Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

[Troonwhisperer]

Vaush repays Tim Pool by calling him stupid and too dumb to know what's on the latest spending bill. He has a point about Tim, but Vaush is one of the stupidest and most vindictive people online.
View attachment 1823232

Christ, this is the reason I can't bear watching any video from Vaush anymore.

"It's not an authoritarian position of mine to eliminate federal investment in a particular type of learning"

Oh, sure! I'm sure Vaush would be happy about an educational course problematizing fat neckbeard leftoids like him. Fact is that CRT is purely political and not a honest intellectual endeavour to advance knowledge. Tell me horsecock sucker: Why is there no country in the world that has no department of physics etc., but some countries reject critical race theory and other questionable fields like gender studies? Mathematics is rarely political, hence you'll see mathematicians that are right wing, left wing, atheist, Christian, Muslim etc. Tell me how many right wing Christians are critical race theorists? Do you think politics is a reason for this?

I'm also always puzzled how Vaush sees behind any person some well-crafted plan to subvert the innocent youth. According to Vaush Tim Pool's show produces well-crafted propaganda
Isn't it possible, just maybe, that people really think what they're saying? Why does anything have to be a dogwhistle, a nod towards white supremacists?

 

[Gaylord Brachiosaurus]

I'm also always puzzled how Vaush sees behind any person some well-crafted plan to subvert the innocent youth. According to Vaush Tim Pool's show produces well-crafted propaganda
Isn't it possible, just maybe, that people really think what they're saying? Why does anything have to be a dogwhistle, a nod towards white supremacists?

At the risk of sounding cliche, I think it's just projection. His viewer base is young and the people who he debates skew just as young. And if you feel like the bad guys are going after the youth, you gotta get to them first, right?

 

[LizCurly89]

Isn't it possible, just maybe, that people really think what they're saying? Why does anything have to be a dogwhistle, a nod towards white supremacists?

The whole "so and so" is a grifter or "what his face" is dogwhisling, is just used by the left to dismiss critique, facts, and statements that challenge their worldview. It reminds me of the academic John Mcwhorter who called out Ibram X. Kendi (author of the popular book "How to be an Antiracist") for calling him a racist. Mcwhorter asserts that if an academic can't realize that his opponent can fully understand his arguments, but may come to a different conclusion based on his own assement, than the person making the allegation of racist, or grifter, isn't worth the accolades they receive based on this inability to grasp a baseline concept.

McWhorter and Glenn, his podcast partner, also rip into the psudo social science produced by sociology depts. I bet Fat Gay Retard would just love hearing his beloved discipline be rilled to shreds by actual academics...

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

The whole "so and so" is a grifter or "what his face" is dogwhisling, is just used by the left to dismiss critique, facts, and statements that challenge their worldview. It reminds me of the academic John Mcwhorter who called out Ibram X. Kendi (author of the popular book "How to be an Antiracist") for calling him a racist. Mcwhorter asserts that if an academic can't realize that his opponent can fully understand his arguments, but may come to a different conclusion based on his own assement, than the person making the allegation of racist, or grifter, isn't worth the accolades they receive based on this inability to grasp a baseline concept.

McWhorter and Glenn, his podcast partner, also rip into the psudo social science produced by sociology depts. I bet Fat Gay Retard would just love hearing his beloved discipline be rilled to shreds by actual academics...

McWhorter is beloved as a professor at Columbia. But since he teaches linguistics—and a more analytical sequence than sociological, too—there's no way someone like Vaush would ever avail himself of the opportunity to interact with him. I've heard a lot of great things about McWhorter, but it was never about his politics, just his kindness and teaching capability. And that makes me like him more, since it proves he's truly not a grifter, just an academic who can comment intelligently on social issues (a lot like Victor Davis Hansen, I would say).

 

[Ged!]

Isn't it possible, just maybe, that people really think what they're saying? Why does anything have to be a dogwhistle, a nod towards white supremacists?

One of Pool's big criticisms of CRT is that it fucks over Mixed-race people such as himself. Unless White supremacists have suddenly accepted Hapas as honorary Aryans, you'd think even Vaush should be able to realize that Pool's critique is honest, if a tad bit self-serving.

 

[Overlined Lips]

His strategy is just not addressing any real criticism of his views. He only ever posts debates that he's done on his channel if they're children or trolls. Pretty much everyone points out that he supports the establishment even though he claims to be some kind of radical.

Vaush basically gaslights. His strategy is to gaslight the audience if he doesn't have a formal response prepared. His tactics are juvenile quite honestly.
I would say I have pity for the Hyena bitch, but I feel just as sorry for him after taking a proper look at her.

 

[longtimelurkerfirsttimepo]

Well here is what looks like Vaush sock, or diehard fan that has made a twitter account to whiteknight on twitter: Archive

And since archive.whatever doesn't get a full twitter profile, here is a picture of compiled tweets.

 

[hundredpercent]

One of Pool's big criticisms of CRT is that it fucks over Mixed-race people such as himself. Unless White supremacists have suddenly accepted Hapas as honorary Aryans, you'd think even Vaush should be able to realize that Pool's critique is honest, if a tad bit self-serving.

Aren't they, though? That's what we're seeing right now - Nick Fuentes is White, Zim-zam is "White Hispanic" with a heavy emphasis on White, and Asians are "White/Asian".

Even hardcore racists don't usually have a problem with Asians - maybe Pinoys or something, but (American-born) Chinese?

 

[Doctor Placebo]

Aren't they, though? That's what we're seeing right now - Nick Fuentes is White, Zim-zam is "White Hispanic" with a heavy emphasis on White, and Asians are "White/Asian".

Even hardcore racists don't usually have a problem with Asians - maybe Pinoys or something, but (American-born) Chinese?

That's more due to a rise in hardline nationalists who don't fit into the old white supremacist mold than the right being full of closet white supremacists who are also okay with people of other races. Because the later makes a whole lot of sense. The left has to push this idea that these sort of people are going to commit genocide against every homo and nonwhite person despite many of them being in those groups, because otherwise they'd have to actually sell their own ideas as a better deal for normal blokes in the country. Since they're movement is now controlled by shadowy elites and transgender trust fund thought police brats, they have to fall back on "The other side literally wants to kill you for how you were born! That is the only political position on the right! Your only options are on the left, no matter how loaded with shitty people doing shitty things we are!" The sad thing is that this has worked with a lot of people.


Sharing these recent images from the Antifa thread here, because Vaush said during his shitty Proud Boys video that Antifa "doesn't want to kill anyone."

 

[TÜV Certified Ehrenmann]

Vaush is speaking with Hakim today. I do not know exactly what to expect but I believe it will go a little like this:

Hakim is going to ask Vaush about his horrible knowledge on theory
Vaush will stall and pretend he knows stuff
Vaush will make fun of or pester Hakim about being Sunni Muslim
Literally none of Hakim's questions will get answered sufficiently

Vaush will probably upload a the vid of it later, but as of yet the conversation has not happened

 

[DarkSoulsPhil]

One of Pool's big criticisms of CRT is that it fucks over Mixed-race people such as himself. Unless White supremacists have suddenly accepted Hapas as honorary Aryans, you'd think even Vaush should be able to realize that Pool's critique is honest, if a tad bit self-serving.

Hapas women are allowed into the ethnostate, otherwise fuck off we're full, no chingas

 

[Kheapathic]

Hapas women are allowed into the ethnostate, otherwise fuck off we're full, no chingas

What if their vaginas has epicanthic folds?

 

[Ged!]

Aren't they, though? That's what we're seeing right now - Nick Fuentes is White, Zim-zam is "White Hispanic" with a heavy emphasis on White, and Asians are "White/Asian".

Even hardcore racists don't usually have a problem with Asians - maybe Pinoys or something, but (American-born) Chinese?

I'm not one to stick up for Fuentes, but I honestly don't think he is a White nationalist, at least not in the traditional sense.

Fuentes is part of what really amounts to a growing trend of nationalists who may be against race mixing to some degree, and are staunchly anti-immigration, but don't want to create an ethnostate. Hardline WNs are firmly in the WigNat camp rather than the AmNat camp at this point.

 

[CreamyHerman’s]

Fuentes is part of what really amounts to a growing trend of nationalists who may be against race mixing to some degree, and are staunchly anti-immigration, but don't want to create an ethnostate. Hardline WNs are firmly in the WigNat camp rather than the AmNat camp at this point.

Isn't Nick a mixed-ethnicity guy himself?

 

[Bec]

I'm not one to stick up for Fuentes, but I honestly don't think he is a White nationalist, at least not in the traditional sense.

Fuentes is part of what really amounts to a growing trend of nationalists who may be against race mixing to some degree, and are staunchly anti-immigration, but don't want to create an ethnostate. Hardline WNs are firmly in the WigNat camp rather than the AmNat camp at this point.

Isn't Nick a mixed-ethnicity guy himself?

Nick is part Mexican but he's basically white, even then he isn't a white nationalist the media/twitter just lies about that.
he's also kind of annoying.

 

[CreamyHerman’s]

Nick is part Mexican but he's basically white, even then he isn't a white nationalist the media/twitter just lies about that.
he's also kind of annoying.

I figure he wasn't a white nationalist, but yeah Nick is a bit annoying

 

[Doctor Placebo]

I'm not one to stick up for Fuentes, but I honestly don't think he is a White nationalist, at least not in the traditional sense.

Fuentes is part of what really amounts to a growing trend of nationalists who may be against race mixing to some degree, and are staunchly anti-immigration, but don't want to create an ethnostate. Hardline WNs are firmly in the WigNat camp rather than the AmNat camp at this point.

At this point Nick's ideology is basically an incoherent mess of /pol/ memes and posts, with "no swastikas or heiling Hitler" as his only hard rule.

Nick is part Mexican but he's basically white, even then he isn't a white nationalist the media/twitter just lies about that.
he's also kind of annoying.

Him sucking Mussolini's bullet riddled penis multiple times and making holocaust jokes certainly doesn't help with that. Sure, Italian Fascism is different from German National Socialism, but the average normie doesn't know the difference.

 

[Troonwhisperer]

Him sucking Mussolini's bullet riddled penis multiple times and making holocaust jokes certainly doesn't help with that. Sure, Italian Fascism is different from German National Socialism, but the average normie doesn't know the difference.

I'm pretty sure that Nick doesn't know the difference either. Nick's appeal is mostly to young men and will fade quite quickly when they get older. Like Vaush, he isn't very intelligent and it's quite shocking that both of them were able to amass so much followers in such a short time.

However, I really do think that liberalism won't go anywhere in the next century. Maybe I'm wrong, but people really overexaggerate the backlash against liberalism today. It isn't like there was never a pushback against liberalism in the last 200 years. Fascism and Communism were both ideologies that prove how bad the backlash against liberalism actually was. But at the end both ideologies proved to be less lindy than liberalism. Fascism is too aggressive and this aggressiveness often causes other countries to attack fascistcountries. Communism thinks that it can mould human nature to whatever it wants and at the end failed too, because the marxist man was never a thing (Some people really thought during the late 70's that for example Russians were now people of a different (marxist) nature. After the collapse of the Soviet Union it was clear that most people really didn't buy the communist propaganda. Furthermore around 20% of the Soviet Union's GDP was probably made by the black market, so even in a totalitarian regime human never can't be extinguished). Furthermore both ideologies depend to much on the state and just eat too many resources. This was clearly proven for communism, less so for fasicsm because fascism is too expansionist and aggressive. But I'm pretty sure that the some would go for fascism, since facist Germany's economy was also quite wasteful with resources.

Most states that were totalitarian 50 years ago, are now "only" authoritarian, some even democracies/semi-democracies. The military dictatorships of Europe (Until he 70's Greek, Spain and Portugal were all ruled by the military) all disappeared, often surprisingly. The number of (liberal) democracies often waxed and waned as well. Three hundred years ago there was not one, then many democracies were established but many disappeared again during the second world war. During the cold war there were less democracies than before the second world war, but after the 90s there were more democratic states around the world than ever. It wouldn't surprise me that many democractic states disappear now again, but recover some decades later. People often forget how much authoritarianism/totalitarianism suck and sometimes just need the boot on their neck again to remember why exactly they suck. In the case of the USA: I really don't think that the USA will become a much more authoritarian nation in the next years. Fact is that authoritarians have become dumber on average than the ones from the previous generation (look at Nick and Vaush as examples) and outside of YouTube and Twitter their appeal is almost non-existent.

 

[Rekkington]

Vaush repays Tim Pool by calling him stupid and too dumb to know what's on the latest spending bill. He has a point about Tim, but Vaush is one of the stupidest and most vindictive people online.
View attachment 1823232

Vaush "joking" on Twitter about never wearing pants
View attachment 1823236

Okay so the new thing is pretending Critical Race Theory doesn't exist?
I love watching Leftists completely walk back their own bullshit when everyone decides it's gay and retarded.
This is why I liked BLM for 5 minutes, cause black people don't possess the ability to coat all their revolutionary nonsense in pseudo-academic speak, they literally just had a whole section on their site that said they wanna abolish the nuclear family. Guys like Vaush will step back from that but then if pressed they'll go on and on about how heteronormitivity is bad and white families need to be decentralized and the entire relationship between parents and children is corrupt. Vaush wants to say Tim Pool can't "define" critical race theory and then probably 15 minutes later will be defending it. What a fat retard.

 

[Troonwhisperer]

Look look who is on the tankie Hakim's stream