Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
Otaku - I made my point quite clear. No, marriage for straight people itself didn't change but the name marriage as an institution did.

This is crossing from an argument basic on logic to a liberal vs conservative argument.

I don't like conservatives much but in this case I am the conservative. I really don't know what else to say. I saw such debates on this and they amounted to the same thing we're discussing here, with the liberal side calling the conservative petty for making the feelings argument.

But that's just how I see it.
Click to expand...

This is a lie. Claiming that the expanding of the institution hurts straight people is pretty much the same as saying that marriage for straight people changed. I proved that earlier after reading this next gem of yours and commenting on it.


Holden said:
No, not at all. Christianity didn't change by expanding, or at least didn't intend to originally. Messages, dogmas and ceremonies were, or at least should had been least in theory, initially the same.

By expanding marriage to include not just a man and a woman but two men or two women you are expanding the nature of institution by changing it. This is hurtful to straight people.
Click to expand...

So please, keep talking it circles. It is very fun to watch. Someone bring me some popcorn.
 
Roosechu said:
Sometimes I wonder whether Holden is real or an elaborate ruse a la Deagle Nation.
Click to expand...

Jace was at least amusing. I haven't seen @Holden battle a trannycopter yet.

Holden, have you ever considered making vlogs and assorted videos? Preferably uploading them to YouTube. After all, you're only reaching a very small audience at the Farms, and we're all already irreversibly indoctrinated in the bluepill beta cuck mangina TAC feminst manlet ideology. If you uploaded your arguments to YouTube in verbal form, you may have a chance of starting the glorious incel/love-shy/MGTOW revolution.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Rin, HickoryDickory, Scratch This Nut and 2 others
Humanoid Email Address said:
Jace was at least amusing. I haven't seen @Holden battle a trannycopter yet.

Holden, have you ever considered making vlogs and assorted videos? Preferably uploading them to YouTube. After all, you're only reaching a very small audience at the Farms, and we're all already irreversibly indoctrinated in the bluepill beta cuck mangina TAC feminst manlet ideology. If you uploaded your arguments to YouTube in verbal form, you may have a chance of starting the glorious incel/love-shy/MGTOW revolution.
Click to expand...


What would he call this glorious video revolution? How about "The Rapening" or "Huntsmen" or possibly even "Rape Nation"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
Failed to quote or tag once again. Such cowardice.

Holden said:
Otaku - I made my point quite clear. No, marriage for straight people itself didn't change but the name marriage as an institution did.
Click to expand...

Then you wouldn't have been discussing the feelings of straight people. You would have been discussing the institution itself.

Holden said:
This is crossing from an argument basic on logic
Click to expand...

Yes, and you've shown a complete absence of contributing logic.

Holden said:
I saw such debates on this and they amounted to the same thing we're discussing here, with the liberal side calling the conservative petty for making the feelings argument.
Click to expand...

I have never, in my life, heard the feelings argument until I met you. I heard the religion argument, the values argument, the genetic skepticism argument, and even both forms of the pedophile argument - arguments rooted in word of god, personal beliefs, or scientific "uncertainties." Never this selfish argument.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Saint
I just noticed something odd. Holden seems to use the definitions of liberal and conservative in the context that is almost unique to American politics rather than party labels that would be appropriate in Croatian politics. More evidence he's a shut in who gets all his information from the TV/internet?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: HickoryDickory, Scratch This Nut, Saint and 2 others
Ah, well. I apparently had my three minute warning from Marijan stating:
yeah, i think i'll block you now
[9:45:13 PM] Caamib Caamib: show me your cunt or i'm blocking you in 3 min
Click to expand...

Meh.
S5oXkur.png
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: cromit, Rin, Scratch This Nut and 1 other person
drtoboggan said:
You're a bad choice because you're an asshole obsessed with rape.
Click to expand...

Not only that, there's also a lot more. He's...

Unemployed.
Has no skills.
Lives with his mom.
Smells bad.
Bad in bed.
Has a drug addiction.

Chris is literally a better choice for a partner. I didn't even know it was possible to fall far enough that Chris was the better option, but you did it, @Holden.

Congratulations!


Holden said:
There we go. Honesty ! He's not "charming", aka a seducer.

Thanks so much Scratch.
Click to expand...

Surprise! Randomly asking women you don't know to show you pictures of their genitalia is creepy!

What is the world coming to. Fucking liberals.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, Rin and HickoryDickory
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back