Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
And yet labor participation rate stagnated: https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm

Unemployment rates being essentially fiction wasn’t new under Trump but he certainly didn’t try correcting them do they’re more realistic.

You're never going to see an administration admit that Unemployment % is a useless rate for measuring the overall health of the economy, and you'll unfortunately never see anyone mention that LFPR even exists. People would freak out if they came to realize that 36% of working-age adults in the US just straight up aren't doing it, well above the normal 8-9% that might account for invalids, students, and early retirees.

The Trump economy was great... if you're in finance or tech, which are the sectors that the GDP is most predicated on. I won't deny that he was better for business on the whole than Obama, though, sure; but that's less because of anything he did, and more because he didn't feel like getting in the way to force you to work your shitty employees for 29.5 hours and not a minute more.
 
What exactly did Donald Trump’s party achieve for working Americans for the four years it had power?

If this is Donald Trump’s party, Trump can take it with him when he leaves the White House.
You could say the same for Obama who had the same problem of a Congress that didn't agree with him.

What's with people suddenly getting extra riled up over Trump lately? Excited to see him go and Biden be in? Ready for things to get back to normal?
Cannot believe the levels of upset still.
 
You could say the same for Obama who had the same problem of a Congress that didn't agree with him.

What's with people suddenly getting extra riled up over Trump lately? Excited to see him go and Biden be in? Ready for things to get back to normal?
Cannot believe the levels of upset still.

Considering they barely even know what Biden represents ( and voted for him knowing this ), I can understand the panic and uncertainty not going away like it should must come as alarming. It's kind of sad really.
 
SMASH UR LED LIGHTBULBS

View attachment 1813535
hErE's HoW tRuMp CaN sTiLl WiN
View attachment 1813537
KRAKEN
View attachment 1813538

I can't imagine supporting Trump, who's been trying to move US manufacturing jobs to India which has considerably less labor protections to China, and saying something this fucking stupid.

If you can put trade barriers up against China because it's more successful, you can put up trade barriers against India or anywhere else with no labor protections. Honestly, you people...

It seems Sidney Powell remains undeterred by Smartmatic's pending legal action:

Image1.png


I'd give you the page number (it's about half-way through) but the Patriots who compiled this 'Protocols of the Elders of Biden' were clearly too busy for any of that.
 
Considering they barely even know what Biden represents ( and voted for him knowing this ), I can understand the panic and uncertainty not going away like it should must come as alarming. It's kind of sad really.
Funny coming from a guy who worships a 75 year old career conman who is a lolcow himself

When is Q's plan going to come to fruition?
 
You could say the same for Obama who had the same problem of a Congress that didn't agree with him.
Ah, the good old 'Trump had absolutely no power'. Clearly he couldn't have gotten anything in exchange for letting Paul Ryan's tax cuts pass... oh, wait, he was never trying to do anything but Paul Ryan's policies in the first place.
 
Biden is a career politician, sure, but he's not a career conman and compulsive liar like Trump. Biden never ran a fraudulent charity, for example.
>career politician
>not career conman
>not compulsive liar

Pick one
But thanks for letting me know, I was genuinely curious your thoughts on that.

Ah, the good old 'Trump had absolutely no power'. Clearly he couldn't have gotten anything in exchange for letting Paul Ryan's tax cuts pass... oh, wait, he was never trying to do anything but Paul Ryan's policies in the first place.
Are you saying Trump could have done everything he wanted but he decided not to? Like Obama he ended up stuck with a chamber of Congress that hated his guts and that was that. While he had Congress he pushed for his own agenda and played friendly with the GOP which is the ticket he ran on. I really don't know what people expected to happen. He was never going to tell the GOP to go fuck themselves while he had Congress and needed them to pass stuff and even then plenty of Republicans refused to work with him on almost anything.

Say whatever you want about Trump but he tried to do a lot and threw a fit literally everytime he got stonewalled and people make fun of him for that. Just like Republicans bitching about Obama being useless and barely getting anything done once he lost any hope of getting anything big through Congress. Can't wait for people to bitch about Trump ruling through EOs or something.
 
Last edited:
Dude read that guy's recent posts he's losing his fucking mind. The rantings of a schizophrenic retard.

View attachment 1813710
View attachment 1813711
View attachment 1813715

Oh is this the new gotcha now? Mashing the jizz off your keyboards and scouring post history for some rebuttal in my own words instead of actually speaking for yourself? :story:

Biden is a career politician, sure, but he's not a career conman and compulsive liar like Trump.

Sweetheart, don't make it that easy. You've gotta try harder. Maybe step up the daddy projection some more? Aren't you the faggot who ranted about how mad he is to be surrounded by his 'hick family' and that's why you launch into deranged smugposting whenever anybody mentions anything about your child-sniffing hero? Why don't you reveal more intimate details of yourself for the class.
 
Ah, the good old 'Trump had absolutely no power'. Clearly he couldn't have gotten anything in exchange for letting Paul Ryan's tax cuts pass... oh, wait, he was never trying to do anything but Paul Ryan's policies in the first place.
Washington tore Trump apart.

That's what happens when you try to work with scumbags who make you look harmless... despite being in the executive...
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: BSC
Washington tore Trump apart.

That's what happens when you try to work with scumbags who make you look harmless... despite being in the executive...
Trump had full control of the senate and the house. He had all the power to do whatever he wanted.

Sweetheart, don't make it that easy. You've gotta try harder. Maybe step up the daddy projection some more? Aren't you the faggot who ranted about how mad he is to be surrounded by his 'hick family' and that's why you launch into deranged smugposting whenever anybody mentions anything about your child-sniffing hero? Why don't you reveal more intimate details of yourself for the class.
Lol at you accusing someone of deranged posting after your unhinged posting in the covid thread. Settle down, dude. It's gonna be like life before 2016 again. You weren't thrown in camps then and you won't be now, either. You're being even more retarded than the lefties were when they said Trump was gonna throw the trannies in camps
 
Welp its done get for REEE new rules by record company :story:
1609124678898.png

Trump signs massive measure funding government, COVID relief
By JILL COLVIN, LISA MASCARO and ANDREW TAYLOR
58 minutes ago

1 of 4
President Donald Trump rides in a motorcade vehicle as he departs Trump International Golf Club, Sunday, Dec. 27, 2020, in West Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — President Donald Trump signed a $900 billion pandemic relief package Sunday, ending days of drama over his refusal to accept the bipartisan deal that will deliver long-sought cash to businesses and individuals and avert a federal government shutdown.

The massive bill includes $1.4 trillion to fund government agencies through September and contains other end-of-session priorities such as money for cash-starved transit systems and an increase in food stamp benefits.

Trump announced the signing in a statement Sunday night that spoke of his frustrations with the COVID-19 relief for including only $600 checks to most Americans instead of the $2,000 that his fellow Republicans rejected. He also complained about what he considered unnecessary spending by the government at large. But Trump’s eleventh-hour objections created turmoil because lawmakers had thought he was supportive of the bill, which had been negotiated for months with White House input.

“I will sign the Omnibus and Covid package with a strong message that makes clear to Congress that wasteful items need to be removed,” Trump said in the statement.

While the president insisted he would send Congress “a redlined version” with items to be removed under the rescission process, those are merely suggestions to Congress. The bill, as signed, would not necessarily be changed.

Lawmakers now have breathing room to continue debating whether the relief checks should be as large as the president has demanded. The Democratic-led House supports the larger checks and is set to vote on the issue Monday, but it’s expected to be ignored by the Republican-held Senate where spending faces opposition.

Republicans and Democrats swiftly welcomed Trump’s decision to sign the bill into law.

“The compromise bill is not perfect, but it will do an enormous amount of good for struggling Kentuckians and Americans across the country who need help now,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “I thank the President for signing this relief into law.”

Democrats are promising more aid to come once President-elect Joe Biden takes office, but Republicans are signaling a wait-and-see approach.

In the face of growing economic hardship, spreading disease and a looming shutdown, lawmakers on Sunday had urged Trump to sign the legislation immediately, then have Congress follow up with additional aid. Aside from unemployment benefits and relief payments to families, money for vaccine distribution, businesses, cash-starved public transit systems and more is on the line. Protections against evictions also hung in the balance.

“What the president is doing right now is unbelievably cruel,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. “So many people are hurting. ... It is really insane and this president has got to finally ... do the right thing for the American people and stop worrying about his ego.”

Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania said he understood that Trump “wants to be remembered for advocating for big checks, but the danger is he’ll be remembered for chaos and misery and erratic behavior if he allows this to expire.”

Toomey added: “So I think the best thing to do, as I said, sign this and then make the case for subsequent legislation.”

The same point was echoed by Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican who’s criticized Trump’s pandemic response and his efforts to undo the election results. “I just gave up guessing what he might do next,” he said.

Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois said too much is at stake for Trump to “play this old switcheroo game.”

“I don’t get the point,” he said. “I don’t understand what’s being done, why, unless it’s just to create chaos and show power and be upset because you lost the election.”

Washington had been reeling since Trump turned on the deal. Fingers pointed at administration officials, including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, as lawmakers tried to understand whether they were misled about Trump’s position.

“Now to be put in a lurch, after the president’s own person negotiated something that the president doesn’t want, it’s just — it’s surprising,” Kinzinger said.

Kinzinger spoke on CNN’s “State of the Union,” and Hogan and Sanders on ABC’s “This Week.”

___

Mascaro and Taylor reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Alexandra Olson in New York contributed to this report.
 
I'm still convinced a great deal of Biden's win had to do with tech companies propping him up. Around the first of the fiscal year (July 1) numerous social media platforms banned conservative posters/subs, started censoring conservative (or non-Biden) posters. It was pretty obvious to me at the time, and I was not a self-described Trump fan. This development made me extremely suspicious. I might not agree with hardcore right wingers, but I don't advocate banning them outright. Most of the mainstream media outlets had already backed Biden by that time. However, I imagine it's already well known that a great deal of the younger voters DON'T rely on mainstream news for their information... they go to twitter, reddit, other platforms. The admins of these platforms were firmly in support of Biden as of mid-Summer, were given free reign to censor and ban people, and made sure most anti-Biden sentiment was squashed.

In hindsight, in 2016, it seemed many of these same social media platforms and search engines were backing Trump and/or propping him up. Everything outside of mainstream media was pro-Trump online. The exception that time around was that mainstream news media didn't back Trump. Weeks before the election, it seemed many of these platforms pushed the anti-HRC narrative hard. I couldn't help but think at that time that this was deliberate and that the admins for these platforms were turning a blind eye to it. I remember the Trump admin granting cable/phone/internet companies the right to harvest, collect, and sell user data. Perhaps the tech industries saw that the GOP would push whatever they wanted under the guise of "pro-business practice", whereas for some reason they thought HRC would not? I don't know.

Going further back, I vaguely remember Obama being heavily pushed on Facebook and other online platforms in 2012 and 2008.

I guess my point is: whomever Tech supports will ultimately win any given election. This is aside from voting machine shenanigans. The "grassroots" campaigning for Antifa/BLM/Democrats was largely organized via online platforms, twitter accounts, etc., as was grooming young people into extreme ideology. Conservative entities were banned from these same platforms. One notorious tr00n mod from Reddit who advocated "trying registered Republicans for treason" was also shilling for campaign donations for "act Blue".. there are numerous other examples I've seen of this-- high ranking admins on social media openly shilling for Biden.

People have a short attention span nowadays, and a huge number of them seem easily manipulated by what they read and hear online. Pushing propaganda or "hot news stories" right before an election will sway people. Tech companies know this. For whatever reason, they saw Biden as their winning horse. Tech squashed the Hunter controversy story hard whereas in 2016 they helped push Pizza Gate.

My assumption is that the whole transhumanism ideology/global economy/environmental issues were what drove them to support Biden/ the Democrats as they will make tech and bio-med companies huge profits. They know COVID will be a great excuse to automate more people out of work, to invade more people's privacy, and they wanted to back whomever would also support the most micromanaging COVID restrictions as well. The whole "Great Reset" ideology hinges on globalist governmental policies and grifting via environmental policies, and vested interests (including many tech moguls) knew the Republicans wouldn't accept that to some extent as many of their constituents are against "one world government", hate the UN, are anti-transhumanistic ideology, don't want invasive policies that include compulsory vaccination.
 
@FrankyKismyFP Big agree from me, my main concerns going forward don't really have to do with Biden or the DNC so much as big tech having immense power through influence and control of information.
I don't know who wears the pants, but the dems and the major tech companies seem to be in a relationship, though I'm not sure if it's just big tech pushing whoever they think benefits them the most or what. Trump was great for social media but then he ended up hating it and saying they should be regulated so now we'll see how hard a stance a Biden (aka DNC) admin takes.
 
I'm still convinced a great deal of Biden's win had to do with tech companies propping him up. Around the first of the fiscal year (July 1) numerous social media platforms banned conservative posters/subs, started censoring conservative (or non-Biden) posters. It was pretty obvious to me at the time, and I was not a self-described Trump fan. This development made me extremely suspicious. I might not agree with hardcore right wingers, but I don't advocate banning them outright. Most of the mainstream media outlets had already backed Biden by that time. However, I imagine it's already well known that a great deal of the younger voters DON'T rely on mainstream news for their information... they go to twitter, reddit, other platforms. The admins of these platforms were firmly in support of Biden as of mid-Summer, were given free reign to censor and ban people, and made sure most anti-Biden sentiment was squashed.

Contrary to what some of these absolute brainlets on here might seem to think, most of the posters who voted for Trump don't worship the ground he walks on; it's all the shit surrounding him and noticing how driven Big Tech has been across the past few years. An automaton who doesn't think beyond the surface of his feelings or is steered by the apparatus of the media is a very different person who makes a decision based on trying to ensure the person those entities is supporting the most obviously doesn't get in, because history will tell you it's a very bad thing when they get together and brainstorm.

Trump is too much of a screaming idiot to let himself be steered by anybody but himself and what he wants; I'm afraid that's infinitely more endearing than a man who has the Washington fist rammed so far up his ass that it's using his mouth like a hand puppet every time he talks. Worrying about the future of my job, my life, and my autonomy as a human being as I inherit this mess isn't schizoprenic ranting; try again. Or better yet, come up with a good case for Biden that doesn't make everything you've accused me and the other posters of look like projection; because you certainly don't seem to be worried about where we're heading. I mean, then again I could have probably told you that; you voted to get orange man out, not Biden in.
 
Back