Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

What do y'all hate the most about Chantal's videos?

For me:
  • When she scrunches her hands into baby fists...and when she scrunches her face into a baby fist.
  • When she can't eat without getting food all over her face, cleavage, clothes and fingers....which she then sucks (even ALR doesn't have all that happening)
  • When she encourages Peetz to engage and then rolls her eyes at him, ignores him, and/or talks over him.
 
Afterthought: It made me giggle to find out James' mum tunes in. The plot thickens...

Dear fucking Christ, what?!? I'd haul my child (adult or not) out of there. But, then, her rearing created him so I guess that explains it. I'd like to think there have at least been a few awkward conversations, but then again they were engaged...

What do y'all hate the most about Chantal's videos?

For me:
  • When she scrunches her hands into baby fists...and when she scrunches her face into a baby fist.
  • When she can't eat without getting food all over her face, cleavage, clothes and fingers....which she then sucks (even ALR doesn't have all that happening)
  • When she encourages Peetz to engage and then rolls her eyes at him, ignores him, and/or talks over him.
The cats and her rat face/voice.
 
I'm 100% certain she's buying subs and yes, it goes up another 100 every 1-2 days. I think she thinks once she gets 100k subs, she'll get her very own YouTube concierge and be able to vanquish all the haters and no one can ever say a bad word about her afterward.

Assuming she lives that long.
Why is she so obsessed with this stupid Torrid haul? Who's eagerly anticipating it? Most of her viewers just want to point and laugh at a hog trying on people clothes. I had to laugh at Yabba mocking her over doing a reveal for doing the most basic human things. Just clean your fucking house like an adult.

I am fascinated how her sub count continues to grow by 100 every second day. I get that she's being particularly messy right now but how is she attracting new viewers?

Speculation here is that she's buying subs. I haven't been paying attention, but does it increase at relatively the same rate every second day? If so, that could be telling.
This is like the milionth time that this speculation gets brought up, her subs gets refreshed every 100 by 100 because they changed the Youtube API to work that way to prevent "wars" beetween youtubers and cancel culture. We don't have any proof that she's buying subs and sincerely she doesn't need to buy subs. She gets plenty of views (which equals money) as is.

The only problem in her channel is engagement, she keeps her comment section very controlled and like/dislike ratio hidden, this makes hard for the Youtube algorithm to suggest her videos to the audience. ALR stopped doing so a while ago because she understand how to make money and how to troll her audience.
 
Sex with Chantal.

Every so often, this topic comes up, and it never goes further than speculating if she's actually had any, or how many partners she's had, or the frequency of her encounters. I think we all need to really sack up and accept that if this issue is going to be explored on this thread, it is necessary to examine the logistics and physics of the act of Chantal copulating. That's where I come in, sleeves rolled up and bravely willing to wade into the raw sewage that is this discussion.

First of all, how? How does a man actually go about it? I've always figured that good ol' missionary would be missionary impossible with Chantal, given the enormous amount of lard she carries in front. I imagine a man mounting her would be something like lying face-down on a very large boulder, arms and legs dangling down into space, or just splayed out to the sides. There is no way a penis could enter Chantal with a man lying on top of her. I suppose if she lay sprawled out, half-on and half-off her bed (a la an infamous shot of Hungry Fat Chick that I'm not going to link here) the guy could somehow maneuver himself inside of her through some very Cirque du Soleil-like contortions.

But would that colossal gut--which hangs almost to her knees--really obscure her genital area, even while splayed out like a pig in a caja china? Would there be the inevitable hoisting-up in order to gain access to her unwashed honeypot? Chantal's too lazy; she'd never have the wherewithal or interest in holding up her two-hundred-pound fleshball. This means whichever poor bastard attempted this feat would have to not just position himself in a very precarious way in order to penetrate her, he'd also have to keep her fupa lifted up with one arm, leaving the guy exhausted, breathless, and wondering if any of it was worth it. Let's not forget the clothespin that would surely be on his nose, needing constant adjustment throughout the act.

I was thinking spoon position could work, but didn't Chantal claim a few days ago to have a "deep ass"? Not even John Holmes would be able to reach the portal of her vagina, not with that extended shelf she calls a butt, so that would be out of the question. Doggy-style? Chantal can't keep herself held up on her hands, or even her elbows. Not a chance. I suppose she could just lie there on her stomach, but I don't think she's able to do that without being elevated a couple of feet, and there's still that "deep ass" factor making it a challenge.

Cowgirl? Possibly, possibly. But it would be difficult for the man to know if he'd entered Chantal's vagina, or just one of her many warm, sweaty folds. And I have a feeling Chantal couldn't make any sort of motions if she were on top, unless the man was half-exercise ball. Frankly, I think Chantal's attempts at sex--with however many partners there have been, or how many times--have amounted to nothing more than, well, a sad trombone sound.


This could possibly be answered by someone who watches a lot of XXXL porn.

@Null ??
 
What do y'all hate the most about Chantal's videos?

For me:
  • When she scrunches her hands into baby fists...and when she scrunches her face into a baby fist.
  • When she can't eat without getting food all over her face, cleavage, clothes and fingers....which she then sucks (even ALR doesn't have all that happening)
  • When she encourages Peetz to engage and then rolls her eyes at him, ignores him, and/or talks over him.
I can't sit through any of her non-clothing haul videos; they're so boring. My least favorite thing about her videos is the way she lives. How a person upkeeps their home and car says a lot about them. Chantal is such a horrible mess inside and out.
 
I don't know why Chantal would think that she gets her own YouTube concierge when she hits 100k. It has to do with how much money you bring into them. Rackets has had one since when he was less than 50k subs because of how much he brings in with superchats. YouTube cares about $$$ and Chantal makes peanuts compared to others of the same channel size
 
What do y'all hate the most about Chantal's videos?

For me:
  • When she scrunches her hands into baby fists...and when she scrunches her face into a baby fist.
  • When she can't eat without getting food all over her face, cleavage, clothes and fingers....which she then sucks (even ALR doesn't have all that happening)
  • When she encourages Peetz to engage and then rolls her eyes at him, ignores him, and/or talks over him.
Everything. I also hate how reaction channels will ask "is that how they do things in Canada?" and it must be remembered she doesn't represent any of us. Ever.
This is like the milionth time that this speculation gets brought up, her subs gets refreshed every 100 by 100 because they changed the Youtube API to work that way to prevent "wars" beetween youtubers and cancel culture. We don't have any proof that she's buying subs and sincerely she doesn't need to buy subs. She gets plenty of views (which equals money) as is.

The only problem in her channel is engagement, she keeps her comment section very controlled and like/dislike ratio hidden, this makes hard for the Youtube algorithm to suggest her videos to the audience. ALR stopped doing so a while ago because she understand how to make money and how to troll her audience.
Yes, but the count is still climbing. When it's 83.2 yesterday and 83.3 today, the count increased somewhere between 1-99.
I don't know why Chantal would think that she gets her own YouTube concierge when she hits 100k. It has to do with how much money you bring into them. Rackets has had one since when he was less than 50k subs because of how much he brings in with superchats. YouTube cares about $$$ and Chantal makes peanuts compared to others of the same channel size
Always remember Chantal is stupid and entitled and doesn't understand how anything works. Dustin Dailey and Nick Snyder (don't judge me) both said they never got anything special from YouTube but listed others who have. But Charlie has that Play button and the ogress doesn't.
 
What do y'all hate the most about Chantal's videos?

For me:
  • When she scrunches her hands into baby fists...and when she scrunches her face into a baby fist.
  • When she can't eat without getting food all over her face, cleavage, clothes and fingers....which she then sucks (even ALR doesn't have all that happening)
  • When she encourages Peetz to engage and then rolls her eyes at him, ignores him, and/or talks over him.
It sounds horrible but I hate her cats, not so much the animals themselves but the entire three minute long segments we get out of nowhere where she just growls at them in her demon voice. That needs to go.
 
Sex with Chantal.

Every so often, this topic comes up, and it never goes further than speculating if she's actually had any, or how many partners she's had, or the frequency of her encounters. I think we all need to really sack up and accept that if this issue is going to be explored on this thread, it is necessary to examine the logistics and physics of the act of Chantal copulating. That's where I come in, sleeves rolled up and bravely willing to wade into the raw sewage that is this discussion.

First of all, how? How does a man actually go about it? I've always figured that good ol' missionary would be missionary impossible with Chantal, given the enormous amount of lard she carries in front. I imagine a man mounting her would be something like lying face-down on a very large boulder, arms and legs dangling down into space, or just splayed out to the sides. There is no way a penis could enter Chantal with a man lying on top of her. I suppose if she lay sprawled out, half-on and half-off her bed (a la an infamous shot of Hungry Fat Chick that I'm not going to link here) the guy could somehow maneuver himself inside of her through some very Cirque du Soleil-like contortions.

But would that colossal gut--which hangs almost to her knees--really obscure her genital area, even while splayed out like a pig in a caja china? Would there be the inevitable hoisting-up in order to gain access to her unwashed honeypot? Chantal's too lazy; she'd never have the wherewithal or interest in holding up her two-hundred-pound fleshball. This means whichever poor bastard attempted this feat would have to not just position himself in a very precarious way in order to penetrate her, he'd also have to keep her fupa lifted up with one arm, leaving the guy exhausted, breathless, and wondering if any of it was worth it. Let's not forget the clothespin that would surely be on his nose, needing constant adjustment throughout the act.

I was thinking spoon position could work, but didn't Chantal claim a few days ago to have a "deep ass"? Not even John Holmes would be able to reach the portal of her vagina, not with that extended shelf she calls a butt, so that would be out of the question. Doggy-style? Chantal can't keep herself held up on her hands, or even her elbows. Not a chance. I suppose she could just lie there on her stomach, but I don't think she's able to do that without being elevated a couple of feet, and there's still that "deep ass" factor making it a challenge.

Cowgirl? Possibly, possibly. But it would be difficult for the man to know if he'd entered Chantal's vagina, or just one of her many warm, sweaty folds. And I have a feeling Chantal couldn't make any sort of motions if she were on top, unless the man was half-exercise ball. Frankly, I think Chantal's attempts at sex--with however many partners there have been, or how many times--have amounted to nothing more than, well, a sad trombone sound.

What a disgusting topic, but you're right, it can and will be discussed. There is no stopping it.

I refuse to go into the question of logistics because that is a road too far for me. Even being vague is a little much. I ask this, though, do you really think that Bebe would have gone so far as to live with her if he didn't complete the act in full? Bebe willingly lived with Chantal, he put up with all of it, even if you assume Canadian citizenship was on the line I can't see how they wouldn't have figured it out.

All I know is that I'd bet my right leg that Peetz never did the brappy with her.
 
When I first started watching her I was shocked by her abhorrently atrocious table manners, so shocked I felt the wind from my mother spinning in her grave when watching Chantal: I'm not sure the noise I heard was the wind or her reeeing but I felt an embarrassment for Chantal I didn't even know I had.

Then came everything @TrainWreckSpotter mentioned.

She is a diseased soul.
 
Last edited:
Regarding the sex thing (thanks, @A borscht-on, ya bastard): in the famous dingleberries vid, she claimed that dudes would be venturing down and would encounter dingleberries. I wonder just htf it would be possible - not the dingleberries, because yeah, she's nasty and gross, but anyone managing to find her cooch without suffocating. Do they use snorkels? Deep sea diving rigs?

Cued for MichaelBePetty's gasp and "Nooo!", which always make me laugh.
 
On top of that, when you took a roll of film in to be processed, you got back only one print of each photo (I remember when the option to get two sets of prints became a thing).

If you wanted extra prints, you had to identify which negative had the right image, put it in a separate envelope so it wouldn't get scratched or dirty, take it in to have prints made, and wait a few days for it to be ready for pickup.

Doing that for just one extra print was a huge pain in the ass; normally, you'd only bother doing it for a group/family photo where lots of people would want a print of their own. And while it wasn't prohibitively expensive, it wasn't cheap, either.

Chantal's mom probably has photo albums with more pics of Chantal as a kid and adolescent, but I'm not surprised Chantal herself only has a few.

I used to develop film for cvs. Both 35 mm and aps film. One hour photo was really 15 mins, but we just said one hour because we would always have a bunch of rolls to go through. Negatives were just scanned by the machine then reprinted on demand, only took maybe a min. We could also do enlargements up to a certain size and what I would also do is color correction as well if necessary.

not sure what other labs are like but it should not take days to get film back.
 
I used to develop film for cvs. Both 35 mm and aps film. One hour photo was really 15 mins, but we just said one hour because we would always have a bunch of rolls to go through. Negatives were just scanned by the machine then reprinted on demand, only took maybe a min. We could also do enlargements up to a certain size and what I would also do is color correction as well if necessary.

not sure what other labs are like but it should not take days to get film back.
I believe @Angry New Ager is talking about what it was like having film developed a couple decades ago. It was expensive and it was slow.
 
What do y'all hate the most about Chantal's videos?

For me:
  • When she scrunches her hands into baby fists...and when she scrunches her face into a baby fist.
  • When she can't eat without getting food all over her face, cleavage, clothes and fingers....which she then sucks (even ALR doesn't have all that happening)
  • When she encourages Peetz to engage and then rolls her eyes at him, ignores him, and/or talks over him.
That hand wave thing she does. Kind of like jazz hands but she usually only does it with her one free hand that is not holding the fork. I don't know exactly how to describe it, but anyone who has watched Chantal for any considerable amount of time knows what I am talking about. I fucking can't stand it.
 
Ok, I lied. The two things that really bug me are when she presents her food as if it's for us. "Today, I have for you guys...." No bitch, that food is for you and you only. And her cravings. In the NYE live, she said she was craving this when pointing to the vegetable tray.

Then there's a billion other things she does. I do enjoy her professional presenter voice because it highlights her stupidity.
 
not sure what era, I was doing it 20 years ago and it wasn’t bad at all to do and certainly not long at all.

20 years ago was not the 80s and 90s, which was Clotso's youth, and thus the era being discussed. A lab in 1994 was very different than a lab in 2004.

A lot of people worked at those photo labs. The work to develop 1 single roll did not take long, but as you said, the backlog is what made it. "One hour" photos cost extra because they were put in the front of the queue. IIRC at the place I may or may not have worked at, they had 1-hour, 24-hour, 2-days, and then the "econo" option where you'd basically just come back whenever.

After doing all the priority ones, you'd just go in order of arrival. The backlog could most certainly take days. Especially at holidays and graduation season. Remember, we're talking about an era where NOBODY had digital cameras, not even the rich kids.
 
Ok, I lied. The two things that really bug me are when she presents her food as if it's for us. "Today, I have for you guys...." No bitch, that food is for you and you only. And her cravings. In the NYE live, she said she was craving this when pointing to the vegetable tray.

You know she'd strike like a pit viper if anyone started to reach in and take some of that food.

 
Back