Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
I'm no one you've ever guessed, Pam.



Keep dreaming, Pam.



I have the right to comment on your life because it's free speech. You comment on the lives of celebrities all the time. I have the right to tell you the truth because it is the truth. You just hate it because I tell you your delusions are delusions and deep down you know I'm right but your brain is broken and you can't admit that. Too prideful.





No, Pam, you brought them up initially. Key word "initially"

In this post



You tried blaming Alicia Vikander for it. It's always struck me as you attempting to avoid admitting blame for a serious fuckup.

I didn't even bring Alicia Vikander up. Someone else testified to that. Good luck trying to find out.

I think you don't know anything and it's making me laugh. You bring things up and you lie about it. And you are missing quite a bit of information.

Priceless entertainment.
 
I didn't even bring Alicia Vikander up. Someone else testified to that. Good luck trying to find out.

I think you don't know anything and it's making me laugh. You bring things up and you lie about it. And you are missing quite a bit of information.

Priceless entertainment.

Pam, that was a quote of you bringing the nudes up for the first time and yes, you blamed Vikander. Your half-assed attempt at gaslighting isn't going to change anything or convince any of us that these nudes-that we only know about because you brought them up- were faked by a conspiracy of celebrities for no particular reason.
 
Pam, that was a quote of you bringing the nudes up for the first time and yes, you blamed Vikander. Your half-assed attempt at gaslighting isn't going to change anything or convince any of us that these nudes-that we only know about because you brought them up- were faked by a conspiracy of celebrities for no particular reason.

Nope.

*munches popcorn*

Keep sperging.
 
I wouldn't want to muscle in on your racket there, Pam.

Say, did you know that people have written tells as well as verbal and physical ones?
Yes. You give them out all the time.

It's quite clear you are trying to create a narrative to create control over me. The problem is that you make huge mistakes that undermines your own attempts to create said narrative.
1. You're unbelievably lazy. You don't want to the extra mile to make yourself believable.
2. You lack the ability to anticipate problems. It's a skill that can only be acquired from higher independent guided training.
3. You fail to align any of your claims with actual proof and truth.
4. You are so obsessed. It now borders on mental health and incompetence. You have to take control of me. You can't function now without in your mind, controlling me.
5. There are no facts to support your claims. As a matter of fact. my true sexual history consists of men I've dated ....here in Georgia. If you start out far fetched, you'll end up far fetched.

Where's the love letters to celebrities? Where's the meet ups? And you've done nothing but repeat yourself over and over. Why is this that important to you?

So where does this leave us? Me with screenshot messages to prove Harvey Weinstein and Tony Robbins contacted. They consist specific death, rape, and sexual threats. There were nudes spread around about me sent from someone who said she was Fassbender's wife. These were sent around to harass and humiliate me and scare me under your control.

The answers are in black and white sent from you all acting really mentally unbalanced. Fact.

You need help. You are just as obsessed and confused now as from the very beginning. I said no and I meant no. I'm not having sex with any of you freaks. If you have a problem with this you can confront me face to face but I can't guarentee your safety.

Oh and you went all the way back to October 2019 when the truth came out about the nudes. However you brought them two days ago again trying to use it against me only to find out again, I didn't send them.

Failure.

You want to talk tells. Your motive to continue this means you've been involved in criminal harassment to me personally and you're trying to wiggle out of it. By getting me to make a what "flub"? That's not going to happen. All I have is the truth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
giphy.gif


Woo boy.
 
Yes. You give them out all the time.

Mostly of bafflement at your continued inability to face the simple truth. But anyways, you give them out a lot and "eating popcorn" and pretending to be superior is a sure sign you're feeling on the back foot. You bluff big when your delusions are threatened.

It's quite clear you are trying to create a narrative to create control over me. The problem is that you make huge mistakes that undermines your own attempts to create said narrative.
1. You're unbelievably lazy. You don't want to the extra mile to make yourself believable.

I speak only the truth as I understand it, Pam.

2. You lack the ability to anticipate problems. It's a skill that can only be acquired from higher independent guided training.

Or from life in general, but whatever you need to tell yourself.

3. You fail to align any of your claims with actual proof and truth.

Says the women who thinks she's being gang stalked by celebrities because she thinks they want to fuck her.

4. You are so obsessed. It now borders on mental health and incompetence. You have to take control of me. You can't function now without in your mind, controlling me.

Which me is this referring to again? You seem confused on that front a lot.

5. There are no facts to support your claims. As a matter of fact. my true sexual history consists of men I've dated ....here in Georgia. If you start out far fetched, you'll end up far fetched.

What claims about your sexual history are you referring to, Pam?
My claims are very simple. Here, I will reiterated them again for you.

A: You suffer from erotomania, the delusional belief that someone is in love with you and trying to contact you.
B: You suffer from paranoid delusions, comorbid with the erotomania, and thus believe that celebrities are also out to get you.
C: A and B influence your daily life and cause you to act in ways you are later ashamed of, which causes you to blame your mistakes on the conspiracy you believe is against you.

Where's the love letters to celebrities? Where's the meet ups?

No where. Neither of those are necessary components of either delusions I think you suffer under.

And you've done nothing but repeat yourself over and over. Why is this that important to you?

Because hope springs eternal, Pam. And because it's funny to see the ways your delusions manifest themselves in spite of all objective reality.

So where does this leave us? Me with screenshot messages to prove Harvey Weinstein and Tony Robbins contacted.

I assure you, that is not what your screenshots demonstrate.

They consist specific death, rape, and sexual threats.

Specific threats such as?

There were nudes spread around about me sent from someone who said she was Fassbender's wife. These were sent around to harass and humiliate me and scare me under your control.

So you claim the nudes were sent by someone claiming to be Fassbender's wife?

The answers are in black and white sent from you all acting really mentally unbalanced. Fact.

Pam, you are reacting to shitposts by obvious trolls trying to get a rise out of you.

You need help. You are just as obsessed and confused now as from the very beginning. I said no and I meant no. I'm not having sex with any of you freaks. If you have a problem with this you can confront me face to face but I can't guarentee your safety.

No one wants to have sex with you. No one here is asking. No one here is a famous person you are obsessed with.

Oh and you went all the way back to October 2019 when the truth came out about the nudes. However you brought them two days ago again trying to use it against me only to find out again, I didn't send them.

Failure.

You claim you didn't send them and you blame a celebrity that doesn't know you exist. A: Of course I don't believe a random celebrity sent them instead of you and B: I brought them up because you were trying to talk about proper etiquette. They just happen to be one of many examples where your delusions have made you act in a fucked up manner.

You want to talk tells. Your motive to continue this means you've been involved in criminal harassment to me personally and you're trying to wiggle out of it. By getting me to make a what "flub"? That's not going to happen. All I have is the truth.

Not a word you just spoke even remotely approached the truth. I guess the real world is really just that scary to you that your crippling delusions are the safer place, huh?
 
@The last
Mostly of bafflement at your continued inability to face the simple truth. But anyways, you give them out a lot and "eating popcorn" and pretending to be superior is a sure sign you're feeling on the back foot. You bluff big when your delusions are threatened.



I speak only the truth as I understand it, Pam.



Or from life in general, but whatever you need to tell yourself.



Says the women who thinks she's being gang stalked by celebrities because she thinks they want to fuck her.



Which me is this referring to again? You seem confused on that front a lot.



What claims about your sexual history are you referring to, Pam?
My claims are very simple. Here, I will reiterated them again for you.

A: You suffer from erotomania, the delusional belief that someone is in love with you and trying to contact you.
B: You suffer from paranoid delusions, comorbid with the erotomania, and thus believe that celebrities are also out to get you.
C: A and B influence your daily life and cause you to act in ways you are later ashamed of, which causes you to blame your mistakes on the conspiracy you believe is against you.



No where. Neither of those are necessary components of either delusions I think you suffer under.



Because hope springs eternal, Pam. And because it's funny to see the ways your delusions manifest themselves in spite of all objective reality.



I assure you, that is not what your screenshots demonstrate.



Specific threats such as?



So you claim the nudes were sent by someone claiming to be Fassbender's wife?



Pam, you are reacting to shitposts by obvious trolls trying to get a rise out of you.



No one wants to have sex with you. No one here is asking. No one here is a famous person you are obsessed with.



You claim you didn't send them and you blame a celebrity that doesn't know you exist. A: Of course I don't believe a random celebrity sent them instead of you and B: I brought them up because you were trying to talk about proper etiquette. They just happen to be one of many examples where your delusions have made you act in a fucked up manner.



Not a word you just spoke even remotely approached the truth. I guess the real world is really just that scary to you that your crippling delusions are the safer place, huh?
*munches popcorn*

TL:DR
 
I think Tony's having a breakdown.
Tony Robbins isn't here Pam. He never was. He never will be. Tony doesn't know who you are and does not care.
It's quite clear you are trying to create a narrative to create control over me. The problem is that you make huge mistakes that undermines your own attempts to create said narrative.
So where does this leave us? Me with screenshot messages to prove Harvey Weinstein and Tony Robbins contacted. They consist specific death, rape, and sexual threats. There were nudes spread around about me sent from someone who said she was Fassbender's wife. These were sent around to harass and humiliate me and scare me under your control.
There is no narrative. The people who contacted you are internet trolls, not celebrities. You have zero proof of any of this.

Pam, are you familiar with the Red-Brown coalition?

Do you enjoy the 2018 Mortal Engines movie?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Viridian
Tony Robbins isn't here Pam. He never was. He never will be. Tony doesn't know who you are and does not care.
There is no narrative. The people who contacted you are internet trolls, not celebrities. You have zero proof of any of this.

Pam, are you familiar with the Red-Brown coalition?

Do you enjoy the 2018 Mortal Engines movie?
Ok Tony.
 
The only one having a breakdown here is you. Are you Tony?

I mean, with the amount of projecting you're doing, it does look like you're referring to yourself in the third person.
Actually I think the people on this thread are suffering from some mental health issues including extreme obsessive tendencies along with now talking about Qanon and unstable conspiracy type conversations and theories.
These conversations and responses are disturbing. I think it would be in the best interest of the accounts @LoverofPi @Analog Devolved and @Kurple Pecleon to be checked out for underlying mental health issues that could potentially place them or someone else in harm's way.
 
Desperation.

I agree, you are showing signs of desperation.

I think Tony's having a breakdown.

You mispelled "Pamela Swain."


No one here is Tony Robbins.

Actually I think the people on this thread are suffering from some mental health issues including extreme obsessive tendencies along with now talking about Qanon and unstable conspiracy type conversations and theories.

Where is this happening? I'm certainly not talking about Qanon except to mock it and its followers as morons.

These conversations and responses are disturbing. I think it would be in the best interest of the accounts @LoverofPi @Analog Devolved and @Kurple Pecleon to be checked out for underlying mental health issues that could potentially place them or someone else in harm's way.

You go right to a psychiatrist and you tell them all about us, Pam. You tell them about the conspiracy you believe is bothering you. The Psychiatrist will know exactly what to do for you, Pam!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Analog Devolved
Back