Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Lots of people object to using FB. It's a prime way to be targeted by Stalkers and Serial Killers




There's no AMMO. He makes the same mistake you guys do: assumptions



Because I already said Torah culture. What Jews decide to do doesn't mean it represents The Torah



It's not luck. If I didn't state everything correctly then the judge wouldn't have filed a Default

Service was valid. That's why the judge issued a Default after a "review of the record"

You're just sore losers




THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT AND WHY I DONT HAVE A DEVELOPED PROFILE ON ANY SOCIAL MEDIA SITE WHERE MY LOCATION AND FAMILY CAN BE TARGETED




None. I'm not bisexual. I don't think becoming a lesbian is the solution because other than the fact that it's against The Torah, I think women have the potential to be just as abusive as men



Let's be more accurate here: Servant[ אָמָה], not Slave. They are two different things in The Torah.

Marshall likes to be in charge. So even though I don't believe in female submission, I thought it was a way to "meet in the middle". He gets the power he wants, I get the respect and love I deserve, and the family stays in tact.

Problem is, Marshall is too harsh with me. He will actually makes me cry, even on my darn birthday. The Torah forbids doing that to a Wife. And I run from pain. He doesn't understand that you can actually get someone to yield to your will with gentleness and listening to their needs/wants.

"Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, because I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”" (Matthew 11:39-30)

The Messiah is the husband of Israel and he isn't a tyrant




But they knew what they were doing when they dismissed my other cases?
You just said that it is impossible to have respect in a submissive relationship, so why are you now saying that you were in fact happy and getting respect in a submissive relationship until recently? Why did you claim to be happy when you are now saying that marshall forced you into submission and was so rude you cried all the time?
 
You haven't won and I have zero stakes in the lawsuit besides laughing at your tard scrawlings.
That's really what I don't get about her. Even if she had managed to successfully serve and get an actual ruling against Null and her four "John and Jane Doe" defendants, that's five people on a site of thousands. How are any of us losers if we have absolutely no stake in this suit?
 
Lots of people object to using FB. It's a prime way to be targeted by Stalkers and Serial Killers
I would like to point out that no one knows why/how serial killers choose their victims. When asked they all give different answers.

Also, it's a fallacy to state that the two members of this site who either planned/ or did kill people were serial killers. A serial killer is someone who kills at least three people and a considerable amount of time has to happen between each murder (two if you go by the FBI). If not, then at most it's just a mass murder. Little fun fact, the older you get the less chance a serial killer will target you (I only know this shit due to my Call of Cthulhu games and the amount of research I do for them).
 
Both your stupidity and your arrogance are your folly. THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION is protected too, you're an idiot.

You know nothing about the concept of a State Actor and you clearly don't understand the First Amendment. You're a bunch of international stalkers trying to attack the American Constitution

The First Amendment reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO EXPRESS THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND FREELY EXERCISE THEM AS WELL WITHOUT SURRENDERING THEIR RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

You're a bunch of foreigners trying to attack the US Constitution.



Facts to support your theory?

You can't even get The Creator's name right, you think you're fit to judge me?
I will never stop laughing that Melinda thinks that we aren't allowed to criticize, mock, laugh at, and denigrate her silly beliefs because of MUH FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. And completely forgetting our first amendment rights that allow us to do just that. It just gives me the giggles every time.



Speech that interferes with other's constitutional rights is not protected.

Exactly. You can't sort out fact from fiction. I'll just let your comment stand for every Netzarim watching this thread.

(Hi guys!)
She just doesn't understand how it works. At all. Lol
There is not one place in The Hebrew Bible that says that you have to have a conversion certificate from a Rabbi to be "Jewish" (a Hebrew/an Israelite in a general sense, not necessarily someone just from the tribe of Judah). If you have even one drop of blood from an ancestor standing at Mt. Sinai you are part of the promise to those at Mt. Sinai.

Are you familiar with Nehemia Gordon? He is a Karaite and has a good video on this subject



Whoever wants to worship Elohim is free to do so and will be accepted by Elohim

"And the foreigners[הנכר] who join themselves to Adonai
to serve him, to love the name of Adonai,
and to be his workers,
all who keep Shabbat and do not profane it,
and hold fast to my covenant,
I will bring them to my holy mountain
and make them joyful in my house of prayer;
their burnt offerings and sacrifices
will be accepted on my altar;
for my house will be called
a house of prayer for all peoples.”
Adonai Elohim says,
he who gathers Isra’el’s exiles:
“There are yet others I will gather,
besides those gathered already.” (Isa. 56:6-8*)





Kosher jelly beans

Jelly Belly company makes a really good one





Yes, that photo is a boy in a red dress





The comment I made to him was about uterus envy, not breaking up with people

The reason someone breaks up with someone is the distinguishing factor. Marshall's two ex-wives were addicts. I would leave addicts too. I have a zero tolerance policy for two things in a relationship: (a) cheating and (b) substance abuse. One strike, you're gone.

I broke up with my exes for valid reasons. It's not my fault if I'm more righteous than every man I've ever met. Overall, the women of my generation are more righteous than the men. That's why there are so many happy single mothers and happy single women. Now that women in the western world have more access to money and education, you see more women opting to be single and be intentional single mothers. Most men just haven't caught up morally and spiritually. If women in other countries would have more access to money and education you'd see more matriarchal women who just don't buy into Patriarchy which doesn't serve women's best interest. Patriarchy thrives on the economic oppression of women.

It takes TWO people to make a TAMIYM relationship. If the men of my generation would step up their Torah game, then maybe my life could have a different storyline, but I don't stress over changing other people. You can't change other people and believing you can is codependency. I accept that I live in an evil world where most people are in fact evil.

Why would you stay with an evil person?





Ahhh, so now your moral philosophy -- when it suits you as a male -- is that it's okay to break up with people if they don't treat you righteously


Hm, imagine that :cunningpepe:

Deadpool, you seem rather MOTI at melinda than most. I don't know why but maybe you should chill?

You haven't threatened her outright but your constant kys towards her is getting pretty borderline.
You know, you might consider that is perfectly acceptable to viciously mock someone when they are attempting to sue you. I think you might do the same in the same situation.

I got pregnant because he got to a point after a 5 hour discussion on the phone about Monogamy. After some reflection he said I was right. So we got back together.

Then we fought about female submission. He wanted me to submit. I said no. So we broke it off after I got pregnant.

So then I started making a list of what I would look for in a potential spouse. So that wouldn't happen again.

The thing is that guys often lie to get with me. Or they don't understand themself and don't know who to present themself as. They just say they agree with what I'm saying but forget what they said and then violate my boundaries.

If guys would be honest about what they believe and who they are from the beginning, then a lot of problems would be solved. Like, if a guy thinks watching porn is not a sin, tell a girl before you get with her so she can decide BEFORE the sex if she wants to be with you.

It's unfair to anyone to prevent a false self to seduce someone into a relationship
You do realize that everyone puts forward their best self in dating situations and hide their faults. Right? It's human nature. I would think you were smart enough... Oh. Sorry. My bad.

Not a single man has gotten my uterus for free. My children have a relationship with me and I'm the head of my family clan. I'm the one they honor and give gifts too. My children all resemble me, especially my hair.

Where are those men? Too bad, so sad for cheap $50 loads of sperm whose source is so easily forgotten. A man isn't a father because he can make sperm (that's a sperm donor). He's a father because of his involvement in a child's life.

It's better for women to stand up a little taller anyway. You men have done such a shitty job running the show in the last 5,780 years. Time for righteous women to fix what you broke
I can't roll my eyes hard enough. Humans are flawed. Full stop. As a woman I shudder to think where we would be if we were under female rule. Most women are crueler than men when in positions of power. Plus stupider because they let it go to their head. See Nancy Pelosi for proof. Or Diane Feinstein. Ugh.

Goy culture is full of prostitution and the men and woman of those cultures approve of it. Historically, that has always been true.

That's one major difference between women's rights in The Torah and Goy view of women. Women cannot be sexually objectified in The Torah, they always maintain marital rights in the context of sexual unions. Slave women couldn't be touched sexually.

Goyim culture is defiled with prostitution and sex trafficking.
And Jewish culture never has been? Gosh your rose colored glasses are really really thick.

Because people break the law all the time and don't get caught. I watched a video documentary once where a girl who had been locked up and sex trafficked who said sometimes lawyers would pay for sex with her.
It doesn't look that way to the public when you hide information



Homey, here's the definition of "chronically" and the shoe fits! Kiwi Farms attracts serial killers. That's not a lie and accusing me isn't going to scare me into silence. That's what you're trying to do because I have exposed you to the law. You're trying to blame shift back onto me and I'm not buying your shit.

You're a bunch of psychopaths who stalk people and lie to cover your tracks.

You're stalkers


View attachment 1812607





Because happiness is not the point. It's not complete without full righteousness.

Lack of respect for your wife confirmed: you're a sexist who doesn't acknowledge or respect your wife's equal status

Not going to argue with you about it anymore. You have your Patriarchal Christian worldview and I have mine and we will never agree. No point in arguing this issue again.
You are the weirdest person ever. You take a single anecdote and then extrapolate it to be THIS IS HOW IT ALWAYS IS. I mean seriously this is retarded and you are retarded for thinking that.

Just because you think something doesn't make it so. Just because you say something doesn't make it so. And you will be ridiculed forever because you think this way.

Your belief that we are serial killers simply because we visit a website that someone who aspired to be one, someone who failed to become one and that the video of someone who was one is hosted here is possibly the dumbest thing I've ever seen. But this is you in taking about. You are what you are. I guess you can't help it.

I find it laughable that you just assume that the men here are sexist and treat their wives badly just because the disagree with you. You are dumb.

Even one serial killer associated with your website is enough cause for alarm

That's why Facebook doesn't let people troll their APP anonymously. The flat of your site breads it




Look at you trying to manipulate my words again

"So sue me" is MOCKING YOU because I haven't committed Defamation. You can't demonstrate damages on an anonymous profile

Idiots
Don't learn from my mistakes?
You can't demonstrate defamation either you dumb twit. But keep going. I've got more popcorn.
 
You can't expect any honesty out of Melinda in any circumstances. Even if you fit her definition of Jew she'll still end up lying to you because she lies to herself constantly. She absolutely cannot make it through the day unless she's lying to herself constantly. Lying to the court and other people is just an extension of that. She'll never be an honest person unless she can face reality and accept it. We all know that isn't going to happen anytime soon.
 
She came this close to a moment of realization about herself.

Next time, team.

I haven't abused anyone

Eye for eye is not abuse.


You just said that it is impossible to have respect in a submissive relationship, so why are you now saying that you were in fact happy and getting respect in a submissive relationship until recently? Why did you claim to be happy when you are now saying that marshall forced you into submission and was so rude you cried all the time?

Some days were good, some days were bad.

A Servant/Master arrangement is not female submission on the basis of gender. It's born out of economic disparities rather than gender inequality. It's also based on The Torah concept that females need male bodily protection within family clans. In The Torah men always have a duty to nurture and guard women in their clan because they carry human life.

Sarah called Abraham "Master" and yet when she told Abraham to send Hagar away YHWH told Abraham to listen to Sarah. "Harken unto the voice of thine wife Sarah". She still had a voice of authority in the relationship.

The Master in an Exod 21 style marriage is a male guardian who looks out for the best interests of the Servant Wife. He could express a strong preference for something but every decision always has to benefit the wife as well. So yes he has power but the power if always used for her good too

A Master is required to be generous and kind (Lev. 25:43). He secures her food, clothing and housing. He offers bodily protection and sexual rights to her (exclusive access to his body). In exchange, the Master gets a keeper of his house/Estate (cooking, organizing, cleaning, etc), a companion, exclusive sexual rights to her and children with her. She assists in running the house/Estate but he maintains financial control of it.

It's appropriate for arranged marriages, fatherless women who need male bodily protection, marriages where the woman might be marrying into money (she comes from a poorer social class) or the marriage is not based on emotional love but the two people are physically attracted to each other and like each other's company.

It never says that Sarah and Abraham loved each other. Sometimes people have a lot of chemistry together and this kind of relationship might work for them. Especially if the man in the relationship is not particularly romantic. The woman can surrender her right/need to romance in exchange for other benefits. Which is good because I've seen lots of women leave men because they don't feel romanced. The Master/Servant arrangement of The Torah can keep marriages together. Women can be grateful for male bodily protection, someone looking out for them and material provision instead of complaining there is no romance
 
I haven't abused anyone

Eye for eye is not abuse.




Some days were good, some days were bad.

A Servant/Master arrangement is not female submission on the basis of gender. It's born out of economic disparities rather than gender inequality. It's also based on The Torah concept that females need male bodily protection within family clans. In The Torah men always have a duty to nurture and guard women in their clan because they carry human life.

Sarah called Abraham "Master" and yet when she told Abraham to send Hagar away YHWH told Abraham to listen to Sarah. "Harken unto the voice of thine wife Sarah". She still had a voice of authority in the relationship.

The Master in an Exod 21 style marriage is a male guardian who looks out for the best interests of the Servant Wife. He could express a strong preference for something but every decision always has to benefit the wife as well. So yes he has power but the power if always used for her good too

A Master is required to be generous and kind (Lev. 25:43). He secures her food, clothing and housing. He offers bodily protection and sexual rights to her (exclusive access to his body). In exchange, the Master gets a keeper of his house/Estate (cooking, organizing, cleaning, etc), a companion, exclusive sexual rights to her and children with her. She assists in running the house/Estate but he maintains financial control of it.

It's appropriate for arranged marriages, fatherless women who need male bodily protection, marriages where the woman might be marrying into money (she comes from a poorer social class) or the marriage is not based on emotional love but the two people are physically attracted to each other and like each other's company.

It never says that Sarah and Abraham loved each other. Sometimes people have a lot of chemistry together and this kind of relationship might work for them. Especially if the man in the relationship is not particularly romantic. The woman can surrender her right/need to romance in exchange for other benefits. Which is good because I've seen lots of women leave men because they don't feel romanced. The Master/Servant arrangement of The Torah can keep marriages together. Women can be grateful for male bodily protection, someone looking out for them and material provision instead of complaining there is no romance
So what you're saying is that biblical submissive marriages are okay when you do it, but nobody else.
 
Melinda's butchering the Holy Book, I'm shocked.

Usually when Sarai refers to Abram it's kurios which is just a way of saying "sir" as it's used a few times for different people, including a servant.
 
So what I'm hearing is that Marshall was incapable of romance or expressing any feelings of love towards you.
 
So what you're saying is that biblical submissive marriages are okay when you do it, but nobody else.

No, that's not what I just said.

What I stated was that a Master/Servant Wife arrangement is born out of economic circumstances, NOT gender ideals. A man is Master in Exod 21 style marital unions because of the financial and material resources he has, not because he has a penis. It's like The Torah's solution to a pre-nup. Sarah still had a level of authority

What I also said was that a man telling a woman that he is "Head of the House" and can rule over her because he is a male and she is a female is wrong. There is no place in The Torah that says men are "Head of the House" because they were born with a penis. (Gen. 3:16 is a curse, not a command).

In fact, there is no place in The Hebrew Bible that sets a precedent for the idea that souls put into male bodies are superior to souls put into female bodies. There no precedent in The Hebrew Bible for the idea that souls put into male bodies have extra abilities than souls put into female bodies

The souls of an Israelite man and Israelite woman are equal



Melinda's butchering the Holy Book, I'm shocked.

Usually when Sarai refers to Abram it's kurios which is just a way of saying "sir" as it's used a few times for different people, including a servant.

It says ADONAI there


Screenshot_20201227-122221.png
 
So what I'm hearing is that Marshall was incapable of romance or expressing any feelings of love towards you.
Lol

He wasn't romantic but he could express love


Do you have any proof that it isn't? You present the cavejew Hammurabi shit so often, but you can never actually prove that it's not abusive.
Psychology calls it "reactive abuse". The Torah calls eye for eye "righteousness"
 
What I stated was that a Master/Servant Wife arrangement is born out of economic circumstances, NOT gender ideals. A man is Master in Exod 21 style marital unions because of the financial and material resources he has, not because he has a penis. It's like The Torah's solution to a pre-nup. Sarah still had a level of authority

What I also said was that a man telling a woman that he is "Head of the House" and can rule over her because he is a male and she is a female is wrong.
You continue to display your internalized misogyny like it's a badge of honor.
 
You continue to display your internalized misogyny like it's a badge of honor.

Be more specific.

How is anything I said putting women in an inferior place in society?

The Master/Servant arrangement of Torah actually grants women the dignity of marital rights. In many cultures poor women were overlooked for marriage. Think "Pride and Prejudice". Women in antiquity who weren't virgins or women who were less physically attractive could be overlooked too. The Master/Servant relationship gives women the dignity of marriage even if they are considered less desirable by society's standards.

Look what Goy cultures does instead women they deem less desirable. They use them as...what did you all call it? "Cum dumpsters".
 
I'm much more inclined to believe the field of psychology.
Never mind the fact that in Yeshua's time the concept had been corrupted into justification for petty wars, and he actively advised against it-- but we've been over how @TamarYaelBatYah whites out anything in the bible she doesn't like. Probably literally.

How is anything I said putting women in an inferior place in society?
You condone the master-servant relationship in one breath and in the next condemn what's basically the same thing but without the BDSM elements: mutual consent for the man to handle the bigger affairs of the house. Your insistence that codependency is harmful except when you do it is misogynistic because you are attempting to force your own ideals on all women regardless of faith, circumstance or disability.
 
Back