Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1860118

AJ spends 19 hours a day on a mattress and feels imprisoned in their own body - and mum Sharon rushes off in tears after being delivered some home truths

AJ has spent the last six years trapped in their house, as well as in their own body.

The super morbidly obese 24-year-old can spend 19 hours a day on a mattress in the living room - staring at the same four walls all day.

AJ, who lives in Airdrie, Scotland, is forced to sleep on a pile of pillows while using a special sleep mask because the excess weight compresses the airway.

The biggest fear for mum Sharon is that AJ will stop breathing during the night, so she sleeps beside her child on another mattress.

Even the most basic of tasks require help from Sharon, who has washed AJ for the last six years and helps with trips to the toilet.

"My role at the moment is mother to a giant baby," admits Sharon. "It breaks your heart to see your child like this, it really does."

Isolated at home, AJ relies on two dogs for company because "animals don't judge", having faced cruel taunts from bullies at school and even children on the street.

At a staggering 41st, AJ is carrying four times recommended weight for someone their age and can eat up to 12 teacakes and six litres of cola a day.

Sharon is solely in charge of the cooking and shopping, with AJ consuming around 5,000 calories per day, which is more than double daily recommended amount.

Dinner is eaten kneeling at the counter because AJ doesn't like being higher than the worktop.

"I know a lot of people would say you're a mother it's your fault. Hands up yeah totally agree with you, partly it is my fault," admits Sharon.

Sharon is concerned that without drastic help AJ will never be able to see the outside world, or worse still die at an early age.

"The doctors are saying AJ is not going to be here in five or 10 years time the way you're going on. That's really frightening," confesses Sharon.

AJ, who identifies as non-binary and uses "them" and "they" pronouns has another strong reason for wanting to lose weight.

They dream of having a gender reassignment operation, but doctors warn they might die if they went under the knife.

"My body doesn't reflect who I am because I still have the female attire. What I want now is a mastectomy and a hysterectomy. I want to be me, just me," says AJ.


Channel 4 documentary Shut-Ins: Britain’s Fattest People charts AJ's journey to get the drastic surgery that will change their life forever.

At 41st, any surgery on AJ is considered too dangerous, so drastic changes in their lifestyle and diet are needed.

Before doctors will agree to surgery, AJ sees a psychologist to confront where there overeating comes from.

Clinical psychologist Dr Laura Williams begins unpicking years of ingrained physical and psychological habits.

While mum Sharon explains that as a busy mum she would cook "cheat dinners" such as microwave meals, then use chocolate to comfort AJ after vile taunts from bullies.

It's then time to for AJ to be assessed to see whether they are a suitable candidate for surgery.

A BMI of 30 is considered obese, which means AJ is off the scale at a staggering 95.

AJ gained 67kg, the weight of a person, in less than a year, which starts ringing alarm bells for bariatric surgeon Professor David Kerrigan.

Giving Sharon some home truths, he says: "That shopping and that food that allowed AJ to gain the weight of a whole person in less than a year, you contributed to.

"This operation could kill AJ if it went badly wrong. It's a small risk. If AJ was my child I'd be thinking do I want them to go through that risk when it could be a waste of time anyway because of things that I'm doing."

It's too much for Sharon to take as she walks out in tears - and AJ confesses to Professor Kerrigan that no one has ever pointed that out to mum before.

They both have to show they've made changes before they can start any surgery.

With the pair both requiring a transformation, Professor Kerrigan believes AJ is up for the challenge but is less convinced about Sharon.

It's a "kick in the teeth" for AJ, who realises there is not a quick fix solution.

"The problem has been swept aside for so long you don't notice things. It's only when someone says take a step back you realise they're right," confesses Sharon.

The family start making big changes into the type of food that is brought into the house - with AJ writing an action plan to Professor Kerrigan.

The fry ups and fatty snacks are gone, being replaced by healthy meals with vegetables.

As well as changing diet, exercise is part of the new action plan, which means finally leaving the security of the house.

Just 15 minutes of gentle walking if exhausting for AJ, but they refuse to get a lift home when suggested by mum.

During another session with the psychologist, Dr Williams points out that avoidance of issues has caused problems and AJ's refusal to speak negatively about mum Sharon.

"These sessions have been an eye-opener to me. I thought I knew best. Basically I need to grow up and accept other people's advice," admits Sharon.

In the next episode, we discover whether AJ has done enough to be able to have surgery.

AJ realises they need to be more independent and change their lifestyle - but will it be enough?

*Shut-ins: Britain's Fattest People airs Mondays on Channel 4 at 10pm


If she was a man it would make no difference she'd still have massive sweaty tits and a cock you couldn't see or use. She's done better than most troons in changing their sex. Pass the greedy cunt a pie.
 
It's actually jarring that, as with nearly everything else, the most gullible to it all are young women. Actual, biological women who want to be "trendy" in bringing their item relevancy to ruin, but after reality hits hard, you can bet that a lot of them will go full terf.

Woke activism in general and trans activism in particular is just perfectly engineered to draw young women in.
As much as it pains me to admit this, women are, on average, more gullible than men. Not less intelligent, but more agreeable and less willing to call out bullshit. Or rather, to call out their friends' bullshit. Women will be plenty angry and disagreeable with their enemies, but they create the worst sort of hugboxing environment amongst themselves where they desperately try to project an image of kindness. Ironically these environments then get incredibly hostile to people perceived as disturbing the peace.

Girls are brought up to "be kind" while boys are just left "to be boys". Girls also are constantly told by society to follow a lot more restrictions around how they should look, act, dress, etc and that they should be submissive and that men are more intelligent. It makes sense that young women are going along with "positivity", "being your authentic self" and as part of a movement where the loudest voices are male.

In general, women face much worse social repercussions if they disagree with something than if men do. There's also the issue that trans women overwhelming still look and act like men and instinctively women fear men's violence and anger and so are more likely to agree with whatever they want.
 
Last edited:
putting this here for the comments, the thread is huge.

lots of ppl obviously never even thought of this stuff before & seem blindsided.

i think this signals the mainstreaming of sentiments questioning trans claims & in that sense, the Biden executive order might have a strong (unforeseen) backlash.

i've never seen any thread this long about this subject before. Bret opened up proverbial can of worms.

Bret Weinstein thread
bretW.png
 
Last edited:
Woke activism in general and trans activism in particular is just perfectly engineered to draw young women in.
As much as it pains me to admit this, women are, on average, more gullible than men. Not less intelligent, but more agreeable and less willing to call out bullshit. Or rather, to call out their friends' bullshit. Women will be plenty angry and disagreeable with their enemies, but they create the worst sort of hugboxing environment amongst themselves where they desperately try to project an image of kindness. Ironically these environments then get incredibly hostile to people perceived as disturbing the peace.
So. Those are the starting conditions. Then, most politically-minded women will give feminism at least some consideration. Those for whom the concepts resonate with their personal experiences will learn more about it, and eventually they'll get introduced to the concept of intersectionality that tells them that to be good feminists, they must also care about all these other issues. Because they're eager to please and they don't want to be the Bad sort of feminist, oh no, they start learning about a whole prepackaged worldview that has something to say about every issue imaginable. Support for the T is snuck in this way.
And so, step by step, women get drawn away from the very thing that first drew them to feminism - their self-interest. Centering yourself in your own activism? Yikes, sweaty, you really need to examine your attitude because your kind of White Feminism isn't wanted here. We need to center Queer voices. Listen to your Black trans sisters and don't you dare invalidate them with your cisnormative notions of what womanhood is. Sit down, shut up and listen until you've unpacked your privilege.

And that's how you end up with feminists cheering for the destruction of women's sports. Because they've been systematically taught to distrust their own thoughts because their thoughts are sinful racist/transphobic/every other -ist and will lead them astray.


How can I use this information to get women to sleep with me?
 
Not less intelligent, but more agreeable and less willing to call out bullshit. Or rather, to call out their friends' bullshit. Women will be plenty angry and disagreeable with their enemies, but they create the worst sort of hugboxing environment amongst themselves where they desperately try to project an image of kindness. Ironically these environments then get incredibly hostile to people perceived as disturbing the peace.
The term for this is "conformity enforcement". The nail that stick up gets hammered down.
 
And so, step by step, women get drawn away from the very thing that first drew them to feminism - their self-interest. Centering yourself in your own activism? Yikes, sweaty, you really need to examine your attitude because your kind of White Feminism isn't wanted here. We need to center Queer voices. Listen to your Black trans sisters and don't you dare invalidate them with your cisnormative notions of what womanhood is. Sit down, shut up and listen until you've unpacked your privilege.
I'm so glad I saved this before r/gendercritical got nuked:
Screenshot_20210122-153502__01.jpg
 
Girls are brought up to "be kind" while boys are just left "to be boys". Girls also are constantly told by society to follow a lot more restrictions around how they should look, act, dress, etc and that they should be submissive and that men are more intelligent. It makes sense that young women are going along with "positivity", "being your authentic self" and as part of a movement where the loudest voices are male.

In general, women face much worse social repercussions if they disagree with something than if men do. There's also the issue that trans women overwhelming still look and act like men and instinctively women fear men's violence and anger and so are more likely to agree with whatever they want.
Does this still happen today? I see the opposite a lot more.
"boy shut up, you're stupid unlike your sister".
I mean in what country you live where this is till going on? Not bashing I am genuinely curious.
 
Girls are brought up to "be kind" while boys are just left "to be boys". Girls also are constantly told by society to follow a lot more restrictions around how they should look, act, dress, etc and that they should be submissive and that men are more intelligent. It makes sense that young women are going along with "positivity", "being your authentic self" and as part of a movement where the loudest voices are male.

In general, women face much worse social repercussions if they disagree with something than if men do. There's also the issue that trans women overwhelming still look and act like men and instinctively women fear men's violence and anger and so are more likely to agree with whatever they want.
I disagree, "boys will be boys" is one of the most openly hated sayings and "toxic masculinity" is a go to insult to the left. Boys have plenty of social presure to act nice and in many situations girls get away with shit that guys get called out on immediately. Especially passive aggressive behavior, insults and playing victim (earned or not) are something that girls can do much easier than boys. Girls can act way more physically aggressive to boys than boys can towards girls before getting called out by authorities. I'm not saying that there aren't social situations and environments where boys have it easier but it's very far from universal.

As far as the dressing goes, of course there are more rules to girls because there are more styles and self expression going on among girls. Most guys dress t-shirt and jeans, if feeling fancy collared shirt and a suit for formal. That's not much to judge there and deviating from that too much tend to been seen as wierd. Just look all the jokes made about kilts. Girls have tons more to choose from and so of course have more rules and judgment going on, most of it from other girls. A girl can dress like a guy and it's far from social suicide, I know I have done this, but most don't want to. They prefer looking pretty and making choices of what to wear depending on circumstances and mood. Nothing wrong with that but it's hardly a larger social pressure than guys meet being boring or getting ridiculed.

While of course nurture has affects, I think alot the differences in aggression and assertiveness are more about nature. That we have evolved group trends. I remember reading about studies that noted that girls and boys tend to be fairly similar on how risk averse and eager to please they are till puberty hits. Sure there are some differences that can be spotted even from babies, but they are muted compared to gendered behavior after puberty. We don't get the full experience of natural tendencies till sexual maturity and full adult hormone effects. FtM trans have reported more aggressive behavior and higher desire fir sex after getting HRT so at least to me this seens fairly plausible.

Also especially when dealing with strangers we have issues of shared knowledge. Everyone knows that most people are nice but there are some who really aren't. When meeting someone you don't know very well or who know isn't exactly nice we do automatically risk evaluation. How likely they are able to hurt you vs. how likely you are able hurt them. While not only factor gender plays a role and everyone knows even if they aren't willing to admit it out loud witch one is the weaker sex. So if things go sour women are in larger danger than men in mixed sex conflict. Therefore women are more likely to play it safe and not to rock the boat. Not because society says they have to be submissive but because getting in to a fight with a man is just stupid.

To be clear I don't dismiss social pressures completely, of course we as a social species have them. Social skills are important, and are quite largely about reading the room. When to go with the flow, witch is most of the time and when to go against it. I just think people are over blaming the social pressures and that many of them come from natural tendencies.
 
Con man, liar, Stonewall “survivor” Miss Major Griffin Gracy gets his 80 year old hands on a baby, describes him as “juicy”:
C43C338D-F3A9-4800-B2BC-C42618D5E0B2.jpeg
645175BB-36FC-45D3-A0B6-ACC9889F304F.jpeg
Archive

Gracy’s enby partner Beck (not the bozo nightmare one) gave birth to a baby boy on Jan 9.

If you’re unfamiliar with Major Gracy, he’s a geriatric troon who’s been dining off his supposed Stonewall participation for the last twenty years or so, even claiming he was part of the first round of arrests and was beaten by cops for his efforts.

The only problem is there’s zero documentation that Gracy was even in New York City at the time of Stonewall, much less a participant. Not a single, credible account of the riot has ever named Gracy, nor have any of the remaining Stonewall veterans stepped forward to confirm Gracy’s claims. You won’t find his name in any of the Stonewall histories or the NYPD arrest records.

Even Sylvia Rivera who wouldn’t STFU about Stonewall if it got him a hot meal, never mentioned Gracy in the numerous interviews he gave on the riots. Nothing about Gracy in connection to Stonewall shows up until the 2000s when he himself came forward to claim to be a part of the riots.

Gracy on Stonewall: “It’s been 50 years of fags running around talking about how proud they are and doing it on the back of my community.”

Gracy has gone so far to claim that he was the original sole combatant against the cops, refers to Marsha P Johnson, as ‘Martha’ and claims that Johnson, a verified Stonewall participant, was never there.

TERF tumblrite asks the real questions:
07D35BD1-933D-451A-BFD5-E22EAE327CCD.jpeg

Gracy has also lied about his role in the 1971 Attica riots, even though it was later disproved that he was even incarcerated at Attica during that time.
DFA101DA-A7B7-4728-A90C-EBF8B5C06767.jpeg
A288B50D-6310-4AC4-9792-57624C7AB9C7.jpeg

Unfortunately it’s becoming increasingly difficult to disprove Gracy’s con as sources have been scrubbed or are unavailable. His bullshit has been accepted wholesale, even when photographic evidence disproves that the white “fags” stood by and did nothing:

D7847008-C027-4927-A708-42F4C814398F.jpeg

And now he has a baby.

ETA in @trannyfucker excellent post on Gracy’s fictions.
 
Last edited:
Does this still happen today? I see the opposite a lot more.
"boy shut up, you're stupid unlike your sister".
I mean in what country you live where this is till going on? Not bashing I am genuinely curious.
submissive isn't just about intelligence.

look at the Weinstein thread i posted. women who agreed with him are accused of not "caring" about the well-being of trans women. (so what if they don't? why should they?)
nobody ever asks men if we "care" about anything, trans included. we're not expected to "care" & rarely called out for being mean or "exclusionary" etc.
this is a way of baiting women in a certain way, we don't even answer (or notice) that shit.

Weinstein does not feel called to jump in the thread & assure everyone he cares about trans women the way terfs like jane claire jones (etc) jump in their threads to assure everybody they care.
i actually found it annoying once i noticed this.

this "wanting to be seen as a nice girl" thing is female socialization.
look at how many women in that thread go out of their way to assure everybody they welcome welcome welcome trans women anywhere they want to go.

men do not bother with that behavior.

remember, trans women, raised as men, know it too & use this to manipulate. i think all the hysteria: "you don't care if we diiiie, we are being killed every daaaaaay!" is to get sympathy from women & keep them in line, keep them being nice.
 
remember, trans women, raised as men, know it too & use this to manipulate. i think all the hysteria: "you don't care if we diiiie, we are being killed every daaaaaay!" is to get sympathy from women & keep them in line, keep them being nice.
Ain't that the truth. More or less only women care about this shit. A man is way more likely to just say "DASS RIIIIITE!"
 
Men don’t care about troons because it’s not their spaces being invaded, and because men aren't threatened when women move into their spaces. They either tolerate them, or tell them to GTFO, and there's no backlash against them like there is when women tell trannies to GTFO. And you know what, I really don't blame men, considering how radfems and libfems horrendously tell men to "stay in your own lane" and "all men are scum" and "don't you mansplain to me mister!" I can honestly understand why men absolutely don't give a fuck about this. If they speak out against it both sides accuse them of toxic masculinity and trying to talk over women.

I used to browse r/GenderCritical, and while some of it I could relate to, I hated the immense hatred of males and them telling any man who was sympathetic to their plight to GTFO and not speak over women. Men are damned if they do, and damned if they don't, and when both sides of the debate are hurling insults at you and telling you to STFU, then why even bother? Women have created this problem themselves, and unfortunately women like me who don't have a warped view of men seem to be few and far between, and when we do try to speak out against it rationally to the males in our life, at best we get indifference, though I know they do see through the bullshit, but just go "fuck it".

I do applaud the men who are speaking out against this, because they are given quite a bit of hate for doing so, though they are spared the rape threats that women get. Most men can get away with saying far more negative things about troons than women can right now, because most troons don't want to actually have to fight another man. They're pussies and would rather attack someone weaker, which in this case would be women.

And you know what? As much as this sounds as cruel, the handmaidens will only change their views once they are forced to live with their push for trans rights. They'll definitely be singing a different tune when troons start taking over job positions, scholarships, sports positions, and medals. They'll be regretting their decision when their spaces are completely taken over by troons and perverts using the troon label to access them. I think it really fucking sucks that we have to let it happen like this, but there is no other way for these women to "peak trans" until they are forced to live with what they're pushing.

And to end this, thank you for all the male kiwis on here who see the lunacy of this all, and are against it completely, even though you might not feel as invested in this as us women. Even though this is definitely a woman's battle, it's nice to know there's some men out there who agree with us, and will back us up, even though they might not have as active a role.
 
I have very little hope of it working. You really do need quite a bit of exposure to trannies before it really sinks that all the "hateful" stereotypes are true. Slight powerlevel but I'm ex-woke and even after having met 5 AGPs, three of which were hypersexual and creeped me out and one had a split personality, I was STILL spewing twans women are women. Cognitive dissonance is an amazing thing and you can just keep telling yourself that you've met a weird outlier - or five - and that surely all the other trans women you haven't met are normal people. When you're deep in that mindset, you are afraid of thinking about topics too hard because you don't want to end up with the wrong opinions. Woke people are very aware how their own tribe treats dissent.

As long as the media is continually broadcasting pro-trans propaganda and polarization is deepening, I have very little faith that there will be any reversal on this. The stars really aligned for the T to take over like this. It hitched itself to a cause far more popular than it (LGB) and came to prominence right as idpol was exploding and everyone still felt vaguely guilty for ever having been anti-LGB, so nobody wants being anti-T on their political record. Being on "the right side of history" is their personal longterm salvation, and being caught on the wrong side of it their personal hell. And people afraid of hellfire don't think critically.
It's almost as if their ideology is full of contradictions and lies.
 
putting this here for the comments, the thread is huge.

lots of ppl obviously never even thought of this stuff before & seem blindsided.

i think this signals the mainstreaming of sentiments questioning trans claims & in that sense, the Biden executive order might have a strong (unforeseen) backlash.

i've never seen any thread this long about this subject before. Bret opened up proverbial can of worms.

Bret Weinstein thread
View attachment 1865160

Here's a novel solution to the sports problem

untitled2.png

It could be the 21st century version of rollerball.
 
And you know what? As much as this sounds as cruel, the handmaidens will only change their views once they are forced to live with their push for trans rights. They'll definitely be singing a different tune when troons start taking over job positions, scholarships, sports positions, and medals. They'll be regretting their decision when their spaces are completely taken over by troons and perverts using the troon label to access them. I think it really fucking sucks that we have to let it happen like this, but there is no other way for these women to "peak trans" until they are forced to live with what they're pushing.
I agree with this but once the right is given it will never be taken back. In the US, this is here to stay.

I think the real hope is that it will be completely passée in a few years. Sports will be destroyed but that mostly helps poor black people out of poverty and we don't care about them anyway.

Just wondering how much the dudes who hate women "won't care" when the same troon brigades who "put bitches in their places" brainwash their sons into castrating themselves.

'tis but a small sacrifice for the cause. Throughout history people have been happy to sacrifice their kids for the state and "the cause." I take the view of when it comes between you and your family and "the other guy" send flowers. But plenty of people want the honor of making their kid cannon fodder on the beaches of Gallipoli.

When these kids grow up and realize what their parents have given up for them without their consent - I think that's when the real reckoning comes.

Unrelated. How we present ourselves as male or female changes throughout history. There was a time when long hair, and heels, and a faceful of makeup was perfectly masculine. If a man wants to go full Duke of Orleans (noted gay who fathered several children and who's financial acumen has kept many royal houses of Europe wealthy to this day) I see nothing wrong with it.
 
Last edited:
A 22-year-old Arizona woman was arrested on bestiality charges after she placed an ad on Phoenix Craiglist looking for a horse to engage in sexual activity with. The trans woman, whose legal name is Donald Waelde, was busted by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for placing an ad for someone who owned a horse “on which to commit the act of fellatio,” according to the Phoenix New Times.


areatea.jpg


1. THE AD WAS PRETTY CLEAR ON WHAT WAELDE WAS LOOKING FOR.Waelde’s post in the Missed Connections section, which was published on April 8, stated: “I am 22 years old and I want to play with a male Horse. simple as that. If you have access to a Male horse, and can allow me access to a male horse, then contact me please I will do something in return.”

2. ANOTHER CRAIGSLIST USER CONTACTED THE POLICE.Another visitor to Craiglist who had a “genuine interest in horses” is the one who alerted the MCSO to the presence of the post. Upon investigation, they discovered the identity of the poster and her intention in making the post. “In the undercover investigation, Sheriff’s deputies contacted the suspect and engaged Waelde in conversation where the suspect stated the sex act he wished to perform on the horse and agreed to meet the undercover detective on Tuesday,” a spokesman for the MCSO said in a statement.

3. THEY ARRESTED WAELDE IN A STING.The undercover officer went to meet Waelde with a borrowed horse, and Waelde was immediately arrested. She confessed to placing the ad and “stated his intentions to consummate the act.” They also served a search warrant on Waelde’s home.


4. THIS WAS THE FOURTH ARREST IN THREE YEARS OF ITS KIND.While you wouldn’t expect bestiality to be all that popular of a crime, that’s apparently not the case. Waelde’s arrest was the fourth made by MCSO in three years for similar offenses, proving just how twisted some people can be.

 
Back