Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

AltisticRight said:
View attachment 1816270
View attachment 1816271View attachment 1816272View attachment 1816273

Nick's not wrong here. What does she want, a golden star on her forehead for not killing a baby? Given her history, yeah, "conservative", she is not. Just a grift, just like Nick. Neither are conservatives. Not killing your kid makes you a decent human being, not a conservative activist, whatever that means.

Unfortunately, her Twitter is now protected. Not sure if these tweets have been archived.
Click to expand...
If you listen or watch any of the normie Republican media - Fox News, Glenn Beck, Ben Shapiro, etc, the pro-life advocates on all the shows are liberals who 'had a change of heart' and make the rounds as regular guests on all the shows. It's approved grift. I don't know if it's the party itself or the accepted people decided who were the advocates, but no longer is it the big family who were high school sweetheart virgins who had 10 kids. It's the whore who had a kid when she was 14 and now has become a 'pillar of society'. Or someone like Abby Johnson who gets high appearance fees from telling everyone she helped facilitate the killing of thousands of babies and 'after seeing one on an ultrasound suddenly realized it was a baby'. Sure, she had never seen an ultrasound of a baby until 2009 even though she worked at Planned Parenthood and ultrasounds were around for decades. Definitely not the thousands in appearance fees to become the top former Planned Parenthood pro life advocate. (Edit - It's rumored she makes $10K - $20K per appearance).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: janekop, UnimportantFarmer, AltisticRight and 5 others
Terrorist said:
“I think in America you're 'liberal' if you want Negroes to gangbang your daughter, and you're 'conservative' if you want one Negro to marry her and start behaving himself” - Thomas777

Once again Nick is right, but has made too much of a degenerate ass of himself for it to matter.
Click to expand...
AltisticRight said:
Modern conservatism is about "securing the existence of our grift and a future for hammerhead mutts.
Click to expand...
Now that I think about it, one of the biggest things that puts me off of modern conservative movements like TPUSA and YAF is the level of minority patronization they invoke to try and win over normie voters and people from the opposing party. If the so-called "Democrats are the real racists" talking heads actually respected black people, they wouldn't be trying to lure them in with big-name minority celebrities, cultural trends, or whatever prevailing zoomer trend that the one black student and his ten white friends are currently in to. If all these "how-do-you-do, fellow-kids" political movements actually regarded everyone as equal, they wouldn't be constantly trying to prove that they are on a public level. Same reason why white middle-class liberals arguably see minorities as beneath them. Respect, not patronization, should be the ideal to political success. Nick is still an insufferable ass-clown with buddies who are far more prone to vice and actual crime than any basic lady looking for cock in college, but I'd say the problem's validity still stands.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: janekop, Kenobi, ditto and 3 others
HarpersFerryWest said:
Now that I think about it, one of the biggest things that puts me off of modern conservative movements like TPUSA and YAF is the level of minority patronization they invoke to try and win over normie voters and people from the opposing party. If the so-called "Democrats are the real racists" talking heads actually respected black people, they wouldn't be trying to lure them in with big-name minority celebrities, cultural trends, or whatever prevailing zoomer trend that the one black student and his ten white friends are currently in to. If all these "how-do-you-do, fellow-kids" political movements actually regarded everyone as equal, they wouldn't be constantly trying to prove that they are on a public level. Same reason why white middle-class liberals arguably see minorities as beneath them. Respect, not patronization, should be the ideal to political success. Nick is still an insufferable ass-clown with buddies who are far more prone to vice and actual crime than any basic lady looking for cock in college, but I'd say the problem's validity still stands.
Click to expand...
Probably going to be a bit all over the place with this one but I'll attempt to keep it on the rails:

I don't like it but I can see where these conservative (if you can even call them that for the most part) movements are coming from trying to get them on board. They know, along with liberals/Democrats and everyone else that conservatives/Republicans have the label of being for white people, and some (on both sides) are actually delusional enough to think that the Republicans are pro-white of all things. Not just that, but also being anti-minority (specifically blacks, because everything always has to revolve around black people) is the other wide stereotype. The idea of just hitting them with respect is nice in theory (as you said, the ideal) but it doesn't do all that much in reality for conservative movements. "Lowest black unemployment ever" doesn't mean damn at the end of the day other than for white conservatives/Trump supporters (which again, relatively few a black)/Fox News to once again use as a desperate plea of "We're not racist!" to people who largely don't give a shit.

On top of this blacks are the dominant force in culture especially young people (even Nick fucking Fuentes worships at the altar of Kanye West). American culture, for as much as blacks and white liberals bitch, revolves around black people and black appeasement. If you're going to try to get a movement to be socially acceptable and off the ground you have to have the stamp of approval from at least a large portion of the black population (this isn't just an American thing, it's in a lot of the west thanks in part to so much of our culture being American) otherwise you might as well just resign yourself to being called the Klan if you're any sort of conservative movement (not that you won't be anyway).

It makes it seem "okay" to be a part of if you go out of your way to be pro-black. If you're an all black group you don't have to deal with any real accusations of being racist, if you don't have blacks you're a white supremacist/nationalist friendly group at best and it's not up for debate in the eyes of many. It's like that embarrassing duo Diamond and Silk. They're black women who might as well put on black face and their whole grift is to be black Trump supporters that (white) boomers can look to and say that it's okay to be a Trump supporter because "See, these ladies get it! They know we just love the constitution!" Boomers being boomers of course don't realize how fucked younger generations are and that no amount of this matters to them. There's people like Candace Owens for younger people but she's not exactly a household name or anything. They thought they kind of had Kanye West but that was never really going to be a thing other than an amusing story for the news to run with.

Edited to make it a little less of an eyesore, added a tiny bit too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Yellow Letter, High Tea and HarpersFerryWest
I’ll also say that the angle of Democrats being the real racists and we just need to get blacks off of the Democrat plantation has been a thing since the 1980 election. The best Republicans have done with blacks was in 1972 where Sammy Davis Jr was shucking and jiving on the campaign trail full time for Nixon and negroes were beginning to grow tired of rioting. Even then they just mustered 12%. Trump, who supposedly was beloved by blacks only gets the occasional shout out, which doesn’t mean shit. The GOP has been unable to match 1972 and never will. The platinum plan would have negroes money for nothing and 90%+ of them would still vote for Democrats.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: janekop, Kenobi, Terrorist and 3 others
Local Fed said:
Probably going to be a bit all over the place with this one but I'll attempt to keep it on the rails:

I don't like it but I can see where these conservative (if you can even call them that for the most part) movements are coming from trying to get them on board. They know, along with liberals/Democrats and everyone else that conservatives/Republicans have the label of being for white people, and some (on both sides) are actually delusional enough to think that the Republicans are pro-white of all things. Not just that, but also being anti-minority (specifically blacks, because everything always has to revolve around black people) is the other wide stereotype. The idea of just hitting them with respect is nice in theory (as you said, the ideal) but it doesn't do all that much in reality for conservative movements. "Lowest black unemployment ever" doesn't mean damn at the end of the day other than for white conservatives/Trump supporters (which again, relatively few a black)/Fox News to once again use as a desperate plea of "We're not racist!" to people who largely don't give a shit.

On top of this blacks are the dominant force in culture especially young people (even Nick fucking Fuentes worships at the altar of Kanye West). American culture, for as much as blacks and white liberals bitch, revolves around black people and black appeasement. If you're going to try to get a movement to be socially acceptable and off the ground you have to have the stamp of approval from at least a large portion of the black population (this isn't just an American thing, it's in a lot of the west thanks in part to so much of our culture being American) otherwise you might as well just resign yourself to being called the Klan if you're any sort of conservative movement (not that you won't be anyway). It makes it seem "okay" to be a part of. If you're an all black group you don't have to deal with any real accusations of being racist, if you don't have blacks you're a white supremacist/nationalist friendly group at best and it's not up for debate in the eyes of many. It's like that embarrassing duo Diamond and Silk. They're black women who might as well put on black face and their whole grift is to be black Trump supporters that (white) boomers can look to and say that it's okay to be a Trump supporter because "See, these ladies get it! They know we just love the constitution!" Boomers being boomers of course don't realize how fucked younger generations are and that no amount of this matters to them. There's people like Candace Owens for younger people but she's not exactly a household name or anything. They thought they kind of had Kanye West but that was never really going to be a thing other than an amusing thing for the news to run with.
Click to expand...
I don't think you ever went off the rails at all. As a matter of fact, I found your arguments to be compelling and rooted in good observations of modern political trends. On the matter of "respect," what I meant to imply was that there should ideally be a better way to compel minority voters, predominantly Black Americans, to join their side rather than going down the same "look at these black people, they're Republicans too, come on over!" thoroughfare.

Forgive the following history sperging:

Maybe if these conservative movements tried to invoke the anti-slavery origins of the GOP, and even moreso with the abolitionist tendencies of Abraham Lincoln and his cabinet, they would have more firm ground to stand on when trying to defeat the misnomer of the Republican Party being exclusively "pro-white." Crafting arguments rooted in history can be more effective than using brand-recognition to carry political favor, in a sort of "I didn't know that" sort of way. For example, they could make historical references such as "Lincoln and Liberty Too," the campaign song that was used by the Republicans for the 1860 election. Verses like:

"Our David's good sling is unerring,
The Slaveocrats' giant he slew;
Then shout for the Freedom-preferring—
For Lincoln and Liberty too!"

and even more explicitly abolitionist like:

"We'll finish the temple of freedom
And make it capacious within
That all who seek shelter may find it
Whatever the hue of their skin."

And historical lithographs celebrating the right for all American men the right to vote, saying that "Education will prove the equality of the races," in 1870, like this:

NMAH-2011-04418.jpg


Frame it correctly, and the GOP might be able to actually get people to support them without the preexisting assumptions of the party being "whites only." And they didn't even have to retroactively make a promiscuous college girl "conservative!"
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Yellow Letter, George Floyd Sneed and Local Fed
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: janekop, Get_your_kicks_with_30-06, George Floyd Sneed and 1 other person
Poland is currently resisting legislation that requires them to turn over land, property, wealth that may at one time belonged to a Jew. Of course, it’s literally anuddah shoah and shows just how mean and hateful those ignorant and backward P*les are. Now if Poland asked for shit that has been taken from them over the years, they would have a field day but they’re goyim so they’re not allowed to ask for that. The Holocaust reparations racket is one of the many untold stories the media suppresses. Totally baste Donald Trump and Mike Pompeo has applied pressure on Poland to pass this legislation.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: janekop, DarkSydeHyde, Azovka and 12 others
HarpersFerryWest said:
Now that I think about it, one of the biggest things that puts me off of modern conservative movements like TPUSA and YAF is the level of minority patronization they invoke to try and win over normie voters and people from the opposing party.
Click to expand...
Not sure about the USA, but most lagal "minorities" here in Australia either vote liberal (middle class and up ones) or goes with how the rest of the country votes. If this election cycle labor gets in, then most non-whites voted for labor, just like the whites.

There are exceptions to the rule. Chinese mostly vote liberal whereas the browns mostly vote labor. Probably has a lot to do with gibs, and conservatives aren't huge fans of gibs. They'd rather have whatever shitskin has a good paying job and pay them taxes. That's probably why the TPUSA types want to appeal to minorities.

Here, Liberals are absolutely against mass immigration, Muhammad Allahdirkajihad can't just chain migrate his family of 983 people into the country. Maybe that's another reason? It's pretty complicated. Then there's the fag marriage vote, most liberal areas (with the exception of a Chinese suburb we like to call little HK/Shanghai) voted in favour, and many Muslim heavy Labor areas of course went against it. The libs here are the Republicans of America and Labor is a less left wing Democrat party.

Arm Pit Cream said:
Nick and the gr*ypers are on the naughty list from my favourite Ey/Em pronoun, onion eating twitter account @jewish_activist
View attachment 1817299
Click to expand...
Why is it censoring Spanish nationals, which could include Muhammad dirkadirkayallah?
I'll take dumb little T.Swift stans over some nosenberg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hüftpriester, HarpersFerryWest and Skarlatvoros
AltisticRight said:
Not sure about the USA, but most lagal "minorities" here in Australia either vote liberal (middle class and up ones) or goes with how the rest of the country votes. If this election cycle labor gets in, then most non-whites voted for labor, just like the whites.

There are exceptions to the rule. Chinese mostly vote liberal whereas the browns mostly vote labor. Probably has a lot to do with gibs, and conservatives aren't huge fans of gibs. They'd rather have whatever shitskin has a good paying job and pay them taxes. That's probably why the TPUSA types want to appeal to minorities.

Here, Liberals are absolutely against mass immigration, Muhammad Allahdirkajihad can't just chain migrate his family of 983 people into the country. Maybe that's another reason? It's pretty complicated. Then there's the fag marriage vote, most liberal areas (with the exception of a Chinese suburb we like to call little HK/Shanghai) voted in favour, and many Muslim heavy Labor areas of course went against it. The libs here are the Republicans of America and Labor is a less left wing Democrat party.


Why is it censoring Spanish nationals, which could include Muhammad dirkadirkayallah?
I'll take dumb little T.Swift stans over some nosenberg.
Click to expand...
In almost every country with large immigration populations they vote for the liberal parties. Despite being "conservative" back home, they know where the gibs me dats comes from. They realize they have a meal ticket and as long as they keep the liberals in power they're only going to get a larger and larger one. The exceptions tend to be immigrants who want to shut the door once they got through, but they're pretty rare overall. Immigrant voting is generally less about what they believe, but what they can get and how fast. They don't consider their new country to be their home, they know where home is and have loyalties to it while getting as much gibs as they can. They're best thought of as looters the left use to attack the native population rather than a political block. As long as you promise the looters more free stuff they will let you murder as many babies as you want, it's not theirs babies which get the coat hanger either way.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: janekop, plattschwanz, Kenobi and 3 others
Arm Pit Cream said:
Nick conducted the second test on his new streaming platform today, the site dates at least back to August from what I can see. I know for a fact the guy working for Nick on his streaming platform is a hardcore Siege guy.
http://aflive.app (https://archive.md/oaZqa)
View attachment 1821348
Click to expand...
I know one of the guys working for Fuentes is/was Saevant a Twitter Verified™ Thelemite-turned-"Christian" who hangs around the AF crowd and judging by his twitter TL seems to be extremely exceptional. I don't know if we're talking about the same person, but Fuentes does seem to have a habit of associating with WigNats who will kiss the ring more than he will actual TradCaths.
 
  • Informative
  • Autistic
Reactions: tantric_depressive, GranDuke, HarpersFerryWest and 1 other person
Marche said:
Nick being the optics king he is decided to jump in on going after this dumn TPusa chick who made a I LOVE MY FARTHERLESS UNABORTED MIX RACE MUTT post, of course this would be fine for people with an anime avatar or pretending to be a chinese man on twitter but Nick wan't to be taken seriously and have a serious political movement.
What is worse is he deleted it because he can't even stand by being an edgy boy.

View attachment 1815934View attachment 1815935
Click to expand...
What a pussy. Stand by what you say faggot.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: plattschwanz, HarpersFerryWest, Marche and 4 others
Gravityqueen4life said:
What a pussy. Stand by what you say faggot.
Click to expand...
They could never on any important topic because *optics* and racially ambiguous grift right big tent to keep together. What's more funny is even the most hardcore thot slayer Beardson, who by his own admission is not a political commentator, can't go that far. This is the same guy giving ex coalburners like Lauren Southern endless shit about being irredeemable. Yet when push comes to shove and it's time to keep the muttmerica first groids in line, here's what he's got:
Mind you, the mulatto is already on record repeatedly getting touchy with white women. Technically, so long as he doesn't marry them he can keep fucking them and still play a part in the most authentic and effective fight for white americans there currently is. Also, obligatory groyper in replies screeching about bad optics.
The absolute state of edgy teenage muttmerican white nationalism.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tantric_depressive and Skarlatvoros
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back