Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge
- Thread starter Saney
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
No, that is incorrect. While I won't pretend to be an expert on the specifics, I can tell you that it's nothing like that at all. It doesn't attack the weaker or weakest argument posed in the opposition's argument.
In lazy lay-man terms, it's intentionally misconstruing, if not outright claiming that the opposition said something--made an argument, that they did not make. Using, say, a nation's military budget as a topic, person A says, "We should cut back how much money we're spending on the military." Person B responds, utilizing a strawman, "But we would have to layoff a number of soldiers: Betraying their trust and harming them. Why do you hate the troops so much?"
Never did A in that example say anything about disliking their nation's soldiers, hell they didn't even say the cuts should be acquired through slashing personnel numbers. However, B strawmans it by intentionally trying to advance the argument A posed, and advancing it in such a way that it seems slimy and unlikeable, as a means to win the argument.
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
So how does this hurt straight people? Even before the expansion, gay men were only interested in other gay men. Lesbians only interested in lesbians. How does that affect straight people getting married? It doesn't.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
Nobody gives a fuck that you're incel! Jesus!
Also you do remember when I called you the most repulsive man I've ever talked to, right?
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
Do you not know how international travel works? It's advised that you look into their laws so you don't violate them and cause issues.... So yes, foreigners SHOULD look into other country's laws.
Your country provided, in english, their slander/libel/privacy laws. They are not in a context, they are the straight up Code, not an interpretation of the law.
There is literally nothing that the kiwi is doing that would violate any of your laws.... however, having sex with a mentally ill girl (who does not have the capacity to make contracts or show consent) is actually violating a minor law in Croatia... remember when we found that little law? Good times, good times.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
All that changed by expanding marriage is the participants, just as all that changed in religious expansion was the participants. The ceremony itself remains unchanged otherwise.
And this is why I called your posts selfish. They share a ceremony with gay people, and you call it "hurtful."
Fixed that for you.
Obsess much?
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
He isn't incel, he is Insane, incest, and in doubt of everything we say. He is claiming incel as a crutch to cover up his real issues.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Not true, dear. By you knowing I'm incel you know I'm a bad evolutionary choice. In your female brain it matters very little why. Hence I say that women would resist a rape by a an incel. Then again, they'd resist going on a date with one as well.
- Joined
- May 18, 2014
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
You are not incel. We knew you were a bad evolutionary choice just from how stupid you are in your arguments.
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
You are aware that non-Christian can and always have been able to marry, right?
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
And why do you think you're incel? Because everyone here has made it pretty clear why.
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
@Holden, I love it when you try to debate current issues that I like to discuss, because every time without fail, you manage to pose an argument I already know how to refute from arguing with enough homophobes alone.
What of Christianity? What of Christianity and marriage? Oh, is it something because, "The bibles says marriage is between a man and a woman..." If so, I have a newsflash, Christianity doesn't own marriage. Marriage as a societal institution has existed for many more thousands of years than Christianity has existed. We have written marriage documents dating all the way back to the Sumerians, who existed as far back as 7,000 years ago. Notably, it wasn't really a religious ceremony even back then, primarily a legal one. Marriage existed for thousands of years before the times of Christ's life, and the establishment of Christianity. Christianity has no more control over marriage than Judaism, Islam, or even Scientology.
Well of course he's not an incel, since incels are things that don't exist.
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
Of course not. If he said he was a Unicorn, at least then it would be claiming something that actually exists. This whole "Incel" thing is bullshit.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
Otaku - I made my point quite clear. No, marriage for straight people itself didn't change but the name marriage as an institution did.
This is crossing from an argument basic on logic to a liberal vs conservative argument.
I don't like conservatives much but in this case I am the conservative. I really don't know what else to say. I saw such debates on this and they amounted to the same thing we're discussing here, with the liberal side calling the conservative petty for making the feelings argument.
But that's just how I see it.
This is crossing from an argument basic on logic to a liberal vs conservative argument.
I don't like conservatives much but in this case I am the conservative. I really don't know what else to say. I saw such debates on this and they amounted to the same thing we're discussing here, with the liberal side calling the conservative petty for making the feelings argument.
But that's just how I see it.
Roosechu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
Sometimes I wonder whether Holden is real or an elaborate ruse a la Deagle Nation.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
He's a very special boy.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
And even if it was, his own definition of the term bars him from being incel.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
- Status