March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%

  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%

  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%

  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%
  • Total voters
    2,105
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
However, the amount that it occurs isn't enough to change the results.

Trump and his cult are just seething that he lost, and so they're clinging onto the hope that the conman they worship is indeed as popular as their echo chamber said he was
Click to expand...
"There is no cat in that box, Schrodinger! And even if there were, what are the odds it would be shaped like an ass?"
 
2021-01-13 19.02.15 twitter.com 12b3ddf5d795.jpg
 
  • Optimistic
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: Donny Cheese, DerSandstrom, HIVidaBoheme and 30 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Meat Pickle, Donny Cheese, DerSandstrom and 25 others
Arm Pit Cream said:
What a kike
thehill.com

Kushner stopped Trump from joining Parler, Gab after Twitter ban: report

Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, stopped Trump from joining fringe social media platforms Parler and Gab after he was banned from Twitter, according to a
thehill.com thehill.com

God forbid you go to less used platforms to promote them and get your message out. Truly it's better to be silence for no reason.
Click to expand...
*sources familiar with the matter told CNN
Yeah.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Lunacy
Reactions: SheerHeartAttack, Dark Edea, ditto and 5 others
PESTPOOM said:
How naive are you? The dude is trying to save his own skin.

I guess it doesn't matter, you fit right in with the general populace.
Click to expand...
I guess so. The general populace doesn't matter to politicians, on either side. All anyone in their current position wants is to stay in the government job with pension they have, or move up. It matters, in a way, but what matters more is local politics.

For example, a new business wants to move in, that can hypothetically promise thousands of jobs (temporarily) and hundreds after. (Realistically, they would employee five hundred locals to get the existing building up to code, include another fifty State workers for the upgrades to infrastructure and keep one hundred on full time staff, with fifty at will temps.) But, they need sewage and water lines from the town, before they decide what to do. The town doesn't have those. Its all septic tanks and wells. Does the town invest in the company that may disappear within a decade, and tax everyone out of their homes in the meantime to install these things, or do they decline the friendly offer?

These are the issues most people deal with. Not infringements upon speech or weapons. Most of America is rural. And far enough from any capitol, be it State or national, that no one really cares what you do, unless you traffic children, or make a faulty meth lab barn that explodes, suddenly.
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PESTPOOM, Gravemind and Suburban Bastard
  • Dislike
Reactions: stares at error messages
2wear the mask faggot clayton guse.jpg
I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter, or how we got here. After a clear warning we’d take this action, we made a decision with the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter. Was this correct?

I believe this was the right decision for Twitter. We faced an extraordinary and untenable circumstance, forcing us to focus all of our actions on public safety. Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all.

That said, having to ban an account has real and significant ramifications. While there are clear and obvious exceptions, I feel a ban is a failure of ours ultimately to promote healthy conversation. And a time for us to reflect on our operations and the environment around us.

Having to take these actions fragment the public conversation. They divide us. They limit the potential for clarification, redemption, and learning. And sets a precedent I feel is dangerous: the power an individual or corporation has over a part of the global public conversation.

The check and accountability on this power has always been the fact that a service like Twitter is one small part of the larger public conversation happening across the internet. If folks do not agree with our rules and enforcement, they can simply go to another internet service.

This concept was challenged last week when a number of foundational internet tool providers also decided not to host what they found dangerous. I do not believe this was coordinated. More likely: companies came to their own conclusions or were emboldened by the actions of others.

This moment in time might call for this dynamic, but over the long term it will be destructive to the noble purpose and ideals of the open internet. A company making a business decision to moderate itself is different from a government removing access, yet can feel much the same.

Yes, we all need to look critically at inconsistencies of our policy and enforcement. Yes, we need to look at how our service might incentivize distraction and harm. Yes, we need more transparency in our moderation operations. All this can’t erode a free and open global internet.

The reason I have so much passion for #Bitcoin is largely because of the model it demonstrates: a foundational internet technology that is not controlled or influenced by any single individual or entity. This is what the internet wants to be, and over time, more of it will be.

We are trying to do our part by funding an initiative around an open decentralized standard for social media. Our goal is to be a client of that standard for the public conversation layer of the internet. We call it @bluesky:

This will take time to build. We are in the process of interviewing and hiring folks, looking at both starting a standard from scratch or contributing to something that already exists. No matter the ultimate direction, we will do this work completely through public transparency.

It’s important that we acknowledge this is a time of great uncertainty and struggle for so many around the world. Our goal in this moment is to disarm as much as we can, and ensure we are all building towards a greater common understanding, and a more peaceful existence on earth.

I believe the internet and global public conversation is our best and most relevant method of achieving this. I also recognize it does not feel that way today. Everything we learn in this moment will better our effort, and push us to be what we are: one humanity working together.
Click to expand...
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Allakazam223, LemmeSee, madethistocomment and 1 other person
RomanesEuntDomus said:
This is "Trump will put Trannies into FEMA concentration camps" levels of retarded. It's not like they get punished for wrongthink, they get investigated for participating in a violent riot, that lead to the armed invasion of your seat of government. No amount of MUH BLM RIOT whataboutism negates that fact. Unless you actually advocate for violent riots without legal repercussions, I don't see your point.

And before you post something stupid in return: Yes, that means I am in favor of punishing BLM for burning down properties and attacking people for not chanting buzzwords with them.
Click to expand...
If you think shit isn't escalating hard right now, I have a bridge to sell you. Kicking the POTUS off of Twitter, kicking Parler off the internet (shitty though they may be) and excising hate groups from Telegram, a platform made specifically for rebuffing government probes, half the nation trying to sue the other half, people storming the capitol building, millions of people globally fleeing Big Tech for encrypted communication, and one political party trying to expunge the other from office, all unprecedented until now.

What do you think it means when politicians declare that the capitol siege is worse than 9/11? Just that they're retarded, or that they want to set the stage for some seriously unconstitutional shit? What do you think it means when politicians use hyperbole?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: make_it_so, SheerHeartAttack, Shadfan666xxx000 and 9 others
i originally posted this under youtube autism but i think it bears repeating hear or at least the first 45 minus but i cant edit it down.


some of matt's words range from repeative and insufferable and the same leftist sperging that's been echoed over the last four years "Trump is literally hitler and his supporters are nazis." To just flat out harsh and monstrous "Delete your social media, fuck you nobody loves you," like yeah the people who stormed the capital were idiots who really shouldn't have done what they did but...my god the man is starting to sound (ironically) like a full on fascist himself, the marxist kind.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Bad Luck, Takashi_69 and Flip: Draw 2
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
If you think shit isn't escalating hard right now, I have a bridge to sell you. Kicking the POTUS off of Twitter, kicking Parler off the internet (shitty though they may be) and excising hate groups from Telegram, a platform made specifically for rebuffing government probes, half the nation trying to sue the other half, people storming the capitol building, millions of people globally fleeing Big Tech for encrypted communication, and one political party trying to expunge the other from office, all unprecedented until now.

What do you think it means when politicians declare that the capitol siege is worse than 9/11? Just that they're retarded, or that they want to set the stage for some seriously unconstitutional shit? What do you think it means when politicians use hyperbole?
Click to expand...
Definitely. We aren't having armed national guard napping in monuments for a goddam sleepover. Something has to break. I dont know how big or long it will be, but something will pop off.
 
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Lady Round Buns, Scribbler, Allakazam223 and 4 others
horrorfan89 said:
i originally posted this under youtube autism but i think it bears repeating hear or at least the first 45 minus but i cant edit it down.


some of matt's words range from repeative and insufferable and the same leftist sperging that's been echoed over the last four years "Trump is literally hitler and his supporters are nazis." To just flat out harsh and monstrous "Delete your social media, fuck you nobody loves you," like yeah the people who stormed the capital were idiots who really shouldn't have done what they did but...my god the man is starting to sound (ironically) like a full on fascist himself, the marxist kind.
Click to expand...

He looks like that fatshit guy from Cinemassacre if he lost 10 pounds.
 
A WA teacher's union president says reopening schools is an example of "white supremacy," concern over a child's mental health or suicide risk is "white privilege," and push to reopen schools is like rioters pushing to enter the U.S. Capitol.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: I.B. Niggin, Dark Edea, RudeRoasts and 14 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back