Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[soulless guarantee]

‘I felt like I was born again’: first non-binary person granted UK refugee status (archive)​

Initially refused asylum, a judge on appeal ruled that Arthur Britney Joestar would suffer persecution if sent back to El Salvador​

Refugee status has been granted over a person’s non-binary status for the first time in a UK court, following a landmark ruling.

The judgment, in the upper tribunal, was decided in the case of Arthur Britney Joestar from El Salvador after concluding that they would face persecution for their identity if they returned to their home country.

In El Salvador, transgender women have a life expectancy of 35 years due to violence. Across the Latin America and Caribbean region, the figure ranges from 30 to 35 years, compared to average life expectancies ranging from 65 to 81.

In July activists had welcomed the “landmark ruling” when a judge in San Salvador found three police officers guilty of the 2019 murder of Camila Díaz Córdova and sentenced each to 20 years in prison as pivotal, it was the first conviction for a hate crime against a transgender woman in the country.
The UN has repeatedly called for more to be done to tackle the violence there.

The UK ruling states that Joestar would be likely to face specific threats, including physical and sexual violence, if they returned to El Salvador.

Joestar, 29, now settled in Liverpool, came to the UK in October 2017 to escape daily abuse in their home country.

“When I walked along the streets, people threw rubbish at me from their windows – once, someone threw a plastic bag full of urine at me,” they said. “In El Salvador, non-binary people are in so much danger – I’ve seen corpses. Anything could have happened to me. I could have been tortured, raped, shot, killed.”

In one incident, in the capital San Salvador, Joestar was stopped by police. “One of the policemen started asking about my hair, telling me I wasn’t normal, that they wanted to teach me how to be a man. Then they punched me on the chest and pushed me to the floor.

“I’m not sure what was worse – the attack or when I was just left there and no one came to help me. I had a lot of bruises, my arms were bleeding and I was crying. But no one cared. It was really terrifying,” they said.

Joestar had previously been refused asylum in the UK. The first claim, in November 2018, was dismissed by the first-tier tribunal which said the police brutality “amounted to no more than discrimination” and occurred only once. The second, in February 2020, on the basis of non-binary identity was initially refused but upheld on appeal.

“The way the judge handled the case: she just understood me – all the tiny details … she saw the whole picture,” they said. “At the end, she turned to look at me and started speaking to me in Spanish,to tell me she granted me the right to stay in this country and the right to be who I want to be. I just started to cry. I felt like I was born again.”

At the appeal hearing, Judge Bruce criticised the previous decision that the Salvadorian police attack was not persecution.

“It was a physical assault, by the police, motivated by nothing other than homophobia,” she said. “Five minutes is a long time to be beaten. I do not doubt that it was for the appellant a terrifying experience.

“Having had regard to the country background evidence,” she added, “and the evidence personally relating to the appellant … It follows that the appeal must be allowed.”

The judge said previous hearings had been wrong to use the pronoun “he”.

Activists welcomed the judgment. Nancy Kelley, chief executive at Stonewall, said: “We’re incredibly pleased for Mx Joestar, whose landmark case is likely to make it easier for non-binary people to seek asylum in the UK. No one should be subject to attacks and violence simply because of who they are, and it is vital that the UK offers refuge to those for whom their own country is not safe.”

Joestar hopes the case will help others.

“All the injustice I suffered, maybe it’s worth it, to show people there is something positive to take from all the suffering. I just hope that soon people can see us and we can finally say we’re not invisible.”

UK influx of Latin American refugee trannies when?

 

[Dante Alighieri]

It deserves persecution everywhere for being a disgusting ogre.

 

[Cliff Booth]

Arthur Britney Joestar

Anime. Not even once.

 

[Devyn]

‘I felt like I was born again’: first non-binary person granted UK refugee status (archive)​

Initially refused asylum, a judge on appeal ruled that Arthur Britney Joestar would suffer persecution if sent back to El Salvador​

UK influx of Latin American refugee trannies when?

The moral: act like a complete sexual degenerate/weirdo for refugee status in the West. As if we don't have way too fucking many of those already.

"No one should be subject to attacks and violence simply because of who they are, and it is vital that the UK offers refuge to those for whom their own country is not safe.”

"Vital"? Eat shit.

 

[Sí.]

In El Salvador, non-binary people are in so much danger – I’ve seen corpses.

How do you know these corpses are even non-binary?
He acts like the problem is his little gender identity no one can tell, rather than the fact that he is obviously a man who doesn't dress like most men. I mean, good thing he's not going to be beaten up and harassed to this level anymore, but to pretend the problem is his twitter pronouns rather than the fact most people must think he's a gay man for dressing weird is ignorant.

 

[Snekposter]

Protip: the Latin Americans utterly despise fags on a level that makes blacks look tolerant. "Faggot" is what every single soccer fan down there chants as an insult to the other team, and after FIFA tried to put a stop to that by fining teams they were forced to give up because the fans all kept doubling down on their chants, and tripled them when an openly gay player was on the field.

Edit: Before anyone goes "based Latins", it really is a place where gay men can and will be beaten to within an inch of their life, robbed of everything on them including their clothes, subjected to anal rape with a foreign object (or three), and then left for dead just because they walked down the wrong street. That said this fag should be denied asylum on grounds of being a fag, which I wish was still different from being merely gay...

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

While her death is being investigated as a homicide, police declined to confirm whether the case is being considered a potential hate crime, even though her loved ones believe she was likely targeted for being transgender.

Beverly Ross added: “I believe Eshay was targeted. We need to get to the bottom of this because Black trans lives matter. We are not going anywhere.”

Key is at least the 43rd transgender person to be been killed in the United States in 2020, the majority of which were Black and Latinx transgender women.

"Black trans person killed on the street" is usually connected to being a prostitute. The police know this, it's not really a secret. Little children get shot every weekend in Chicago but the only thing these """people""" care about are literal streetwalking gigolos.

 

[AnOminous]

That said this fag should be denied asylum on grounds of being a fag, which I wish was still different from being merely gay...

It should be legal to exclude weebs.

 

[TheBlackVolga]

The New Year's Honours list was just released. Katherine Stock has received an OBE (Order of the British Empire) for services to Higher Education.

The troon chimpout will be great.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

‘I felt like I was born again’: first non-binary person granted UK refugee status (archive)​

Initially refused asylum, a judge on appeal ruled that Arthur Britney Joestar would suffer persecution if sent back to El Salvador​

UK influx of Latin American refugee trannies when?

He will soon assimilate to the UK's new culture and demand straight men jave sex with him. Bujarra!

 

[Positron]

Upon receiving her OBE Dr. Kathleen Stock posts an essay on her Twitter, in which tell us that academia is still in a very bad shape, and Stonewall needs to get out.

(Underlines mine)

Honoured to have been given OBE for services to higher education. I want to use this opportunity to draw further attention to suppression of critical thought about gender identity ideology and trans activism in UK Universities - so here’s a thread.​

​

Most UK Universities are Stonewall Diversity Champions. Translation: effectively they’re now trans activist institutions. This significantly limits free thought and free speech of gender-critical academics. I describe how here. And yet academics and students in Universities urgently need to be able to discuss the social importance of biological sex, and to criticise gender identity ideology and trans activism. Both freedoms are of crucial importance given issues of pressing public interest such as rapid increases in trans-identifying kids; erosion of single-sex spaces; threats to women’s sport; medical ignorance about female bodies; effects on gay population; trans women - some, sex offenders - in female prisons; & failures of data collection on sex and its impacts. These anonymous testimonies I gathered in 2019 give flavour of Uni environment: e.g. disciplinary investigations for tweets/ letter-signing; removal from editorships; failure to act against student harassment; rejection of publications for "transphobia".​

​

Elsewhere: at Oxford University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), feminist Professor Selina Todd needed security for her lectures. At Essex University (Stonewall Diversity Champion) Professor Jo Phoenix’s talk on trans women in female prisons was cancelled after complaints. At the Open University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), a conference on prison reform was cancelled after an organiser’s gender-critical views drew threats. At Oxford Brookes (Stonewall Diversity Champion), feminist artist Rachel Ara was no-platformed for her gender-critical views. At Edinburgh University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), a conference on trans-identified kids in schools was cancelled as speakers’ safety could not be guaranteed, and feminist speaker Julie Bindel was physically attacked at a campus meeting on sex-based rights. At Imperial University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), Professor Simone Buitendijk was forced to make “grovelling apology” for retweeting material defending women’s sex-based rights. At UCL (Stonewall Diversity Champion), signing a letter to the Guardian expressing concern about academic freedom and trans activism drew student complaints. And at UEA (Stonewall Diversity Champion) my talk on womanhood was postponed by managers after complaints.​

​

(Aside: Observant readers will notice that nearly all the people described above have something in common. Hint: it’s not a shared gender identity. Further hint: it’s a thing that never makes difference, their critics say, and whose negligible effects shouldn't be tracked).​

​

Meanwhile, University managers pay lip service to goal of academic freedom but - looking with longing eyes at Stonewall Top 100 Employers Index - they continue to greenlight repressive trans policies such as those gathered on my blog here. Highlights include: “Think of the person as being the gender that they want you to think of them as” (Edinburgh) and ”If a trans person informs a staff member that a word or phrasing is inappropriate or offensive, then that staff member should take their word for it, and adjust their phraseology accordingly”. Upshot: Stonewall doesn't belong in UK Universities (or schools, or gov departments, or local authorities, or judiciary, or police forces..) Once a great organisation, they’re now a threat to freedom of speech/ public understanding. Get them out​

 

[Queen Elizabeth II]

Upon receiving her OBE Dr. Kathleen Stock posts an essay on her Twitter, in which tell us that academia is still in a very bad shape, and Stonewall needs to get out.

(Underlines mine)

Honoured to have been given OBE for services to higher education. I want to use this opportunity to draw further attention to suppression of critical thought about gender identity ideology and trans activism in UK Universities - so here’s a thread.​

​

Most UK Universities are Stonewall Diversity Champions. Translation: effectively they’re now trans activist institutions. This significantly limits free thought and free speech of gender-critical academics. I describe how here. And yet academics and students in Universities urgently need to be able to discuss the social importance of biological sex, and to criticise gender identity ideology and trans activism. Both freedoms are of crucial importance given issues of pressing public interest such as rapid increases in trans-identifying kids; erosion of single-sex spaces; threats to women’s sport; medical ignorance about female bodies; effects on gay population; trans women - some, sex offenders - in female prisons; & failures of data collection on sex and its impacts. These anonymous testimonies I gathered in 2019 give flavour of Uni environment: e.g. disciplinary investigations for tweets/ letter-signing; removal from editorships; failure to act against student harassment; rejection of publications for "transphobia".​

​

Elsewhere: at Oxford University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), feminist Professor Selina Todd needed security for her lectures. At Essex University (Stonewall Diversity Champion) Professor Jo Phoenix’s talk on trans women in female prisons was cancelled after complaints. At the Open University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), a conference on prison reform was cancelled after an organiser’s gender-critical views drew threats. At Oxford Brookes (Stonewall Diversity Champion), feminist artist Rachel Ara was no-platformed for her gender-critical views. At Edinburgh University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), a conference on trans-identified kids in schools was cancelled as speakers’ safety could not be guaranteed, and feminist speaker Julie Bindel was physically attacked at a campus meeting on sex-based rights. At Imperial University (Stonewall Diversity Champion), Professor Simone Buitendijk was forced to make “grovelling apology” for retweeting material defending women’s sex-based rights. At UCL (Stonewall Diversity Champion), signing a letter to the Guardian expressing concern about academic freedom and trans activism drew student complaints. And at UEA (Stonewall Diversity Champion) my talk on womanhood was postponed by managers after complaints.​

​

(Aside: Observant readers will notice that nearly all the people described above have something in common. Hint: it’s not a shared gender identity. Further hint: it’s a thing that never makes difference, their critics say, and whose negligible effects shouldn't be tracked).​

​

Meanwhile, University managers pay lip service to goal of academic freedom but - looking with longing eyes at Stonewall Top 100 Employers Index - they continue to greenlight repressive trans policies such as those gathered on my blog here. Highlights include: “Think of the person as being the gender that they want you to think of them as” (Edinburgh) and ”If a trans person informs a staff member that a word or phrasing is inappropriate or offensive, then that staff member should take their word for it, and adjust their phraseology accordingly”. Upshot: Stonewall doesn't belong in UK Universities (or schools, or gov departments, or local authorities, or judiciary, or police forces..) Once a great organisation, they’re now a threat to freedom of speech/ public understanding. Get them out​

Tories really don't care for wokeism lmao

 

[Miss Misery]

The Trans Lifeline, a crisis line for trans people, has reported a 40 percent increase of calls where the caller is actively considering self-harm.

Oh boy, 40 percent more calls to ignore!

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/greta-gustava-martela-kjel-anderson-nina-niraj-chaubal.23222/

 

[Grandpa Simpson]

 

[Traummaschine]

From advoate.com

From Money to Mental Health, Pandemic Ravages LGBTQ+ Households
An alarming new report indicates LGBTQ+ people are suffering disproportionately from COVID-19.
BY MEY RUDE DECEMBER 23 2020 3:28 PM EST

According to a report by the Movement Advancement Project (MAP), a U.S.-based gender equality think tank, this year’s global pandemic has hit LGBTQ+ people and households harder than the average American.

The report interviewed over 3,400 adults in the U.S., and found that almost two- thirds of LGBTQ+ households have had at least one member lose a job since the pandemic started. A little under half of non-LGBTQ+ households reported losing a job.

Additionally, two thirds of LGBTQ+ households reported having at least one serious financial problem this year. The numbers are much worse for QTPOC. Seventy percent of Latinx LGBTQ+ households have had serious financial problems and 95 percent of Black LGBTQ+ people have.

Queer households also lost health coverage at double the rate of non-LGBTQ+ people this year. Nearly 40 percent also said they’ve been unable to get medical help they needed this year because of the pandemic. One-fifth of households also reported that they weren't getting the food they needed to just make it through each day.

“We know LGBTQ households and the community more broadly experience higher rates of discrimination in the workplace, steep obstacles to housing, accessing medical care -- and to the extent that LGBTQ people and LGBTQ people of color are experiencing the full force of this pandemic, it’s likely their recovery will take even longer,” said Logan Casey, co-author of the report.

While 23 percent of non-LGBTQ+ people reported problems dealing with the isolation that comes from quarantine, 44 percent of LGBTQ+ households reported them. The Trans Lifeline, a crisis line for trans people, has reported a 40 percent increase of calls where the caller is actively considering self-harm.

Casey warned that these results might just be the tip of the iceberg. “Think about this,” Casey said. “This poll was conducted in July of this year. And so now here we are in December, many months later, and numbers are continuing to surge and setting new records. It’s likely going to make these painful ripple effects even worse.”

So being stuck in your alphabet household is worse for you than being out in the white supremacist patriarchal world that forces the gender binary on them.

 

[queue-anon]

So for all the troon and homo whining about how awesome and important they are, it turns out they're not actually needed in society after all.

They certainly aren't "essential" if they're losing their jobs at nearly double the rate of other Americans.

Maybe they should learn to code?

Undoubtedly a lot of those people work in low-paid service and entertaining jobs, especially trannies who are rarely functional adults pre-transition, and many of those who were functional become dysfunctional post-transition. I've noticed a lot of trannies in STEM going into much more unstable careers (or simply e-begging) after trooning out. I figure, for a lot of them, it's a midlife crisis that has them regressing to their teen/twenty-something years.

 

[CatParty]

https://www.invenglobal.com/articles/12980/brazilian-league-of-legends-scene-promotes-diversity-with-5-women-registered-for-cblol-2021-and-transgender-focused-championship

The Brazilian competitive League of Legends scene actively works to promote diversity, schooling other regions on creating an inclusive safe space for all players. CBLoL is set to start its 2021 season with five female players included in four of its ten franchised teams, while the country will see its first transgender community focused tournament.


Contender of the 2020 World Championship representing the Brazilian region, INTZ once again brings a female player to their roster, Mid Laner Tainá "Yatsu" Santos will be active in the team’s academy roster, moving past her substitute role along Support Júlia "Mayumi" Nakamura in the previous year.

LOUD joins CBLoL for the first time in 2021, bringing in a stacked up roster for its main team, adding the Jungler Elizabeth "Liz" Sousa to the Academy roster. Stemming from the Brazilian Soccer scene, Cruzeiro Esports will add Support player “Larissa “Lawi” Santos, and Mid Laner Ariel “Ari” Lino. Rensga Esports brings back Gabriela "Harumi" Gonçalves as their substitute Support player, the first woman to compete in an official LoL Esports competition in Brazil.

The first step to include women in the professional League of Legends scene has been given, however, we are yet to see women play official matches in the CBLoL stage.

The competitive League of Legends scene will have its first championship focusing on the transgender community. The competition, named “Copa Rebecca Heineman, after the American video game designer, programmer, and first-ever video game champion, will take place on January 29, 2021, the national date for Transgender Visibility in Brazil.

Organized by Sher “Transcurecer”, one of the prominent trans women in esports, the tournament focuses on fostering and discovering transgender talent, also offering a workshop for players looking to level up their play.

 

[Clem Fandango]

Tories really don't care for wokeism lmao

I don't respect the current crop of Tory politicians to believe this is anything other than cynical, focus-group tested vote chasing, but still I can't help but feel that they've managed to call this one completely correctly.

I mean, when most people see "I'm Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the Labour party, my pronouns are he/him...", they're going to vote for whoever the fuck else. Especially up north.

 

[Terrifik]

Happy News Trannies Age no longer a Restrictiction in CA

Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria​

News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

...............................................................................................................................................

 

[Positron]

The whole piece is dumb (you don't expect less from such shithole country as California) but this bit stood out particularly to me.

imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.

Breast cancer or trauma are not conditions chosen by the patient herself; these are externally imposed condition and the patient's age is irrelevant here. On the contrary wanting to become transsexual is a patient's choice.

Unless Medicine and Law have the courage to address the elephant in the room -- that transsexualism is a choice and a patient can be convinced out of it -- we are going to see such dumb shit spreading outside California. We will continue to waste public money to destroy lives, especially children's lives.