Anything missttributed to this thoery of schizophrenia will be that overtreated
I am going to be very precise in this post, because after that last one, it has become clear that precise factual observations make you say very funny things indeed.
Here's a different kind of scrutiny:
to the inclusion of heightened g
High levels of "g" are not associated with the habitual misuse of words. High levels of "g" are modestly associated with succinct, high-scoring timed essays, according to a limited analysis of the American ACT. This is not the pattern you display.
Celtic grammatical features
You do not utilize any "Celtic grammatical features" not in common with English. You do not count vigesimally, you do not structure verbs as intransitives, and you do not formulate sentences as VSO. These features, or lack thereof, exclude any meaningful Celtic contribution.
Slavic grammatical features (neology and word-extensions including preposition chaining respectively)
You do not utilize neology or word-extensions in a way unique to or indicative of Slavic influence. Notably, neology is not a grammatical feature, not unique to Slavic languages, and even in the context of Slavic writing, used to deliver artistic points, not share useful information. Modern Slavic languages have steadily excoriated neologisms of this kind and removed them from their dictionaries.
emotional sensitivity from higher amygdylatic differentiation (arguably in this case a Kimmate-Slavonid transfusion if anything
"Amygdalic differentiation" does not exist. You may be referring to differentiation of amygdala responses, however, that phrase has a different and exclusionary meaning in medical terminology. "Kimmate-Slavonid transfusion" does not exist. I am not speaking from practical knowledge: I have performed a discrete search for the phrase "Kimmate" alone through databases you will never in your life have access to, and returned with zero results. You may have simply butchered the spelling, but "Slavonid" did little better, and those results were not related to the thread or your claims.
sometimes worsened by an attempt to negrifying the hormones and well that is admittedly self-faulted)
"Negrifying the hormones" does not exist. Negrification is a real word, but has no medical significance. I did not deign this with a search.
brain damage from a fibromyalgiac distendation causing phenomenon in "kicking out neocytic pregnae" to speak
"Fibromyalgiac distendation" does not exist. Fibromyalgia is associated with serotonin syndrome, which is in turn associated with abdominal distension, but there are no particular distensions in the body that would involve neocytes, let alone induce "brain damage." I can only reasonably conclude that any resemblance between your use of the word and medical fact are coincidental due to the addition of incorrect assertions.
and a misrecognition of retraction in reactivity responses to humour of irrelevance in RAD types...
RAD is commonly used to refer to reactive airway disease, which has no neural implications except in periods of extreme oxygen deprivation. None of the other medically accepted uses of this abbreviation, common or uncommon, of which I am aware of at least seventeen, would fit within the context of your statement. I refuse to humor whatever new one you've invented.