therapist and see what they think of this, and not one of your "friends" (even though I've seen emails that heavily imply you have no friends) who think the same or similar to you. Present yourself to a therapist who has absolutely no clue who you are upon meeting and see if they don't try getting you on meds

I don't care what worldly Psychologists think about religious people. Psychology isn't a constitutional right, religion is. Psychology therefore, does not have a right to restrict other's practice of religion and beliefs.

Wrong. Try telling that to all those snake handlers arrested, charged and convicted everywhere it's practiced except west virginia, which has no law against it. If the practice of your religion violates the law, you get arrested. Your local fundamentalist baptist preacher can't have a giant Koran bonfire right nextdoor to his strip mall church without the proper fire permits. Practice is absolutely restricted. Certain religious believers think that a woman like you should be stoned to death, in accordance with their religious beliefs. Is their practice protected by law?
There's definitely an idiot here.

Practice is restricted only when it interferes with another person's constitutional rights to life, liberty and property. Or animal rights.

Otherwise, you can take your foreigner beliefs off my American soil.

She says, as she contrives to limit the First Amendment rights of people who are making fun of her.

You don't have a First Amendment right. You're aren't the press. You're a website. Typing isn't free speech.

Speech that interferes with other's constitutional rights is not protected.

G-d, or Elohim, or Emmanuel, or Jesus, or Y-shua, or YHWH, or Adonai has many names. Your inability to recognize this is why every theologian you've ever encountered has secretly recalled your inane ramblings while laughing their asses off, amongst many other reasons. "Elohim" literally means "god(s)".

Exactly. You can't sort out fact from fiction. I'll just let your comment stand for every Netzarim watching this thread.

(Hi guys!)