Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:

A new study suggests transgender women maintain an athletic advantage over their cisgender peers even after a year on hormone therapy.

The results, published last month in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, could mean the current one-year waiting period for Olympic athletes who are transitioning is inadequate.

“For the Olympic level, the elite level, I'd say probably two years is more realistic than one year,” said the study's lead author, Dr. Timothy Roberts, a pediatrician and the director of the adolescent medicine training program at Children's Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri. “At one year, the trans women on average still have an advantage over the cis women," he said, referring to cisgender, or nontransgender, women.

Roberts began investigating the athletic performance of transgender men and women while in the Air Force, working under co-author and physician Lt. Col. Joshua Smalley at a clinic coordinating care for airmen beginning or continuing their gender transition.

Active duty service members are required to take a physical readiness test every six to 12 months. Roberts, Smalley and another co-author, Dr. Dale Ahrendt, realized they had access to robust data on service members before, during and after they started hormone replacement treatment.

The three physicians conducted a retrospective review of medical records and fitness tests for 29 transgender men and 46 transgender women from 2013 to 2018. The Air Force’s fitness assessment includes the number of pushups and situps performed in a minute, and the time required to run 1.5 miles.

They also had records on when the subjects started testosterone or estrogen, the type of hormone used and the number of days from when treatment began to when their hormone levels reached the normal adult range for a cisgender person.

For the first two years after starting hormones, the trans women in their review were able to do 10 percent more pushups and 6 percent more situps than their cisgender female counterparts. After two years, Roberts told NBC News, “they were fairly equivalent to the cisgender women.”

Their running times declined as well, but two years on, trans women were still 12 percent faster on the 1.5 mile-run than their cisgender peers.

Unsurprisingly, testosterone affected the fitness scores of the transgender men they reviewed: Prior to starting hormones, they performed fewer pushups and had slower running times than the cisgender men in the control group. A year into treatment, though, those differences disappeared.

With situps, the trans men were comparable to the cisgender men before treatment and actually exceeded them after a year on testosterone.

The longest any participant was followed was two and a half years, according to Roberts.

He said he’s not suggesting being in the military is the same as being an elite athlete, but, he added, “it’s a comparable situation, where you have someone doing whatever they can to maintain or improve their abilities.”

Joanna Harper, a medical physicist in Portland, Oregon, has conducted research into the effect of testosterone blockers on transgender women runners like herself.

In 2015, she published the first study of transgender women and athletic performance and found that trans women ran at least 10 percent slower after beginning hormones. And, relatively speaking, they did no better against cisgender female runners than they had previously done against cisgender men.

Harper said Roberts’ methodology is solid, but she sees some limitations in the study. In an assessment shared with NBC News, she questioned the lack of data on participants’ individual training habits. She also noted there was no coordination between when subjects started hormones and when they took their annual fitness test.

“The tests were placed into three bins,” Harper said. “One bin of tests that took place in the first year after the start of hormone therapy, one bin of tests that took place between one to two years of hormone therapy, and a third bin that took place between two and two and a half years after the initiation of hormone therapy.”

Lumping the data together could blur out changes that occurred within a 12-month period “and might distort the results notably,” she theorized.

The fact that the trans women were still faster after two years could be due to differences in training intensity, she speculated. But the pushup and situp tests involve muscular strength, technique, muscular endurance and cardiovascular endurance, and “are probably good proxies for success in many team sports.”

Increased scrutiny of trans athletes


As the transgender community has become more visible, their place in athletic competitions has come under increased scrutiny.

In October, the World Rugby League became the first international sporting body to ban transgender women from playing in the women’s division, citing “player welfare risks.” Two months later, a group of 200 elite female athletes — including Billie Jean King, Megan Rapinoe and Candace Parker — signed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the rights of trans women and girls to participate in female sports.

The brief was filed with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in response to Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, signed by Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, in March. The law prohibits transgender athletes from competing in school sports consistent with their gender identity, regardless of when they transitioned.

The case is currently before the 9th Circuit after a lower court blocked it from going into effect in August.

"There is no place in any sport for discrimination of any kind,” King in a statement. “I'm proud to support all transgender athletes who simply want the access and opportunity to compete in the sport they love."

Idaho is the first state to pass such a ban, but similar legislation has been introduced in Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Washington.

In Congress, Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., sponsored S.4649, the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” which seeks to pull federal funding from any school that allows someone assigned male at birth to compete in girls’ athletics. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, a co-sponsor, calls the measure “a simple question of fairness and physical safety.”

Proponents of such legislation have already started using Roberts’ research to support their cause, but he insists he’s not on board.

“I'm definitely coming out and saying, ‘Hey, this doesn't apply to recreational athletes, doesn't apply to youth athletics,’” he said. “At the recreational level, probably one year is sufficient for most people to be able to compete.”

He also underscored the data he compiled was on adults: The average age of the airmen he studied was 26. A transgender woman who transitions before or at puberty, “doesn't really have any advantage” when it comes to athletic performance, he said. “So that young lady should be allowed to compete with all the other people who are born women.”

It’s at the Olympic level where a few percentage points matter, he said, “and we need to do a few more studies to see if that's a permanent effect.”

“There wasn't really a whole lot of data available when the IOC made their guidelines,” Roberts added, using the acronym for the International Olympic Committee. “Now we have a little bit more.”

Harper, who was a consultant on the IOC’s current recommendations, said the real takeaway from Roberts’ study is that transgender women ultimately do reach parity with cis women in athletic tasks. She, however, doesn’t think Roberts’ findings mean sporting organizations need to require two years of testosterone suppression before trans women can compete against cisgender women.

“It’s not necessary for all advantages to be removed,” she said. “All that is necessary is for trans women to perform more like cisgender women than like cisgender men.”

A ‘totally level’ playing field


Roberts said there is no way to remove all of an athlete’s advantages — regardless of their gender identity.

“People who got testosterone at puberty tend to have narrower hips. If you're taller and have narrower hips, that gives you an advantage that's probably not going to change from testosterone blockers or estrogen,” he said. “On the other hand, we have a lot of elite female athletes who tend to be tall and thin with slender hips — and we're not outlawing them.

Roberts also noted that physical advantages are not the only advantages that some athletes have over others.

“LeBron James' kids have access to the best coaches and the best facilities with the best equipment. They're going to have an advantage over somebody,” he said. “And all of those people are still in the same competition.”

The IOC last revised regulations for transgender competitors in 2016, removing a requirement for gender-confirmation surgery and lowering the minimum requirement for hormone-replacement therapy for trans women from two years to one.

Currently, transgender men can compete in men’s events without any restrictions.

The guidelines, which are employed by most sports federations, also established that trans female athletes must maintain testosterone levels below 10 nanomoles per liter. That’s on the far low end for most cisgender males but higher than average for cisgender women, whose testosterone typically falls between 0.3 and 2.4 nanomoles per liter.

But, Roberts points out, cisgender women with polycystic ovary syndrome and some other conditions can have levels three times that — or even higher. Nearly a third of elite adolescent female athletes have relatively elevated testosterone, compared to just 2 to 12 percent of the general female population. Female Olympians also tend to have higher levels than age-matched controls.

“The playing field has never been totally level,” Roberts said.

The International Olympic Committee said it is working on new guidelines to be released some time in 2021 after the rescheduled Tokyo Summer Games.

“This work is based on an extended consultation to consider not only the medical, scientific and legal perspectives, but also that of human rights, with an emphasis on the view and experiences of affected athletes,” an IOC spokesperson said in an email. “Overall, the discussions to date have confirmed considerable tension between the notions of fairness and inclusion, and the desire and need to protect the women’s category, all of which will need to be reconciled.”
-----
Stage 1: Denial

Twitter salt: https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1346418438860906498?s=19

N-no but...Transwomen have estrogen levels better than bio women! They're the same!

But good. I hope these losers cry some more that they can't dominate women's sports. Truly, my heart weeps for the fact they can't legally beat up women in rough contact sports like rugby and boxing. Their collective reeeeing makes for a good symphony.
 
Watch the video for the delightful sight of Chris Mosier with an unbelievably bad cartoon-villain moustache, stuffed up to the eyeballs with T and blithely hawking the lie that if women can't beat hulking trannies it's because they just need to try harder.

fucker.PNG
 
Watch the video for the delightful sight of Chris Mosier with an unbelievably bad cartoon-villain moustache, stuffed up to the eyeballs with T and blithely hawking the lie that if women can't beat hulking trannies it's because they just need to try harder.

View attachment 1845747
He sounds just like Rekieta 🤔🤔
 
In handcuffs and in tears, the transgender individual, who runs beauty business Nur Sajat Aesthetic, said in a video posted yesterday that she was summoned by Selangor’s Islamic religious authorities on Wednesday over a report that was filed three years ago accusing her of allegedly “insulting Islam.”

That report was related to an incident when the 36-year-old and her employees visited a religious school in Subang to distribute aid. An officer could be heard in Sajat’s Instagram video telling her that the accusation was related to what she wore on that day, which was a pink long dress and a floral headscarf. Sajat was also consistently referred to as “Mr. Sajat” by officers.

“We didn’t do this just once a year, it’s something we did at least once a month as a company to learn more about Islam,” Sajat said about her visit to Tahfiz Az Zahrah Lilbanat in the video, which has been viewed more than a million times since it went up. “I was only trying to get closer to my religion and help others along the way.”

If found guilty of insulting Islam under Section 10 of the country’s Islamic law, she could be fined up to RM5,000 (about US$1,200) and jailed for three years. The vague law also covers ridiculing Islamic culture and defaming the religion.

The 40-minute long clip began with Sajat speaking to an officer over the phone and asking why the Islamic religious authorities were requesting for her to be present at the station for investigations. But the officer on the other end of the line had declined to divulge the details, asking her to come to the station to find out more.

The clip then cut to Sajat at what appeared to be an interrogation room, where she tearfully claimed that she was being wrongfully handcuffed. She had kept her phone hidden in her handbag the whole time.

“While attending prayer session was not a violation of the law, the elements of it based on your clothing was,” an officer could be heard telling her. Then Sajat could be heard struggling with the officers, screaming: “I have given you guys enough cooperation now. Don’t touch me!”

An officer then replied to her saying that he had “the power” over her.

Sajat’s mother Maimon Omar was eventually let into the room and began lashing out at the two officers who had been in the room with her daughter.

“I pray that you will all have a child like Sajat, if not you, your future generations!” she said. “How dare you hurt my child!”

Her mother was heard making calls to a lawyer. Sajat was then freed and allowed to go home.

“Everything I do, they say it’s wrong. I have tried to be a blessing, but they punish me instead,” Sajat wrote in subsequent Instagram posts.

The Islamic Religious Department in Selangor did not respond to Coconuts’ request for comment via email at publication time.

60FA0405-0F60-4A78-AF0E-8A60C0F772A5.jpeg
 
The clip then cut to Sajat at what appeared to be an interrogation room, where she tearfully claimed that she was being wrongfully handcuffed. She had kept her phone hidden in her handbag the whole time.
Oh no! I went to an Islamic country and insulted their religion and somehow, they didn't like it! REEEEE! Enjoy prison you stupid troon.
 
In handcuffs and in tears, the transgender individual, who runs beauty business Nur Sajat Aesthetic, said in a video posted yesterday that she was summoned by Selangor’s Islamic religious authorities on Wednesday over a report that was filed three years ago accusing her of allegedly “insulting Islam.”

That report was related to an incident when the 36-year-old and her employees visited a religious school in Subang to distribute aid. An officer could be heard in Sajat’s Instagram video telling her that the accusation was related to what she wore on that day, which was a pink long dress and a floral headscarf. Sajat was also consistently referred to as “Mr. Sajat” by officers.

“We didn’t do this just once a year, it’s something we did at least once a month as a company to learn more about Islam,” Sajat said about her visit to Tahfiz Az Zahrah Lilbanat in the video, which has been viewed more than a million times since it went up. “I was only trying to get closer to my religion and help others along the way.”

If found guilty of insulting Islam under Section 10 of the country’s Islamic law, she could be fined up to RM5,000 (about US$1,200) and jailed for three years. The vague law also covers ridiculing Islamic culture and defaming the religion.

The 40-minute long clip began with Sajat speaking to an officer over the phone and asking why the Islamic religious authorities were requesting for her to be present at the station for investigations. But the officer on the other end of the line had declined to divulge the details, asking her to come to the station to find out more.

The clip then cut to Sajat at what appeared to be an interrogation room, where she tearfully claimed that she was being wrongfully handcuffed. She had kept her phone hidden in her handbag the whole time.

“While attending prayer session was not a violation of the law, the elements of it based on your clothing was,” an officer could be heard telling her. Then Sajat could be heard struggling with the officers, screaming: “I have given you guys enough cooperation now. Don’t touch me!”

An officer then replied to her saying that he had “the power” over her.

Sajat’s mother Maimon Omar was eventually let into the room and began lashing out at the two officers who had been in the room with her daughter.

“I pray that you will all have a child like Sajat, if not you, your future generations!” she said. “How dare you hurt my child!”

Her mother was heard making calls to a lawyer. Sajat was then freed and allowed to go home.

“Everything I do, they say it’s wrong. I have tried to be a blessing, but they punish me instead,” Sajat wrote in subsequent Instagram posts.

The Islamic Religious Department in Selangor did not respond to Coconuts’ request for comment via email at publication time.

View attachment 1846836
It'd almost be worth it to buy Kylie Brooks a ticket and ship them to one of these areas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ARAVIS

Back to jail: Dunedin child rapist found with sex-abuse material

A Dunedin man who raped a 12-year-old girl and stole her clothes to wear has now been caught with child abuse material.

Pierre John Parsons, 43, is subject to his second decade-long Extended Supervision Order (ESO) - a measure which allows Corrections to keep close tabs on high-risk sex-offenders after their release from prison - until 2027.

It means the defendant has effectively been closely managed by authorities for almost his entire adult life.

While under that spotlight of Corrections, the Dunedin District Court heard today Parsons was obliged to give up any internet-capable device for analysis when his probation officer requested.

On October 15 last year, the contents of his cellphone were browsed as a result of such a request. The officer noted Parsons had made internet searches for illicit material including one for a "10-year-old girl and 20-year-old man", and another referring to schoolgirls. When police further examined the device, they found a 47-second video of child sex abuse.

Parsons subsequently pleaded guilty to possessing an objectionable publication.

Judge Michael Crosbie called the offending "vile and degrading" and reminded the defendant there was a real victim at its heart. "Your possession of this video amounts to sexual exploitation of a child - a child of incredibly young and tender years," he said.

Parsons, the court heard, was struggling to answer questions about sexual arousal. In a pre-sentence interview, he strongly disputed being attracted to children and claimed the downloading of the video was an accident.

In 1995, the defendant, who was then 18, was jailed for 11 years for the rape of the 12-year-old girl.

Since his release from prison, his wayward behaviour had continued. While living at a residential facility, Parsons invited a prostitute to the address - a breach of the rules. And in December 2015, Parsons deviated from an approved route to work to approach a 15-year-old girl wearing a school uniform.

He did so again in May 2016, giving her a note with his cellphone number, asking her to buy underwear and other items.

In imposing the ESO in 2017, Justice Gerald Nation noted Parsons' gender issues had reportedly been the driver for much of his offending.
"He wants to be living as a woman ... in a relationship with a woman who accepts him as transgender," the court heard.

Parsons was jailed for nine months. His ESO will be suspended while he serves the sentence.
 

What I cannot for the life of me understand is how anyone buys the whole "I raped little girls because I was struggling with my gendur identitee!!" bullshit excuse for a second. If you're claiming to be a woman "on the inside", raping little girls is not exactly characteristic female behavior, for fuck's sake. In fact, fetishizing and/or abusing underdeveloped females (i.e. little girls and teenagers) is just about the most toxic form of distinctly male-pattern behavior there is.

How the fuck does anyone in the legal system buy this, and why do these degenerate troons and their legal teams insist on continually floating it? I know making sense is hardly their forte at the best of times, but jesus christ people...
 
How the fuck does anyone in the legal system buy this, and why do these degenerate troons and their legal teams insist on continually floating it? I know making sense is hardly their forte at the best of times, but jesus christ people...
Because (a) lawyers will make any stupid argument and (b) troons have been taught that all they have to do is shout "bigot" or "victim" or "hate speech" at people until they roll their eyes and give up.

This "incite violence" that sprung up in the MSM over the Capitol Raid has been the troon calling card for years: criticism leads to hate and hate leads to violence. Anyone making fun of them is literally endangering their lives in their minds, either through "inspiring hatred and violence" or making them sad enough to 41% themselves.

N-no but...Transwomen have estrogen levels better than bio women! They're the same!

But good. I hope these losers cry some more that they can't dominate women's sports. Truly, my heart weeps for the fact they can't legally beat up women in rough contact sports like rugby and boxing. Their collective reeeeing makes for a good symphony.

Watch the video for the delightful sight of Chris Mosier with an unbelievably bad cartoon-villain moustache, stuffed up to the eyeballs with T and blithely hawking the lie that if women can't beat hulking trannies it's because they just need to try harder.

View attachment 1845747

I think biological women know, even if they aren't allowed to say it out loud, that if troons were allowed to compete in women's sports, that that would be the end of women's sports. What would be the point after that? Why would 14-16 year old girls compete at the high school level when a bunch of boys can literally just say that they identify as women and then go dominate everything? At that point, biological boys would be taking away the girls athletic scholarship opportunities and then women's college sports would be fucked up (even more so), leaving even less for the professional level.

Then I have to hear about how no troon has won an Olympic gold YET.
 

Parsons, the court heard, was struggling to answer questions about sexual arousal. In a pre-sentence interview, he strongly disputed being attracted to children and claimed the downloading of the video was an accident.

In 1995, the defendant, who was then 18, was jailed for 11 years for the rape of the 12-year-old girl.

Love it when journalist juxtapose paragraphs like this. One of the few good things they do.

Also, you forgot to post his picture!
20210114_170517.jpg
Man screams child molester.
 
Judge Michael Crosbie called the offending "vile and degrading" and reminded the defendant there was a real victim at its heart. "Your possession of this video amounts to sexual exploitation of a child - a child of incredibly young and tender years," he said.
I kinda wish judges would not say this sort of thing, because I suspect that the man in the dock gets off on hearing this
 
Back