Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
I don't remember biden supporters getting disowned by friends/family members, slandered by the media as ist and phobes by celebs, politicians or mainstream media to the point they have to move to alternatives that payment processors will eventually blacklist whenever it gets traction, have loco congresswomen calling for hitlist, janny up damaging stuff about trump that would've influenced the election. Biden supporters got the audacity...it was only a few months ago twitter suspended the Trump administration and the New York post about hunter biden, when it came to trump's alleged childhood abuse and taxes they hyped it up for months. But the President elect son doing deals with china from his dad they waited till after the election to make it a bombshell...when they banned the New York Post 2 months prior...
 
Last edited:
That's why Antifa has plainclothes members walking around with phones at every riot. The fact that no one has figured out to target them with spraypaint and the like is a sin.
This is already happening at large Trumpdrone rallies. They'll accuse a random bystander of being an antifa-informant and a bunch of people will start to threaten them.

Attacking random bystanders in witchhunts is a great idea, literally nothing could go wrong. And never forget, BLM threatening random bystanders is bad, but it's good when the Trumpdrones do it. :story:
 
Mitch McConnell refusing to bring the $2000 checks for a vote is a disgrace and the voters of Georgia are watching it unfold on a national stage. Georgia just might send 2 Democrats to the Senate and Mitch will be relegated to Minority Leader. If that happens, his refusal to allow a vote on the $2000 checks is the likely tipping point for the Republicans losing their Majority status.
 
Mitch McConnell refusing to bring the $2000 checks for a vote is a disgrace and the voters of Georgia are watching it unfold on a national stage. Georgia just might send 2 Democrats to the Senate and Mitch will be relegated to Minority Leader. If that happens, his refusal to allow a vote on the $2000 checks is the likely tipping point for the Republicans losing their Majority status.
It's amazing isn't it? Trumpers are quickly becoming the new SJWs with the delusions,cope and witchhunts/purity testing while the GOP just took a shotgun to it's cock and managed to make Pelosi,AOC and every other liberal boogeyman look like national heroes.

The 2020s are off to a great start.
 
Last edited:
Mitch McConnell refusing to bring the $2000 checks for a vote is a disgrace and the voters of Georgia are watching it unfold on a national stage. Georgia just might send 2 Democrats to the Senate and Mitch will be relegated to Minority Leader. If that happens, his refusal to allow a vote on the $2000 checks is the likely tipping point for the Republicans losing their Majority status.
See I don't think that's quite true. Both Georgia Republicans have already said they'd vote in favor of the $2000 checks.

On top of that Mitch isn't just ditching the checks either. He's bringing forwards the $2000 checks, but with section 230 repeal, and election integrity attached to it. Which, funny enough, means they're likely going to serve this back to the Democrat controlled house to blame it on the Democrats if it doesn't pass.
 
See I don't think that's quite true. Both Georgia Republicans have already said they'd vote in favor of the $2000 checks.

On top of that Mitch isn't just ditching the checks either. He's bringing forwards the $2000 checks, but with section 230 repeal, and election integrity attached to it. Which, funny enough, means they're likely going to serve this back to the Democrat controlled house to blame it on the Democrats if it doesn't pass.
Yeah, because using emergency funds for Americans in need as leverage for your shit always goes over well.
 
Yeah, because using emergency funds for Americans in need as leverage for your shit always goes over well.
230 is probably in there as something they're willing to drop. And it's not that hard to spin it to say the Democrats are either hiding something or don't care enough about election integrity to pass this when it should be a nonpartisan issue.

Either way, it really looks like they are putting the Democrats on their heels going into the runoffs.
 
"Sure, repealing Section 230 will mean I can no longer say the n word on Kiwi Farms, but it'll stick it to Twitter for saying bad things about Daddy!"
I think repealing is a stupid way to go about it myself. There are better ways, like moving social media under utilities and putting free speech protections on it that way.
 
"We don't fly Biden signs because we don't want our houses burned down."
Yeah, I gochu. Those damn Trump supporters are really well known for wanton property destruction because someone disagrees with them. Can't think of a group more prone to it.
Well, being a victim is the left's favorite past-time after all. If the current post-election fallout is any indication, the right is about to join them, though.
 
The Trumpers were the true snowflakes all along
Well, wouldn't say "the" true snowflakes, given what we can find on the fringes of the far left that seeps into the centre-left as well... more like the right has their own brand of deluded snowflakes with a victim-complex. But certainly the horseshoe-theory is in full swing once again.

Wouldn't it be kind of ironic if the slapfight between left and right caused them to vilify centrists to a degree that both political wings start to see them as collaborators and traitors and let out their frustration on them? 5 Day for us to find out what the right is going to amount to in DC, but I'll be surprised if it's even enough for a decent march.
 
230 is probably in there as something they're willing to drop.
No, it's there because the GOP considers allowing the ADL to enforce speech codes more important than America playing a role in the internet economy
I think repealing is a stupid way to go about it myself. There are better ways, like moving social media under utilities and putting free speech protections on it that way.
Yes, if the intention was to create more free speech, that would be true. That's why the party you support isn't doing it that way.
 
No, it's there because the GOP considers allowing the ADL to enforce speech codes more important than America playing a role in the internet economy

Yes, if the intention was to create more free speech, that would be true. That's why the party you support isn't doing it that way.
I don't support a party. I don't even support most politics in general. I just try to share thoughts or information.
 
lol, Michael Flynn has now endorsed a website that sells QAnon merch

Proceeds go to a joint venture between Flynn and crazy Tracy Diaz (@tracybeanz on Twitter) who burnt her own house down by throwing cigarette butts into the trash on her deck, to launch a new fake news site.
Some great items available
1609522751200.png
1609522807000.png

EDIT: The lawsuit against Lin Wood by his former partners is going interesting places:
“I might actually be Christ coming back for a second time in the form of an imperfect man, elevating Christ consciousness,” an extraordinary footnote quotes Wood telling his partners. “That cause you to have a little bit of a chill? Who would be more eloquent to say what the will of God is, the belief of God in me.”

Wood is said to have called himself the representative of various Biblical figures.

“I represent Moses,” Wood allegedly declared on tape. “I represent Ananias the believer. I’m like the power of King David. Now look you all, I told you I was going to pray tonight to my God, not to myself, because to me there’s God and there’s me.”...

The former partners claimed that their relationship with Wood spanning roughly half a decade started deteriorating late last year as Wood began to exhibit “erratic, hostile, abusive, and threatening” behavior.

“In the Fall of 2019, defendant Wood also committed assault and battery on Grunberg in an elevator of a hotel during an out of town deposition,” they wrote in their complaint, which also alleges that Wood attacked Wilson. “In both assaults, there was essentially no reason whatsoever for the attack, and defendant Wood later acknowledged and apologized for this violence.”

What’s more, the partners claim, Wood admitted to those assaults on tape...

Clapping back at the lawsuit as a “shakedown effort,” Wood filed counterclaims of defamation and false light invasion of privacy, describing the lawsuit’s lurid details of his exploding at his former partners impertinent and “scandalous.” The complaint quotes him dropping him the F-bomb some 15 times and derisively calling Grunberg a “Chilean Jew.”...

Denying that they defamed Wood by accusing him of being “mentally unstable,” “delusional,” or having a “God-complex,” the partners claim they are simply quoting his well-documented words. The remarks come from a Dec. 23 filing seeking to punish Wood’s “frivolous” countersuit under Georgia’s anti-SLAPP law.
EDIT2: The attitude of many posters in this thread perfectly described
1609523787800.png

Another kayfabe lolsuit has been filed by Louie Golmert to prevent Pence declaring President-elect Joe Biden the winner of the Electoral College. The DOJ has responded on behalf of Pence. This all bodes well for Jan 6.
In the Friday response to Gohmert's litigation, Deputy Assistant Attorney General John V. Coghlan wrote that Gohmert's lawsuit is "not a proper vehicle" for addressing the counting of the electoral votes "because plaintiffs have sued the wrong defendant."

"The Vice President—the only defendant in this case—is ironically the very person whose power they seek to promote," the court documents continued. "The Senate and the House, not the Vice President, have legal interests that are sufficiently adverse to plaintiffs to ground a case or controversy under Article III. Defendant respectfully request denial of plaintiffs' emergency motion because the relief that plaintiffs request does not lie properly against the Vice President."
Gohmert's team have attempted to respond to the response.

But they got confused by computer.
1609524183400.png

 
Last edited:
Back