Insurrection 2021

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

"I'm encouraging them to break the law or shut up but I refuse to say what those things are because it might get me in trouble."
You deserve the dice roll of the FBI report for some of your posts just for being such a retard about all this, but Null needs a break from that level of stupid so no one should bother.

Just stop constantly telling people to nut up or shut up to people to silence and belittle them for not committing major felonies that you refuse to even talk about because you're scared of just mentioning them.

Not my fault they continue to shit their pants and do nothing while talking about how someone should do something.
I'll lay off the specifics because it looks like the worst offenders have reached that point now, anyways.

 

[Terrifik]

cross post: Neat Tranny Win

Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria​

News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.

 

[Meat Target]

cross post: Neat Tranny Win
View attachment 1826607
View attachment 1826606

Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria​

News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.

Remember, the idea that Democrats might be pedophiles is a baseless and dangerous cuntsthpeeracee theeoree.

 

[Dangerously Gay Llama]

While I generally agree that most people saying the govt is the big bad and the government has been taken over by [insert evil group here] are larpers who won't ever do shit, constantly saying "DO SOMETHING OR YOU'RE A FUCKING LARP!!!" is just as retarded and you do it frequently.
What is it you think people who believe these things should be doing? Just say it instead of beating around the bush so much. Who should they kill? What should they burn?

Most people are just ruffling feathers but even those who truly believe what they say have very few avenues to go down that they could openly discuss that wouldn't put them under federal spotlights and I don't know what you expect a non-larper to do that is meaningful and not just murder or arson that'd be swept under the rug.

Nice try, but I'm not getting banned for fedposting.
There are very logical targets they should position themselves against, and as someone who worked at one for half a year- their security is less total than you would think. If even a dozen people coordinated, they could accomplish a lot of damage.
Of course, my more immediate point is as below:

You are a mega faggot. You're trying to play lawyer with fedposting. I don't think the feds would have any problem asking questions about why you're constantly encouraging domestic terrorism and prodding "extremists" or something equally as vague.

I'm encouraging these people to put up or piss off, and unlike them, I am willing to take actual risks to do this, because they are actively ruining a site I quite enjoy and don't want to fully turn into a shithole.

"I'm encouraging them to break the law or shut up but I refuse to say what those things are because it might get me in trouble."
You deserve the dice roll of the FBI report for some of your posts just for being such a retard about all this, but Null needs a break from that level of stupid so no one should bother.

Just stop constantly telling people to nut up or shut up to silence and belittle them for not committing major felonies that you refuse to even talk about because you're scared of just mentioning them.

Not my fault they continue to shit their pants and do nothing while talking about how someone should do something.
I'll lay off the specifics because it looks like the worst offenders have reached that point now, anyways.

I bet you guys don't even have the balls to spell iCup out loud.

 

[Dark Edea]

I bet you guys don't even have the balls to spell iCup out loud.

AND BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE!

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Point taken - I need to spend more time in the more relaxed parts of the site. Thank you for the advice.

You know what. I'll join you. When one posts too much in a heated debate like this, it's easy to forget that we're all here to enjoy ourselves together.

As much as I don't understand some people, I'm happy that there is at least one place on the net where we can meet and have autistic slapfights over stuff like this.
You know, at least it's not getting boring.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

I bet you guys don't even have the balls to spell iCup out loud.

Dangerously based, I'll see myself out.

 

[Dark Edea]

Dangerously based, I'll see myself out.

Can I watch your profile picture pee before you leave? I must fulfill a prophecy.

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

cross post: Neat Tranny Win
View attachment 1826607
View attachment 1826606

Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria​

News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.

This is the election thread, retard.

 

[Terrifik]

This is the election thread, retard.

I though this was general forum for everthing happening toward end of Donald fall & Crowning of Joe bidden .

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

I though this was general forum for everthing happening toward end of Donald fall & Crowning of Joe bidden .

And what exactly does some tranny law in California have to do with either of those things?

 

[Aidan]

This is where I will post my guerilla ops plans when the false king takes the throne.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Lol, from a few days ago, alcoholic stripper Melissa Carone is taking an 'interesting' strategy in response to Dominion's preservation of records notice

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9101261/Melissa-Carone-hits-Dominion-voting-threatening-defamation-suit.html

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

Lol, from a few days ago, alcoholic stripper Melissa Carone is taking an 'interesting' strategy in response to Dominion's preservation of records notice
View attachment 1826702

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9101261/Melissa-Carone-hits-Dominion-voting-threatening-defamation-suit.html

If I don't understand a subpeona, how can you hold me in contempt of court? Checkmate libtards

 

[Odnovo]

I'm encouraging these people to put up or piss off, and unlike them, I am willing to take actual risks to do this, because they are actively ruining a site I quite enjoy and don't want to fully turn into a shithole.

You are vastly more instrumental in turning this place into a shithole than any of your opponents.

 

[Confused Doggo]

cross post: Neat Tranny Win
View attachment 1826607
View attachment 1826606

Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria​

News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.

At least we're all in agreement that this is fucked up.

 

[All becomes gunt]

This is where I will post my guerilla ops plans when the false king takes the throne.

Barbeque Bravo will be installed on the rooster's nest. Hotel Whiskey will be sightseeing the festivities from Trailer Charlie. Await for further instructions, Grillmaster out.

Spoiler

To the feds and secret service monitoring this thread, this is a meme, this is a joke XD and not to be taken seriously

 

[Terrifik]

And what exactly does some tranny law in California have to do with either of those things?

It just shows that tranny idelogy is Unbreakable. That rain or shine tranny will be more important people or normal politics that all court will bend the knee for them.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

Trump-brand diaper,

You could choose a worse brand. Supposedly theyre the best.

cross post: Neat Tranny Win
View attachment 1826607
View attachment 1826606

Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria​

News: 2020 Press Release
For Release: December 30, 2020
Media Calls Only: 916-492-3566
Email Inquiries: cdipress@insurance.ca.gov
Commissioner Lara takes proactive step to ensure transgender youth have access to gender-affirming medical care for gender dysphoria
Department of Insurance finds applying strict age limits in health insurance for gender transition surgery impermissible under California law
LOS ANGELES, Calif. — Today, Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara directed the Department of Insurance to issue a General Counsel Opinion Letter clarifying that under existing California law, health insurance companies may not deny coverage for male chest reconstruction surgery for female-to-male patients undergoing gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria based solely on a patient’s age.
“For far too long, individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria have had to battle a host of challenges to get access to gender-affirming care in order to be their true selves,” said Commissioner Lara. “Social stigma, misconceptions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, and outdated medical criteria create barriers to necessary medical care that can lead to tragic results for individuals with gender dysphoria, especially for our transgender youth.”
California law already provides protections meant to reduce these barriers to gender-affirming care for gender dysphoria. However, due to complaints from young Californians and their parents, some health insurance companies may still use coverage criteria and processes that wrongfully deny coverage, and place the burden on consumers to pursue their legal rights to transgender health services through time-consuming appeals and independent medical reviews. To be proactive, health insurance companies should evaluate their coverage criteria for gender dysphoria treatment and eliminate any noncompliant practices to avoid needlessly delaying and interfering with medical care recommended by a patient’s doctor.
The Department’s General Counsel Opinion Letter, issued pursuant to Insurance Code section 12921.9, was prepared in response to an inquiry from San Diego’s TransFamily Support Services regarding several denials of coverage for male chest surgery for patients under 18 years old who are transitioning from female to male. The Department determined that denying coverage for mastectomy and reconstruction of a male chest based solely on age is impermissible under state laws requiring coverage of reconstructive surgery. Health insurance companies must consider a patient’s specific clinical situation in determining medical necessity.
“TransFamily Support Services is proud to partner with the California Department of Insurance to remove the age barrier for gender-affirming care,” said Kathie Moehlig, Executive Director at TransFamily Support Services. “This barrier was discriminatory and detrimental to the lives of trans youth. To have to navigate the overwhelming barriers to health care should not be a part of their experience. Transgender youth already face so many challenges from unsupportive families, bullying at school, social stigmas, and even violence.”
Additionally, imposing strict age limits on coverage of male chest reconstruction surgery when it is requested to treat gender dysphoria but not other medical conditions, such as breast cancer or trauma, constitutes discrimination in health coverage based on age, sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, and health conditions in violation of state and federal law.
"Today the State of California has put insurance companies on notice that they cannot deny access to medically-necessary care based on outdated rules that are not supported by evidence or scientific consensus,” said Dr. Ward Carpenter, Co-Director of Health Services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center. “In so doing, the state not only expands access to health care but also takes an important step in saving the lives of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) adolescents struggling with gender dysphoria, depression and suicidal thoughts. Decisions about an adolescent’s health must be left to the patient, their families and their care providers, not to insurance companies."
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, an international professional association that provides evidence-based standards of care for transgender people, states that male chest reconstruction surgery to treat gender dysphoria could be carried out in individuals under 18 “depending on an adolescent’s specific clinical situation and goals for gender identity expression.” The use of rigid age criteria in determining medical necessity, and thus insurance coverage, for female-to-male chest reconstruction surgery does not allow consideration of each individual’s unique clinical situation, contrary to the generally accepted standards of care for transgender health and the requirements of state and federal law.

Can't get a wisdom tooth removed, but prime-aged tits can get the chop on the dole? We are already in hell.

And what exactly does some tranny law in California have to do with either of those things?

Woke up with a West Coast tranny lawyer.
Such an empty chest,
Not a single breast
for
me.
*don henley suddenly starts bawling*

 

[HumanHive]

I honestly think Waco, Kenosha, and Charlottesville were the key events that trained the right that they're not allowed to lawfully gather for events and that the law's always itching to hammer them down. I'd argue it trains frustrated conservatives that they need to take after Uncle Ted if they want to make a point - with the problem being that it also makes other conservatives think they're alone in a sea of insanity. How long can that conservative urge keep getting hammered into submission?

But that's 100% true, though. After the 60's, when Nixon put down the growing leftist rebellion by force, the Left infiltrated the courts and law enforcement to prevent it from ever happening again. Back in the 90's, the paranoia was some randos living in bunkers were going to take over the government and so everything under the sun was heavily infiltrated; but now the FBI just can't get enough of it and most right-wing organizations are straight up FBI created and led, just so they can put them down.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/n...-kidnapping-plot-suspects-hearing/3666696001/

Remember this utterly random incident? Weird how some guy wants to kidnap a judge for no practical gain to him or anyone else. Why would he come up with such a plan? Voices in his fucking head? No, he got baited for no other reason than US law enforcement has an unofficial quota system of "gotta arrest this many right wingers to make sure fascists don't take over the country". It's complete crickets when it comes to left wing groups, who are allowed to go to conferences that talk about how to break police lines in protests and the like. It's not simply unfair or the fault of the right wing, this is an active hostile effort and has been going on for decades. The best comparison isn't an attack on the right wing, but a weird form of agriculture. The harvest is headlines like the one I posted above