March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

[RichardMongler]

The deranged American is schizenu, a Christian shizoposter. He posts his autistic walls of text since several years now. Ernstchan as a whole is very left-leaning as it's a ban-happy chan that became an antipole to the right-leaning KC. I don't know why you would expect a different reaction from them.

Whoever that guy is, he seems like a massive lolcow who would probably get his own thread if more were known about him.

 

[Shittus Maximus]

comparing a lone wolf to an organized group which clearly traded tips, organized, and planned an event and calling them synonymous is about as retarded as suggesting that screaming and trying to vandalize a federal courthouse is synonymous to breaking into the nation's capitol.

Yeah, breaching the nation's capitol is definitely not an international disgrace which thoroughly damages the US's reputation and definitely not a crime punished far higher than looting and arson in every country in the world or anything. I mean, go on, find me a country that treats them as equivalent.

What do you think made us more of a national disgrace:

Abunch of people breaking intoa government building

OR

Citizens torching more cities than Sherman punishing the Confederacy?

FYI, foreign countries think it's a disgrace that we still let our citizens be armed and more importantly, I don't give a fuck.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

Like I said in my previous post, a congressman was shot in 2017. Now we can (should) both agree that was worse than what the capitol hill rioters did. So therefore in equal treatment land the governments response should have been greater for the second instance than the first.

The gunner died of his wounds, so that alone means we can't compare this on the level of the perpetrators to the Capitol riots in any way.

Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley have both been put on no fly lists because they are tangentially related to the rioters in DC. I think this a gross overreaction along with a bunch of other shit they are going to try and ram through as a response. Trump shouldn't be impeached over this (and probably won't be convicted anyway) but if the dems had their way, he would.

Putting people on no-fly lists should only be done (if it has to be done at all, that is) if they have direct, personal connection to the riots. As far as I know, Cruz endorsed the MMM before it went to shit and I doubt that he defended it afterwards. It is most likely a "gross overreaction".
When it comes to Trump, if they impeach him over this, they need to establish his guilt beyond the reasonable shadow of a doubt. Repercussions for his actions are justified, but wether an impeachment is justified, I do not know. What I do know is that Trump was a retard that took every spare minute to shake the hornets nest and appeal to Qtard loonies and whipped them into a frenzy, told them to come to the Capitol and then... well... shit escalated. In a way that I personally didn't think would happen (partially, cause I didn't expect people to be this fucking retarded, but oh well). And Trump still doubles down on what riles people up so much in the first place. In his (now deleted) video, he still reiterated the nonsensical bullshit about the stolen election before telling people to go home and yesterday again in Alamo (even though he threw his fanboy revolutionaries under the bus right at the start of the press conference, too).
I doubt he expected them to go haywire, I assume he thought he'd have a nice little crowd of people yelling "yeah right", so he could pretend he has the support of the majority in his election fraud claims or something. Again: He shook the hornets' nest and when people told him it might be a bad idea, he gave it a good kick, just to show everybody how badass he is. Then the hornets came out and started fucking shit up and Trump, after a day or two, went "Well, Hornets are assholes, don't blame me."

Even if this riot wasn't what he intended, but rather the outcome of his own ignorance and incompetence, that still needs to be addressed. Doesn't mean by an impeachment, and it certainly shouldn't mean being banned from any website between Twitter and Fur Affinity. But this should carry a consequence for the supreme tard in chief.

In contrast when Scalise was shot they only punished the man responsible. I think this was the correct response and all I ask is for you to confirm whether the Dems are overreacting or whether the Trump administration should have cracked down on all Bernie Bros and tangentially related dem congressman like Barbara Waters?

The guy that shot Scalise died of his wounds. He was some lone loony. If he had supporters that enabled him to act out his little plot, those should be held accountable, just like those that supported the riots in DC should be held accountable. Everybody according to the measures of the law, depending on their guilt and involvement.

Are you happy now?

 

[Shittus Maximus]

lol acting like some meme pics were the worst that came out of that riot. Is that the cope you're going with?

The worst thing that came out of the riot is that it stopped. I wanted to see politician's shit themselves and actual crying.

 

[Taco]

It's only considered terrorism when it's the lives of politicians at stake, you the average citizen don't matter.

What if I told you dozens of BLM protestors were charged with terrorism counts despite only doing property damage
It's almost like the system is against anything that threatens it

 

[All Cops Are Based]

Hate to say it, but a person really needs to step back and wonder if democracy has simply failed in the USA.

If you'll excuse the edge: America is great despite the fact it's a democracy (akkshually, democratic republic), not because of the fact.
I'll never get the breathless, religious reverence people have for a system that says a bad idea deserves more weight than a good idea as long as it has more people pushing it.

 

[Shittus Maximus]

The gunner died of his wounds, so that alone means we can't compare this on the level of the perpetrators to the Capitol riots in any way.


Putting people on no-fly lists should only be done (if it has to be done at all, that is) if they have direct, personal connection to the riots. As far as I know, Cruz endorsed the MMM before it went to shit and I doubt that he defended it afterwards. It is most likely a "gross overreaction".
When it comes to Trump, if they impeach him over this, they need to establish his guilt beyond the reasonable shadow of a doubt. Repercussions for his actions are justified, but wether an impeachment is justified, I do not know. What I do know is that Trump was a retard that took every spare minute to shake the hornets nest and appeal to Qtard loonies and whipped them into a frenzy, told them to come to the Capitol and then... well... shit escalated. In a way that I personally didn't think would happen (partially, cause I didn't expect people to be this fucking retarded, but oh well). And Trump still doubles down on what riles people up so much in the first place. In his (now deleted) video, he still reiterated the nonsensical bullshit about the stolen election before telling people to go home and yesterday again in Alamo (even though he threw his fanboy revolutionaries under the bus right at the start of the press conference, too).
I doubt he expected them to go haywire, I assume he thought he'd have a nice little crowd of people yelling "yeah right", so he could pretend he has the support of the majority in his election fraud claims or something. Again: He shook the hornet's nest and when people told him it might be a bad idea, he gave it a good kick, just to show everybody how badass he is.

Even if this riot wasn't what he intended, but rather the outcome of his own ignorance and incompetence, that still needs to be addressed. Doesn't mean by an impeachment, and it certainly shouldn't mean being banned from any website between Twitter and Fur Affinity. But this should carry a consequence for the supreme tard in chief.


The guy that shot Scalise died of his wounds. He was some lone loony. If he had supporters that enabled him to act out his little plot, those should be held accountable, just like those that supported the riots in DC should be held accountable. Everybody according to the measures of the law, depending on their guilt and involvement.

Are you happy now?

The gunner literally wrote that he did it because of what Bernie said. I don't see Bernie in jail or being prosecuted...

 

[RudeRoasts]

comparing a lone wolf to an organized group which clearly traded tips, organized, and planned an event and calling them synonymous is about as retarded as suggesting that screaming and trying to vandalize a federal courthouse is synonymous to breaking into the nation's capitol.

Yeah, breaching the nation's capitol is definitely not an international disgrace which thoroughly damages the US's reputation and definitely not a crime punished far higher than looting and arson in every country in the world or anything. I mean, go on, find me a country that treats them as equivalent.

I really don't see why simply "breaching" the Capitol with comparatively minimal violence and damage should be seen as so much more serious than a protracted period of looting, arson, assault and murders facilitated by riots. Breaching the Capitol is illegal and should be taken seriously, but it stinks of activist statism when the "protected class" tells their populace to endure the months worth of damage, death and debts (you remember the muh insurance shtick, right?), but then goes scorched earth because they've got to pick up some papers, replace some windows and maybe install some new mahogany.

Let us not forget that multiple federal buildings were burned down or otherwise damaged during the summer riots.

And it's not like these things were happening just in the US. I still remember that video of people in fucking Athens throwing molotov cocktails at the US Embassy or something.

And if we do see breaching the Capitol as so serious to warrant the all-encompassing crackdown, why did the left get away with it when they were protesting the Kavanaugh hearings?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kavanaugh-protests-escalate-120-arrested-capitol-hill/story?id=58048599

The answer is simple. The side in power in education, media, arts, entertainment, etc did allow an actual armed insurrection known by CHAZ to go on for over 3 weeks despite resulting in multiple deaths, shootings, stabbings and rapes on private property subjugated by said insurrectionists.

And the media had the sheer audacity to suggest that ANTIFA wasn't an organization after that, and that they were "peaceful protests".

The Capitol being breached isn't the problem that's lead to what we've seen so far, and what's coming. The side that's doing the breaching mixed with the incoming shift in power is the problem.

The Capitol Riot on the 6th wasn't a good thing. Not at all. But what happened over Summer-Fall 2020 is much, much worse. It's not even comparable. Worse still, because the powers that be are being allowed to push an international narrative that it was a good thing, and punish people who state the contrary.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

The gunner literally wrote that he did it because of what Bernie said. I don't see Bernie in jail or being prosecuted...

Some loony did something crazy cause he thought he got secret messages from Bernie Sanders... and you want to make that the foundation of your argument? Okay I guess.

I really don't see why simple "breaching" the Capitol with comparatively minimal violence and damage should be seen as so much more serious than a protracted period of looting, arson, assault and murders facilitated by riots.

Race riots aren't particularly new and race related violence is an everyday occurance in the US.
A mob of boomer LARPers intruding into the seat of power of the strongest nation on earth unopposed is something completely new and has a certain novelty to it.

 

[Pentex]

Don Lemon is here to school you MAGA chud fascists on why riots are okay as long as you say the magic words "racial justice."

 

[An Avenging Bird]

I just can't see what The Plan was here with the Capitol.
The President whipped up that crowd, told them Pence had better show strength and side with him, then told everybody he'd march with them over to where the hearings were being held.
One doesn't need to be Nostradamus to have seen there would be instigators in that group.
And now because of that absolute stupidity, nobody is talking about election fraud anymore, conservatives are branded terrorists, and it worked out so well for the establishment that there is a guaranteed false flag set up for the 20th to take away the 2nd Amendment.

So after all of that, Trump calls that crowd "the mob" and is now gonna slink off while 75 million people who had just gotten fucked over are gonna be infinitely screwed because this incident will be used for-ev-er.

Great job, asshole.
Would have been better if you had just resigned on the 6th.

 

[starborn427614]

I really don't see why simple "breaching" the Capitol with comparatively minimal violence and damage should be seen as so much more serious than a protracted period of looting, arson, assault and murders facilitated by riots. Breaching the Capitol is illegal and should be taken seriously, but it stinks of activist statism when the "protected class" tells their populace to endure the months worth of damage, death and debts (you remember the muh insurance shtick, right?), but then goes scorched earth because they've got to pick up some papers, replace some windows and maybe install some new mahogany.

Let us not forget that multiple federal buildings were burned down or otherwise damaged during the summer riots.

And it's not like these things were happening just in the US. I still remember that video of people in fucking Athens throwing molotov cocktails at the US Embassy or something.

And if we do see breaching the Capitol as so serious to warrant the all-encompassing crackdown, why did the left get away with it when they were protesting the Kavanaugh hearings?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kavanaugh-protests-escalate-120-arrested-capitol-hill/story?id=58048599

The answer is simple. The side in power in education, media, arts, entertainment, etc did allow an actual armed insurrection known by CHAZ to go on for over 3 weeks despite resulting in multiple deaths, shootings, stabbings and rapes on private property subjugated by said insurrectionists.

And the media had the sheer audacity to suggest that ANTIFA wasn't an organization after that, and that they were "peaceful protests".

The Capitol being breached isn't the problem. The side that's doing the breaching mixed with the incoming shift in power is the problem.

The Capitol Riot on the 6th wasn't a good thing. Not at all. But what happened over Summer-Fall 2020 is much, much worse. It's not even comparable. Worse still, because the powers that be are being allowed to push an international narrative that it was a good thing, and punish people who state the contrary.

Your government was literally under attack, no amount of "BUT THE BLACKS" is going to change that. Either cope, or move on.

 

[ZippyZoopa]

I really don't see why simple "breaching" the Capitol with comparatively minimal violence and damage should be seen as so much more serious than a protracted period of looting, arson, assault and murders facilitated by riots. Breaching the Capitol is illegal and should be taken seriously, but it stinks of activist statism when the "protected class" tells their populace to endure the months worth of damage, death and debts (you remember the muh insurance shtick, right?), but then goes scorched earth because they've got to pick up some papers, replace some windows and maybe install some new mahogany.

Let us not forget that multiple federal buildings were burned down or otherwise damaged during the summer riots.

And it's not like these things were happening just in the US. I still remember that video of people in fucking Athens throwing molotov cocktails at the US Embassy or something.

And if we do see breaching the Capitol as so serious to warrant the all-encompassing crackdown, why did the left get away with it when they were protesting the Kavanaugh hearings?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kavanaugh-protests-escalate-120-arrested-capitol-hill/story?id=58048599

The answer is simple. The side in power in education, media, arts, entertainment, etc did allow an actual armed insurrection known by CHAZ to go on for over 3 weeks despite resulting in multiple deaths, shootings, stabbings and rapes on private property subjugated by said insurrectionists.

And the media had the sheer audacity to suggest that ANTIFA wasn't an organization after that, and that they were "peaceful protests".

The Capitol being breached isn't the problem. The side that's doing the breaching mixed with the incoming shift in power is the problem.

The Capitol Riot on the 6th wasn't a good thing. Not at all. But what happened over Summer-Fall 2020 is much, much worse. It's not even comparable. Worse still, because the powers that be are being allowed to push an international narrative that it was a good thing, and punish people who state the contrary.

"The Capitol Riot on the 6th wasn't a good thing"

Found a glowey

 

[Mr Cuddles]

The gunner died of his wounds, so that alone means we can't compare this on the level of the perpetrators to the Capitol riots in any way.


Putting people on no-fly lists should only be done (if it has to be done at all, that is) if they have direct, personal connection to the riots. As far as I know, Cruz endorsed the MMM before it went to shit and I doubt that he defended it afterwards. It is most likely a "gross overreaction".
When it comes to Trump, if they impeach him over this, they need to establish his guilt beyond the reasonable shadow of a doubt. Repercussions for his actions are justified, but wether an impeachment is justified, I do not know. What I do know is that Trump was a retard that took every spare minute to shake the hornets nest and appeal to Qtard loonies and whipped them into a frenzy, told them to come to the Capitol and then... well... shit escalated. In a way that I personally didn't think would happen (partially, cause I didn't expect people to be this fucking retarded, but oh well). And Trump still doubles down on what riles people up so much in the first place. In his (now deleted) video, he still reiterated the nonsensical bullshit about the stolen election before telling people to go home and yesterday again in Alamo (even though he threw his fanboy revolutionaries under the bus right at the start of the press conference, too).
I doubt he expected them to go haywire, I assume he thought he'd have a nice little crowd of people yelling "yeah right", so he could pretend he has the support of the majority in his election fraud claims or something. Again: He shook the hornets' nest and when people told him it might be a bad idea, he gave it a good kick, just to show everybody how badass he is. Then the hornets came out and started fucking shit up and Trump, after a day or two, went "Well, Hornets are assholes, don't blame me."

Even if this riot wasn't what he intended, but rather the outcome of his own ignorance and incompetence, that still needs to be addressed. Doesn't mean by an impeachment, and it certainly shouldn't mean being banned from any website between Twitter and Fur Affinity. But this should carry a consequence for the supreme tard in chief.


The guy that shot Scalise died of his wounds. He was some lone loony. If he had supporters that enabled him to act out his little plot, those should be held accountable, just like those that supported the riots in DC should be held accountable. Everybody according to the measures of the law, depending on their guilt and involvement.

Are you happy now?

Man that was a long post. I do not agree with you that Trump is responsible for the action of the rioters, unless he ordered capitol police to do what they did. I too believe that the election was stolen as do tens and possibly hundreds of millions across the globe. The guy who shot Scalise got radicalised and at least some of it was from misinformation. It is easy to say that purveyors of misinformation should be held accountable for the actions of the misled, but who becomes that arbiter of truth?

The only thing I don't from your post is you think that Trump should be punished, but kind of dance around the hot porridge as to how.

I guess I should just be happy you that you agreed with at least some of what I said.

 

[Shittus Maximus]

Some loony did something crazy cause he thought he got secret messages from Bernie Sanders... and you want to make that the foundation of your argument? Okay I guess.

Race riots aren't particularly new and race related violence is an everyday occurance in the US.
A mob of boomer LARPers intruding into the seat of power of the strongest nation on earth unopposed is something completely new and has a certain novelty to it.

... that's literally the current argument against Trump right now. Or did you forget that one? He didn't get a secret message, he listen and read what Bernie said. Stop obfuscating the point.

 

[Meat Target]

A mob of boomer LARPers intruding into the seat of power of the strongest nation on earth unopposed is something completely new and has a certain novelty to it.

Acktchually, it's not.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

The only thing I don't from your post is you think that Trump should be punished, but kind of dance around the hot porridge as to how.

You will be utterly surprised to learn that I am not, in fact, a federal judge, specialised in US presidential or constitutional law.

... that's literally the current argument against Trump right now. Or did you forget that one? He didn't get a secret message, he listen and read what Bernie said. Stop obfuscating the point.

That comparison is between apples and oranges. Did Bernie tell him there was unprecedented injustice against him by Scalise? Did he rile him up personally for months and months? Did he endorse his lunacy throughout all this time and voice his support and appreciation? Did he invite him to the stadium and call him a hero for doing the right thing? You might as well blame the Tate murders on the Beatles with this logic.

Trump riled up his Qtard followers and did the surprised Pikachu-face meme when the situation blew up in his face. He fanned the flames, he was directly involved in this shitshow taking shape. He did not tell them to storm the Capitol, but his rhetoric was insanely confrontational against everyone that didn't buy into his poorly supported claims of fraud and brandmarked everyone standing in his way for another term an enemy in no uncertain terms.

As I said, comparing these two things is utterly ridiculous.

 

[Very Honest Content]

I still support Donald Trump. Ike was President when I was born, so have seen many Presidents. Trump has his failings, but far as I'm concerned he's the best President since Reagan. Have never doubted President Trump's desire to put America and the American people first. The Dems stole the election from him. Once he steps down from office there will be NO leadership in Washington, just office-holders.

If anyone has noticed, ever since congress got cucked last week, all they seem to be doing is acting like a bunch of little bitches. Can't think of anything they've done to meet the needs of the people. All they are worried about is punishing the peons who had the audacity to enter their holy sepulchre. Hate to say it, but a person really needs to step back and wonder if democracy has simply failed in the USA. The vast majority of senators and congresspeople are re-elected, time after time. They apparently end up believing they are the people's masters instead of their servants. And some of those elected to congress are idiots, such as the clown who was worried about Guam tipping over, or AOC, etc. Even worse, there are plenty who milk their time in office for the maximum financial gain possible, for themselves, their relatives, and their friends. Haven't we all seen too much of that? Remember, Donald Trump accepted no salary as President, donated it throughout his term.

It's been said that the first 535 names in a phone book could govern the country better than the present office-holders in congress. Am quite sure of that. I could see all formerly-elected positions being filled by lottery, with basic age/background qualifications. You'd serve one term, period. Selections staggered for continuity. President and Vice President would be chosen by lottery, at different times, from those who'd previously served as Senators/Representatives. You don't need to be a genius to be a great public servant. Just have common sense and be willing to listen. Problem is now, too many office-holders, at all levels, once elected, no longer care about those who elected them. See that in the city I live in. Not voting any more except for bond issues and initiatives. Otherwise, my vote is meaningless.

View attachment 1845242


View attachment 1845243


Here's a story about a Congresswoman who's told Harvard to fuck off after they canceled her from a board where she'd been serving for many years. Looks like she has some guts.

Harvard removes GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik from advisory board as part of purge. Here’s her response.​

January 12, 2021 | Jon Dougherty | Print Articl



New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik was removed from a politics advisory board at Harvard University over claims of voting irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.

“Over the past several days, Mark Gearan and I have spent a good deal of time considering the role at the Institute of Politics of our colleague Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, whom I have included in this message,” Dean Douglas Elmendorf wrote to the Senior Advisory Committee of the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School, which Gearan heads.



“Mark and I have read public materials, listened to students and alumni, and consulted with colleagues at Harvard on this important matter,” Elmendorf continued,

“Following this consideration, I spoke with Elise and asked her to step aside from the Senior Advisory Committee. My request was not about political parties, political ideology, or her choice of candidate for president,” he wrote.
“Rather, in my assessment, Elise has made public assertions about voter fraud in November’s presidential election that have no basis in evidence, and she has made public statements about court actions related to the election that are incorrect,” wrote Elmendorf. “Moreover, these assertions and statements do not reflect policy disagreements but bear on the foundations of the electoral process through which this country’s leaders are chosen.

“I made this request to Elise mindful of her important contributions to the crucial mission of the Institute of Politics over a long period, beginning with her role as a student leader (she was in the class of 2006) and continuing to her mentoring students and strengthening the IOP’s programming in many ways. I know that we are grateful for her long and committed service,” he noted further.
“In my conversation with Elise, she declined to step aside, and I told her that I would therefore remove her from the IOP’s Senior Advisory Committee at this time,” Elmendorf said.

Last week, Stefanik joined scores of other House Republicans in objecting to slates of electors from states where officials altered voting rules and procedures ahead of the Nov. 3 General Election. Stefanik and others have said they believe those changes were unconstitutional because they were not made by state legislatures and appeared to violate existing state election laws.
Nevertheless, her objection led more than 750 Harvard students and alumni to petition for her removal from the board.

In response, the New York Republican blasted the decision, saying that the board now consists “only of Joe Biden voters.”
“As a conservative Republican, it is a rite of passage and badge of honor to join the long line of leaders who have been boycotted, protested, and canceled by colleges and universities across America,” Stefanik said in a statement.
“The decision by Harvard’s administration to cower and cave to the woke Left will continue to erode diversity of thought, public discourse, and ultimately the student experience,” she continued. “The Ivory Tower’s march toward a monoculture of like-minded, intolerant liberal views demonstrates the sneering disdain for everyday Americans and will instill a culture of fear for students who will understand that a conservative viewpoint will not be tolerated.”
“I relish the opportunity to stand up for freedom of speech and freedom of thought on college campuses across America,” she added. “Congratulations Harvard, the entire Board of the Institute of Politics now consists only of Joe Biden voters — how reflective of America.”

Harvard removes GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik from advisory board as part of purge. Here's her response.

New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik was removed from a politics advisory board at Harvard University over claims of voting irregularities

www.bizpacreview.com

Archive slow as shit right now.

tl;dr but that's plenty of seethe. Enjoy your camping and forced hrt.

The gunner died of his wounds, so that alone means we can't compare this on the level of the perpetrators to the Capitol riots in any way.


Putting people on no-fly lists should only be done (if it has to be done at all, that is) if they have direct, personal connection to the riots. As far as I know, Cruz endorsed the MMM before it went to shit and I doubt that he defended it afterwards. It is most likely a "gross overreaction".
When it comes to Trump, if they impeach him over this, they need to establish his guilt beyond the reasonable shadow of a doubt. Repercussions for his actions are justified, but wether an impeachment is justified, I do not know. What I do know is that Trump was a retard that took every spare minute to shake the hornets nest and appeal to Qtard loonies and whipped them into a frenzy, told them to come to the Capitol and then... well... shit escalated. In a way that I personally didn't think would happen (partially, cause I didn't expect people to be this fucking retarded, but oh well). And Trump still doubles down on what riles people up so much in the first place. In his (now deleted) video, he still reiterated the nonsensical bullshit about the stolen election before telling people to go home and yesterday again in Alamo (even though he threw his fanboy revolutionaries under the bus right at the start of the press conference, too).
I doubt he expected them to go haywire, I assume he thought he'd have a nice little crowd of people yelling "yeah right", so he could pretend he has the support of the majority in his election fraud claims or something. Again: He shook the hornets' nest and when people told him it might be a bad idea, he gave it a good kick, just to show everybody how badass he is. Then the hornets came out and started fucking shit up and Trump, after a day or two, went "Well, Hornets are assholes, don't blame me."

Even if this riot wasn't what he intended, but rather the outcome of his own ignorance and incompetence, that still needs to be addressed. Doesn't mean by an impeachment, and it certainly shouldn't mean being banned from any website between Twitter and Fur Affinity. But this should carry a consequence for the supreme tard in chief.


The guy that shot Scalise died of his wounds. He was some lone loony. If he had supporters that enabled him to act out his little plot, those should be held accountable, just like those that supported the riots in DC should be held accountable. Everybody according to the measures of the law, depending on their guilt and involvement.

Are you happy now?

Same guy who was awarded a medal for stopping the baseball park shooter was apparently also the guy who ventilated the woman during the failed insurrection a week ago too. Guess that makes him an equal opportunity shooter when he's trying to collect his pension?

 

[Shittus Maximus]

You will be utterly surprised to learn that I am not, in fact, a federal judge, specialised in US presidential or constitutional law.


That comparison is between apples and oranges. Did Bernie tell him there was unprecedented injustice against him by Scalise? Did he rile him up personally for months and months? Did he endorse his lunacy throughout all this time and voice his support and appreciation? Did he invite him to the stadium and call him a hero for doing the right thing? You might as well blame the Tate murders on the Beatles with this logic.

Trump riled up his Qtard followers and did the surprised Pikachu-face meme when the situation blew up in his face. He fanned the flames, he was directly involved in this shitshow taking shape. He did not tell them to storm the Capitol, but his rhetoric was insanely confrontational against everyone that didn't buy into his poorly supported claims of fraud and brandmarked everyone standing in his way for another term an enemy in no uncertain terms.

As I said, comparing these two things is utterly ridiculous.

No, Bernie said that the establishment, especially Republicans, were preventing progress from happening and in order to succeed we must fight them. It's almost like you didn't pay attention to the event at all...
It's like you're half-assing this conversation. It's also weird how everyone else seems to be wrong but you..

 

[Dark Edea]

I really don't see why simple "breaching" the Capitol with comparatively minimal violence and damage should be seen as so much more serious than a protracted period of looting, arson, assault and murders facilitated by riots.

Because Congress can't pass the buck to a local or state level individual or group and blame them. This was Congress' fault for decades of arrogance and decadence. And they have to take the hit.

Congress' main game is deferring or deflecting blame away from themselves. Even their response to this event ensures it will happen again because they are looking in every direction for blame except the one that actually matters.