See, the thing about this train of thought that completely bucks me off the wagon is that it shouldn't matter if the courts will or will not hear the evidence. If they have a mountain of irrefutable proof that the election was stolen and the courts are literally refusing to even look at it, then why is the evidence still under lock-and-key? Why not just leak it out to the public so it's forced to become an issue that the courts have to rule on, otherwise they're clearly allowing a President to be sworn in illegally? There are so many legal avenues that open up if that's the case, not the least of which being the wealth of powers afforded to the Presidency such as the goddamned insurrection act to prevent it, and yet Trump hasn't played a single card from that deck.
If the entire country is about to be plunged into chaos because the election results were tampered with to the tunes of tens of millions of votes, I'd kind of expect someone to do something about that more than keep throwing paper at the court until they run out of shrugs. "We have irrefutable proof that this election was stolen but the court wouldn't look at it and you can't either just trust me." Is not a compelling or convincing argument, to me.
I was listening for the first month, I got bored and started walking away by the second, and now that we're at the third I'm just calling a cab so I can get as far away as possible before it gets any stupider. If you want to believe it, by all means I'm not a cop, but I'm personally off the wagon because it's just silly and I can't think of a rational explanation for this that paints Trump in a positive light.
