Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Wasn't this dude an Anarchist at one point of his grift?

That sounds statist as hell, matter of fact isn't that why most brainwashed statist vote in the first place to get a political figure that aligns close to their political preference so they can coerce the political figure? To bad Biden/The state will be doing the coercion

Stay coerce Vaush you bootlicker
Vaush is always first and foremost, a grifter. Expecting him to make any kind of principled or consistent stand is setting yourself up for disappointment.
 
Part of me really hopes that it dies down. I think 4chan (all boards, not just /pol/) got significantly worse due to the 2016 election (I say as I'm posting on a political lol-cow's thread..lmao). That being said I hope everyone can focus less on trump and more on funny shit going on in government and the country...but I doubt that's going to happen at all.
pol died long before 2016...
 
Vaush should keep going after Sowell... It will enough clout for a lot of response videos from people who actually read him and while his spergs will zerg rush and ratio those responses, it won't suffice to the embarrassment that he can't feel but will continue to destroy his public perception that not even the most scholarly left leaning political theorist on the platform could save his ass. And in result, probably centrist spergs will get a free dramatized course on Sowell. Could be fun for the Farms.
I'm glad there at least some people that are aware that Vaush is strawmanning and insulting Sowell out the ass and comparing him to Candace Owens, which is the most laughable thing considering that Owens has nothing on Sowell. That's all that people do when it comes to black conservatives who are accomplished: strawman, ad hominem, insult, talk about him being a white man bootlicker, call him ugly or go on some racist tirade against him and Kimberly Klacik ("Every single mother**king black woman in America talks the exact same way. The exact same f**king way"; see The Post Millennial), and worst of all, just ignore them.

You could get cancer from reading these dumb comments and the strawmanning.

1610760815938.png

1610759239300.png

1610759631085.png

1610759663665.png

1610759591327.png

1610759913601.png

1610759938232.png

1610760123805.png

1610760176717.png

1610760238781.png

1610760547390.png

1610760598261.png

1610760618693.png

1610761088239.png

1610761100717.png

Going through all of Vaush's fan's commentary is awful.
 
Last edited:
So vaush did go yo college right? What does he have a degree in then?
not that it makes him any less dumb.
 
I'm glad there at least some people that are aware that Vaush is strawmanning and insulting Sowell out the ass and comparing him to Candace Owens, which is the most laughable thing considering that Owens has nothing on Sowell. That's all that people do when it comes to black conservatives who are accomplished: strawman, ad hominem, insult, talk about him being a white man bootlicker, call him ugly or go on some racist tirade against him and Kimberly Klacik ("Every single mother**king black woman in America talks the exact same way. The exact same f**king way"; see The Post Millennial), and worst of all, just ignore them.

You could get cancer from reading these dumb comments and the strawmanning.

View attachment 1850218
View attachment 1850148
View attachment 1850157
View attachment 1850158
View attachment 1850156
View attachment 1850168
View attachment 1850170
View attachment 1850179
View attachment 1850180
View attachment 1850184
View attachment 1850202
View attachment 1850205
View attachment 1850207
View attachment 1850235
View attachment 1850237
Going through all of Vaush's fan's commentary is awful.
Remember. These are the so called "Anti-Racist" I heard so much about. I would love to see a black conservative, hell any non-white person on the right, to be Vaush and the other breadtubers in their place.
 

This is embarassing. Doug is just letting Vaush say incorrect information. This is why live debates are cancer.
If you wanna keep being invited on the shows where you get to promote your own grift to the consumers you have to play nice, which means the occasional supergay 'debate', specifically tailored to make it seem whichever grifter it is that has the 'intellectual' gimmick on whatever random show it is they're on gets to appear smart and verbally dextrous in front of their mentally impaired paypig audience. In a rl argument though, the majority of the 'intellectual ' ecelebs would get verbally raped by even low IQ people with common sense
 
If you wanna keep being invited on the shows where you get to promote your own grift to the consumers you have to play nice, which means the occasional supergay 'debate', specifically tailored to make it seem whichever grifter it is that has the 'intellectual' gimmick on whatever random show it is they're on gets to appear smart and verbally dextrous in front of their mentally impaired paypig audience. In a rl argument though, the majority of the 'intellectual ' ecelebs would get verbally raped by even low IQ people with common sense
This is why pilled up and drunk ralph vs vaush was amazing. "Imma make that bitch famous" is an underrated Guntism.
 
Vaush had another pedo moment
View attachment 1855473

Why, for the love of whatever any of us hold dear, can he not fathom that the existence of child pornography can never be ethical, that the production of it can never be moral, and that all his comparisons are ludicrous? The existence of a moral and ethical harm does not justify the commission of some other moral and ethical harm.
 
Why, for the love of whatever any of us hold dear, can he not fathom that the existence of child pornography can never be ethical, that the production of it can never be moral, and that all his comparisons are ludicrous? The existence of a moral and ethical harm does not justify the commission of some other moral and ethical harm.
Why ask, when you likely already know the answer?
 
Back