March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
I legitimately want some answers for this, and mainly if any lurkers from this side of the political spectrum are here.

Socdems, anarchists, and lefties in general who cry to destroy the feds, ACAB, and crush capitalism become the biggest bootlickers when the boomers actually storm the feds.

HOWEVER, their "strongest" counter to this is that "well it was fascist doing a coup against the feds so we have to stop that because good people are not storming DC!" That's just retarded even at a surface level, wouldn't you want that chaos in the first place even if all of them were fascist? They realistically don't just control everything if they fuck up the feds as that creates a power vacuum for multiple groups to take power (just look at German and Russian history in the last few centuries). If something anarchic dismantles the fed somehow shouldn't you take advantage of that power vacuum?

This only paints you guys as 100% grifters went the opportunity arrives to create the great progressive commune or revolution or whatever, you you cry that we have to "protect the feds from the destruction of our sacred democracy!" You go straight to neolib shit when it shifts from grift to ACTUAL opportunity for lefty change.
 
It wouldn't be awesome (in minecraft) because fucking heck, it's like chimps vs. chimps. Nobody would win!

Biden supporters are as dense as bricks and Trump supporters can't count.
Nah, I am excited for the Minecraft Civil War mod. The U.S. is corrupt and both our Minecraft political parties deserve to get lynched and thrown into the Nether.
 
Haha get fucked :story:
LMAOOOOOO.png
 
Socdems, anarchists, and lefties in general who cry to destroy the feds, ACAB, and crush capitalism become the biggest bootlickers when the boomers actually storm the feds..
I feel like most of the ACAB crowd is just in it because it’s trendy like BLM, and in turn aren’t really consistent. It’s pretty common in the 3D printed firearms community where someone will tweet a picture of a gun they printed the lower to and assembled only for someone with ACAB, BLM, 1312 or fuck 12 in their bio or screen name to tag the police or FBI. It doesn’t help that many of them get their views from the media they consume and from internet personalities like markiplier that parrot them to appeal to their audience.
 
I have one thing I want to say about the situation at large, now that the establishment is actively chasing conservatives and other right-leaning people to the other websites they take refuge on, such as Parler (shitty though it may be), the pressure that got people to act into storming the capitol building is only going to get worse and radicalize more people.

Just a few days ago I saw Telegram trending on Twitter, which is pretty telling since Telegram was specifically designed to block out government probes. The fact conservatives are being chased into a communications network like Telegram can only mean two things (1 that they're going to be left to their own echo chambers where moderate voices go to die and (2 more and more conservatives will be radicalized without the presence of a more mild or opposing voice to dissuade them from extremist views.

For a political group that claims they want to mend the gulf between both sides, they're doing everything in their power to specifically not deescalate the situation.

What we're going to start witnessing now is a war of resources, where the main tactic is resource denial, and the first step is denying communication networks. From there, it'll move into finding ways to cut off electricity and other utilities from certain locations, then attempts at starving out the opposition by sabotaging food distribution networks like train tracks and the highways semis use to deliver food to cities. There will be idiots who go out in public to shoot and beat each other like right now, but the real war will be fought & won with resource denial tactics.

After realizing that, consider where exactly leftists tend to live: in large cities with no agriculture and millions of people to feed. I recall a few years ago that the military ran a simulation to determine what they'd do if a terrorist caused a total blackout in a major city, and in the end they determined they'd bail due to the sheer number of retarded civilians that would go apeshit in the aftermath and how uncontrollable they would be without bread and circuses; literally not worth the effort to restore order or even try to.
 
I feel like most of the ACAB crowd is just in it because it’s trendy like BLM, and in turn aren’t really consistent. It’s pretty common in the 3D printed firearms community where someone will tweet a picture of a gun they printed the lower to and assembled only for someone with ACAB, BLM, 1312 or fuck 12 in their bio or screen name to tag the police or FBI. It doesn’t help that many of them get their views from the media they consume and from internet personalities like markiplier that parrot them to appeal to their audience.
It's like the retards with the Confederate Flag, American Flag, Police Lives Matter Flag and Gadson Flag at the same time, the only difference is the retards with these flags don't have corporations and the feds supporting them.

The strong and powerful US army will surely protect the government
View attachment 1842235
Surely having a multi-cultural army only has benefits to your nation, and there is not a single disadvantage to it AT ALL.
jan.jpg

austro.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's like the retards with the Confederate Flag, American Flag, Police Lives Matter Flag and Gadson Flag at the same time, the only difference is the retards with these flags don't have corporations and the feds supporting them.
It’s not just the corporations, but the media and social networks as well. The people who fly those flags are idiots, but people will cheer for someone being recorded sperging out about it.
 
Weren't you just in a fight last week with Null over how important it was not to regulate banks even if they shit on individual liberty? The worst part about you is you are intellectually lazy. You bitch and moan about the state of affairs but refuse to address any of it because you are reading from a script that reads "government bad, corporation good". Seeing the mental gymnastics you engage in to explain the current state of Affairs is hilarious and disheartening at the same time. You simply cannot articulate a scenario where a private corporation has the power to censor the President of the Unifed States. So all you are left with is punchy one liners like this.
Corporations are just as bad. I explained this to you. But anyone who things the GOP is conservative is just as misguided and low information who believes that the Democrats are "progressive". The GOP has not once actually conserved or upheld the values they campaign on. Not even fucking Reagan. If he believed in liberty as much as he claimed he wouldn't have consolidated as much power to the federal level as he did, and tax cuts would have been followed by spending cuts.

People complain about Reagan because "muh trickle down doesn't happen", but really, the issue was poor fiscal policy. You can't spend money you don't have and expect things to be better when you do nothing to pay that money back and reduce spending.

Corporations, as they exist today, are a problem because they stifle competition and excrete stagnancy.

Government is bad because power corrupts.

Neither of these things are good for people. The highest point in US history was 1955. Small businesses are the heart-beat of your economy, and free people are happy people. No one today stands up for those two simple truths.

And the issue truly being highlighted by Trump being banned from Twitter? It's the reliance on the internet for information. Everyone, even boomers and Xers are just consoomers, and that's the real problem. Everyone would sooner stay in their home watching the glowing box instead of meeting with the tribe and questioning the world around them.

Who's to blame? The corporations for making products and using advertising psy-ops to make people buy product? Or the government for exploiting public education to induce docility in the masses? Both have shaken hands and worked for each other to placate the sheep into accepting that their "betters" know what's best.

Look at the lumps in your family. Today, Grandpa Jed just watches News Corp. approved narratives when he's not at his desk working for Big Inc. while waiting for the next Marvel movie because he recognizes the characters but has forgotten the stories.

60 years ago, Grandpa Jed would hang out with his buddies at the hardware store for a few hours after work on Monday, hang out at the barbershop with his other buddies on Wednesday, Friday he'd go to the baitshop or the golf course, and on Sunday he'd go to church. In all of these places he'd share ideas with people who thought differently or similar about different matters and exchange ideas and grow. And, when people had community, people didn't turn to the state to save them from crisis, and Grandma Jill didn't miss him because during the day while he was at work she'd go spend a few hours at the salon, go visit the grocer and spend a few hours trading recipes, play bridge with her friends on Saturday, and talk to some of the same but also some different people at church.

Today? The local hardware store and the baitshop and the grocer have been replaced by Wal-Mart, the barbershop has gotten smaller and is no longer conducive to socializing, and the Pastor preaches progressivism. Women no longer trade recipes at the store, they get them from News Corp, approved internet sites. Bridge and Golf have been replaced with Netflix and Amazon Prime.

Everything has been destroyed and washed away, and the GOP was running the boat for half of the show.

In a perfect world, people would live their lives without initiating violence on each other or feeling it was necessary to dictate how others live their lives inside the confines of their own home. You would at least know the manager/owner of the businesses your shop at to see them, even if not to talk to them, and "the customer experience" would be concerned about more than just zipping into the store, easily finding what you want to buy, and getting back outside. Government would exist to ensure that neighbors did not initiate aggression towards each other, that outside actors would not initiate aggression towards the collective, and that no business would be able to co-opt industry or the market place.

However, all of those institutions drank from the spring of power to the point of drunkenness and worked for the exact opposite, ensuring that they remain on top and the human meat that they extract blood and treasure from remain only functional enough to be exploited while ensuring they are too weak and too ignorant to rise up or even notice what is going on.

Have you ever questioned why most food people eat today comes from a box? That's all part of the design, too. Keep the masses too busy to be healthy, and the destruction of their bodies will hasten the destruction of their minds. Even those switched on enough to see what's going on will be too incapable of doing anything. Interesting too that those same boxes come from the corporations who government changed laws to allow preservatives and edible plastic to make up the bulk of the mass of the food products you consume as a matter of convenience while making you unhealthy and decrepit to the point that you're a slave to your doctor where you are pumped full of more chemicals at the behest of the corporations with the cooperation of the government.

Corporations are bad, but their poor behavior is enabled by willing conspirators in Government.

So you want to be upset at Twitter for banning a sitting President? Then don't demand that government regulate how Twitter operates within the context of their business. Trump has the money and influence to either make his own media network or move somewhere else.

Instead, demand that your elected officials enforce existing anti-trust and tort laws to ensure that Amazon doesn't break their contracts with Parler to ensure that Twitter maintains their monopoly.

But no, smooth brain that you are, you'll put your hands in the air and get red in the face and demand that "government do something!", only to roll over and explain how great it is when the government just constructs another alphabet agency and raises taxes and bogs everything down in more bureaucracy while Twitter gets to keep reaping the benefit of their monopoly until something finally changes.

Maybe when President Cortez starts her second term something will finally get done about Twitter.

Twitter/Facebook/Other internet censorship isn't the problem, it's just the symptom. The problem is the people allowing the internet to monopolize so much of how ideas are shared in the first place, further eroding community for the sake of division.

Tell me again how I'm wrong about the GOP failing to live up to conservatism when they've happily sat on their hands and allowed all of the above to happen.
 
I have one thing I want to say about the situation at large, now that the establishment is actively chasing conservatives and other right-leaning people to the other websites they take refuge on, such as Parler (shitty though it may be), the pressure that got people to act into storming the capitol building is only going to get worse and radicalize more people.

Just a few days ago I saw Telegram trending on Twitter, which is pretty telling since Telegram was specifically designed to block out government probes. The fact conservatives are being chased into a communications network like Telegram can only mean two things (1 that they're going to be left to their own echo chambers where moderate voices go to die and (2 more and more conservatives will be radicalized without the presence of a more mild or opposing voice to dissuade them from extremist views.

For a political group that claims they want to mend the gulf between both sides, they're doing everything in their power to specifically not deescalate the situation.

What we're going to start witnessing now is a war of resources, where the main tactic is resource denial, and the first step is denying communication networks. From there, it'll move into finding ways to cut off electricity and other utilities from certain locations, then attempts at starving out the opposition by sabotaging food distribution networks like train tracks and the highways semis use to deliver food to cities. There will be idiots who go out in public to shoot and beat each other like right now, but the real war will be fought & won with resource denial tactics.

After realizing that, consider where exactly leftists tend to live: in large cities with no agriculture and millions of people to feed. I recall a few years ago that the military ran a simulation to determine what they'd do if a terrorist caused a total blackout in a major city, and in the end they determined they'd bail due to the sheer number of retarded civilians that would go apeshit in the aftermath and how uncontrollable they would be without bread and circuses; literally not worth the effort to restore order or even try to.

I really don't think shit will go that far, but it's fun to speculate.
 
It’s not just the corporations, but the media and social networks as well. The people who fly those flags are idiots, but people will cheer for someone being recorded sperging out about it.
Media and social networks are run by corporations . . . you fail.

Weren't you just in a fight last week with Null over how important it was not to regulate banks even if they shit on individual liberty? The worst part about you is you are intellectually lazy. You bitch and moan about the state of affairs but refuse to address any of it because you are reading from a script that reads "government bad, corporation good". Seeing the mental gymnastics you engage in to explain the current state of Affairs is hilarious and disheartening at the same time. You simply cannot articulate a scenario where a private corporation has the power to censor the President of the Unifed States. So all you are left with is punchy one liners like this.
You're a small-minded child who believes that ceding power and responsibility to the government is "doing something". Your method of "addressing things" is to drop to your knees and lick the boots of the state while begging them to do something for you.

That's not addressing issues either.
 
Back