- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From Ian's video today it sounds like he's doing a lot of headstamp shit. The amount of original research that you'd have to do for a book on Warlord-era Chinese pistols is mind-blowing.
I also think that at the very least Ian is annoyed / embarrassed at Karls mask autism. Ian hasn't been photographed at any of Karls mask mandatory outdoor shooting match / sperg rallies as far as I can see and he's posted more match vids that a normal year.
I think the distance also started about the same time as Karl's polycuck gf, I suspect that might be a factor too. I know I can't really respect a person after I find something like that out about them, so that's my head cannon.
They did quite a bit over the years, particularly hassling sales representatives.Didn't Karl is piss off a bunch of industry people a couple years ago at shot show?
It's not just about internet respect either for Ian. A lot of what he does with FW requires access to museums and other large collections so he needs an image of professionalism or he's risks losing access to those resources. If his name gets attached to a bunch of autism and shit posting those museum curators might stop letting him have access to their collections and then there goes FW.The other possibility is that they are still friends, but Ian has just realized that Karl's spergery is radioactive so he's trying real hard to separate stuff so that his ship doesn't sink with Karl's. I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if Karl has an actual touch of the autsm, so maybe he just hasn't figured it out yet.
Ian seems savvy enough to know that he's generally more well liked and respected by the internet at large, and additionally Karl is probably an albatross around Ian's neck with regard to getting access to the more professional areas of the gun industry for his publishing stuff. Didn't Karl is piss off a bunch of industry people a couple years ago at shot show?
Ian has built up a significant network in the historical firearms community, and public association with Karl could jeopardize that. So far, Ian has a published book, has visited private and state-owned collections in multiple countries, interviewed Larry Vickers, Ken Hackathorn, and many others, and has established connections with well-respected researchers in other countries like Max Popenker (TKB-022 someday?).It's not just about internet respect either for Ian. A lot of what he does with FW requires access to museums and other large collections so he needs an image of professionalism or he's risks losing access to those resources. If his name gets attached to a bunch of autism and shit posting those museum curators might stop letting him have access to their collections and then there goes FW.
Plus he reads this thread, which just warms my heart in a way that only KF can.What has Karl done? Meme tests in AZ, match videos in AZ, rants in the desert, dabbing on manufacturers at Shot Show a couple times, and Finnish Brutality. He's only a couple steps up from the average arfcom user, and is abrasive and unprofessional.
Getting an invite to the French Ministry of The interior Armory was not a small thing. The GIGN have a very standoffish attitude to the media, even French Media. That French movie about the Loyada snipers was full of tecnical mistakes because they wouldn't offer any assistance to the producers.Ian has built up a significant network in the historical firearms community, and public association with Karl could jeopardize that. So far, Ian has a published book, has visited private and state-owned collections in multiple countries, interviewed Larry Vickers, Ken Hackathorn, and many others, and has established connections with well-respected researchers in other countries like Max Popenker (TKB-022 someday?).
Getting an invite to the French Ministry of The interior Armory was not a small thing.
Thought the major hatred toward scopes was less about the scopes themselves; but the high value targets (officer core) throwing a bitchfit that it is ungentlemanly to snipe at them instead the disposable enlisted and draftees.The hatred of scopes comes from a time when scopes were fragile and relying on them would mean you're fucked if they break. He sounds like Hank Hill complaining that kids these days aren't learning the fundamentals when he goes on about iron sites.
The National Firearms Centre is especially hard to visit - you will absolutely not get in without a referral. You can trudge around the non-firearms bits of the Royal Armouries just fine as Joe public, but there are literally thousands of people in the UK who would do almost anything to go look at guns but can't. It's a credit to Iain's credentials and connections that they allowed him access - let alone to film.I'm pretty positive his work with Jonathon Ferguson & the Royal Armory/National Firearms Center opened a LOT of doors to museum collections elsewhere in Europe. Their research access standards are a bit different; it's not what you know/are officially studying, it's about who sent you.
I will give him credit that he’s at least more put together and articulate than a true lolcow, but I can see him being just a handful of poor decisions away from something truly pathetic.Yeah Karl definitely has the smell of lolcow in the making about him, to put it politely,
To be fair, that's almost as old as organized warfare itself.Thought the major hatred toward scopes was less about the scopes themselves; but the high value targets (officer core) throwing a bitchfit that it is ungentlemanly to snipe at them instead the disposable enlisted and draftees.