March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

[You're a Big Guy]

Two impeachments is pretty hype. Trump is my favorite President so far.

TWO IMPEACHMENTS
TWO SCOOPS
TWO GENDERS
TWO(ONE) TERMS

 

[starborn427614]

> Even if they were going to make fake ballots for people, do you really think they'd be stupid enough to do it in front of security cameras? Come on now. You can't be this naive.
Given how people are literally denying BLM burning down entire cities, and now you're just completely dismissing literal video evidence, I think they have valid reason to be confident in their brainwashing.

A few buildings is "an entire city" now. No wonder people don't take the right seriously with hyperbole like this.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Well, post some for me here. Null won't ban you for it.


1st video. How do you know that's what that even is?

2nd and 3rd videos - you do know that they often have to correct ballots so that the machines can scan them correctly, right? Is this your first election? Even if they were going to make fake ballots for people, do you really think they'd be stupid enough to do it in front of security cameras? Come on now. You can't be this naive.

 

[mr.moon1488]

I've already explained the video "evidence". It's nothing out of the ordinary in any of the videos. Is this your first election?

Lol, you literally didn't explain anything. You just basically made a retarded argument of "well they got caught, so that disproves they did it!" Now you're sperging out and repeating "is this your first election!" to anyone who challenges you on anything.

A few buildings is "an entire city" now. No wonder people don't take the right seriously with hyperbole like this.

>A few buildings
@Hollywood Hulk Hogan case in point.

 

[Cold Root Beer]

God, this shit is hilarious. It's like watching a Harlem Globetrotters game, and the Q-boomers just bet all their life savings on the Washington Generals.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

View attachment 1846345

She is showing them how she processes the ballots. But I am totally sure she'd be stupid enough to do the fraud, and show them how to do it, on camera. Trump is offering $1 million for proof of election fraud, so why don't you retards cash in? You are seriously naive as shit if you think this is proof of fraud. Do you want to buy a bridge? I painted MAGA on it for you. It's very profitable.

Lol, you literally didn't explain anything. You just basically made a retarded argument of "well they got caught, so that disproves they did it!" Now you're sperging out and repeating "is this your first election!" to anyone who challenges you on anything.

>A few buildings
@Hollywood Hulk Hogan case in point.

I sure did explain why it wasn't evidence of voter fraud, but you're just too blinded by your lust for a 75 year old conman to be able to process it.

 

[You're a Big Guy]

A few buildings is "an entire city" now. No wonder people don't take the right seriously with hyperbole like this.

A 'few buildings' does not cause over a billion in damages, but nice deflection.

 

[OnMoTi]

A few buildings is "an entire city" now. No wonder people don't take the right seriously with hyperbole like this.

A few buildings?

In the first few days after George Floyd was killed had a heart attack from swallowing fentanyl and meth, and deciding to resist arrest by Minneapolis police, rioters tore through dense stretches of Minneapolis, St. Paul and other metro communities in retaliation, causing millions in property damage to more than 1,500 locations.

In their wake, vandals left a trail of smashed doors and windows, covered hundreds of boarded-up businesses with graffiti and set fire to nearly 150 buildings, with dozens burned to the ground. Pharmacies, groceries, liquor stores, tobacco shops and cell phone stores were ransacked, losing thousands of dollars in stolen merchandise. Many were looted repeatedly over consecutive nights.

https://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-st-paul-buildings-are-damaged-looted-after-george-floyd-protests-riots/569930671/

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

She is showing them how she processes the ballots. But I am totally sure she'd be stupid enough to do the fraud, and show them how to do it, on camera.

She showed them how to edit a vote in the tabulation software, she literally demonstrated that she could add checkmarks and void existing checkmarks at a whim and change the entire contents of a ballot, are you retarded?

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

Two impeachments is pretty hype. Trump is my favorite President so far.

It only took them a few days to do this one, they should squeeze out another while they're primed. "Most impeachments ever!"

TWO(ONE) TERMS

Maybe the second term will be a prison term?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

She showed them how to edit a vote in the tabulation software, she literally demonstrated that she could add checkmarks and void existing checkmarks at a whim and change the entire contents of a ballot, are you retarded?

That isn't proof that they edited the votes, though, you retard. It's also possible for them to swap out everybody's ballot and have it be for Jeb Bush, but that doesn't mean it happened. You are seriously overdosed on the Trump copium because you're posting even more retarded than usual

 

[You're a Big Guy]

That isn't proof that they edited the votes, though, you retard. It's also possible for them to swap out everybody's ballot and have it be for Jeb Bush, but that doesn't mean it happened. You are seriously overdosed on the Trump copium because you're posting even more retarded than usual

It's still proof that it's possible. They shouldn't be using software so easily changeable for this shit to begin with.

 

[Special Agent Punchy]

You guys, stop scaring the liberals and explain to them that "Hang Mike Pence" isn't literal. The slogan represents the pressing need to address decades of systematic disenfranchisement. "Mike Pence" is just a metaphor for the judicial and legislative branches refusing to hear the fraud cases. What do we want? A fair trial! What was sometimes the result of a fair trial at the founding of the US? That's right, a Hangin'! So when we say "Hang Mike Pence," they need to recognize that we're not talking about just hanging the vice president. Our movement is inclusive of the entire system and getting the reform we all want.
They will not recognize this because the first instinct of Power will always be to dismiss the rhetoric of the Voiceless and Oppressed.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

I've already explained the video "evidence". It's nothing out of the ordinary in any of the videos. Is this your first election?

Your Honor, I will present this evidence only if you do not allow any cross-examination of our experts' testimony about it, and accept that everything I assert is true and honest.
Otherwise I will say you're part of the globohomo conspiracy online. You are not allowed to raise any objections or I will leave a negative yelp review of you.

View attachment 1846345

This woman testified before the Georgia senate committees, which all did their very best to order investigations into each and every item. Each of those inumerous vote audits resolve all of the possible abuses that she displays (and isn't sure would happen). That is, if someone tried to 'adjudicate' the ballot differently from how it appeared, the vote audit would catch that.

The exception would be if someone wrote on the ballot before scanning it -- which would contradict the vote totals recorded by the people opening the ballots in the first place. Scanning the same ballot twice produces an item with the exact same SSN information, so that clearly doesn't go into an extra total. The suggestion is then limited to the -idea- that someone scanning batches of ballots flips through each and every single ballot that somehow has not voted for -any- presidential candidate, and bubbles that in for their preference.

If someone tried to discard ballots from a batch, it would again contradict the count from the people opening the ballots. There's a reason they had those people doing that. Her thing with the blank ballot would have to be tied to an SSN, and an audit of the ballot would show a discrepancy between how it appears in the database and whether the ballot physically has been marked. That would be why this helped to get GA to audit its entire vote count, matching up the votes on the ballots to the votes in the system.

Which of course led us to the signature nonsense, which I didn't realize was as stupid as it was until a few days ago (nothing tethers the signature on the outer ballot to the inner ballot).

 

[mr.moon1488]

She is showing them how she processes the ballots. But I am totally sure she'd be stupid enough to do the fraud, and show them how to do it, on camera. Trump is offering $1 million for proof of election fraud, so why don't you retards cash in? You are seriously naive as shit if you think this is proof of fraud. Do you want to buy a bridge? I painted MAGA on it for you. It's very profitable.


I sure did explain why it wasn't evidence of voter fraud, but you're just too blinded by your lust for a 75 year old conman to be able to process it.

This is verbatim the post where you "explained" it.

1st video. How do you know that's what that even is?

2nd and 3rd videos - you do know that they often have to correct ballots so that the machines can scan them correctly, right? Is this your first election? Even if they were going to make fake ballots for people, do you really think they'd be stupid enough to do it in front of security cameras? Come on now. You can't be this naive.

Firstly, those were obviously blank ballots for one, and for two, if they do have to "correct them" they have to go in front of a panel to correct them under law. Not just have some cat lady mark things as she pleases and then toss them into a pile. The security camera comment is just full-on retarded since once again your argument is basically "the evidence that they did it, in fact proves they didn't do it." It would be as dumb of a comment as a defense attorney saying "your honor, my client Tyrone couldn't have raped that girl because there's no way he would have left DNA evidence at the scene of the crime."

 

[RichardMongler]

Jim Goad weighs in on the Capitol Hill protests (full article in the link):

I realize that many of the people who showed up in DC at Trump’s behest to protest what they see as a stolen election — only for him to stab them all in the back — were acting out of a deep sense of betrayal and alienation. Many of us do things that feel fantastic in the moment but wind up affecting us negatively for a lifetime. I can personally bear witness to the fact that finally losing your temper and hitting someone who’s been persistently threatening, attacking, and taunting you feels fantastic — until you wind up in prison for it.

...

I became a writer because I care about the truth. It took about thirty years before I realized that hardly anyone shares my concern. It took the same amount of time to realize that people only care about being on the side of power — or at least on the “good” side as they fight the “evil” people who currently hold power — and feel absolutely no shame when you point out their egregious hypocrisies.

But as the saying goes, truth is the first casualty of war. And if you’re lying bleeding on the ground because you’ve just been shot, I doubt you’ll find much comfort in the fact that, hey, at least you weren’t a hypocrite.

Morality doesn’t win wars. Neither does being factually correct. Being the most efficient killer is what wins wars. So does monopolizing the propaganda outlets.

Did the people who stormed the Capitol on Wednesday have any idea what the fuck they were doing, or was it all a big video game and selfie opportunity for them? What they did was the equivalent of crossing enemy lines in the midst of a war, only to fart loudly on camera. Did they think they would frighten Congress into reconsidering the topic of election fraud? Well, it backfired. Badly.

I’ve never staged a coup nor plotted a coup, but my instincts tell me that if you’re going to attempt one, take it to its logical conclusion. If you don’t, you’ve greatly strengthened those you were trying to overthrow. This might have been the most half-assed attempted coup in world history.

What’s bitterly ironic is that this failed coup was staged by many of the same people who have been acting like frigid schoolmarms and sternly lecturing us about “optics” ever since Charlottesville. Well, what happened Wednesday was a textbook display of mental optardation. If your whole shtick involves worshiping cops and touting “law and order,” it’s bad optics to bludgeon police, one of whom allegedly died from being smashed in the skull with a fire extinguisher. If you worship the Constitution, it’s bad optics to construct a gallows with which to hang elected officials. It’s bad optics to gloat about how you’re going to blow out Nancy Pelosi’s brains on live TV.

If good optics is about winning over the normies, polls show that anywhere from 71% to 92% of normies disapproved of what happened Wednesday. If good optics are about uniting Republicans to fight the Democrats, a YouGov poll found that Republicans were evenly split about what happened — 45% supported it and 43% opposed it. This latest stunt definitely did not “unite the right.”

The normally Trump-friendly New York Post predicted that this event will be used to discredit everything about Trump and his supporters from here until the end of time:

On Wednesday, Jan. 6, a line was drawn in the sand. Before that date, critics had unfairly slammed Trump supporters for being violent, resentment-fueled lunatics for four years, but they couldn’t point to any major proof of it. . . . Then, on Jan. 6, the critics were proved right, as thousands of Trump fans — goaded by the president during a rally — encircled the US Capitol and stormed it while Congress tried to certify the election. . . . Trump condemned what happened. These people risked their lives for someone who didn’t have their back.

That’s the most startling, sad, and contempt-inducing thing about Trump’s continued support — I wonder how many times he needs to disavow these people before they finally get the hint.

The blowback has been swift and predictable, and it’s only begun. Trump was banned from Twitter, and by the time this essay sees the light of day, the MAGApede Twitter alternative known as Parler will probably have been permanently shuttered.

Noted ex-German political sage Arnold Schwarzenegger compared the siege to Kristallnacht. BuzzFeed — for once — did a cop-sympathetic piece about how black Capitol Police had to deal with “Racist-Ass Terrorists,” but the article didn’t make a peep about how one of those cops shot a white woman dead. Senator Dick Durbin resurrected his “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act,” the first line of which reads as follows: “White supremacists and other far-right-wing extremists are the most significant domestic terrorism threat facing the United States.”

Problem is, that’s not much different than Trump’s position. He rewarded black America for rioting all summer with a $500-billion “Platinum Plan,” while he never once addressed white Americans as a political constituency and his Justice Department aggressively targeted white nationalists.

I fully expected the gaslighting, deplatforming, and utter contempt for free speech to get worse under Biden. What I didn’t expect was that a group of Trump supporters would hand-deliver Biden and everyone who’s propping up his carcass an excuse to feel justified about bringing the boot down on our necks that much harder. From now on, the powers that be will equate any allegations of electoral fraud with violent domestic terrorism. In war, truth doesn’t matter. But it’s dumb to hand your enemy a loaded gun, then walk away claiming victory.

I suspect that a lot of die-hard Trump supporters are caught in a spiral of cognitive dissonance because if there’s one thing humans hate doing, it’s admitting that they were suckered.

Some say that the federal government’s power is not insurmountable and that the very fact that protesters were able to penetrate into the Capitol building exposed the government’s vulnerability. But what if, just like Charlottesville, they walked right into a trap?

If there’s anything positive to come out of what happened on Wednesday, it’s the remote chance that millions of people became aware that the government sees us as enemies whether we like it or not. It’s impossible to work within a system that’s designed to eliminate you.

Violence and propaganda are the only things that win wars, and all governments exist to monopolize violence. Voting only gives you the false impression that your voice matters. When there is no apparent political solution and no common ground, things tend to get violent.

They taught me back in journalism school that the only speech the First Amendment does not protect is when one calls for the immediate violent overthrow of the government. By that standard, the Declaration of Independence was an Anglophobic document consisting of nothing but violent white-supremacist terrorist hate speech.

So although I realize that violence is what makes the world go ’round, I’m not so naive that I’d directly advocate violence. I’m simply observing that the pretense of democracy shrouds the reality that the main business of government is to monopolize violence.

I’m a fighter by temperament. Social ostracism doesn’t shut me up. Attempts at shaming don’t shut me up. Multiple near-death experiences haven’t shut me up. The only thing that could shut me up is a bullet to the head, Ashli Babbitt style.

I wonder how many others are fighters, though. The imminent clampdown is going to be insane. We’re heading into a dark blizzard, and if there’s even a remote chance of turning the tide, I’d suggest all you nitpicking purity-spiralers put aside the endless doctrinal infighting and focus instead on the common enemy. This isn’t about scene status — it’s about life and death.

...

I suspect the federal government is gearing up to drag us into deep waters and keep us underwater without air. But until you stop trusting the plan and realize the government is not your friend, you are all doomed to drown.

I hope I’m wrong here. I take no comfort in suspecting that I’m right. In fact, it’s the worst feeling in the world.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

It's still proof that it's possible. They shouldn't be using software so easily changeable for this shit to begin with.

They have to keep it changeable in case there's errors. Again, it'd be theoretically possible for someone to collect the ballots and change them all, but that doesn't mean it happens. There's always going to be ways to do some fraud, but that doesn't mean it happens. And it certainly isn't proof that fraud did happen.

This is verbatim the post where you "explained" it.

Firstly, those were obviously blank ballots for one, and for two, if they do have to "correct them" they have to go in front of a panel to correct them under law. Not just have some cat lady mark things as she pleases and then toss them into a pile. The security camera comment is just full-on retarded since once again your argument is basically "the evidence that they did it, in fact proves they didn't do it." It would be as dumb of a comment as a defense attorney saying "your honor, my client Tyrone couldn't have raped that girl because there's no way he would have left DNA evidence at the scene of the crime."

Jesus christ you're retarded. You can just admit that the conman you are madly in love with lost and then go back to posting the n-word.

I am totally sure that there is a vast conspiracy to commit fraud, by many states, including GOP election officials, and they were so good that they are able to hide it all. However, they were stupid enough to change ballots, during vote processing hours, on camera. I know you autists are naive, but come on now. Just because the conman you are in love with says it, doesn't make it true.

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

Goddamn Jack is a faggot, wow what a total joke

https://twitter.com/jack/status/1349510769268850690

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Goddamn Jack is a faggot, wow what a total joke

https://twitter.com/jack/status/1349510769268850690

He does not know DA WAY!

 

[Samson Pumpkin Jr.]

Pennsylvania and other swing states shouldn't have counted votes weeks before or weeks after the election was over. That is illegal and unconstitutional. The supreme court declined to hear it because they knew they would have to rule in favour of Donal Tron and throw all those votes out swinging the election for Trump