Law Twitter refused to remove child porn because it didn’t ‘violate policies’: lawsuit - Right-wingers? Against TOS. CP? @Jack approves.

Twitter refused to take down widely shared pornographic images and videos of a teenage sex trafficking victim because an investigation “didn’t find a violation” of the company’s “policies,” a scathing lawsuit alleges.

The federal suit, filed Wednesday by the victim and his mother in the Northern District of California, alleges Twitter made money off of the clips, which showed a 13-year-old engaged in sex acts and are a form of child sexual abuse material, or child porn, the suit states.

The teen — who is now 17 and lives in Florida — is identified only as John Doe and was between 13 and 14 years-old when sex traffickers, posing as a 16-year-old female classmate, started chatting with him on Snapchat, the suit alleges.

Doe and the traffickers allegedly exchanged nude photos before the conversation turned to blackmail — if the teen didn’t share more sexually graphic photos and videos, the explicit material he’d already sent would be shared with his “parents, coach, pastor” and others, the suit states.

Doe, acting under duress, initially complied and sent videos of himself performing sex acts and was also told to include another child in his videos, which he did, the suit claims.

Eventually, Doe blocked the traffickers and they stopped harassing him but at some point in 2019, the videos surfaced on Twitter under two accounts that were known to share child sexual abuse material, court papers allege.

Over the next month, the videos would be reported to Twitter at least three times — first on Dec. 25, 2019 — but the tech giant failed to do anything about it until a federal law enforcement officer got involved, the suit states.

Doe became aware of the tweets in Jan. 2020 because they’d been viewed widely by his classmates, which subjected him to “teasing, harassment, vicious bullying” and led him to become “suicidal,” court records show.

While Doe’s parents contacted the school and made police reports, he filed a complaint with Twitter, saying there were two tweets depicting child pornography of himself and they needed to be removed because they were illegal, harmful and were in violation of the site’s policies.

A support agent followed up and asked for a copy of Doe’s ID so they could prove it was him and after the teen complied, there was no response for a week, the family claims.

Around the same time, Doe’s mother filed two complaints to Twitter reporting the same material and for a week, she also received no response, the suit states.

Finally on Jan. 28, Twitter replied back to Doe and said they wouldn’t be taking down the material, which had already racked up over 167,000 views and 2,223 retweets, the suit states.

“Thanks for reaching out. We’ve reviewed the content, and didn’t find a violation of our policies, so no action will be taken at this time,” the response reads, according to the lawsuit.

“If you believe there’s a potential copyright infringement, please start a new report. If the content is hosted on a third-party website, you’ll need to contact that website’s support team to report it. Your safety is the most important thing, and if you believe you are in danger, we encourage you to contact your local authorities.”

In his response, published in the complaint, Doe appeared shocked.

“What do you mean you don’t see a problem? We both are minors right now and were minors at the time these videos were taken. We both were 13 years of age. We were baited, harassed, and threatened to take these videos that are now being posted without our permission. We did not authorize these videos AT ALL and they need to be taken down,” the teen wrote back to Twitter.
He even included his case number from a local law enforcement agency but still, the tech giant allegedly ignored him and refused to do anything about the illegal child sexual abuse material — as it continued to rack up more and more views.

Two days later, Doe’s mom was connected with an agent from the Department of Homeland Security through a mutual contact who successfully had the videos removed on Jan. 30, the suit states.

“Only after this take-down demand from a federal agent did Twitter suspend the user accounts that were distributing the CSAM and report the CSAM to the National Center on Missing and Exploited Children,” the suit, filed by the National Center on Sexual Exploitation and two law firms, states.

“This is directly in contrast to what their automated reply message and User Agreement state they will do to protect children.”
The disturbing lawsuit goes on to allege Twitter knowingly hosts creeps who use the platform to exchange child porn material and profits from it by including ads interspersed between tweets advertising or requesting the material.

Twitter declined to comment when contacted by The Post.
 
So they will ban a person who will say Biden isn't the real president.

But when it come to pedros its fine. God I hope Jack Dorsey dies a painful death
Well, some kid taking dickpics is basically a victimless crime, but trying to subvert the democratic process is outright dangerous. We all saw how violent things got on Capitol Hill that one time. They've got their priorities straight if you ask me.
 
Featuring complete lunacy such as:
  • "It's from the New York Post, they're obviously lying!" (user doesn't respond to others linking the lawsuit docs)
  • "Twitter wouldn't do that, they have a policy against it!"
  • "If Twitter is wrong, then they should pay, but we shouldn't cancel the site!"
  • "Cancel Twitter? Lol must be Trumptards" (because only Trump voters dislike CP, apparently
And our winner for Goofiest Nigga of the Day goes to:
gfotd.png
Yes, because people regularly file frivolous lawsuits against billion dollar corporations. :story:
 
Remember when it was Pornhub getting banned from payment processors for legal porn and not taking down illegal porn faster?
Good times.

Twitter refusing to take down CP and making money off ads *shrugs*.

🌈How long until Twitter gets banned from payment processors? 🌈
How long until Facebook gets banned by the credit card companies for hosting the streaming video of the psycho who shot up New Zealand? They platformed hate!

CP gets posted on every SM site, the issue is the cooperate response.
What retards on the Pornhub thread couldn't understand is that PH did far more than Twitter or Facebook ever has in deleting illegal or even questionable content.
But they're an icky porn site! It's different!
 
Unpopular opinion, but when are we going to hold teenagers responsible for doing this bullshit? By this point, you definitely do know better than to not post your nudes around whether it's because, hello, YOU'RE A MINOR, or because you simply should just already be aware of how volatile the open Internet is and will be.
The idiot was purposefully posing as a 16-year-old, and no doubt thought nothing bad until it turned against them. Don't care if this makes me seem like a CP or TOS apologist, again, there's no excuse to not be aware. There's no excuse for not parenting properly, ect.
Are teens or kids today taught not to put things of themselves online? Because last I saw, kids having Facebook or Twitter is the norm, not the exception.
 
Are teens or kids today taught not to put things of themselves online? Because last I saw, kids having Facebook or Twitter is the norm, not the exception.
I grew up in the era where the Internet was becoming more commonplace (so early 2000s). At one point YES, you are 100% correct, we used to live by the powerlevel rule. Keeping that sort of info private meant it kept everyone safe. Sites like MySpace and Facebook completely changed this. Obviously part of this too is the fact that nobody really understood just how "big" the Internet would become. That point is especially true when we think about data collection. Zucc certainly didn't think about data collection in the beginning of Facebook. (unless I'm completely wrong and there are sources out there proving that)

I personally didn't have a proper "social media" page until I was in middle school, so early 2010s. By that point the Internet was definitely shifting, and by that point we were already fucked.
 
Featuring complete lunacy such as:
  • "It's from the New York Post, they're obviously lying!" (user doesn't respond to others linking the lawsuit docs)
  • "Twitter wouldn't do that, they have a policy against it!"
  • "If Twitter is wrong, then they should pay, but we shouldn't cancel the site!"
  • "Cancel Twitter? Lol must be Trumptards" (because only Trump voters dislike CP, apparently
And our winner for Goofiest Nigga of the Day goes to:
View attachment 1862929
Yes, because people regularly file frivolous lawsuits against billion dollar corporations. :story:
Normies who post Wojaks in 2021 should be beaten with hammers.
 
Mother of pearl, that poor fucking kid. But what's with this line?
The federal suit, filed Wednesday by the victim and his mother in the Northern District of California, alleges Twitter made money off of the clips, which showed a 13-year-old engaged in sex acts and are a form of child sexual abuse material, or child porn, the suit states.
You can't make money off of tweets like you can with views on jewtube. Twitter makes their money off of advertisements that adblock blocks most of. Which could explain why they bleed money like crazy. If there were ads on this video then they're right to add that in.

this clown world is turning into Pennywise world.
I like the evolution in the metaphor but fuck that clown.

Twitter is officially a pedophile haven. God damn.
It already is, like everything else on the net you just have to know where to look. People on tumblr get around the porn ban by avoiding tags. They've gotten around being reported on twatter too: Dumb luck.

Didn't Tumblr get nuked for this?
Its always shocking how some corporate entities are immune over others.
No it got deathly wounded and its new owners are keeping it alive for their own amusement. Tumblr got bought by Yahoo who sold it to Verizon who sold it to WordPress who are doing nothing with it and kept Verizon's porn ban. If this lawsuit goes anywhere past square 1, Twitter might share its fate. Very big "might".

View attachment 1862587

When you fuck up so badly, your users try to get you cancelled.
Ignore it. There have been like three TwitterIsOver parties where all of them bitched and none of them left.
 
Mother of pearl, that poor fucking kid. But what's with this line?

You can't make money off of tweets like you can with views on jewtube. Twitter makes their money off of advertisements that adblock blocks most of. Which could explain why they bleed money like crazy. If there were ads on this video then they're right to add that in.
Twitter automatically puts ads at intervals between tweets, regardless of the content of the aforementioned tweets. So in theory, in between tweets of CSAM they would have interposed paid adverts that they would be making money off of. It's an interesting claim, and if the case proceeds I'd be interested to see how it's adjudicated.
 
Unpopular opinion, but when are we going to hold teenagers responsible for doing this bullshit? By this point, you definitely do know better than to not post your nudes around whether it's because, hello, YOU'RE A MINOR, or because you simply should just already be aware of how volatile the open Internet is and will be.
The idiot was purposefully posing as a 16-year-old, and no doubt thought nothing bad until it turned against them. Don't care if this makes me seem like a CP or TOS apologist, again, there's no excuse to not be aware. There's no excuse for not parenting properly, ect.

When my grandfather was a kid, he was nearly killed, because his friends dared him to sneak into a blind man's house - who almost stabbed him to death. When my father was a kid, he and his friends nearly killed themselves by blowing up a tree stump with a stick of dynamite. When I was a kid, I nearly killed myself driving 115MPH down back country roads in the middle of the night in a car with warped brake rotors. Kids these days are nearly killing themselves after being the victim of CP blackmail.

Kids are always going to wind up doing extremely stupid shit. They're kids, it's what they do. My mom and dad raised me very well: I stayed out of trouble for the most part, but I still drove like an absolute madman when there was nobody on the road, because I was an idiot and thought I could get away with it.

Kids should know better, but good luck wrangling that herd of cats. If they're not sharing pictures of their genitals to pedophiles, they'll be experimenting with butt plugs in the janitor's closet or whatever they do these days.
 
Yes, because people regularly file frivolous lawsuits against billion dollar corporations. :story:
Remember when women would make accusations against men with no evidence, and they were instantly to be believed and the men shunned from society? Good times.

Only the men on the right though. Definitely not Democrats. Tara Reade got memory holed quickly.
 
Kids should know better, but good luck wrangling that herd of cats. If they're not sharing pictures of their genitals to pedophiles, they'll be experimenting with butt plugs in the janitor's closet or whatever they do these days.
I guess that's just where I'm the minority in this. I'd rather catch my kid doing lunacy in my own home with another kid, at least that can be handled to some extent. You catch your kid uploading CP of themselves in any regard that's not going to be an easy task to just sweep up and possibly forget, whether it involves only teens or somehow adults are mixed.
 
Mother of pearl, that poor fucking kid. But what's with this line?

You can't make money off of tweets like you can with views on jewtube. Twitter makes their money off of advertisements that adblock blocks most of. Which could explain why they bleed money like crazy. If there were ads on this video then they're right to add that in.


I like the evolution in the metaphor but fuck that clown.


It already is, like everything else on the net you just have to know where to look. People on tumblr get around the porn ban by avoiding tags. They've gotten around being reported on twatter too: Dumb luck.


No it got deathly wounded and its new owners are keeping it alive for their own amusement. Tumblr got bought by Yahoo who sold it to Verizon who sold it to WordPress who are doing nothing with it and kept Verizon's porn ban. If this lawsuit goes anywhere past square 1, Twitter might share its fate. Very big "might".


Ignore it. There have been like three TwitterIsOver parties where all of them bitched and none of them left.
Twitter's especially bad for it though, even compared to Facebook or Tumblr. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...e-half-child-abuse-material-uk-investigators/
 
It already is, like everything else on the net you just have to know where to look. People on tumblr get around the porn ban by avoiding tags. They've gotten around being reported on twatter too: Dumb luck.
The worst part about twitter regarding that:


Is that Twitter themselves set up a major loophole pedos use. TLDW: If you see someone with MAP or NOMAP on their profile, get the fuck away from that shit ASAP.
 
The human brain isn’t fully formed at age 13 or 14 or whatever age this poor little bastard was. That’s why teenagers do stupid shit. You can warn them not to do 999 stupid things and even if they listen they’ll find something stupid to do that you didn’t think to include. My kids had cyber safety and pedo awareness drilled into them, but still did lots of stupid things that I hadn’t thought to mention. These days surely every parent should be across online predators (maybe she’s not very bright, or he was seriously stealth) but I’m not on board with blaming the kid or his mum for this one.

TLDR: Don’t blame the boy, he was just a kid and he has enough problems now.
 
Well, some kid taking dickpics is basically a victimless crime, but trying to subvert the democratic process is outright dangerous. We all saw how violent things got on Capitol Hill that one time. They've got their priorities straight if you ask me.
Yes. We are are committed to old world values like democracy, and the rule of law.
Also, it's really gross when these kind of things get propagated and held in people's private collections.

Does the FBI have the power to requisition the list of IPs/accounts that accessed and distributed the file?
 
Back